NewStats: 3,259,436 , 8,170,110 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 May 2025 at 01:03 AM 6e1b4a

Akpabio, one of the most wicked and corrupt ruler in Nigeria

😁😁😁 Natasha is struggling like a man that is about to drown....I bet she doesn't have any shred of evidence despite her numerous allegations....she has been silent for weeks now only to petition the IGP and AGF...what stops her from approaching the courts with issible evidence?

Cherrybae:
Why sue them to court. Honestly I wonder who is advising this woman.

She is really killing her career. No single evidence for anything just allegations and allegations.

Na wa oooo

She is loved by her people. She is not killing her political carrier.

No week without Natasha

mekuso89:
This woman is killing her career but who am I to advice her

Someone is trying to clear her name .. u are talking ooposite

My take away from all this is that this woman doesn't have tangible evidence to all her allegations. Why petition the AGN and IGP, when you can conveniently sue with the evidence you said you have. Also in her petition, she seems to agree to have with Sandra Duru only that she's claiming blackmail. If so, sue Duru.. she's be begging to be sued for sometime now.

Celestialsword:


https://dailypost.ng/2025/05/19/natasha-files-fresh-petition-drags-akpabio-sandra-duru-to-igp-agf/

I was thinking she will head to court!!!!!
Wetin concern IGP for this matter?

moodyguy:
Someone is trying to clear her name .. u are talking ooposite

Has she been able to come up with one evidence?

mekuso89:
This woman is killing her career but who am I to advice her

She's fighting back and not the other way round.

We need women like her in position of authority

Natashism: the act of prostituting from one controversy to another without following any to the end or supplying evidence on claims made.

Supply evidence in the court of public opinion where trial was initiated. They didn't.

File a case in court and present evidence. No.

Okay, file evidence in senate petition. They filed affidavit.

What kind of law are they teaching?

There is an organized gang-up against Natasha

Godjone:
Akpabio , Wike and Tinubu three most dangerous people in Nigeria - Sahara reporters

was there a time in the history of Nigeria that people never suffered. I blame the one clamping to be una supreme god who claim he has all the powers to change things but never do anything.

DrAda:
It's exhausting reading about this duo. What exactly is the end game here?

season film wey never reach middle, you are using " exhausting"

No way, women ing women have come to stay

Natasha is just trying to save face in the midst of Dr Duru allegations.

Why's Natasha dragging Akpabio and Duru to IGP and Attorney General?

Dr Duru said you should sue her to court if you (Natasha) feel offended. Natasha couldn't approach court. When has IGP or AGF become court?

Now we know who's lying.

bixton:




I was thinking she will head to court!!!!!
Wetin concern IGP for this matter?

Does she have any evidence to take to court? Everything is online fight for sympathy.

Cherrybae:
Why sue them to court. Honestly I wonder who is advising this woman.

She is really killing her career. No single evidence for anything just allegations and allegations.

Na wa oooo

. it's called suspense she has to consider the options before deciding everything that woman said it's likely to be true if not by now Akpabio i know would have been threatening fire & brimstones, they would had her arrested by now.

They just using different headlines to distarct us from the bad governance

Thanks for this....they can both perish in their childish war.....

Spursy:
Please can we not talk about this matter again?
Its Now stale and boring. Allow them do whatever they like, it's their problem not ours.
We are indifferent to issues like this especially now that the hardship is excruciatingly bitting.

Cherrybae:
Why sue them to court. Honestly I wonder who is advising this woman.

She is really killing her career. No single evidence for anything just allegations and allegations.

Na wa oooo

It’s astonishing how confidently you speak from a place of ignorance. Taking a matter to court is not some reckless move—it’s a legal right exercised when someone seeks justice, especially when other channels fail. If you don’t understand how the legal system works, you should probably stay silent instead of exposing how uninformed you are.

As for your baseless claim that there's 'no evidence'—are you part of the legal team? Have you seen the filings? No? Then you’re in no position to judge. Allegations are not meaningless—they trigger investigations, and that's how the law functions.

Instead of questioning who is advising her, maybe ask yourself who is advising you to speak so recklessly. You’re not helping any cause—just amplifying noise without substance.

Imagine what 5 minutes humility would have covered up for this woman when she was discipline. I know my right is what brought here here wasting money and time unnecessarily.

To IGP
OR
To the COURT?
What's All these shenanigans about,na?
Who is Fooling Who here?
Over to the Social Media, gaulibles audiences!
Radarada!
So,this is what Nigerian Masses Are Spending 💰 over N30 Millions on, every Month,abi?

Tareq1105:
Natasha is just trying to save face in the midst of Dr Duru allegations.

Why's Natasha dragging Akpabio and Duru to IGP and Attorney General?

Dr Duru said you should sue her to court if you (Natasha) feel offended. Natasha couldn't approach court. When has IGP or AGF become court?

Now we know who's lying.

Your comment is a prime example of loud ignorance packaged as opinion. First, petitioning the IGP and AGF is not a substitute for court—it’s a legal step in triggering investigation and criminal proceedings, especially when public officials or systemic abuse are involved. This isn’t social media drama; it’s called due process—look it up.

Second, your obsession with 'why Natasha is dragging Akpabio and Duru' ignores the possibility that credible claims exist involving both individuals. You're conveniently dismissing that because it doesn't fit your preferred narrative. If you’re so confident in who's lying, maybe try getting facts from legal filings, not WhatsApp forwards.

Third, ‘go to court’ is not a magic phrase that overrides legal strategy or security concerns. Not every case starts in court; criminal matters often begin with police reports and petitions to competent authorities. That's exactly what she's done—and your frustration clearly stems from the fact that she’s using the system in a way that threatens your biased assumptions.

In short, your logic is hollow, your argument is lazy, and your conclusion is worthless. Stick to facts or kindly step aside.

xjiggy:
My take away from all this is that this woman doesn't have tangible evidence to all her allegations. Why petition the AGN and IGP, when you can conveniently sue with the evidence you said you have. Also in her petition, she seems to agree to have with Sandra Duru only that she's claiming blackmail. If so, sue Duru.. she's be begging to be sued for sometime now.

Your interpretation of the situation appears deeply flawed and lacks an understanding of how legal processes actually function. Petitioning the AGN, IGP, or any relevant authority is a legitimate and often necessary step in escalating a matter to the appropriate institutions for investigation—especially when systemic abuse or criminal conduct is alleged.

Your repeated fixation on ‘tangible evidence’ without access to the case files, petitions, or testimonies is not only speculative but intellectually dishonest. You are not in a position to determine the weight or issibility of the evidence she may possess.

Furthermore, your assertion about her with Sandra Duru misrepresents the core issue. Acknowledging does not negate the possibility of blackmail. If anything, it reinforces the need for legal intervention, which she is now pursuing through the proper channels. Suing is not always the first step—especially when criminal elements are involved and safety concerns are present.

Finally, dismissing a serious claim simply because someone has ‘been begging to be sued’ trivializes the gravity of the matter. The law is not a tool for spectacle—it is a process, and she is within her rights to follow it as she deems fit. Until you've reviewed all facts, it would be wise to refrain from unfounded conclusions.

sailor2011:
😁😁😁 Natasha is struggling like a man that is about to drown....I bet she doesn't have any shred of evidence despite her numerous allegations....she has been silent for weeks now only to petition the IGP and AGF...what stops her from approaching the courts with issible evidence?

Your comment reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how the justice system works. First, approaching the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) is not a sign of weakness—it’s a procedural step in seeking justice within the bounds of law and due process.

Secondly, your assumption that she has ‘no shred of evidence’ is both baseless and irresponsible. Are you privy to the contents of her petition or the ongoing investigations? If not, then making such definitive claims only exposes your bias, not any truth.

Silence during a legal process is often a strategic and necessary measure—not a sign of defeat. Legal matters are not prosecuted in the media or public comment sections, but through properly filed complaints, investigations, and ultimately, the courts.

If you genuinely care about justice, you should be encouraging due process—not mocking someone for using it. Until you have access to facts, your ‘drowning’ analogy says more about your own desperation to discredit her than about the actual situation.

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s decision to file formal petitions with both the Inspector General of Police and the Attorney General of the Federation is a commendable and constitutionally appropriate step. In a democracy governed by the rule of law, serious allegations such as criminal conspiracy, defamation, cyberstalking, and threats to life must be subjected to thorough investigation by competent authorities—not dismissed or trivialized.

Her approach reflects a respect for due process and institutional ability. Rather than engaging in media theatrics or online battles, she has chosen the path of legal redress, which should be applauded. The petitions raise critical concerns about the misuse of digital platforms, abuse of power, and the personal safety of a sitting Senator. These are not matters to be ignored or politicized.

It is imperative that the IGP and AGF treat this matter with the seriousness it deserves. No public servant—male or female—should be subjected to targeted harassment or intimidation, especially for speaking out against misconduct. The law must apply equally, regardless of status or political affiliation.

Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done—and this petition is a crucial step in that direction.

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition to the IGP and AGF is a bold and lawful move. When faced with serious allegations like defamation, cyberstalking, and threats to life, the proper path is legal redress—not silence or online outrage.

This is about ability and justice. No one is above the law—not even powerful politicians. Her decision reflects respect for due process, and the authorities must act swiftly to investigate.

The law must protect those who speak truth to power.