NewStats: 3,259,434 , 8,170,091 topics. Date: Saturday, 24 May 2025 at 11:54 PM 1h63x6z3e3g |
(1) (10) (of 11 pages)
![]() |
Who has an idea what the current rates for other funds asides Stanbic
|
![]() |
darealabi: Superior processes - Stanbic Superior returns - Norrenberger Assuming rate is 20% and it’s compounded monthly like Stanbic, you’ll gain #15,796,158. If it’s compounded quarterly like other funds, you’ll gain #15,516,450. 1 Like |
![]() |
djaybaba: No they’re not. I used to think the same way, but the difference in returns really doesn't matter much over time, even if the rates are identical. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see what I mean. In this case, with a nearly 2% difference in rates, the fund providing those higher quarterly returns will always outperform Stanbic. |
![]() |
Superex: They do…. |
![]() |
bassdow: Stanbic has never had the highest rate in recent times tho. You can’t always predict the highest, you’re right, but you can see a pattern based on historical trends. Their rates have been trailing behind competitors by around 1-2%. That might not sound like much, but over 10 years? That tiny 1.4% gap means real money left on the table. And when you’re playing the long game, those ‘small’ differences add up fast. |
![]() |
bassdow: But you dilute your earning potentials that way. Putting everything with the highest returning fund maximizes your gains. Except other considerations are at play asides that. |
![]() |
Why is stanbic rate still relatively low. I’m just tired….🤦🏽♂️
|
![]() |
Is there a website where someone can view MMF rates regularly, either daily or monthly? These rates seem less accessible than stock prices, and I'm not sure why.
1 Like |
![]() |
IchKampf: Visit their branch. Calmly lay your complaint and be patient through the resolution. However I’ll also advise you to initiate a full termination simultaneously. Liquidate your with them and never look back. There’s no justification for poor customer service. 1 Like |
![]() |
Preator: You’re right, redeeming directly to another is an option. But I prefer moving funds to Stanbic first as a safety step, especially for large amounts. If anything goes wrong, it’s easier to sort it out with them. Besides, my other bank s also have the 5m limit. I only recently increased GT’s limit because of the Stanbic issue, so for now, GT is my only option for redemptions above that cap. Thanks. |
![]() |
bassdow: I was even referring to the transfer limits on savings s, not the MMFs themselves. Meanwhile you can’t have more than one savings with the same bank, regardless of how many MMFs you’ve opened. The main reason I even requested a limit increase is because once you redeem a large sum into your savings , moving the funds out becomes an issue due to the current limit. And as for splitting my capital across different fund managers, well it’s not really my style. I’ve already got two MMFs with same FM, each serving a different purpose. If I ever decide to move my money, I’m taking all at once. Keeping things consolidated just makes oversight easier for me. 2 Likes |
![]() |
egojeny1: Ok…I was referring to the maximum limit |
![]() |
egojeny1: To 25m? |
![]() |
freeman67: Honestly it’s annoying. Well, based on my current experience, you still can't raise limits to the maximum via the app. You must fill those plenty forms in their branch. Even at that no guarantee it’ll be treated….Their obsession with outdated KYC protocols is something else |
![]() |
Care4: Maybe that's why my limit increase request is stalled. They've cited network issues for close to 2months now…even after filling several forms then. Something I did in GT on my own in less than 5min without filling any form. I feel the bank arm is dragging the group down sort of… |
![]() |
You're both correct. You don't need a Stanbic to invest in their MMF. And most times if you follow the laid down instructions you shouldn’t have any issue. But personally, I find it easier to manage redemptions through their app since I already bank with them. The 'withdraw to bank ' feature is seamless, and if any issues pop up, I can just reach out to their bank arm since it's all under the same umbrella. Two truths can coexist…
1 Like |
![]() |
emmasoft: Are you certain about this? 1 Like |
![]() |
bassdow: Ok then… |
![]() |
I did a partial termination on their app yesterday afternoon and got value today. Maybe the delay some are experiencing only applies to top ups.
|
![]() |
enque: Had the same issue last year up till early this year. They called it a system glitch, but it fixed itself later. That’s why I said they aren’t as error-free as you think… 3 Likes |
![]() |
egojeny1: Yes they’ve sent the third one just now. |
![]() |
egojeny1: Ok so they sent two days of accrued interest today instead of the three days that were on hold, which leaves one day still unpaid. If they only cover today’s amount, it looks like they’re counting just 30 days. This isn’t the first time I’ve dealt with something like this, so I’m not totally convinced they can’t make mistakes sis. Can’t even say it’s a mistake, it may just be a policy thing. Still, I’ll hold off on judging until I see today’s payment come through. |
![]() |
Looks like a day is missing from my calculations. I check this thing daily, and from what I can tell, interest was suspended on Friday and only resumed at noon today. It seems like they’re counting 30 days instead of 31. Don’t know if this is how other MMFs operate too
|
![]() |
emmasoft: I agree and I’ve always said this too. But at the very least, stay in line with competitors. You can’t have most market share while offering one of the lowest rates. Investors are rational…superior processes only matter if the returns hold up. A 2% lower rate on let’s say 100M is 2M lost, and that gap grows even more with compounding. To most heavy investors this is a real concern. Anyway let’s see how this one goes. 2 Likes |
![]() |
egojeny1: It’s the volatility I'm concerned about. The effective rate will be significantly lower than their competitors by the end of the year if this random walk continues. |
![]() |
Uberchic1: Thank you |
![]() |
Onyiridike: Hmmm, I feel stanbic is taking advantage of its market dominance because moving funds across MMFs is a hassle. Investors should be able to transfer funds directly between MMFs without first withdrawing to a bank . The main hurdle is settlement, but a T+1/T+2 system or a central clearing mechanism could fix that. If SEC allows seamless transfers, competition will force fund managers to keep rates competitive. Meanwhile anyone with the rates of other MMFs (especially Bank d ones) should pls share. |
![]() |
A305: I get your argument and it makes sense, but investors don’t have the cards. The desired outcome is dependent on the things I’ve mentioned earlier. Check my last response. Forever is a pretty long time…. 1 Like 1 Share |
![]() |
jayce232: Theoretically this works under ceteris paribus but in reality, it all depends on monetary policy. The last istration didn’t go hawkish even as inflation spiked. For instance back in October 2022, Stanbic’s MMF yield was 7–8% while inflation hovered around 20%. Rate hikes have rarely kept pace with inflation. This istration has been more aggressive, but can you bank on that? A future government, or even this one, could flip and start cutting rates. That’s the risk…we’re at their mercy, so it’s smarter to stay conservative with long-term projections. |
![]() |
Rhyah: Let’s keep in mind that interest rates won’t remain at the current level indefinitely. In fact, they could drop to 10% or even lower in the future. 3 years ago, stanbic MMF rates were around 9% or so. I think it’s wise to always plan based on worst-case scenario basis… 5 Likes |
![]() |
keeper303: Valid points. If I may add, I think he should also think about how inflation will impact his returns over time. Then there’s also interest rate risk. If he doesn’t own a home yet, securing one before relocating would be wise. The proceeds from his investment can also be used to acquire a scalable business, something that can serve as a backup to his financial assets in the long run. At his age, relying on a single portfolio indefinitely isn’t sustainable. A lucrative business on the side would help hedge against inflation. Just my two cents…. 7 Likes |
![]() |
sky404: Tomorrow’s CBN MPC meeting will decide. With inflation rebased downwards, there’s a good chance the MPR will be reduced, but it’s unlikely to be a major cut. |
(1) (10) (of 11 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: How To . 49 Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland. |