NewStats: 3,262,371 , 8,176,944 topics. Date: Monday, 02 June 2025 at 02:40 AM 5x506i

9PBLIVE:
Dijon to win at half-time was 10 odds.

screw lille.

They scored immediately after first half mate

Viking007:
Okay. One thing I can tell you is this thread has not churned out so many winners like we've been having since the goal via shot started trending. That's the undisputed fact. Even legendary trolls don't troll anymore, everyone is now hustling.

Cc tolu121

PAOK Vs Athens be giving someone hearth attack ... Why I add this game

Aston (ah home), with over £140m worth of players, has 0 shot on target while City 11.

9PBLIVE:
Cc tolu121

lol ,if e strt to troll na u go begain yab am,beta leave tolu alone

9PBLIVE:
Aston (ah home), with over £140m worth of players, has 0 shot on target while City 11.

Boom Goal, shot on target confirmed

israelp:
lol ,if e strt to troll na u go begain yab am,beta leave tolu alone

Exactly.
Dude is currently waiting for FA Cup, not time for shits.

Chidexter:


Boom Goal, shot on target confirmed

Ope o, aston villa to score don enter.

not suprised they scored.

amabengroup2:


Bet9ja finally did the right thing.
My winning have been confirmed.

God for you

Don't spend it all at once though

toseen7:

Sterling is on the bench...

I didn’t check the lineup, would have picked Aguero...refund

nawa o chi chi i nr win today alabi wot did i do u na

Please guys

How long does it take to complete a withdrawal from bet9ja?

Anyone??

Ayaba444:
Please guys
How long does it take to complete a withdrawal from bet9ja?
Anyone??

u neva collect b4? 48hrs na

man city multi correct score 4-0/0-4 and others, na 3odds o.. fear no gree me

Ayaba444:
Please guys

How long does it take to complete a withdrawal from bet9ja?

Anyone??

Upto 6hours.

Ayaba444:
Please guys

How long does it take to complete a withdrawal from bet9ja?

Anyone??

Under 24hrs.

Ayaba444:
Please guys

How long does it take to complete a withdrawal from bet9ja?

Anyone??

2 to 3 hours una go see your money kongrat

israelp:
u neva collect b4? 48hrs na

I never still collect

Na my guy i dey ask for

Viking007:
Under 24hrs.

See how people dey tag me.. Boss Viking sef

Oluwa when me sef go collect standard money too??
Make i bless men dem

Very soon my son, very soon

Ayaba444:

I never still collect
Na my guy i dey ask for

oya nee down lemme pray for u

Ayaba444:

See how people dey tag me.. Boss Viking sef
Oluwa when me sef go collect standard money too?? Make i bless men dem
Very soon my son, very soon

congrats you fit bless my bet9ja still .. 3676606 Jerryboy1993

Lille sha.

Better days ahead...

Viking007, can you cook 8 -10 odds for me tomorrow? Wana throw in a substantial amount. Please..

Alexistaiwo when you go post games na

israelp:
totally wrong,nt true n incorrect...let me educate u,goal via shoot option has many emeimes

1.goal via freekick
2.goal via heading
3.goal via penalty
4.goal others part of d body

dats 5possible option,..more dangerous than 1x2,oh and i forget goalless draw

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

jerrythafinisher:

congrats you fit bless my bet9ja still ..
3676606 Jerryboy1993

My gee
No be collect o

Na my guy collect nii

Our turn dey come

israelp:
oya nee down lemme pray for u

I'm neeing oo

cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the

chop knuckle

Ayaba444:

I'm neeing oo

in d name of alabi,e wife and kids b free!!

Excuse me please

Does bet9ja delete tickets??

Because there are some of my games running since the 4th of this month and i cant find them on my betlist

Help o biko

cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

You dey mind am? E sure me say he dey part of those wey no want make people eyes open to that market make bet9ja no commot am or bastardize the odds

Ayaba444:
Excuse me please

Does bet9ja delete tickets??

Because there are some of my games running since the 4th of this month and i cant find them on my betlist

Help o biko

are you using the old-bet9ja site

cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

I love your analysis.

The tendency of losing with goal type method (shot) will only increase if you accumulate so many games.

A ticket of 10 games split into 3 tickets has a very high tendency of breaking even. At least 1 ticket would likely come out green if all doesn't come out.

I like being around data analysts. Permit me to ask if you are a statistician?