NewStats: 3,259,281 , 8,169,730 topics. Date: Saturday, 24 May 2025 at 04:02 PM 294n3

April 19, 2016

Translated by Eugenia

During the fighting in Aleppo, the Russian pilots tested a self-navigating aerial bomb capable of destroying any modern armored vehicle. Designed by Russian military engineers, modernized action elements SPBE-D for the aerial bomb RBK-500 are capable of selecting a target and destroying it with one hit.

СПБЭ-Д
[img]http://thesaker.is/wp-content/s/2016/04/%D0%A1%D0%9F%D0%91%D0%AD-%D0%94.jpg[/img]
The SPBE-D system in action
“Syria became a polygon for testing the Russian weapon systems. From the beginning of the Syrian campaign, this was the third use of SPBE-D. In the first case, it was evident that the ammunition was “old” – manufactured in the Soviet time. Today, judging by the new photos that shows unexploded ammunition, the Air-Cosmic Force used their new modifications” – said the newspaper “Isvestia” siting a well-known military expert Aleksey Rumm.

Cluster bomb idea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrViSg60U9E

The action elements SPBE-D are positioned inside the aerial bomb and separated from it after the bomb is dropped gliding over the battlefield on parachutes. Then, using the built-in detection systems, they find appropriate targets and hit them. A target is destroyed by a so-called shock nucleus – a copper ingot that accelerates to the speed of 2 km/sec. The enemy armored vehicles are hit at the top, which is the least protected: with the ammunition capable of penetrating armor 150-160 mm thick, that ensures the destruction of the target.

“No modern tank, personnel carrier, or reinforced infrastructure object of the enemy can survive a hit of that “nucleus”. The RBK-500 SPBE-D was first used in 2008 in Georgia-Ossetia conflict in South Ossetia. At that time, the Russian multiple launch rocket systems “Smerch” (Tornado) equipped with the action elements SPBE-D destroyed an ammunition storage facilities of the Georgian Army. In Syria, the ammunition is used from the bombers Su-24” – explained the Editor of the journal “National Arsenal” and military expert Victor Mourakhovsky.

Cluster bomb re-modified idea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igg6hQQ0EkM
Importantly, SPBE-D, albeit extremely effective, cost less than guided aerial bombs and rockets that are traditionally used to combat armored vehicles. This allows for the use of this ammunition not only for the destruction of the armored units and infrastructure but also for saving money on expensive ammunition.

War war everywhere. Man is ready and willing to destroy his fellows over power and fame hiding behind freedom, religion, for country and for loyalty. Man is the only problem of man.

delishpot:
War war everywhere. Man is ready and willing to destroy his fellows over power and fame hiding behind freedom, religion, for country and for loyalty. Man is the only problem of man.

I believe you.

Congratulations to Russia for catching up. The US have been deploying it since 1998

Next please

Missy89:
Congratulations to Russia for catching up. The US have been deploying it since 1998

Next please

WHich catching up.. The concept was manufactured in the Soviet time... Where is it catching up ? Or it's the U.S that copied it and did junk as usual. After the fall of the soviet.. How many Battle has Russia partake in ?

The concept in U.S is different. The cluster bombs is not the same with this one.. This one seeks target and destroy. Unlike U.S cluster bomb that just destroy everything in that area and its the reason cluster bomb was banned by nations who ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which was adopted in Ireland,Dublin.

This concept is not the U.S... SO U.S need catching up here. You don'tread article.. The first video shows cluster bombing and the second is SPBE-D system that seeks and destroy. So open your eyes very well.

See another video of Cluster bomb bellow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXT9o9jWxZw


The SPBE-D uses parachute system to seek target before destroying it. Very different from Cluster..

Missy89:
Congratulations to Russia for catching up. The US have been deploying it since 1998

Next please

In fact,Pentagon has declined to make use of it in recent years cause the explosion has higher rates of civilian casualties,also some of the submunitions once scattered do not explode until later years which ends up killing people.

Some dollop head comes here and claims rubbish.

delishpot:
War war everywhere. Man is ready and willing to destroy his fellows over power and fame hiding behind freedom, religion, for country and for loyalty. Man is the only problem of man.

Gbam. I don't know what is appealing to some folks about war ?. War is not the answer. WAR, WHAT'S GOOD FOR , ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

scully95:



WHich catching up.. The concept was manufactured in the Soviet time... Where is it catching up ? Or it's the U.S that copied it and did junk as usual. After the fall of the soviet.. How many Battle has Russia partake in ?

The concept in U.S is different. The cluster bombs is not the same with this one.. This one seeks target and destroy. Unlike U.S cluster bomb that just destroy everything in that area and its the reason cluster bomb was banned by nations who ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which was adopted in Ireland,Dublin.

This concept is not the U.S... SO U.S need catching up here. You don'tread article.. The first video shows cluster bombing and the second is SPBE-D system that seeks and destroy. So open your eyes very well.

See another video of Cluster bomb bellow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXT9o9jWxZw


The SPBE-D uses parachute system to seek target before destroying it. Very different from Cluster..

Lol.

arguing with you is a waste of time

go and look up what CBU-105 and CBU-97 is.

They were originally designed during the cold war to destroy soviet tanks.

The Russians even copied America's visual aid

Missy89:
Congratulations to Russia for catching up. The US have been deploying it since 1998

Next please

nothing hurts ruskies troll than being hammered by missy89 buhahaha

ValerianSteel:
In fact,Pentagon has declined to make use of it in recent years cause the explosion has higher rates of civilian casualties,also some of the submunitions once scattered do not explode until later years which ends up killing people.

Some dollop head comes here and claims rubbish.

The military developed another variant. CBU-107 for ive attack. Instead of bomblets, it carries metal penetrator rods to prevent collateral damage.

Russia bootlickers will tell us the Russians have it first when they get one in 2045

Missy89:



The military developed another variant. CBU-107 for ive attack. Instead of bomblets, it carries metal penetrator rods to prevent collateral damage.

Russia bootlickers will tell us the Russians have it first when they get one in 2045

He even claims the concept was manufactured in the Soviet era,how come they just developed it in 2015/2016.SMH at Kremlin's clown.

Missy89:


Lol.

arguing with you is a waste of time

go and look up what CBU-105 and CBU-97 is.

They were originally designed during the cold war to destroy soviet tanks.

The Russians even copied America's visual aid

You see where you always copy and use junks. Where has it ever been used ? mention one real war or battle it has been used and successful ? Russia has used it twice.. In Georgia and Syria... This is where propaganda of we build this, we build that. Fear mongering, does not work here..

There is difference between having the concept. Anothing thing is getting the concept out.. ANother thing is actually testing it in a real battle field and get success. What U.S has is cluster bombs. Again cluster.. ok

Which part has U.S been ? Sowhen you talk be updated ok.

scully95:


You see where you always copy and use junks. Where has it ever been used ? mention one real war or battle it has been used and successful ? Russia has used it twice.. In Georgia and Syria... This is where propaganda of we build this, we build that. Fear mongering, does not work here..

There is difference between having the concept. Anothing thing is getting the concept out.. ANother thing is actually testing it in a real battle field and get success. What U.S has is cluster bombs. Again cluster.. ok

Which part has U.S been ? Sowhen you talk be updated ok.

Lol. more useless rant from a dull propagandist

Now educated yourself here


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmFwPyfEAWo

More:



http://www.economist.com/node/15391218

excerpts

On April 2nd 2003, during the second Gulf war, a hundred or so Iraqi armoured vehicles approached a far smaller American reconnaissance unit south of Baghdad. Responding to a call for help, a B-52 bomber attacked the first 30 or so vehicles in the column with a single, historic . It dropped two new CBU-105 bombs, and the result shocked the soldiers of both sides—and, soon enough, military observers everywhere.

While falling, the CBU-105 bombs popped open, each releasing ten submunitions which were slowed by parachutes. Each of these used mini rockets to spin and eject outward four discs the size of ice-hockey pucks.

The 80 free-falling discs from the pair of bombs then scanned the ground with lasers and heat-detecting infra-red sensors to locate armoured vehicles. Those discs that identified a target exploded dozens of metres up. The blast propelled a tangerine-sized slug of copper down into the target, destroying it with the impact and the accompanying shrapnel. The soldiers in the 70 vehicles farther back in the column surrendered immediately.

Missy89:


Lol. more useless rant from a dull propagandist

Now educated yourself here


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmFwPyfEAWo

Again..You see where you love to drink propaganda.. Can you show me the reminants bomb in that video ? I have watched that video 100 times. This is Vblog video propaganda.

You saw the remnants of the bomb in the video I shared above.. It showed the tracking piece with Parrashut on it flying down. Your video honestly only explained the concept. And that is just what I have told you before.. The concept or the ideology. It has never been used anywhere and successful. ode sharing Vblog propaganda and still your normal copy and paste rubbish.

Ok.


Can you please share a video like the one bellow to confirm it..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igg6hQQ0EkM

Not your foolish and very backward propaganda. I hate it when you share propaganda shlt ok.
See it for yourselfin Syria. It landed.. U.S again used Cluster Bomb which is banned. It will just destroy the whole area..

For a example it can destroy an area the size of footballfield..

THis one is differnent.. it was banned because it leads to more civilian death.

Here is a different concept.

If Russia used cluster bomb in Pamyra, all the Accient building will be down by now.

scully95:




Again..You see where you love to drink propaganda.. Can you show me the reminants bomb in that video ? I have watched that video 100 times. This is Vblog video propaganda.

You saw the remnants of the bomb in the video I shared above.. It showed the tracking piece with Parrashut on it flying down. Your video honestly only explained the concept. And that is just what I have told you before.. The concept or the ideology. It has never been used anywhere and successful. ode sharing Vblog propaganda and still your normal copy and paste rubbish.

Ok.

another dull response from a Kremlin clown

More articles for you to read

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/08/19/hln.terror.sensor.fuzed/

excerpts

The result, according to U.S. Air Force officials, was the first ever combat use of a new weapon, the CBU-105 or sensor fuzed weapon. Knox said the weapon performed very well, noting that "from a high altitude, a nearby B-52 got the target coordinates and released two of the weapons toward the leading edge of the Iraqi tank column. The entire first third of the Iraqi tank column was decimated. The Iraqis in the back of the tank column immediately stopped and surrendered to the Marines."

The sensor fuzed weapon, or CBU 105, is a high-altitude, high-tech, weapon that can destroy precise targets in an area larger than a football field from as far away as 5 to 10 miles.

Essentially, the bomb uses infrared sensors to locate heat coming from vehicles and laser technology to fire deadly projectiles at specific enemy targets, such as tanks.

Missy89:


another dull response from a Kremlin clown

More articles for you to read

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/08/19/hln.terror.sensor.fuzed/

excerpts

The result, according to U.S. Air Force officials, was the first ever combat use of a new weapon, the CBU-105 or sensor fuzed weapon. Knox said the weapon performed very well, noting that "from a high altitude, a nearby B-52 got the target coordinates and released two of the weapons toward the leading edge of the Iraqi tank column. The entire first third of the Iraqi tank column was decimated. The Iraqis in the back of the tank column immediately stopped and surrendered to the Marines."

The sensor fuzed weapon, or CBU 105, is a high-altitude, high-tech, weapon that can destroy precise targets in an area larger than a football field from as far away as 5 to 10 miles.

Essentially, the bomb uses infrared sensors to locate heat coming from vehicles and laser technology to fire deadly projectiles at specific enemy targets, such as tanks.

You see your life. Continue sharing from the same establishiment wont proof any point. You saw the video i shared or the reminants. This is not someone typing rubbish to continue telling lies. As if anythign CNN or the whole media establishment says is ok. They are part of the system to sell junks to their puppets and puppets too continue to believe in junks..

Now lets assume yes.. Can you pls send a video confirmation of where it was used and reminants like I shared in the video above ?

If the one U.S has is used in Palmyra, all the accient building would be grounded by now..

This is seek and destroy not Cluster bombing everything that stands in that area.


Again send me video.. Or keep quiet foroever.


If you copy and paste anything you are just fooling yourself.... Ok.
Send video of the reminants..like the one i shared above or shut up forever.

see the video again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igg6hQQ0EkM

scully95:


You see your life. Continue sharing from the same establishiment wont proof any point. You saw the video i shared or the reminants. This is not someone typing rubbish to continue telling lies. As if anythign CNN or the whole media establishment says is ok. They are part of the system to sell junks to their puppets and puppets too continue to believe in junks..

Now lets assume yes.. Can you pls send a video confirmation of where it was used and reminants like I shared in the video above ?

If the one U.S has is used in Palmyra, all the accient building would be grounded by now..

This is seek and destroy not Cluster bombing everything that stands in that area.


Again send me video.. Or keep quiet foroever.


If you copy and paste anything you are just fooling yourself.... Ok.
Send video of the reminants..like the one i shared above or shut up forever.

see the video again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igg6hQQ0EkM

Don't answer that boy (missy89) again, his head is truly full of fake information. You see that he can't back anything up with real video. Naturally anywhere this type of missile is used, you must have the remaining part of it flying down because it seeks target and fire that target while the remaining part will fly down with Parachute attached to it as seen in the Syrian video. But the boy missy89 cannot find any video of where it's used in Iraq because what was used is cluster missiles which is banned.

The boy is comparing it to cluster bomb which will just blow everything in that area off. The Russian concept is real and the pin-point target is destroyed.

scully95:


You see your life. Continue sharing from the same establishiment wont proof any point. You saw the video i shared or the reminants. This is not someone typing rubbish to continue telling lies. As if anythign CNN or the whole media establishment says is ok. They are part of the system to sell junks to their puppets and puppets too continue to believe in junks..

Now lets assume yes.. Can you pls send a video confirmation of where it was used and reminants like I shared in the video above ?

If the one U.S has is used in Palmyra, all the accient building would be grounded by now..

This is seek and destroy not Cluster bombing everything that stands in that area.

Again send me video.. Or keep quiet foroever.

If you copy and paste anything you are just fooling yourself.... Ok.
Send video of the reminants..like the one i shared above or shut up forever.

You are a complete 1diot. The idea of making amateur war footage became popular few years ago because of the internet. There was nothing like YouTube during the Iraq war and all the war footage were from embedded journalists.

So CNN went back in time and planted the story because of your thread?

This is an excerpt from the Human rights watch report about the military conduct in Iraq that was released in 2003

The U.S. Air Force dropped the CBU-105 Sensor Fuzed Weapon for the first time in combat. This weapon, eighty-eight of which were used, employs the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser. It contains ten BLU-108 submunitions, each of which releases four skeet warheads, the size of hockey pucks, with infrared sensors. To reduce the dud rate, the submunitions have self-destruct mechanisms. Human Rights Watch visited one site outside of al-Hilla where the United States had dropped CBU-105s on an isolated field of artillery. No unexploded skeets were visible although some could have been hidden in the tall grass. The CBU-105 Sensor Fuzed Weapon is a potentially significant development that attempts to address key humanitarian problems associated with cluster weapons: accuracy of both the munition and sub munition and dud rates.

Keep waiting for the "video on the reminants" Whatever that means.

And whats up with the ................ at the end of every sentence? Are you a bot?

Chai! Someone still copying from CNN in this modern day to proof a point. I laugh in Swahili, kids playing with keyboard need to grow up

Missy89:


Lol.

arguing with you is a waste of time

go and look up what CBU-105 and CBU-97 is.

They were originally designed during the cold war to destroy soviet tanks.

The Russians even copied America's visual aid

LMFBAO!!!!!!! It's the exact same concept, the Visual Aid is exactly the same, sucks that I can't read the Russian Language, it's probably the same description as the Americans.

jnhmaxxwell:


Don't answer that boy (missy89) again, his head is truly full of fake information. You see that he can't back anything up with real video. Naturally anywhere this type of missile is used, you must have the remaining part of it flying down because it seeks target and fire that target while the remaining part will fly down with Parachute attached to it as seen in the Syrian video. But the boy missy89 cannot find any video of where it's used in Iraq because what was used is cluster missiles which is banned.

The boy is comparing it to cluster bomb which will just blow everything in that area off. The Russian concept is real and the pin-point target is destroyed.

The difference between the American and Russian Targeting systems it that they are designed to explode once their done targeting, we all know how Americans don't want any of the equipment to end up in the wrong hands.

CocaineDreamz:


The difference between the American and Russian Targeting systems it that they are designed to explode once their done targeting, we all know how Americans don't want any of the equipment to end up in the wrong hands.

No, let me explain the concept for you. The Russian uses shtora or a similar jamming system on T90. This uses an intense IR floodlight to shina back at the missiles trajectory and blind the control unit to make the missile go out of control and ground itself.

For a wired ATGMs, Tube launched, Optically tracked, Wire guided missile. I guess the important part here is - Optically tracked. I guess that, simply speaking, it IR "blinds" those binoculars the operator uses to track the target. The system sends error data via the wire so the missile misses the target.

Wire-guided SACLOS missiles use an IR flare at the base of the missile to allow the launch/control unit to identify the position of the missile in relation to the target while it is in flight. If the launcher gets blinded by an IR floodlight, it will lose track of the missile's position and be unable to give it any accurate corrections. This in turn causes the missile to go loco and do pretty much what you can see in the video I shared earlier today or what is seen on T90.

Now upgrade this to Nuclear level, the same logic can be applied and is what SCULLY95 is lecturing those kids that knows nothing about military hardware. Guided ICBMs or unguided is the easiest to kill because you have not only Shtora here, you have other powerful Russian jamming capabilities to deceive it or even turn it off.

scully95:



WHich catching up.. The concept was manufactured in the Soviet time... Where is it catching up ? Or it's the U.S that copied it and did junk as usual. After the fall of the soviet.. How many Battle has Russia partake in ?

The concept in U.S is different. The cluster bombs is not the same with this one.. This one seeks target and destroy. Unlike U.S cluster bomb that just destroy everything in that area and its the reason cluster bomb was banned by nations who ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which was adopted in Ireland,Dublin.

This concept is not the U.S... SO U.S need catching up here. You don'tread article.. The first video shows cluster bombing and the second is SPBE-D system that seeks and destroy. So open your eyes very well.

See another video of Cluster bomb bellow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXT9o9jWxZw


The SPBE-D uses parachute system to seek target before destroying it. Very different from Cluster..

GBAM!

Appleyard:
GBAM!

You are now acting stup1d like scully. What a shame

You should know better

Missy89:


You are now acting stup1d like scully. What a shame

You should know better

huh! :-/ Am stupid because i said ''gbam?'' Well, that's alright. But do you know you are increasingly sounding grots? Ok o.

No vex! Bye!

Appleyard:
huh! :-/ Am stupid because i said ''gbam?'' Well, that's alright. But do you know you are increasingly sounding grots? Ok o.

No vex! Bye!

No offence.

Stop encouraging stupidity however. This is not a competition