NewStats: 3,262,605 , 8,177,679 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 June 2025 at 01:10 AM 734854

Lmao. Happy reading of books

Don’t forget the books, guys. It would save you.

I a recent travel experience where I had about one-third of someone’s body count of 50 in my space. Mostly comprised of student friends of some friends-with-benefits at no exclusive cost except of course making the whole scenery hospitable and their darkest fantasies realizable.

Even at that level of debauchery, I had to review the books sometimes just to unlearn some things and solidify my foundations. Especially since it was just me in a country I was not too familiar with. Also, scenarios like this present you with novel shit-tests that prescriptions won’t address. The books - basically the RP foundations allow you to embody the game. It never ends. You must keep learning.

😂😂 the redpill is a praxeology. The topic being debated has roots in biology and neuroscience but of course you don't expect someone with the comprehension skill of a two year old child to know the difference.

Anyway let me continue jerking off to my books.

imustsaymymindo:
Sometimes we focus on what we can learn or know. But sometimes we have to unknow the things we know and reknow the things we know differently through unlearning and relearning.

And the best ways to unlearn and relearn are books, movement, and trying new experiences.

Videos, news, social media, and even ChatGPT can help you learn but would hardly help you unlearn or relearn. Your cognitive bias would still stand undefeated with these platforms .

This is gold.
Thanks.

He even mentioned chat gpt. Lmao.

Listen up, Men! Every woman has three men in her orbit.

This is the cold, harsh reality of modern dating: every woman has three men in her orbit. Your position among them determines how she treats you. If you don’t understand this dynamic, you’re likely heading straight for the bottom tier—the SIMP. And no man with self-respect should ever allow himself to end up there.

Let’s break it down.

First, there’s the main guy. He’s the one she truly wants, the man she’s dreaming about and hoping will text her first. She won’t say it, but she’s praying for his attention. This guy doesn’t chase her—he doesn’t have to. His focus is on his purpose, not on her validation. His confidence and independence make him magnetic, and ironically, it’s his indifference that makes her crave him even more. He’s in control because he’s not trying to win her—she’s trying to win him.

Then, there’s the backup guy. He’s the “nice” one, the one always available and endlessly ive. This guy sends her “Good morning, Angel” texts while she rolls her eyes or replies out of pity to keep him hanging around. She’ll never fully commit to him, but she’ll keep him close for validation and emotional . If the main guy disappoints her, she might momentarily entertain the idea of dating him, but only as a consolation prize. He’s not her first choice—he’s the safety net.

Finally, there’s the SIMP, also known as the “guy with no chance.” This man has zero value in her eyes. She doesn’t respect him, doesn’t value him, and certainly doesn’t see him as a romantic option. He’s the guy she ignores unless she needs something—money, validation, or attention. He’ll text her endlessly with things like, “Good morning, Angel” or “Did you sleep well, baby?” while she leaves him on read. When she finally replies, it’s often to ask for something. And what does he do? He sends the money, thanks her for acknowledging him, and waits for the next crumb of attention.

This dynamic exists because attraction is about power. The main guy has the power because he knows his worth and doesn’t give it away. The backup guy forfeits some power by chasing her but still holds enough value to be kept as an option. The SIMP? He gives away all his power the moment he prioritizes her over himself. He’s desperate, needy, and willing to sacrifice his dignity for scraps of attention.

Here’s the reality: you can’t change the game, but you can decide where you stand in it. If you’re not the main guy, walk away. Don’t waste your energy being someone’s backup plan or financial sponsor. Women respect men who respect themselves. They chase the men they can’t control, not the ones begging for their attention.

If you ever find yourself in the SIMP category, stop immediately. Refocus on your purpose, your goals, and your self-respect. Women are attracted to confidence, ambition, and independence. The moment you put a woman on a pedestal, you kill her attraction for you. You’re not her savior, her ATM, or her emotional crutch—you’re a man with a mission. Act like it.

Stop chasing women who don’t value you. Stop sending money to women who wouldn’t look at you if you were broke. And for the love of all that’s masculine, stop simping. Build your value, stay focused on your goals, and let the right woman come to you when you’re ready.

Be the man she chases, not the man she uses.

Parasitic ladies known how to give duty seex , you can be spending like 200 times and they seex they give you is only 8 times, what sort of investment is that

Adasun:



my encounter validate many things Ubunja have taught in this forum.

This is why reading the books is needed, bro. Learning from first principles and knowing the RP foundations.

You seem to have RP knowledge and have taken them as prescriptions but when you got stuck in a problem that was novel to you, you slacked only because your foundations are lacking. Don't make the mistake of looking for more prescriptions because tricks change, approaches change, travel to a different country - and boom you are met with new designs, but the foundations will always remain grounded. It's called getting to the point where you are the game. So, what happens when you don't have someone to give you your next prescription like some are already doing right now? You'd become lost?

It may seem like Ubunja, Pansophist.. and other great men here seem to have the answers on the next step, but that came from dedicated hours of reading the books. There are no shortcuts. You can be as pragmatic and even wiser than them if you also do. However, prescriptions are addictive. And that's why most times, people feeding you prescriptions are mostly trying to sell you something which can also be building an ideology or religion around their application of RP or any praxeology actually. If you are sold, then you are falling into the same thing that made us formerly bluepilled- the ability to not think for yourself.

imustsaymymindo:


This is why reading the books is needed, bro. Learning from first principles and knowing the RP foundations.

You seem to have RP knowledge and have taken them as prescriptions but when you got stuck in a problem that was novel to you, you slacked only because your foundations are lacking. Don't make the mistake of looking for more prescriptions because tricks change, approaches change, travel to a different country - and boom you are met with new designs, but the foundations will always remain grounded. It's called getting to the point where you are the game. So, what happens when you don't have someone to give you your next prescription like some are already doing right now? You'd become lost?

It may seem like Ubunja, Pansophist.. and other great men here seem to have the answers on the next step, but that came from dedicated hours of reading the books. There are no shortcuts. You can be as pragmatic and even wiser than them if you also do. However, prescriptions are addictive. And that's why most times, people feeding you prescriptions are mostly trying to sell you something which can also be building an ideology or religion around their application of RP or any praxeology actually. If you are sold, then you are falling into the same thing that made us formerly bluepilled- the ability to not think for yourself.

thank you but i never asked for prescription at any point in the discuss. it was freely given which i appreciate. i knew what step to take next which at some point, i made it know.

all in all, u made a valid point. thanks once again

Adasun:
thank you but i never asked for prescription at any point in the discuss. it was freely given which i appreciate. i knew what step to take next which at some point, i made it know.

all in all, u made a valid point. thanks once again

You are welcome, bro.

One of my favorite nairalanders is NwaAmaikpe.

NwaAmaikpe would paint unbelievable, and unthinkable prescriptions from undiluted truths and foundations.

Shows how truths would always be truth, but how fallible it gets if you try to focus on prescriptions or ideologies milked from it.

Where is he btw?

this arguments self, lols...

there was a time i was with this Ebonyi girl in a factory i was working some years back. while we where gisting, a big booty us. cat walking with her nose high up in the sky. i saw her and giggle. the ebonyi girl scoff her nose and said i want her. then i was like this one wey dey pack nose anyhow? she replied, na she e dey hungry .

in that thesame factory, they is this staunch muslim girl, i have broke her defenses and i do play roughly with her and now that i am not there anymore, we do more of charting... naughty charting from time to time. i once told her, if she is a man, she for be bad boy... she replied 'the way i for the nack girls ehnnn... it made me have a rethink. she is not the first girl to have made that statement of nacking several ladies if they are men... there is something those girls feel and know that majority of mehn don't... this women could be Hot bitchess hiding it always to keep the status quo.

Adasun:
this arguments self, lols...

there was a time i was with this Ebonyi girl in a factory i was working some years back. while we where gisting, a big booty us. cat walking with her nose high up in the sky. i saw her and giggle. the ebonyi girl scoff her nose and said i want her. then i was like this one wey dey pack nose anyhow? she replied, na she e dey hungry .

in that thesame factory, they is this staunch muslim girl, i have broke her defenses and i do play roughly with her and now that i am not there anymore, we do more of charting... naughty charting from time to time. i once told her, if she is a man, she for be bad boy... she replied 'the way i for the nack girls ehnnn... it made me have a rethink. she is not the first girl to have made that statement of nacking several ladies if they are men... there is something those girls feel and know that majority of mehn don't... this women could be Hot bitchess hiding it always to keep the status quo.

Lols, bro...the arguments are needed sometimes especially if productive. That's why we are men. I learn a lot. I know Rizzputin is not a troll and he is intelligent and also has made valid points on this thread but we differ in some respects, especially the understanding that Redpill is a praxeology.

Back to your experiences, and the argument lol, I wouldn't still say this still makes women love/enjoy sex more than men. Even if we are to go by the logic of sexual pleasure and orgasm, men are so sexual that they orgasm in their sleep i.e. wet dreams. I don't know what else could beat that.

Adasun:
this arguments self, lols...

there was a time i was with this Ebonyi girl in a factory i was working some years back. while we where gisting, a big booty us. cat walking with her nose high up in the sky. i saw her and giggle. the ebonyi girl scoff her nose and said i want her. then i was like this one wey dey pack nose anyhow? she replied, na she e dey hungry .

I laugh some people that say women don't have high s*x drive. On the lowkey most of these babes have many options servicing them to stupor. And then pretend. If you see any babe that is withholding sex or romance just know she has someone or a backup option doing it. Some even have spirit husbands.

The truth is that most men are s*x starved. A well s*xed man will exhibit almost the same s*xual control as a woman. Imagine s*xing 4 to 6 women a day. That's like the average some of these damsel can pull effortlessly in a day cause they just need to be women to do it. But for many men to pull this number you have to be the exceptional one and have the means.

Have you guys noticed virgins are more open to sex & want to engage in it or romance than non-virgin. E.g. like you want to touch a girl and she starts pulling away and all that...just know it's a big non-virgin, probably bore-hole. They're very good and have control over their drive--- the borehole. Borehole can deny you entry for several years while feigning virginity while another dude doing the lord's work. Likewise when you compare younger ladies to older ones. Older experienced ladies in the room affairs can feign sexual control more than the younger ladies. On the other hand, virgin will be open to it. Then you'd be the one to find out when you open the place and she tells you she ain't ready during romance. What does that tells us?

Let's do the facts:

If men have higher s*X drive why isn't Love Machine & s*X toy market isn't mainstream for men when compared to women. Infact female s*X toy market is a thriving industry. Some women even put it in their bags like accessories. While for men something like finding relief via an artificial V will be very awkward & might seem more of a psychological issue. Imagine a guy having artificial V's in his cupboard. Seems awkward right?

Then we come to our big aunties molesting us as Teenagers. The so called women have lower drive.

Men, I would say are more visually simulated & are more sexually agile.---Because we need that TLevel for virtually everything. Creativity, War, Endurance, Confrontation, Sex, Protection, Procreation, Creation etc. Men are able to channel their primal and sexual energies towards inventions. You loose that drive-you don't feel yourself as a man. Thus, it seems though we have a higher drive because of our ways of expressing it.

Why is it that industries like Onlyfans, SM, Po*rn target men?

On the other hand the Love Machine/Sextoy servicing market target women. Why is it so?

Then we have cases of men being ran on like a marathon in girls hostel each taking turns till they meet a fatal end. That cannot be said for the male hostels. Infact women are likely to be protected in the gathering of men. So why is it so? So called women have lower drive.

In addition, have you ever eavesdropped on women's groups or chats- how vulgar and raw their conversations are? The so called lower s*X drive. Ahaaa!

This girl is a very good girl from a good family but her something is wide like a borehole. Mind you she ain't a LovePeddler. She has used maybe very big bottle to widen that place cause even cucumber can't do such level of irreversible damage. This is a humble-shy girl from a religious home. End product of constant masturbation.

An average woman can be as sexual as a man. I don't know how they're able to control it such that they can use it as bargaining power or withhold it even during the heat of the moment. Unlike men that find it difficult to control.

I just believe a player is a man with all the machevilian traits of a woman.

Women are as highly sexually aggressive as men if not more!. Like we have men with lower drive so also we have women as well.

Ignore typos, abeg. NL dey rewrite the English.

imustsaymymindo:



, men are so sexual that they orgasm in their sleep i.e. wet dreams. I don't know what else could beat that.

I disagree on this. A man that will do that in sleep is a man that has had relapse. Maybe intentionally or unintentionally.

Like I said, most men aren't having it constantly thus the build up unlike women that have several options thrown at them.

A well s*xed guy wouldn't cum in the dream. Cause the balls are empty.

Then we have discharge in females. Some are always so sexually turned on or always wet that they wash undies every. 247--- day in day out.

Streak47:


I disagree on this. A man that will do that in sleep is a man that has had relapse. Maybe intentionally or unintentionally.

Like I said, most men aren't having it constantly thus the build up unlike women that have several options thrown at them.

A well s*xed guy wouldn't cum in the dream. Cause the balls are empty.

Then we have discharge in females. Some are always so sexually turned on or always wet that they wash undies every. 247--- day in day out.

Lol true. Mostly it's adolescence that have wet dreams.

But my point was to prove how orgasm is so fallible a quantifier to determine whether a man/woman enjoy sex more. Do you understand now?

I already mentioned my take that sex drive is what can be used to judge the arguments. And men have it more. You won dey wine testesterone?

Streak47:
Then we have discharge in females. Some are always so sexually turned on or always wet that they wash undies every. 247--- day in day out.

Sorry but this is actually mostly because the vagina has a natural self-cleaning mechanism that maintains its health and prevents infections. These vaginal secretions help remove dead cells, bacteria, and other debris. It's mostly not about being lubricated as a phallic receptacle.

imustsaymymindo:


Lol true. Mostly it's adolescence that have wet dreams.

But my point was to prove how orgasm is so fallible a quantifier to determine whether a man/woman enjoy sex more. Do you understand now?

I already mentioned my take that sex drive is what can be used to judge the arguments. And men have it more. You won dey wine testesterone?

T-levels aren't a joke. It's what essentially makes up a man. And it's on an exponential decline over the last decade. For libido aka sex drive there isn't one way fits all. It's something that is highly personal & varies on individual level. To say men have more sex drive, I beg to differ.

Tonnyray:
Sorry but this is actually mostly because the vagina has a natural self-cleaning mechanism that maintains its health and prevents infections. These vaginal secretions help remove dead cells, bacteria, and other debris. It's mostly not about being lubricated as a phallic receptacle.

They have it just as much as men. The only thing, theirs isn't as obvious as men. Since it's mistaken always as a discharge.

I can never be of the opinion that the gender that their live literally deals 247 on s*X and men are the ones with less libido.

Those of my colleagues in this thread that read sciences would understand the concept of Kinetic & Potential Energy.

E=mgh

And E=1/2mv^2

While both of them are equal.

E=E

They can vary in many ways but have the same magnitude and severity.

We can compare this analogy to the dynamics of male and female libido.

The male libido can be likened to kinetic energy while the female libido to Potential Energy(having the potential to work).

Some women may have a higher sex drive than men, while others may not. Libido varies on individual levels and generalizations often don't capture individual experiences.

CaveAdullam:


I like how you feel that you have been able to rebut the post and yet contradicted yourself again with your last paragraph @bolded.

Bro...

The quoted post stems from a biological and evolutionary point of view.

You want to be using prostitutes to make a point when they are less than 8% of the total female demography in each continent.

Go research about testosterone hormone.

If you read about 2 - 3 books about testosterone and find out that "women experience more sexual pleasure than men or (have a higher sexual drive than men), then, we can have a discussion.

I don't even know how a specie "can have lower sex drive and still experience higher sexual pleasure".

That contradiction is giving me headache. I swear.

Happy New Year.

make him go research ? Omo wetn the guy talk na true....even 10 year old girl sabi wetn BDSM mean.....

Rizzputin:


You're confused if you think anything there is contradictory.

High sex drive and sexual pleasure while related are NOT the same thing.

Sex drive refers to that urge and eagerness to have sex. That initial sex. Men can look and are ready to go. No long talk involved. Women on the other hand, are slower to get to that sex point in general.

Sexual pleasure is the enjoyment, satisfaction and depth that comes with sex. Women by FAR derive more pleasure and enjoyment in sex. It's NOT something to debate or use book knowledge to argue. Go out and actually experience it.

The fact that you called the Women I described "prostitutes" is laughable. Because you're suffering from good/bad girl syndrome

Women if aroused enough and with the right man will do perverted things that will make you cry. This FALSE belief that Women who have naughty fantasies are prostitutes is just naive.

Find any girl you feel doesn't match the criteria. Tell her to show you the novels she reads and her fantasies. Lol

I mostly debate experience not books. Your flawed theory already goes against reality. Drop the books and actually meet women

Happy New year to you too

that novel own mad ooo...there's this church girl wey dey my DM....she dey read ana todd abi wetn dem dey call the author... Na she even make me realize say e get porn authors omooo..

Tonnyray:
I disagree.
You keep saying "can" and "if" and using the same to establish something as factual.
I can fvck Beyonce doesn't mean I ever will in 7 lifetimes.
Using probability clauses of "if with the right guy" already puts them on a lower pedestal than men sexdrive-wise as most men oftentimes don't even have a right woman but fvck just about any willing p00$$y.
If women had these crazy sex drives as you claim it won't be men being hauled in jail for sex crimes over 95% of the time.
Observing the spectrum of animal species alone does justice to this flawed argument.

u don enter street b4?

Streak47:


T-levels aren't a joke. It's what essentially makes up a man. And it's on an exponential decline over the last decade. For libido aka sex drive there isn't one way fits all. It's something that is highly personal & varies on individual level. To say men have more sex drive, I beg to differ.

Beautiful. I like this. So, let's quantify:

T-levels and estrogen levels are the two major hormones responsible for sex drive and they are both present in men and women.

If they are too low or too high, it can lead to low libido i.e. low sexual drive. So, the best is, it has to be a normal range.

For an average adult male, normal T-levels is around 1.16-8.45ng/ml - just the minimum is about ten times the female
For an average adult female, normal T-levels is around 0.15 to 0.7 ng/mL

For Estrogen:

Adult males: Normal range: 0.01 - 0.05 ng/mL which is pretty much the same level as an adult female that has stopped menstruating
Adult females: Normal estrogen range:
Follicular phase: [/b]0.015 - 0.35 ng/mL
[b]Ovulation: 0.08 - 0.50 ng/mL
Post-Ovulation phase: 0.06 - 0.25 ng/mL 0.015 - 0.35 ng/mL

If you look at these numbers, there is no way on earth a woman can have more sex drive i.e. libido than a man, no matter how much you think T-level is on a decline.

As a rationale being, I take my words back that sexual pleasure cannot be measured. Nothing is impossible. But it is not as straightforward as sexual drive. And of course, orgasm is never a true measure of sexual pleasure.

One way to measure could be to check how the hormones responsible for pleasure such as oxytocin, dopamine, etc. are reacting for the man and the woman during and after sexual activity. So maybe the couples could wear a device of some sort to real-time ingest the values.

But I suspect a very subjective result, as pleasure not just sexual pleasure is a very relative and constantly changing data based on several factors. Pleasure levels may be high today for a woman having sex with a man of 2 inches long, tomorrow or even 3 hrs time, she may only achieve that same amount of pleasure with 3 inches long and a change of style. The same goes for a man.

Sex drive is more straightforward and relatively constant. And more so, the fact that it is the cursor to sex, makes it the reasonable quantifier for who likes sex the most.

Streak47:


I laugh some people that say women don't have high s*x drive. On the lowkey most of these babes have many options servicing them to stupor. And then pretend. If you see any babe that is withholding sex or romance just know she has someone or a backup option doing it. Some even have spirit husbands.

The truth is that most men are s*x starved. A well s*xed man will exhibit almost the same s*xual control as a woman. Imagine s*xing 4 to 6 women a day. That's like the average some of these damsel can pull effortlessly in a day cause they just need to be women to do it. But for many men to pull this number you have to be the exceptional one and have the means.

Have you guys noticed virgins are more open to sex & want to engage in it or romance than non-virgin. E.g. like you want to touch a girl and she starts pulling away and all that...just know it's a big non-virgin, probably bore-hole. They're very good and have control over their drive--- the borehole. Borehole can deny you entry for several years while feigning virginity while another dude doing the lord's work. Likewise when you compare younger ladies to older ones. Older experienced ladies in the room affairs can feign sexual control more than the younger ladies. On the other hand, virgin will be open to it. Then you'd be the one to find out when you open the place and she tells you she ain't ready during romance. What does that tells us?

Let's do the facts:

If men have higher s*X drive why isn't Love Machine & s*X toy market isn't mainstream for men when compared to women. Infact female s*X toy market is a thriving industry. Some women even put it in their bags like accessories. While for men something like finding relief via an artificial V will be very awkward & might seem more of a psychological issue. Imagine a guy having artificial V's in his cupboard. Seems awkward right?

Then we come to our big aunties molesting us as Teenagers. The so called women have lower drive.

Men, I would say are more visually simulated & are more sexually agile.---Because we need that TLevel for virtually everything. Creativity, War, Endurance, Confrontation, Sex, Protection, Procreation, Creation etc. Men are able to channel their primal and sexual energies towards inventions. You loose that drive-you don't feel yourself as a man. Thus, it seems though we have a higher drive because of our ways of expressing it.

Why is it that industries like Onlyfans, SM, Po*rn target men?

On the other hand the Love Machine/Sextoy servicing market target women. Why is it so?

Then we have cases of men being ran on like a marathon in girls hostel each taking turns till they meet a fatal end. That cannot be said for the male hostels. Infact women are likely to be protected in the gathering of men. So why is it so? So called women have lower drive.

In addition, have you ever eavesdropped on women's groups or chats- how vulgar and raw their conversations are? The so called lower s*X drive. Ahaaa!

This girl is a very good girl from a good family but her something is wide like a borehole. Mind you she ain't a LovePeddler. She has used maybe very big bottle to widen that place cause even cucumber can't do such level of irreversible damage. This is a humble-shy girl from a religious home. End product of constant masturbation.

An average woman can be as sexual as a man. I don't know how they're able to control it such that they can use it as bargaining power or withhold it even during the heat of the moment. Unlike men that find it difficult to control.

I just believe a player is a man with all the machevilian traits of a woman.

Women are as highly sexually aggressive as men if not more!. Like we have men with lower drive so also we have women as well.

Ignore typos, abeg. NL dey rewrite the English.

you nail it men! i am personally a reserve person, infact i don't ask my babes for nacks... but the way they frequently want us to conjugate is alarming... before u know, babe lets go out(to lodge), babe, i want you...blablabla. the truth is if and only if, we get nacks or have the key to nack like ladies, we would not be hungry for sexxx as speculated.


infact the level of sensitivity of girls self is high. little touch and whispering here and there, and they are already on fire. listen, i don't usually follow all this scientific research like that because must of them are sponsored research...i dey look wetin i dey experience korokoro and agree with it. girls have more sexual urge to me than men.

imustsaymymindo:


Lols, bro...the arguments are needed sometimes especially if productive. That's why we are men. I learn a lot. I know Rizzputin is not a troll and he is intelligent and also has made valid points on this thread but we differ in some respects, especially the understanding that Redpill is a praxeology.

Back to your experiences, and the argument lol, I wouldn't still say this still makes women love/enjoy sex more than men. Even if we are to go by the logic of sexual pleasure and orgasm, men are so sexual that they orgasm in their sleep i.e. wet dreams. I don't know what else could beat that.

lols, women orgasm from sneezing alone, what do you have to say about that?


guy, women like sex, especially if the guy is quiet good in bed. go around guys that have girls staying with them like in hostels and schools. gist and see how those guys are wailing that the girl want use nack finish me... and so many other talks. listen, when it comes to male and female dynamics, drop science and view it with ur experience... they were born, live and breath for sexuality-women.

As reserve and calm that i am, once they come closer and see that i am also a bad boy, they let loose. one girl once tore her panties to have a quickie with me in a factory i work... during break time. she saw that while i did not request for sex, my words and body language shows i know wasup... she made a hole in her v-ga area and rode me, the exitement and risk involve made me even cum quickly self...


those girls are always hot...

ElasmoBranchii:


Alright my G. I'm open to any discussion as far as it will further extend my understanding of the topic.

Happy New Year to you too bro and
Happy Red New Year to all the Redpillers in the house.

Good day, bro. I found your perspective on hypergamy quite interesting and I wanted you to shed more light on it. Personally, I have always gone with the perspective of hypergamy as the inherent mate selection strategy of females when it comes to marriage: you know, the practice of marrying above or, at least, equal to one's socioeconomic status.

Just like you, I'm aware of the female dual mating strategy: alpha f*cks, beta bucks. However, unlike you, I have never included the phenomenon of being sexually turned on by a member of the opposite sex (and, of course seeking to f*ck that member) as an instance of hypergamy.

Now, if being turned on or finding someone sexually attractive is a subconscious biological mechanism to acquire the best genes for one's offspring and you include this as another aspect of hypergamy, would YOU say, by your own perspective on hypergamy, that men are also hypergamous... in this regard? (my first inquiry). Would you apply the term 'hypergamy' to men? Of course, we all know what men are biologically wired to find attractive in women and I don't think I disagree with you on that.

You mentioned three things that rank high in attractiveness (I presume you meant sexual) for women:
1. Confidence
2. Charming (Can you make her feel special)
3. Responsibility (Can you lead her)

If given these three things and I added the quality of being physically attractive (sexually appealing) as a guy, what number would you rank physical attractiveness compared to the three aforementioned qualities? I am just curious on this. (my second inquiry)


My last set of questions, no vex:

● Do you agree that a man can be financially attractive a woman while not being sexually attractive to her?

● Do you agree that a woman, for long-term survival reasons, can associate with a man and pick him as her potential husband for pragmatic reasons even though she doesn't find him sexually appealing? The pragmatic reason could be that he is the best financial option hence would provide for the family well, and then maybe things like being a good father, and what have you.

● When it comes to marriage, do women marry because they find a man handsome and sexually appealing? Is it not the case that there are more pressing pragmatic reasons (reasons that must be met first) being considered other than that?


==============================
<sub>N.B: This is my inquiry into your perspective. This is not an argument, an I am not contesting anything. I ask in good faith as a fellow redpiller. I have to say this because some trolls and detractors (who are invariably emotional and childish, however well they pretend) will think I am trying to argue or placing my myself as a proud authority who is entitled to demanding answers from you. You never know with these people. Some will start using this as an opportunity to argue and score points, any points.

Lastly, should this morph into a long discussion, which I doubt, let it be known that I intend this for only redpillers.</sub>

Adasun:
lols, women orgasm from sneezing alone, what do you have to say about that?

guy, women like sex, especially if the guy is quiet good in bed. go around guys that have girls staying with them like in hostels and schools. gist and see how those guys are wailing that the girl want use nack finish me... and so many other talks. listen, when it comes to male and female dynamics, drop science and view it with ur experience... they were born, live and breath for sexuality-women.

those girls are always hot...

If we were to all argue based on how we feel, then it's a waste of time. That'd be context over content. So science and data is important.

This your statement is not true, even if true, also negates your claim on Ladies having more sex drive: the truth is if and only if, we get nacks or have the key to nack like ladies, we would not be hungry for sexxx as speculated.

I have my fair share of experiences. My sex drive is way above the moon and I utilize it so well including tours, and trust me I have reached a point where the kind of things that give me pleasure with women is not what I can even talk about here. The more sex you have, the more sex you want. It's the other way around, bro. Your libido increases. Just some weeks ago, I was with a girl who is only crazy about Satanism as her form of pleasure and I matched it with more evil. To roleplay the scenes, I had to get candles, some rock music, and whatnot, and the activities done can't be said here. She even masturbates almost all day when she is on her ovulation and has no one around. I could watch her doing that all day on the call while I am being productive. Does that mean she has a higher sex drive than me? The same girl won't even get wet for someone who can't get her to these levels of debauchery.

I repeat once again: that when a girl decides to do the most debasing thing with/to you or something that seems new/bad to you such as in your case making a hole in her v or pant tearing, this doesn't mean she has a higher sexual drive than a man. Maybe more sexual drive than you, but there is a man whose drive instilled that in her originally.

I would implore you to read my former post where I said: For women, the drive is ive, therefore it needs the right amount of energy to wake it up - be it ovulation, a man whose drive is deeper - in summary, a higher form of energy. And depending on how novel the energy is, the more intense the drive. This is why a female sex drive can never be as much as a male sex drive. It could be more intense as long as the novel energy exists but not more frequent and potent.

But again, all these are feels based on experiences, and if we argue over that, it would never end. And that is why I had to bring out data to . And rather stick to that.

Martinez39s:


Now, if being turned on or finding someone sexually attractive is a subconscious biological mechanism to acquire the best genes for one's offspring and you include this as another aspect of hypergamy, would YOU say, by your own perspective on hypergamy, that men are also hypergamous... in this regard? (my first inquiry). Would you apply the term 'hypergamy' to men? Of course, we all know what men are biologically wired to find attractive in women and I don't think I disagree with you on that.

[/b] [/sub]

Good day, bro. Let me try to put my perspective on your first inquiry.

Yes. I see hypergamy from the dual-mating side too - alpha f*cks, beta bucks. I call it scaling up(vertical scaling). Think SQL databases if you are into tech. The original aim of optimizing hypergamously is to ensure the best quality of sex, genes for the alpha f*cks side, and security/provisioning for the beta bucks if women can completely have their way.

Men don't care about the "bucks" or security from women, so men can't be hypergamous. The best way to describe men's optimizing strategy would be polygamous. Which is more like scaling out (horizontal scaling). Scaling for traffic. Think NOSQL databases if you are into tech. The aim is to knack as many as possible and spread their genes to at least have one survive in any case of loss.

Men's optimization is have many, so that at least one gene would survive(that becomes the best gene(s)). Reason why men are particular about DNA. Women's optimization is 1. I need the beta bucks provision and security to allow me be that woman who is healthy enough and capable of producing the best gene and 2. When it is now time to produce the best gene, I want it with a man who already embodies the ability to give me the best genes.

imustsaymymindo:


If we were to all argue based on how we feel, then it's a waste of time. That'd be context over content. So science and data is important.

This your statement is not true, even if true, also negates your claim on Ladies having more sex drive: the truth is if and only if, we get nacks or have the key to nack like ladies, we would not be hungry for sexxx as speculated.

I have my fair share of experiences. My sex drive is way above the moon and I utilize it so well including tours, and trust me I have reached a point where the kind of things that give me pleasure with women is not what I can even talk about here. The more sex you have, the more sex you want. It's the other way around, bro. Your libido increases. Just some weeks ago, I was with a girl who is only crazy about Satanism as her form of pleasure and I matched it with more evil. To roleplay the scenes, I had to get candles, some rock music, and whatnot, and the activities done can't be said here. She even masturbates almost all day when she is on her ovulation and has no one around. I could watch her doing that all day on the call while I am being productive. Does that mean she has a higher sex drive than me? The same girl won't even get wet for someone who can't get her to these levels of debauchery.

I repeat once again: that when a girl decides to do the most debasing thing with/to you or something that seems new/bad to you such as in your case making a hole in her v or pant tearing, this doesn't mean she has a higher sexual drive than a man. Maybe more sexual drive than you, but there is a man whose drive instilled that in her originally.

I would implore you to read my former post where I said: For women, the drive is ive, therefore it needs the right amount of energy to wake it up - be it ovulation, a man whose drive is deeper - in summary, a higher form of energy. And depending on how novel the energy is, the more intense the drive. This is why a female sex drive can never be as much as a male sex drive. It could be more intense as long as the novel energy exists but not more frequent and potent.

But again, all these are feels based on experiences, and if we argue over that, it would never end. And that is why I had to bring out data to . And rather stick to that.

Alright...

Martinez39s:


Good day, bro. I found your perspective on hypergamy quite interesting and I wanted you to shed more light on it. Personally, I have always gone with the perspective of hypergamy as the inherent mate selection strategy of females when it comes to marriage: you know, the practice of marrying above or, at least, equal to one's socioeconomic status.

Just like you, I'm aware of the female dual mating strategy: alpha f*cks, beta bucks. However, unlike you, I have never included the phenomenon of being sexually turned on by a member of the opposite sex (and, of course seeking to f*ck that member) as an instance of hypergamy.

Now, if being turned on or finding someone sexually attractive is a subconscious biological mechanism to acquire the best genes for one's offspring and you include this as another aspect of hypergamy, would YOU say, by your own perspective on hypergamy, that men are also hypergamous... in this regard? (my first inquiry). Would you apply the term 'hypergamy' to men? Of course, we all know what men are biologically wired to find attractive in women and I don't think I disagree with you on that.

I'm always happy to share my view especially with someone as knowledgeable as yourself. I will try my best to answer your questions as best as I can from my own perspective.

First of all I think we need to start from the top.

The goal (for a lack of better term) of human life is survival. Every organism or species's basic goal is to survive. Reproduction is a form of survival meaning a part of you remains in this world after you die.
Which is why every living thing reproduces.

Now although the need to reproduce is also in women, they are also exposed to more risk during pregnancy and after pregnancy. e.g death during childbirth, inability to fend for themselves and defend against danger during pregnancy, inability to acquire resources to take care of her offsprings and her needs due to being less developed physically than the opposite sex.

Her male counterparts on the other hand don't have these issues. He can go about spreading his seeds as much as he wants. Which is why they say men are polygamous. A man can f*ck an attractive girl and also an unattractive girl. It's a game of numbers to him even though through evolution he knows the type of women more likely to give him healthy offsprings he still might not care cause it's a numbers game to him. Which is why you don't really say men are hypergamous. Men also don't need women to provide resources for them because they are physically built to do that. They just need women that can take care of the domestic stuff while they go out hunting and gathering.

It's not that women are actually look for two mates to fulfill the dual aspect of their mating strategy. It's just that finding a mate that embodies the two (alpha f*ck, beta buck) is really difficult. They would prefer a mate who is an alpha to commit to them but that is easier said than done because most alphas are more interested in spreading their seeds.
Which is why it is necessary to split.

You mentioned three things that rank high in attractiveness (I presume you meant sexual) for women:
1. Confidence
2. Charming (Can you make her feel special)
3. Responsibility (Can you lead her)

If given these three things and I added the quality of being physically attractive (sexually appealing) as a guy, what number would you rank physical attractiveness compared to the three aforementioned qualities? I am just curious on this. (my second inquiry)

Physical attractiveness is not ranked the highest in of female mating strategy because our bodies are not the vessels that carry the offsprings. What is more important for women is how you behave during pregnancy and after her pregnancy because those are the times she is most vulnerable, which is why she has to shit test you to really know if you possess those qualities. There really is no rank per say. Physical attractiveness is also among the qualities that women look for because nobody intentionally wants to create an ugly offspring. They would like to give their offspring the best qualities in order to ensure their long term survival and reproductive advantage. So the ranking of those three is really arbitrary but if you don't possess any of those three qualities, women won't look your way. A man can't even be alpha if he doesn't possess all three.

Being fit is also an evolutionary sign to women that you are capable of defending and providing resources for her.
Also you being physically attractive and giving her attention is a way of making her feel special because you could have given your attention to any other girl but you chose her

My last set of questions, no vex:

● Do you agree that a man can be financially attractive a woman while not being sexually attractive to her?

Yes that's what happens when the man can't fulfill the alpha f*ck part of the equation yet he has the financial resources to take care of her and her offsprings (beta buck)

● Do you agree that a woman, for long-term survival reasons, can associate with a man and pick him as her potential husband for pragmatic reasons even though she doesn't find him sexually appealing? The pragmatic reason could be that he is the best financial option hence would provide for the family well, and then maybe things like being a good father, and what have you.

Yes but if she can find a better option than him that can fulfill both equations of her mating strategy she won't

● When it comes to marriage, do women marry because they find a man handsome and sexually appealing? Is it not the case that there are more pressing pragmatic reasons (reasons that must be met first) being considered other than that?

Which is why I said physically attractiveness doesn't rank high for women. What's more important to them is how you behave during pregnancy (whether the child is yours or not) and after pregnancy.
Women marry because that's the best option she has at the moment that can at least fulfill a part of her dual mating strategy