NewStats: 3,262,917 , 8,178,515 topics. Date: Wednesday, 04 June 2025 at 04:36 AM 2k682h

If you prepare yourself for failure, you will meet failure. Being ready for failure does not mean you prepare yourself specifically for it. That’s a self fulfilling prophecy.

Most people fear embarrassments, when they should be scared of regrets. In the end, it’s the chances you don’t take that fvck with you.

ubunja:
I stopped reading when you called African culture uncivilized. I know it goes south from here.

Smiles, in case you don't know yet, not every part of Africa is civilized. It's alright.

I was watching a documentary few days ago, in some part of Africa, they even dressed more scantily than the picture you posted, their way of life and everything is totally different with the one we have here. In a nutshell, mode of dressing has little to do with being experienced or inexperienced. Culture differs, depending on the environment, but some culture has long gone into the drain, only in a few part of the world are all these still being practiced, it's only a matter of time, it will soon be eradicated.

The reason why people conflate mode of dressing with character or personality is because we tend to address people by the way they dress. If you dress like an insane person, people will regard you as insane, if you dress like a nurse, people will regard you as a nurse, if you dress like a hoe, people will regard you as one.

SOZINN:


Oga don't make an issue out of nothing.
Cultures differ.

Smiles, no one is disputing the fact about varying culture. But we all know even in the past, people were covered not to speak of this 21st century. So how is it any issue then?

ubunja:
is that a Muslim girl? Dude "inexperienced and naive" doesn't have to mean fully covered up, especially when ALL WOMEN IN ISLAM ARE ALWAYS FULLY COVERED UP. C'mon.

In many African cultures the inexperienced and naive virgins display their bodies and only cover up when they get spoken for.

In the culture I'm in at the moment, these below are what are considered Inexperienced and Naive women. They're virgins.....

And the last pic is right in line with this.

Smiles. In a logical view, the picture you posted means the area where those girls are ain't civilized. Even a new born baby is covered up in this current age and time. So does it mean we can't have a girl that's covered up and still inexperienced? We don't need to promote nudity to prove a point here.

And besides, you asked him for a picture and he provided it for you, a picture can't really speak if someone is experienced or not. Also, to me, being inexperienced means a girl that's still in her pristine state, and haven't gotten anything to do with a man or haven't gotten her mind and brain corrupted or what am I missing here? Hmm

fattprince:

I can read sarcasm in your reply. You know femails don't even know what they want. I've experienced this twice in the little relationships I've been in. Immediately you behave like you guys are equal bam!! They feel they are better than you and can get a better guy. But I've learnt sha.

“Once made equal to man, woman becomes his superior.” — Socrates

“When there are no rules, women take charge.” — Tatiana Petrovna, Peaky Blinders (TV series)

Illumined939:
The pristine girl, but with an understanding that it could go south. My point is, people mustn't think the redpill is ultimately perfection.

Of course, nothing is certain in life. Anything can go south at anytime. The goal of the redpill is to make you become aware of this, so when such thing happens, it won't catch you unaware.

Illumined939:
That young girl you are happy for about her naivete, just so you can mould her into what you desire her to be for you, would one day experience an awakening that could shock you, and make you dispute and question the validity of those games / training you ran on her.

With women, nothing is carved in stone. Once you know this, you don't spend too much time writing about women.
Although, the knowledge of the redpill reduces the risk of a man getting burnt in his affairs with women.

With human in general, nothing is carved on stone. People change and feelings also change. But it's better for a man to be the cause of that 'awakening' in his woman than any external factors.

So would you rather go for an 'experienced' woman then, or a girl in her pristine state, since she might one day experience a 'rude awakening' as you've said?

TheDarkGamer:

If we do not want our women to work or have jobs, why do we still complain about them asking for money? I mean, it is only fair if as a man, you do not want your partner/wife to bear any financial responsibility, then you should be able to provide her needs and wants since she would have been able to do so if she had a steady stream of income.

However, some men say they don't want their women working, but they don't want to provide the woman wants. Isn't that having double standards?

First of all, we should understand that the primary job of a woman is her matrimonial home, anything else is secondary. Also, every man wants peace of mind either in a relationship/marriage and their heart will always gravitate towards what provides this. This is why some men love spending more time with friends in beer parlours than at home with family simply because they are avoiding their wife's troubles.

A woman's value is not necessarily money, if she is lazy, experienced, materialistic, not appreciative, always nagging, not family oriented, not submissive, can't cook, etcetera, then she's a liability and doesn't have anything to offer. If a man can have peace of mind in a particular relationship, he might not worry about the woman offering financial assistance. Men don't want to be with a woman that will make him through another phase of stress after getting home from work.

If at all a job was provided for her by the husband, the job shouldn't affect how she runs her matrimonial home. Her main job is her home, the husband, and the kids, anything else is secondary. If a woman can provide this, then she's of value. Men who doesn't want their women working knows that they have to provide the basic amenities she needs and that of the house.

I stand to be corrected though.

Maybe you ain't talking about girls from this planet or this century. Their rule is to spend first, then maybe investigate later. Most women would rather be with an evil but rich person than a good but poor person. They might forgive you for being evil or heinous but they won't overlook the fact that you are poor. In reality, only a small percentage of women would care about a man's source of wealth before having to do anything with him.

This is also the reason why they make easy targets for ritualists or sex traffickers. The more materialistic a woman is, the more likely she's to fall prey. The more desperate someone is, the more easily they can be trapped or manipulated.

ubunja:
What men really want - youth, freshness, fertility, inexperience and naivete.

Naivety is very important in a woman, the more naive a woman is, the more better for the man. This is why it's best to go for young girls and inexperienced women, you'll be able to mould her to any shape you want and also maintain frame. It will be very hard to maintain frame with a woman who have had a lot of experiences with men. Experience is bad for women because it tends to damage them mentally. This is why sometimes, it's bad to date a woman who just got off in a relationship or divorced because you don't know how damaged she is from her previous relationship.

And one thing also, we men seems to ask what women has to offer in a relationship/marriage, in most cases, we shouldn't look at money. Because the more independent a woman is, the less likely she will be submissive, because she also has the power that you have. The value we should expect from a woman should be the orderliness of the home, how she takes care of you and the kids, how she teaches your kids, not being lazy, high agreeableness, etcetera. That's why the stay-at-home wives are the best option in most cases.

I'm not saying the woman shouldn't assist in making some certain payments, but she should depend more on the man.

Ubunja, the picture you posted might begin sowing some 'seeds' in young minds here and might make them 'react' in some way, your message was well understood without it. Thanks.

CaveAdullam:


This is not a matter of game or no game. Lets go back a little and have a clearer picture.

You point out one finger but four fingers points back at you. What do I mean: as we despise women who are not able and loyal, we must also chastise men who fall down from that benchmark.

That man was not loyal to his marriage vows, his family and reputation. He choose or has been choosing tiny b!tches over what he has built over time. I definitely know that this is not his first time he started philandering and there is no way we can ascertain if he has been using game or a simp. But the fact remains that had he been faithful to his marriage vow, he wouldn't have ended like a cheap fowl.

As a man, marry as many women you can take care of just like Ned Nwoko, rather than playing hide and seek. You've the right to be monogamous or polygamous; it is your choice.

Whether game or no game, let your stance be made known in every relationship; infidelity is prohibited, except the relationship is an open one. (Men don't want to see their women with other men and vice versa because jealousy is rooted in the human psyche and anyone that goes against it will pay one way or the other).

The tiny b!tch would have gained more if she hadn't killed the billionaire. Maybe she was on a revenge mission. Maybe she was a spy or an assassin. Maybe she just want to hit big and run. The concluding part of the matter is that luck didn't favour both parties this time around.

Above all, we should be careful the way we live our lives because we have no control over time and luck.

Thanks.

Brilliant!

JimiJunji:


Humans aren't computers with someone either being a one or a zero, humans are non binary, what you consider literacy is Illiteracy in some societies, even according to your redpill theory without a an alpha we can have sigmas and other viables. I think people need to just stop trying to put everything in a box.

Hmm, it's alright.

WesternOligarch:


Dude....if you read what I wrote, I never for once bashed single mothers, but merely made a case for why both parties are needed in the raising of a child, the mother can't and isn't wired to play the role of a father and vice versa, even God who who was an absentee father to earthly Jesus christ knew this, it's why he prepared Joseph to step in as his earthly father cus imagine Mary being a single mother. Single mothers no matter how our society tries to normalise it is a cancer and it's not bashing but a fact.

Hmm, another angle though, based on this statement of yours.

One thing about this thread is that, everyone has been a great contributor to the development of this thread, though some people have been of more impact than the other, that's a known fact, even the people we might call simp (even though I don't like using that word), sometimes, an alpha was once a simp.

Without a simp, we won't have an alpha, without darkness, we won't have light, without illiteracy, we won't have literacy. So we are all here for each other and to learn from each other. Surely everyone has something to project forward, and from that projection, we might learn a thing or two.

mattfeuter:


Him getting murdered at an AirBnB in Lekki doesn’t make him a simp.

He was only unfortunate to have been involved with a cold blooded killer disguised as a side chick.

Exactly. The way people rush to call someone a simp can be funny at times.

That's a really sad experience. This disorderliness has made some people's valuables got stolen from by pickpockets because they see it as an opportunity to carry out their agenda, some even got injured in the process.

Some of those at the bus stops are not really waiting to get into the bus, but to steal. It's really sad. We just have to be careful in this cold world.

ubunja:
that front page story is especially sad. Guys if you have serious money just get yourself two or even three official wives. These side chicks no longer know their place. In the US side chick are busy exposing their lovers, destroying their careers. Smh.

I've heard so many stories related to the one posted on the FP and the one I've experienced around me also, that's why I said that these women sometimes are ready to take with force or anything possible what they can't take with manipulation. This is one of the dangerous entanglements I was talking about back then.

Men, sometimes in order not to fall into booby traps, the best thing is to avoid the location of the traps, don't think because you're redpilled or you're aware of women manipulative techniques that you can always avoid situations like this. Even people more wiser than you has fallen. That's why I said you can never know which woman is out to get you especially in this 21st century. Never assume calm is weak and loud is strong.

This is one of the reason why I what Ned Nwonkwo does instead, at least, it's more safer that way.

I read what Rollo Tomassi said about America. If what he said is true, America is doomed.

https://www.rt.com/usa/507804-kamala-harris-manosphere-rollo-tomassi/

And also, a topic is on the FP right now for anyone who can learn a thing or two.

https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/6610868/michael-usifo-ataga-dead-super

Pussy doesn't cost anything, but it can cost you everything. Tread carefully. (Pussy has led many men to their early grave and the trend will still continue).

In most cases of women gravitating towards married men, it's because married men are evident of being well-to-do and able to take care of responsibilities. Women are always gravitating towards providers.

Take Ned Nwonkwo for example, women keep trying to get attached to him even though they knew he's married to 6 women. If people know you're married, they take it as a sign of being responsible and your ability to provide which most women are naturally drawn to. No one wants to attach themselves to losers.

Some women particularly love dating married men because they know he can provide whatever they want and always feel secured around him. They believe these married men are more matured than singles and they also believe they have a chance of 'stealing' him away from his wife.

We shall see, anything for social media clout.

Martinez39s:
There is no power play here. The discussions you see here emanating from our different views and exposure are normal in this group; it has happened before and it will also happen again. There is no hive mind here. Finally, there is no boss, leader or authority here; almost everyone, even Ubunja, has been dragged here in the past. Anyone who comes to brag and shove nonsense down our throat will be dragged.

Mr Facilitator, abeg no facilitate anything. Don't do what you are thinking.

Thanks for this Martinez, I don't know why some people are taking opposition of views as opposing someone. They are totally different. I say things as it is. If I oppose your views today, it doesn't mean I won't your views tomorrow. But if I'm always quick to oppose everything you say or call you names, that's where the problem is. You can't expect everyone to swallow everything you say all the time. It's not possible. Only robots are programmed that way, there are some things robots won't even process. Just because a particular teacher has been teaching you doesn't mean you'll have to agree with him when he says 2+2 = 9.

That aside, no one is trying to usurp or 'takeover' anyone on this forum, no one is the king here. You don't know what everyone got going too offline, just because they ain't active here on Nairaland or online doesn't mean they ain't active offline. Nairaland is not the only online forum. I've been a guest on Nairaland for a long time before ing this , I didn't just find out about TRP on Nairaland, not even by Rollo Tomassi, I was drawn to it by a Robert Greene's book called Laws of Power I found online, this made me delve into searching for more truths, that's where I came about Illimitable Men and along the path, I met other great authors like RT and some great philosophers too, that's how my full journey into TRP started.

When I was a guest on Nairaland, I don't usually visit the Romance section, but my first visit here was when I came about this thread and it drew my attention because of the number of views it had, since then I started frequenting this thread till I ed this , so that was it.

If your only source of information is on Nairaland, you might be on a long thing. Go out there, read books, check if what you read is in tandem with reality, history or scientifically proven facts. Research yourself, don't feed on everything being told here. Think for yourself. Peace.

ubunja:
with women simping like this for Alphas? Lol you guys really don't know what time it is:

Oh! Wow!! What an achievement!!! I'm thrilled!.

Thanks for the enlightenment. I will check the time in a minute.

Pussy doesn't cost anything, but it can cost you everything. Tread carefully.

CaveAdullam:
Very short speech: DAY 168, REDPILL 2021

1. From an evolutionary standpoint, women always gravitates towards the men that other women finds attractive. It is a prerequisite in identifying men that can provides good genes and resources. These men also exhibits traits of dominance---can hunt animals and had other men they lead. Men that has many women can spread their seeds quickly and easily because their life expectancy is a little lower than women.

2. Whatever applies to hunting animals, applied to getting women---confidence, strength, hugeness, courageous, fearless, abundance mindset. But the men of yesteryear didn't become "bad boys, thugs, touts" to get women. Their forage attitude and gene sold them out to women.

3. Women always play the alpha fvcks and beta bucks game subconsciously and consciously. In the foragers society, the monogamy family existed in some tribes and polygamy existed in other tribes. Their rules and way of living was way different from now.

4. Being nice will get you no women and this is nothing but the truth. And same with being gentle or intelligent. Pvssy only cares about roughness and toughness.

5. : women of old shaped by evolution only gravitates towards dominant men. However, since women can't see raw dominance as they saw in the past, they now gravitate towards men that shows fascimiles of dominance. Hence, you see them frolicking with the sociopathic and narcissistic men in the nooks and crannies of every society.

6. Society is way more better and conducive than the days of our forage ancestors, hence, Men are now weak. And weak men don't attract women. Men failed thinking that being nice will attract women instead of exhibiting traits of dominance but were shocked when bad boys continue to accumulate all the women.

7. In order to get these women, Men began to develop extreme and unhealthy narcissistic/sociopathic traits to score women.

8. The above correlated with the emergence of feminism and her role in ing alliance with the government to postulate laws that weakens the patriarchal society and monogamy(commonest form of marriage).

9. New law produced new regime. Feminism pave the way for women to ostentatiously display their ferocious nature as the patriarchal wall gradually declined. Sociopaths were not left out, they too needed to cash out, they discovered the real female nature and were able to finagle their ways around women. Hence, fvck and dump! Hook up culture! Spin plates!

10. Former nice guys were now able to fvck several women without commitment and women, being emotional, short sighted, continue to graze the beds of these guys thinking they are the best amongst men. It's only when they hit the wall they realize the mistakes they've made. Majority of these guys continue to fvck different women and at the end of their days have nothing tangible to present except folklores and imaginations of the plethora of sexual escapades they've acquired.

11. The result of these behaviours amongst men and women led to the rise of STDs, broken homes, broken family, betrayals, fatherless children, lack of trust, abuse of drugs, greed, crimes, teenage pregnancy, school dropouts etc.

[b]12. In the short term, both men and women pursued their innate sexual desires but at the detriment of their future generations. Both are faulty! We cannot deny the effects of promiscuity and lasciviousness in our society today, we all complain and suffer the degeneracy and the decline. Even redpill gurus say avoid damaged women but becomes reticent when they want to fvck these damaged women, and yet still complains of the degeneracy of women.

Before you remove the wood in your brother's eyes, first remove the speck of dust in your eyes.

13. It's not a matter of immorality or amorality or morality, they're venners to cover the tracks. These behaviours of men and women, are they beneficial to our society, needed for the growth of civilization?Are the resultant effect of these behaviours positive or negative?

Only those that stand for something or probably the truth can answer correctly.

However, since majority are degenerates their answers will win the highest votes even though they're wrong.

14. The game is what it is. Fvck karma. If you play the game you will win but if chance and luck don't favour you, you will bear the consequences of all your actions.

15. Nobody or probably the majority don't care about civilization, everyone is simply playing the game to win or accrue resources to themselves. But those that keep themselves and avoid being tainted by the shades of degeneracy are the true light and pillar holding civilization and will take it to the next level.

16. Don't sullen yourself as a man or a woman because of short term gains. Don't sacrifice integrity and reputation on the altar of pvssy as a man or for the sake of material wealth as a woman. Weigh both the short and long term consequences of all your actions and choose the one that will benefit you. Peace of mind and ability to condemn what's wrong without fear or hypocrisy you will benefit from choosing the right decision.

Roosh V and Neil Strauss has traveled the journey for you. It is then left for you to make your decision. If you really care about the future and currently suffering the pains of corrupt leaders, you will definitely make the right decision.

Prepare for the change that's coming!

Authority: Think positively, have an abundance mindset.

Apt.

@SOZINN, no one is saying women shouldn't be held responsible for their misdoings. Read at where it all started, men were the driving factor. The lust and thirst for sex, the non-dominant frame, being manipulated by women, driven only towards sex. If all the men that brought about civilisation were all PUA, players and men who seek to pump their seeds anywhere possible, where do you think the world would be? What is being talked about is that, in as much as women is to be held responsible, men are also the driving factor.

The masculine men set moral codes for both men and women, they had values, they lead while the women follow. Just because women are attracted to me, does it mean I have to follow my lust every time?

Nobody is born good or bad. Nobody is born an alpha or a simp. The environment and what you're exposed to can lead to this. Since the amount of masculine and goal driven men keeps declining, what do you expect? Are women the cause of this too?. And don't forget, a woman or a man is not good by nature but by nurture. If everyone decides to go haywire, what do you think will happen? The men of nowadays are not setting their kids right. The men grow up to be pussy chasers and while the women grow up to be hoes to these men because of lack of strong masculine men to set strict moral codes. The thirst of men is what led to the downfall of men and societal collapse.