NewStats: 3,261,347 , 8,173,742 topics. Date: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 10:09 PM 4pz5s6z3e3g |
You Say The Earth Is 6000 Years Old, Yet You Enjoy Petroleum Products (9654 Views)
CatfishBilly: 11:03am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Shey you see? Stop reading your news from Christian apologist websites. Here you go, you can thank me later http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm |
cooncudee(m): 11:03am On Apr 11, 2017 |
buffalowings: and your point is? did I justify the killings? I made a correction- he didn't tear them apart, he cursed them. There's distinction between the two. and My question is 'does the fact that the man is cruel make him less intelligent than the op. |
felixomor: 11:04am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: I pity you. "London hammer" is even on wikipedia. Go and learn. |
DoctorAlien(m): 11:06am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor: 1 Like |
CatfishBilly: 11:09am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Shey you see where they write for there say na Christian creationist that bought the hammer? He has refused to release it for independent verification by different groups of scientists. The age being quoted is the age of the rock it was found in because he refused to release it for verifications. Don't be biased bro. 1 Like |
cooncudee(m): 11:11am On Apr 11, 2017 |
Junia: Lol, was that the bone of contention? Let me remind you Did god forcefully interfered with peoples lifes in the bible? regardly if they are its 'offsprings/creations' or not? |
felixomor: 11:12am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: Guy, your descent is complete. Your argument is very dead. I thought ur argument was on "Christian website only" Please show some integrity for yourself. What about the 27,000 year old snails nko? I pirry u ![]() |
Re: You Say The Earth Is 6000 Years Old, Yet You Enjoy Petroleum Products by Nobody: 11:16am On Apr 11, 2017 |
cooncudee:No .. He just called His children to do things for Him. |
Re: You Say The Earth Is 6000 Years Old, Yet You Enjoy Petroleum Products by Nobody: 11:18am On Apr 11, 2017 |
Two NL peeps I don't ve much conversation with are 1) Jù.nia 2) Felix |
CatfishBilly: 11:20am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Okay then, we have settled the hammer issue ![]() ![]() I'll get back to you on the snails. |
felixomor: 11:21am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: Sorry. The London Hammer is in a Museum as we speak. It has been analysed by many scientists. You lied BiGLY ![]() |
CatfishBilly: 11:26am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:It's in a museum so that creationists like your self can masturbateeeee yourselves into a coma while viewing it and at the same time shielding it from the scientific community who will render his claims invalid. As for your snails. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_3.html http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Living_snails_were_C14_dated_at_2,300_and_27,000_years_old Read up bro, that's what doctors do. 2 Likes |
felixomor: 11:32am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly:Firstly, many intelligent scientists are creationists. But your brain thinks that once you are a creationist, it means you are not scientific. Wrong You have been dragged massively to the extent that your logic is failing you. I thought u just said the man who bought it failed to release it for verification. You Lied Again..... ![]() Wikipedia even has the names of at least 2 scientists who analyzed it..... Again I pirry u. The funniest part is after you are exposed, u start saying "doctor this, doctor that"... Mschewww..... |
cooncudee(m): 11:35am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: 11:39am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:You and who is dragging? I've been posting links here that you've not done anything to refute. However, for years Baugh refused to allow the hammer to be C14 dated. In an exchange of letters between creationist Walter Brown and Jim Lippard in Creation/Evolution, Brown (1989) suggested that the hammer handle has not been dated because Baugh had three "understandable" conditions for dating it: that it be done with mass spectrometry, that Baugh be present during the dating, and that someone else pay for it. However, Lippard countered that no one has objected to the first two conditions, and that Baugh had no right to expect the third, since he's the one making the claims, and thus the one obligated to back them up. Even so, even after others offered to pay for the dating, Baugh declined to have it done. As Day (1991) wrote in a follow up letter: "Far from being 'understandable,' Baugh's stipulations seem to be little short of evasive tactics... If four years have gone by and nothing has happened, I think it is safe to conclude that Baugh has no interest whatsoever in determining the truth about his marvelous hammer."That's from the link I posted. A research article. What are the names of the 2 scientists on the Wikipedia article? Is it this same one? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Hammer Oya debunk my snail story. |
analice107: 11:43am On Apr 11, 2017 |
realmindz:Thank you Lord for the Grace to ignore fools. |
felixomor: 11:46am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: What is your problem with appealing to authority that you are always doing? Do you know how many people who studied that Hammer before it was bought by Baugh? Guy just leave, You know nothing about carbon dating. it. |
realmindz: 11:53am On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: You just have to give up on these guys ![]() Bringing up some shi.t from some quack conspiracy theorists calling them scientific claims. Their understanding of science is rly shallow. Their underestimation is worrisome that I wonder if we are in the same fragment of time, some people are rly living the bronze age |
CatfishBilly: 11:55am On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Refute it naa, bros. That's all I ask of you. Stop with the ad hominem and pointing out fallacies, just refute them. When did a research article become an authority? How many people studied it? You've shifted goalposts again, you didn't name the 2 scientists from the Wikipedia article, it's now how many scientists that studied it You still haven't said anything about the snails. |
felixomor: 12:01pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: What is to be refuted? That u failed to it that a hammer was found, dated, analyzed by a scientific work, and even the scientists were even mentioned on Wikipedia... Because the fact doesnt sit with your agenda, u started argument here and there. At first, u said it was only on Christian website Then you switched lanes Now you are telling me to refute your points.... Mscheeeewwww. The funny part is you never even knew about these things before coming to this thread. Abeg move jor. |
sonofthunder: 12:04pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
who said the earth is 6000years old... Source?
|
realmindz: 12:06pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
adepeter26: true, they lack logical approaches to issues, beat around the bush with zero point. Their strategy is to rush into threads, divert topics and make noise |
CatfishBilly: 12:08pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Which scientists I've asked you again. This is a quote from a scientist in the article and THE ONLY scientist quote. J.R. Cole states: "The stone is real, and it looks impressive to someone unfamiliar with geological processes. How could a modern artifact be stuck in Ordovician rock? The answer is that the concretion itself is not Ordovician. Minerals in solution can harden around an intrusive object dropped in a crack or simply left on the ground if the source rock (in this case, reportedly Ordovician) is chemically soluble."Make I no add poor reading comprehension to your list of problems. I don't have to know about them. You lied and I debunked them easily. |
otemanuduno: 12:08pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly:Tell this to wilgrea7 and he would speak as if website contents are written there by angels and not humans. ![]() LOL, na yoke I dey o ![]() |
realmindz: 12:09pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
Junia: your spelling of fossil fuels exposes your little knowledge in that field.. Case closed with you Next time, don't debate what you dont know |
felixomor: 12:11pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: I guess you didnt see "the stone is real" ![]() Or its pretence on your part as usual. Its now even obvious that u dont even understand the story. U dont even know why the hammer is a mystery. Just leave here mehn. This is a big goof |
otemanuduno: 12:14pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Now I am beginning to believe Atum more if indeed the hammer was dated 140million years ago. Realmindz, Lordcenturion and many others who have been following the DOCTUFOS OF TRUTH could bear me witness how all through the write-ups, the homo erectuses make use of hammers, knives, swords and many other devices which we earlier thought were invented few years ago. Pls give me the link to this thing. I have to read it up and know me. Thanks Felixmor. You have helped my new reality by this thing you just mentioned here. |
CatfishBilly: 12:15pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Sure, stone is real, hammer is real, did you read about how the hammer got into the rock in the same quote or you have selective blindness? |
felixomor: 12:20pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: Keep quiet please. Stop insulting your ignorance Thats just one of the ways they thought it happened. But its a scientific impossibility. Because the age of the carbon dating of the rock automatically makes it impossible. And even if it is correct, it means carbon dating is flawed because that rock is younger than the estimated age of the hammer. You see that You have just been fooling yourself. You thought it was the carbon dating of the hammer that was the secret. |
Re: You Say The Earth Is 6000 Years Old, Yet You Enjoy Petroleum Products by Nobody: 12:25pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly:This is murder.. You wicked oo |
CatfishBilly: 12:26pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
felixomor:Nigga how many times am I going to tell you that what was dated was the rock, Baugh refused to release the hammer to anybody that would his claims. He stored it in his own museum where he wankssss to it 5 times daily. Do you know that his fellow creationists like Answer in Genesis hate him because of that? They say he has muddled the water for everybody and made creationism a joke. Read, man |
felixomor: 12:30pm On Apr 11, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: That hammer cannot be older than the age of human civilization.... You still dont get the point. Guy just leave here... Abeg |
Can One Go A Day Without Sinning?
(Go Up)
Sections: How To . 61 Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland. |