NewStats: 3,259,769 , 8,170,866 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 May 2025 at 11:36 PM 6a3u6b

AfroKnight:
All senators are equal.

But they have to choose a member to lead as president.

First among equals.

It is therefore an aberration for the senate president to deny Nigerians of their representation at the National Assembly by suspending an elected lawmaker.

You cannot suspend someone you didn’t appoint.

She needs to challenge the legality of any House rules which give “powers” to the senate leadership to remove or suspend a member as a form of discipline.

---

---

I don’t think you guys can read properly. Any rule or regulation can be challenged in court as long as the plaintiff thinks it is unconstitutional.

Each Senator has the constitutional right to sit in the House. Her presence there as a Senator is not dependent on any senate leader. It only depends on the will of the voters who put her there.

If suspended, her absence for the period of suspension will be her doing. She would have been made to face a disciplinary committee and if penalty is suspension, so be it.

SultanOfAbia:
Women cannot handle POWER

Its like giving a child unparallel power. It will make them reckless

A woman never matures like men
A 56 years old woman still behave like a 7 years old girl.

Thats why we call them "Baby"
They still throw tantrums like a 5 yrs old girl..

Na only men dey mature as they grow. Women will forever be children. They don't mature like men.

So it make sense why Ancestors never involved women in sensitive areas in power.

That is why giving women power is a very bad move. It will swell her head. They are not used to power

Its like giving a kid 1 full bottle of stout to drink. Their small head can't carry the highness.
They will scatter everywhere

correct talk. We still have wise people in this forum.

GOFRONT:
Akpabio, wetin you dey find for this woman body, you nor go ever see am carry...

Leave Uduaghan wife alone Mr SP.

Omo, to marry very fine wife for this Nigeria na another war oo

Predators left right n center husslin for ya wife Kukunase

abeg, her own is too much. Let her learn the rules.
Some women infact most women think once they are very pretty and set, every man will be after their pussy and beauty.
That's why dem dey also wan dey show themselves.

Image123:


Remi Tinubu was in the same senate for 12 years with fierce opposition from Saraki and his goons like Dino. She didn't make all these drama or disobey Senate laws. She still refers to Saraki as her boss till tomorrow.

U don forget that one drama with obanikoro during confirmation and her drama with Dino

Wallade:


If suspended, her absence for the period of suspension will be her doing. She would have been made to face a disciplinary committee and if penalty is suspension, so be it.

If she challenges the suspension in court, she will win.

AfroKnight:


If she challenges the suspension in court, she will win.

Let her challenge it, we shall see how she can enforce it on the Senate.

She will not be the first or last to be suspended in the Senate.

Wallade:


Let her challenge it, we shall see how she can enforce it on the Senate.

She will not be the first or last to be suspended in the Senate.

If she wants to be the last to face this, the ball is in her court.

If the Senate adopt a new rule that empowers the chief whip to actually flog a member who offends the senate president, it still cannot be enforced. Why? Because it is unconstitutional.

Same way the senate president cannot deny Natasha’s constituents their constitutionally guaranteed right to be represented. You can’t deprive them of a voice in the House.

Senators who have gone on suspension in the past did it for political reasons, but not because the suspensions were actually enforceable.

She may be smart, but going against the senate standing rules is a no no..
Finally she might be suspended or silenced further

ricson11:
Senator Natasha to face Senate Disciplinary over seat reallocation outburst in the chamber


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1_jRX41_k8?si=yXFKfFGGScM-XYKG



https://punchng.com/natasha-akpoti-to-face-senates-disciplinary-committee-after-seat-row/?amp

They will suspend her without pay. Ask Ali Ndume

AfroKnight:


If she wants to be the last to face this, the ball is in her court.

If the Senate adopt a new rule that empowers the chief whip to actually flog a member who offends the senate president, it still cannot be enforced. Why? Because it is unconstitutional.

Same way the senate president cannot deny Natasha’s constituents their constitutionally guaranteed right to be represented. You can’t deprive them of a voice in the House.

Senators who have gone on suspension in the past did it for political reasons, but not because the suspensions were actually enforceable.

alcaptainero:
They will suspend her without pay. Ask Ali Ndume

Ali Ndume allowed it for political reasons. If he was ready to deal with problems during re-election, he would ignore that suspension.

AfroKnight:


If she wants to be the last to face this, the ball is in her court.

If the Senate adopt a new rule that empowers the chief whip to actually flog a member who offends the senate president, it still cannot be enforced. Why? Because it is unconstitutional.

Same way the senate president cannot deny Natasha’s constituents their constitutionally guaranteed right to be represented. You can’t deprive them of a voice in the House.

Senators who have gone on suspension in the past did it for political reasons, but not because the suspensions were actually enforceable.

It will be barbaric to deploy flogging as punishment for adults talk less of the Senate.

If a Senator wants to represent his/her constituency properly in the Senate, every Senator will study the rule books of the Senate and adhere to the guides, regulations and decorum in the Senate.

Natasha will be suspended, the suspension will be enforced and nothing will happen. There are rules and when you break the rules, you must be punished except for mercy. Otherwise, Natasha must face the consequences of her actions and learn the rules so she can be properly guided.

If she likes, she can go to court, even if she gets a favorable judgement, she will find it difficult to enforce it.

The Senate must not be turned into a despicable and disrupted house where decorum and ethics are relegated to the background. It is a house for honorables and that should reflect in their behaviors in the Senate.

cr7lomo:


U don forget that one drama with obanikoro during confirmation and her drama with Dino

Remi was always well comported. Disagreement is normal on the floor, that's different from losing reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSPOyReHZZE?si=PyMhQ591HbANFf1m

nwirinedu:


Didnt you see her video when she was protesting? All I heard was ''privileges'' and ''privileges'' you can see she is not there to serve just to seat in the front like a glorified piece of furniture and take horrible selfies of her overwaxed face.

I pity the gullible women who look up to her , just like medusa their destinies will be turned to stone.

VIOLENCE 101
The comment,i was looking for.

You already sounded so biased with your emotional analysis, so why counter your argument? No need. I know your type.

nwirinedu:


You re the one who is bitter. Make a valid counter argument stop being emotional. Thats what it means to be an adult.

ricson11:
Senator Natasha to face Senate Disciplinary over seat reallocation outburst in the chamber


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1_jRX41_k8?si=yXFKfFGGScM-XYKG



https://punchng.com/natasha-akpoti-to-face-senates-disciplinary-committee-after-seat-row/?amp

Kangaroo

Abelino:
You already sounded so biased with your emotional analysis, so why counter your argument? No need. I know your type.

See Akpabio's explanation over the events that led to the display of your distinguished drama queen.

For someone who claimed she read law, she behaved for worse than a riff raff.

https://x.com/i/status/1894415507031208025

DRKRIZ:



VIOLENCE 101
The comment,i was looking for.

See Akpabios response to her randy behavior. https://x.com/i/status/1894415507031208025

There are rules in the house regarding seating arrangement and when to speak.

Senators are free to seat wherever they please, but if you must make a remark on the floor you re expected to do so from the seat assigned to you, this seat has your name inscribed.

Natasha refused to do this on several occasions, they allowed her on that she was new and ignorant, the red book containing the rules was given to her to acquaint herself with the house rules, but she felt since she came in via court order she didnt need to listen to others in the house, this explains her haste to go to court again to complain.

If she was duly elected by a constituency, she would not behave like that, but she was appointed by court so all others in the house are beneath her. As a lawyer she ought to have read the rule book instead of dramatizing her ignorance.

They should have given her a fashion magazine to read instead, she would have gulped it up at once.