Simeonee111: 8:06am On May 04 |
REBUTTAL TO Oby Ezekwesili’S EMOTIVE PROPAGANDA MASQUERADING AS A MEMO
Madam Ezekwesili, your desperate attempt to reframe Natasha Akpoti’s well-documented pattern of falsehood and political manipulation as a “cry for justice” is not only intellectually dishonest but also a gross insult to the intelligence of Nigerians and the integrity of our legal system.
Let’s be clear: for justice must be rooted in veritas—truth. What you are defending is not justice. It’s the weaponization of gender narratives and public sympathy to obstruct lawful inquiries and shield your political ally from the consequences of her own inconsistencies, contradictions, and complete lack of issible evidence.
You claim an incorruptible record, yet your actions now speak volumes: inserting yourself into an ongoing legislative probe to stir public sentiment and derail due process under the guise of activism. This is a classic case of obstruction of justice in spirit, and if not, in letter. If you were truly concerned about justice, you would advocate for facts, evidence, and procedure, and not emotional distractions or social media theatrics.
Madam, your role as a former public servant comes with a moral duty not to lend your voice to charades designed to manipulate the judiciary of public opinion. Your endorsement of a clearly discredited narrative bereft of verifiable proof is not activism; it is complicity.
No matter how many sentimental hashtags or “unwavering memos” you post, the law is not swayed by emotional blackmail or public posturing. It is guided by actus reus, mens rea, and prima facie evidence. And on all three fronts, Natasha Akpoti has woefully failed.
To the Nigerian people: the committee investigating these serious allegations must not be deliberately disrupted by individuals who exploit gender solidarity to shield political allies. No form of orchestrated interference or misplaced loyalty should be allowed to obstruct a lawful process grounded in truth, evidence, and justice. ( Though, its been adjourned indefinitely as Natasha exclaimed and celebrated )
Justice is not a gendered performance. It is a matter of fact, law, and conscience.
Respectfully,
A Defender of Due Process and the Dignity of Womanhood
Dr. Sandra C Duru
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A1rBoNsLT/?mibextid=WC7FNe
47 Likes 3 Shares 
|
EponObi(f): 8:08am On May 04 |
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on!  Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on  " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal  . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress
EponObi: This Sandra is a perfect match for Natasha. If I am Akpabio, I will distance myself; keep quiet while pulling strings behind scene. Sandra Duru has nothing to lose. Na Natasha be politician and senator. Don't underestimate how low Sandra will go. This saga is only starting and will get rough. I'm 100% sure this is only an opening and they have more damning allegation in the pipeline for Natasha. "Natasha bite more than she can chew."
99 Likes 15 Shares 
|
|
freeminded(m): 9:13am On May 04 |
Na wa ooo
|
Mitsurugi(m): 9:14am On May 04 |
This is what happens when stupid issues take the centre stage in a nation plagued with hunger and insecurity. We deserve our leaders
12 Likes 3 Shares |
DesChyko: 9:15am On May 04 |
Dr Duru, as a way of lending credence to the fact that you are not out for blackmail or on a payroll, you insinuated you did not know the Senate President or have any affiliations with the politicians. Fair enough.
How then is it that on your video, while trying to display the messages you allegedly received from Senator Natasha without your request, it clearly shows that you just missed a call from the Senate President, and you are a member of a Pro-Akpabio Whatsapp group?
Just the way the woman who spearheaded that sham of a recall has faded into oblivion, you would as well follow the same route and allow tax paying citizens to hold the government to .
30 Likes 8 Shares 
|
Antichristian2: 9:16am On May 04 |
Women's nuisance!
4 Likes |
SeeWahala: 9:20am On May 04 |
Okay, the show continues . . . It's not like we don't know this woman is working for APC
2 Likes |
Fiscus105(m): 9:22am On May 04 |
Time for Duru to catch out from oga gigolo. Keep it up. You too must shop from national cake.
6 Likes 2 Shares |
LibertyRep: 9:23am On May 04 |
Seems like many episodes will unfold.
The issue is simple and straightforward, na people just dey use English and emotions confuse themselves.
Natasha has the key to resolving all these; provide evidence of sexual harassment and see how 'sensible' people will descend on Akpabio.
Imagine if people had descended on Reno back then and it turned out to be a false alarm once bitten...
Enough of gender manipulation
34 Likes 1 Share |
|
|
DenreleDave(m): 9:25am On May 04 |
I can't believe that I read all that
100 Likes 1 Share |
shinealight(m): 9:26am On May 04 |
2 Likes 1 Share |
DenreleDave(m): 9:26am On May 04 |
Fiscus105:
Time for Duru to catch out from oga gigolo. Keep it up. You too must shop from national cake.
Ipb...... Tell Natasha to present evidence...
U keep reasoning like a. Mob dt u r
89 Likes 1 Share |
DenreleDave(m): 9:27am On May 04 |
DesChyko:
Dr Duru, as a way of lending credence to the fact that you are not out for blackmail or on a payroll, you insinuated you did not know the Senate President or have any affiliations with the politicians. Fair enough.
How then is it that on your video, while trying to display the messages you allegedly received from Senator Natasha without your request, it clearly shows that you just missed a call from the Senate President, and you are a member of a Pro-Akpabio Whatsapp group?
Just the way the woman who spearheaded that sham of a recall has faded into oblivion, you would as well follow the same route and allow tax paying citizens to hold the government to .
U av spoken like a headless mob all bcoz of Ur hatred from Akpabio and ignored the truth that Natasha needs to provide evidence of sexual stuff
90 Likes 1 Share |
DirtyGold: 9:28am On May 04 |
Justice is not a gendered performance. It is a matter of fact, law, and conscience.
What will really annoy me about this nonsense drama is that, if at the end of the day they come out to say that they have resolved it "as family and friends".
This matter needs to be adjudicated upon to the very end with someone getting punished... be it the acc or the accusee. Infact, the CJN should draft judges and mandate expedited hearings of this case.
What's tha business?
6 Likes |
ClearFlair: 9:29am On May 04 |
Senator Natasha should just ignore these people. They have been talking a lot with zero substance. Just a waste of time
2 Likes 1 Share |
asfrank(m): 9:31am On May 04 |
The write up is really on point, Oby should just take a back seat, or better still provide statement from January to date, proving no funds was transferred to her. Some things are simple to discredit if there's no truth in them.
12 Likes 1 Share |
emkz: 9:33am On May 04 |
Let's look at the additional layers.
1. Neither Natasha, Oby, nor Abiola has concretely denied the claims of being offered money to disrupt the senate hearing into her sexual allegations.
2. In her rebuttal, Natasha danced around the bush and ended up trying to cast aspersions on Professor Mgbeke and promised to respond soon.
3. The additional denial from Natasha's camp is that Mgbeke claimed not to have known Akpabio but that there was a record of Akpabio's name on her call log. Didn't Natasha also deny knowing Mgbeke until Mgbeke provided proof that Natasha squealed like a parrot on colos during recorded phone conversations about how she planned with Oby to disrupt senate hearing into her accusations?
What are the substantive issues to be addressed?
1. Mgbeke needs to supply evidence of how much Oby and Abiola were paid. We need bank details. I am sure Natasha may have sent such a receipt to Mgbeke considering how she spoke recklessly in that phone conversation.
2. Akpabio needs to supply CCTV of everything that happened in his house on that night December 8th, 2023. Onyekachi Nwaebonyi said Natasha was not with them when Akpabio gave a tour of his mansion. We need other witnesses to corroborate Natasha's claim of being with Akpabio alone.
3. Natasha has taken everyone on a circus by going to Arise News, Channels, Sky News, BBC and DW television. Anytime she is asked for proof, she gets riled up. Anytime she is reminded of the exact misconduct that led to her suspension, she tries to diminish it and redirect the conversation to her sexual allegations. It seems she is more interested in the circus than closure.
4. Arise News needs to come out and let us know if they sold an award to Natasha, and how much was received.
5. Mgbeke said she'd have an exclusive interview with CNN. We are aware that these interviews are paid for and do not come cheap. Can Mgbeke inform us on who would pay for her appearance?
How is this connected to other issues?
Folks, there is a pattern here.
During presidential election petitions, those who could not prove how they won elections they lost started throwing dirt; like double nomination of someone, phantom drug dealing by the person who defeated them, and so on. When the case was dying, around 27th August 2023, one of those who lost came up with a rant on Twitter than the person who won could not have attended Chicago State University and did not graduate from high school.
Then began a voyage to obtain a deposition from Chicago State University which ended up nullifying their claims. They still brought it, thinking they had a smoking gun, and filed it wrongly without properly authenticating it with the District Court of Illinois. Justice Emmanuel Agim JSC told them that. The other justices told them they couldn't introduce evidence on appeal. This indicated they were clearly unaware of judicial processes. Is this not familiar with someone who wrongly filed sexual harassment petition in the senate?
The judges at the tribunal asked petitioners if they expected the judges to manufacture evidence for them. They never told the judges how many votes they won the election. They hurled dirt, hoping something would stick. Natasha, we cannot manufacture evidence for your case. If you cannot supply evidence, it means you lied. It means you are more interested in the drama of soiling the senate president and the senate to get what you want than proving your claims. Your election versus erection letter proved it.
Since the same pattern of headless fighting was deployed in the presidential elections campaigns and the tribunal, including those who prosecuted their petitions on social media and traditional media instead of the courts; could it be that some people wish to reap political capital from this mess?
What I think transpired between you and Mgbeke
You probably reached out to Mgbeke to use her to do part of your dirty job. She started by bashing Akpabio on your behalf. She then asked you for a contractual agreement but you declined in order not to implicate yourself. From the chats you deleted, it could have been implicating materials you do not want seen. What did you delete?
What I suspect happened is that Mgbeke earned your trust by bashing Akpabio initially. I suspect you paid her. After earning your trust, you started talking carelessly, and she recorded you incase she needed to have something on you. She probably asked for more money and you refused. So others may have reached out to her or she may have reached out to them to say she had information to bury you. This may have led to her live video.
What I see here is that Mgbeke is a smart businesswoman, PR consultant, and probably a smarter blackmailer. She clearly outwitted you because you have not controverted her evidence intelligently.
You had your field day on Arise, Sky News, BBC and DW News. Other foreign outlets like ABC News also reported your case. Some influencers also used their platforms to fight for you. All the while, without supplying evidence.
If Akpabio recruited Mgbeke, I cannot fault him or his team. You started this media fight, end it by supplying evidence or face a more intelligent Mgbeke who is flogging you at your game.
72 Likes 3 Shares |
Abbeytoy(m): 9:33am On May 04 |
Season film…. It will be long o
|
KennethOkonkwo: 9:34am On May 04 |
EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress 
If Akpabio is sponsoring her
Who is sponsoring Obiageli ezkwesili?
Who is sponsoring Natasha herself?
We all know the answer sha!
10 Likes |
CJStarz: 9:36am On May 04 |
This Imo state woman should just kwayet dia.
Typical of them.... Cho cho choo
1 Like |
Honestey: 9:38am On May 04 |
M
|
CJStarz: 9:39am On May 04 |
EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress 
From your 4th paragraph, it can be deduced that Sandra Duru is a woman without scruples! No character! No shame! Can easily be bought over! A betrayer!
Oh wowwww
I rest my case
3 Likes 1 Share |
EponObi(f): 9:40am On May 04 |
KennethOkonkwo:
If Akpabio is sponsoring her
Who is sponsoring Obiageli ezkwesili?
Who is sponsoring Natasha herself?
We all know the answer sha!
Yes, we all know. Their main agenda is attack the king.
7 Likes |
TempleHouse: 9:41am On May 04 |
The Same Professor who mistakenly showed Akpabio s chat on her phone online is now diverting attention.
I wonder how much Akpabio paid for these change of narrative.
Nigeria is indeed a Zoo !!
2 Likes 1 Share |
Honestey: 9:46am On May 04 |
EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress 
Omoh, see how someone turned everything into football game plan. You get talent at coaching and I think Arsenal need you against PSG asap.
6 Likes |
theredaddy: 9:46am On May 04 |
EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress 
Wehdone sir !! Buh please put all these super analyst talent into sportybet make we make money wey go intimidate Dangote.
imagine you share correct score like this ... we will vote for you as next President
2 Likes 1 Share |
EponObi(f): 9:46am On May 04 |
CJStarz:
From your 4th paragraph, it can be deduced that Sandra Duru is a woman without scruples! No character! No shame! Can easily be bought over! A betrayer!
Oh wowwww
I rest my case
"Don't hate the player. Hate the game!" 
Btw, aren't they all the same - Natasha and Sandra? They are both players of the same game and they know the rules. Lmaooooo! Figuratively and literally, na Natasha go price market.
6 Likes 1 Share |
TempleHouse: 9:47am On May 04 |
EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.
Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed 
Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.
The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.
What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:
1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.
The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack". 
Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.
Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.
I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black tro of their proprietress 
I'm sure you are in VAR room and trying to get the real culprit in the foul before the Penalty will be awarded.
|
Dapson73(m): 9:48am On May 04 |
Obi Ezkwesili.... An obidient patron, see your life outside.
Your reputation both locally and international is now on red alert because of your shaddy deal just for survival.
I'm long throat to see your response and see how the acc will expose you, before she came out to accuse you and Natasha, she has enough evidence to nail you.
I'm also waiting for Pandora comment on the matter and blame Tinubu and APC.
Shame on hypocrites.
7 Likes |