NewStats: 3,264,178 , 8,182,877 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 04:12 AM 2e2s4n

Abi now

Enskynelson:

Tender it where
The simple question is, will you believe the social media evidence?

Where she went to broadcast about the sexual harassment.....

If you tender your evidence, ofcos it will be scrutinized....

You can't doctor a document and tell us not to do a forensic on it.. We're not fools.

Common keep quite.

Someone that will still be put behind bars for defamation and false accusation.

Be hailing her you hear, Anamu.

Kremlins:
Natasha came well prepared.

A woman of steel indeed

JuanDeDios:

Huh? That's not how it works. Mr Agbakoba actually did a good job in his letter to Mrs Uduaghan. It's not every case that is supposed to get to court. If our judicial system was mature, the lawyers for either side will sit and hash out the case, and Mrs Udaughan, seeing how weak the basis for her allegation is, will withdraw it to avoid being sued.

It is u that said it is weak, not her legal team

Omo!,this woman has taken agbakoba to the cleaners,they guys fall hand shaa,make ur opponent give u evident way she get so that u go prepare counter evident,lazy lawyer

Enskynelson:

Tender it where
The simple question is, will you believe the social media evidence?

People will believe her, the same way they believed her when she came up with her story. Just help us to tell her to release the evidence. That's all we ask for. Let her release it, so that the whole world will see how she was been harassed.

Maxymilliano:
Quite funny to see a senior lawyer of Agbakoba's repute asking for evidence when the court is yet to make such declaration

Not only funny but concerning. Maybe SAN is just a title, not a mark of learning and experience.

Lanruze:
Common keep quite.

Someone that will still be put behind bars for defamation and false accusation.

Be hailing her you hear, Anamu

She's never going back to the senate. Once she decides to tender a formal apology letter, all her misconduct and lawlessness will be re-evaluated again by Senate Committee on Ethics.

Only court can tell us how she has 6kids for 6 men truly na rea case

JuanDeDios:

Huh? That's not how it works. Mr Agbakoba actually did a good job in his letter to Mrs Uduaghan. It's not every case that is supposed to get to court. If our judicial system was mature, the lawyers for either side will sit and hash out the case, and Mrs Udaughan, seeing how weak the basis for her allegation is, will withdraw it to avoid being sued.

Don't mind d novice

Wizardslayer:
Another vdm in the making.

Nigerians are gradually turning these woman into something else.

Who is she fighting for ?

Madam present your proofs in court and stop creating nuisance on social space.

Wallade:


No sir/ma,

This case must be in court because it has assumed a criminal dimension of assassinating the character and destroying the credibility of the Senate President. There was a criminal motive from the outset.

I seriously doubt Mr Akpabio has any credibility. But that's just me and I may be wrong though.

Kremlins:
Natasha came well prepared.

A woman of steel indeed

It is people like you that are deceiving her

JASONjnr:
The people encouraging this woman are more evil than her because they're not leading her well....


She files a suit challenging her suspension. First and foremost, the senate would've challenged and revoked her suspension if it was illegal.



There's no case in respect to this ☝️except from Akpabio's wife.

Stop being emotional, that woman is not only learned, but very exposed and has gone this route many many times more than you can ever go through....

So leave her alone.. sh knows what sh is doing.. and again, sh has video evidence of Akpabios sexual advances... Sh just doesn't want to do media exposure yet.. ND wanted Akpabio to draw her out.. now sh is out...

So just enjoi the drama and stop conclusion

Wallade:


Let me correct or inform you, she never filed the suit of sexual harassment against Apabio till date.

She has only been using the social media to attack and blackmail and malign the person of the Senate President with criminal accusations of sexual harassment.

Does that not worry or baffle you? That till date, she has not been able to Institute a formal case against Apabio in court on the sexial harassment accusations.

It was Apabio's wife that sued her to court on the sexual harassment accusations against her husband and against her marriage and family.

That is the only case in court about the Sexual Harassment accusations, to the best of my knowledge.

This woman is sensible... Sh allowed people to know what Akpabio is doing without going to court.. just to make him stop it and stop it among all women... Sh told us all sh has strong video evidence, and warned Akpabios wife.. sh will be at discomfort when sh sees this video evidence...

The question itself should be
.a weighty case against sexual harassment against A senate president came against him.. ND he still didn't go to court.. that is to show u , he doesn't want to make a mess of his already battered image.. cuz he knows things he did, but doesn't know at which point he was recorded...

Akpabios wife will surely get what sh want to see in court...

bigpicture001:


This woman is sensible... Sh allowed people to know what Akpabio is doing without going to court.. just to make him stop it and stop it among all women... Sh told us all sh has strong video evidence, and warned Akpabios wife.. sh will be at discomfort when sh sees this video evidence...

The question itself should be
.a weighty case against sexual harassment against A senate president came against him.. ND he still didn't go to court.. that is to show u , he doesn't want to make a mess of his already battered image.. cuz he knows things he did, but doesn't know at which point he was recorded...

Akpabios wife will surely get what sh want to see in court...

Apabio's wife in court against Natasha is the same as Apabio suing Natasha to court.

Do you want Apabio also to duplicate the case in court and create multiple cases with same
or similar filings?

Don't you think Apabio's wife got his permission to sue Natasha in court?

JuanDeDios:

I seriously doubt Mr Akpabio has any credibility. But that's just me and I may be wrong though.

I think you are wrong: every one has some level of credibility to protect, even the devil.

Mr Apabio is the Senate President of Nigeria, that is a level of credibility to protect.

Wallade:


Apabio's wife in court against Natasha is the same as Apabio suing Natasha to court.

Do you want Apabio also to duplicate the case in court and create multiple cases with same
or similar filings?

Don't you think Apabio's wife got his permission to sue Natasha in court?

Do u want to say.. that the wife stand better chance of explaining to judges in details of events and happenings at secret locations .....? Guy think broader!

Akpabios wife sued outta curiosity, to know exactly what the hubby does in secret...

JuanDeDios:

Huh? That's not how it works. Mr Agbakoba actually did a good job in his letter to Mrs Uduaghan. It's not every case that is supposed to get to court. If our judicial system was mature, the lawyers for either side will sit and hash out the case, and Mrs Udaughan, seeing how weak the basis for her allegation is, will withdraw it to avoid being sued.

Why is Akpabio blocking the investigation by sitting as a judge in a case he's involved in?

bigpicture001:


Do u want to say.. that the wife stand better chance of explaining to judges in details of events and happenings at secret locations .....? Guy think broader!

Akpabios wife sued outta curiosity, to know exactly what the hubby does in secret...

Your post is so funny!

Apabio will be a witness in the case, Natasha's lawyers will cross examine Apabio in view of the accusations and evidences presented against Apabio and in favor of Apabio.

Natasha will also be cross examined by Mrs Apabio's lawyers. Natasha has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Apabio has been sexually harassing her.

I guess you don't understand how the court proceedings will be executed.

Wallade:


Let me correct or inform you, she never filed the suit of sexual harassment against Apabio till date.

She has only been using the social media to attack and blackmail and malign the person of the Senate President with criminal accusations of sexual harassment.

Does that not worry or baffle you? That till date, she has not been able to Institute a formal case against Apabio in court on the sexial harassment accusations.

It was Apabio's wife that sued her to court on the sexual harassment accusations against her husband and against her marriage and family.

That is the only case in court about the Sexual Harassment accusations, to the best of my knowledge.

Then, they should wait for court to ask for the evidence.
Why are they asking for evidence through media?

Secondly, why did Akpabio step aside do that the criminal allegation could be investigated by the House?

But u keep pushing some sadistic apology letter to pur face om mattera ylu feel only court can decide.
Aint u daft laidis

Are you saying she has not sued since, with all her noise? I don't understand, I thought she went to court one time? That was one watering document flying around one time about the so-called allegation, so which one was that?

Wallade:


Let me correct or inform you, she never filed the suit of sexual harassment against Apabio till date.

She has only been using the social media to attack and blackmail and malign the person of the Senate President with criminal accusations of sexual harassment.

Does that not worry or baffle you? That till date, she has not been able to Institute a formal case against Apabio in court on the sexial harassment accusations.

It was Apabio's wife that sued her to court on the sexual harassment accusations against her husband and against her marriage and family.

That is the only case in court about the Sexual Harassment accusations, to the best of my knowledge.

Maxymilliano:


https://www.thecable.ng/natasha-akpoti-replies-agbakoba-says-only-court-can-assess-her-case-against-akpabio/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwKATvdjbGNrAoBOR2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeJJnogEIzuJF306FNkecIZ5uJnBD7XXUzXNnYqs6IZ38EXsT-UHHDbr1Qyt8_aem_HlV5wW1qMiLUSL4rU1bfAg

What she's saying is that she never instituted any sexual harassment case in court. That it was Akpabio's wife that did. That the only case she instituted was the six months suspension case.
What this means is that she's in hot pepper soup because she has no proof of sexual harassment. That was why she didn't file the case.

9jatriot:
Are you saying she has not sued since, with all her noise? I don't understand, I thought she went to court one time? That was one watering document flying around one time about the so-called allegation, so which one was that?

The case Natasha filed in court was against the Senate; she got an interlocutory injunction from the court to stop the Senate (ethics and privileges committee) from proceedings on her conduct review and disciplinary actions. She didn't want the Senate to punish her for her disruptive, disrespectful and unruly behavior in the Senate. That was the case she took to court.

Go and check or investigate my claim: she never Instituted a case in court against Apabio for sexually harassing her.

Psoul:


Then, they should wait for court to ask for the evidence.
Why are they asking for evidence through media?

Secondly, why did Akpabio step aside do that the criminal allegation could be investigated by the House?

She went to social media to blackmail and malign Apabio so since people like you have castigated and crucified Apabio, based on social media accusations, before he is convincted. She should provide you guys proof on social media to corroborate her accusations.

Why should Apabio step asside?

Is the Senate investigating Apabio?

The sexual harassment case that Natasha later presented to the Senate ethics and privileges committee could not be investigated for now because a related matter is already before the court (case filed in court by Apabio's wife). So the committee can't continue to investigate for now to prevent sub judiciary influence on the case in court or preemption of the court.

There is no basis for Apabio to step down, even if the Senate Committee is investigating the case. Apabio should only recuse himself from presiding over the Senate meeting where there report of the ethics and privileges committee will present their report to the Senate for decision making.

Just Dey give dem Dey go… I’m enjoying d movie cos you can’t be suppressed!

Wizardslayer:
Another vdm in the making.

Nigerians are gradually turning these woman into something else.

This woman.
These WOMEN (Plural)
This goes for singular
These is used for plural

You know that and you are playing silly games for attention.

Kremlins:
Natasha came well prepared.

A woman of steel indeed

Why u come expose your customer's number down there?

Wallade:


I think you are wrong: every one has some level of credibility to protect, even the devil.

Mr Apabio is the Senate President of Nigeria, that is a level of credibility to protect.

Fair point.