NewStats: 3,259,475 , 8,170,229 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 May 2025 at 08:08 AM m6m3x6z3e3g |
Christianity Etc Section And No More Oaths (9818 Views)
Thunderfayamods: 1:05pm On Apr 25 |
3seriez:To be realistic tell me which religion is the most intolerant? How many times or places do you see Christians killing up and down like Muslims do? All the terrorists in the world are Muslims. Mind you I am not against Muslims there are good and tolerable ones especially the ones from the south. My family is mixed both Christan and Muslim. But all over the world Islam is a problem. 4 Likes 1 Share |
Bluffly: 1:07pm On Apr 25 |
Seun:Most non-muslims are not christians. Name it Christianity and not Christianity E.t.c |
dfrost: 1:32pm On Apr 25 |
IyfeNamikaze(m): 1:43pm On Apr 25 |
mahilip:about 47 percent of Nigerians are Christians. 1 Like |
Dareal90s(m): 1:47pm On Apr 25 |
Greatness09:Because they don't want to hear the truth, they are afraid of truth. 1 Like |
IyfeNamikaze(m): 1:48pm On Apr 25 |
DesChyko:And the likes on each of their comments are always the same. 1 Like |
DrRasheed: 2:14pm On Apr 25 |
Firebomber: I don't tolerate hearsays. Where? Saudi? Qatar? Dubai? Nigeria? Where? |
DrRasheed: 2:19pm On Apr 25 |
TenQ: Thank you for raising these points. You're not alone in asking these questionsâmany sincere seekers and critics alike have wondered about these verses and hadiths. Letâs look at each point carefully and respond from within Islamic sources, using the Qur'an, hadith The Claim of Abrogation: Does 9:5 Cancel 2:256? One of the most misunderstood topics in Islamic theology is the claim that Qurâan 9:5âthe so-called âVerse of the Swordââabrogates peaceful verses like 2:256, which says, âThere is no compulsion in religion.â While it is true that some scholars in the medieval period ed the idea of abrogation here, this view is not unanimous. Many of the most respected exegetes of the Qurâan, including Imam al-Tabari, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, and modern scholars such as Muhammad Asad and Yusuf al-Qaradawi, have rejected this position. These scholars argue that verse 2:256 is a foundational principle of Islamic belief, affirming that genuine faith cannot be compelled. Qurâan 9:29, which discusses fighting âthose who do not believe in Allah,â must be read in the historical and situational context of conflict with the Byzantine Empire. It was revealed at a time when the Muslims were in a state of war, and surrounding empires posed a military threat. The verse is not a license to attack peaceful non-Muslims but a directive for dealing with hostile forces. The inclusion of âuntil they pay jizyaâ is a reference to a political agreement, not religious persecution. In return for jizya, non-Muslims were exempted from military service and guaranteed protection by the Muslim state. This was a common practice in empires of the time, and it is not unique to Islam. The concept of jizya is often misunderstood. It is not a punishment or humiliation, but rather a tax that non-Muslims paid in Islamic states for public services and military exemption. Muslims paid zakat, which often amounted to more than the jizya. In practice, jizya was often lower than the taxes people paid to other governments, including the Byzantine and Sassanid empires. Non-Muslims under Islamic ruleâparticularly âPeople of the Bookâ like Jews and Christiansâwere permitted to practice their religion, govern their internal affairs, and live peacefully under Muslim protection. This was part of a pluralistic legal framework, not a campaign of forced conversion. The hadith you cited from Mishkat al-Masabih outlines military conduct during the Prophet Muhammadâs time. However, even in this report, the Prophetâs instructions emphasize diplomacy and restraint: the commander is told first to invite the enemy to Islam, then to peaceful integration, and only to fight if these options are refused. Even then, there are strict ethical rules: no treachery, no harming civilians, no mutilation. This demonstrates that warfare in Islam is highly regulated and ethical, even by todayâs standards of international law. These instructions were necessary for a time when warfare between empires was the norm and alliances constantly shifted. The Prophetâs approach was rooted in justice and pragmatism, not aggression or compulsion. Yes, both the Qurâan and authentic hadith are relevant for all times, but they must be applied in the context in which they are revealed. Islamic law (Shariâah) is built on principles that for changing circumstances, including war, peace, minority status, governance, and international relations. The overarching aim is always justice, as seen in Qurâan 16:90: âIndeed, Allah commands justice, kindness, and giving to relatives, and forbids immorality, bad conduct, and oppression.â Any interpretation of the Qurâan or hadith that justifies terrorism, forced conversions, or blind aggression violates this core ethic. Despite being revealed in a context of conflict, the Qurâan constantly promotes peace when possible. Qurâan 8:61 says, âAnd if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also].â The Prophet Muhammadâs life shows us this clearly: in Medina, he signed treaties with Jews and pagans, upheld rights of religious minorities, and condemned acts of injustice. Even at the conquest of Meccaâwhen he had the upper handâhe forgave his former enemies and declared amnesty. If Islam were truly about conquest or forced belief, this would not have been the Prophetâs example. Taken out of context, verses like 9:5 and 9:29 may seem to promote violence. But when read in the broader Qurâanic and Prophetic framework, it becomes clear that Islamâs message is one of justice, freedom of belief, and ethical governance. The Qurâan does not condone terrorism or forced conversionâit outright prohibits them. Like any tradition, Islam can be misinterpreted, but its core teachings, properly understood, reject the idea that faith can be spread by the sword. 1 Like |
Antiislam1: 3:19pm On Apr 25 |
DrRasheed: What of those attacking Christians and Christianity 1 Like 1 Share |
Geofavor(m): 3:27pm On Apr 25 |
Seun: Seun, why is it necessary for you to make Christianity less important than Islam? "Islam is a very important religion". So, Christianity is not a very important religion? Which other religion has had a Cleric whose ing elicited condolences from every world leader including our very own president like the Pope? You haven't still created equity. Christians are not less significant nor less in number than Muslims in the country, so why is there a strictly Islam section but a "Christianity etc" board? Letting the Christians have their own dedicated section without other religions included just as you've done for Islam is the fair thing to do. I am not sure why this is a difficult thing for you to do. Though I suspect it's a political play, because I know you're a smart guy. One can only hope you'll do what is right regardless. And it's simple: Let the religion board be titled RELIGION. Then, let there be a section titled Christianity and another titled Islam. Christianity section for Christians only. Islam section for Muslims only. This is the popular demand, not what you've done. It's not the oath. It's the lack of equity that was the issue. Thanks. 1 Like 1 Share |
olayinka63: 4:11pm On Apr 25 |
Raf4:Read very well before barking. Don't waste your education fees. Ask for yours if you want it. Nothing concern you if Muslim protect their thread. Simple logic. |
ferdvict2(m): 5:11pm On Apr 25 |
You're very bias by saying Islam is very important and didn't say so of Christianity. Why will you elevate Islam as an independent entity and you now add Christianity with others which you term etc. There is no difference between what was before and what you have done now. Not everyone can be confused with your use of words. 1 Like 1 Share |
femi4: 5:26pm On Apr 25 |
Seun:Finally...as it should be. Let all section be free entry n free exit No set of people are more nairalanders than others |
Firebomber: 6:08pm On Apr 25 |
DrRasheed: Stop showing your hypocrisy online Abdul đ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam_by_country#:~:text=Prevailing%20Hanafi%20jurisprudence%2C%20per%20consensus,of%20apostasy%20and%20res%20Islam. All the list you needed is above. đ And when did Nigeria become Islamic country that you listed? Shameless hypocrite đ 1 Like |
Greatness09: 6:25pm On Apr 25 |
3seriez: Lol so you felt its right for the procedure to just be for one religionâŚMuslims know how important Jesus Christ is to Christianity religion even some regard him as God the Son and some Muslims calls him just a prophetâŚ.pls since the creation of the country called Nigeria have anyone been killed or stoned to death for insulting JesusâŚ.omo let the God we serve be the judge and not we human fighting the fight of the Gods |
BrighterSyde: 6:43pm On Apr 25 |
DrRasheed: I see. Now what about the fact that Muslims see their religion as more important than the constitution of any country they migrate to? Why do they always want to impose sharia law which Non-religious countries and Christian countries do not permit as it clashes or goes against their own constitution? Why should Muslims always do this when they are in the majority in any place? Why do they always force non-Muslims to be under sharia law once they are the majority in a place? |
BrighterSyde: 6:45pm On Apr 25 |
Firebomber: I totally understand you brother and of course you are right. Their population is not because people are converting but because one man fathers and wives up to four women whereas Christianâs mostly stick to one man one wife. |
DrRasheed: 8:28pm On Apr 25 |
Firebomber: You keep going in circles. The rules exist but show me where people are killed in the listed countries? There are conditions fool |
DrRasheed: 8:35pm On Apr 25 |
BrighterSyde: Please, this sweeping generalization that does not reflect the reality of Muslim communities worldwide. Islam is practiced by over 1.9 billion people from a wide range of cultures, nationalities, and political backgrounds. The vast majority of Muslims live peacefully within the legal and constitutional frameworks of their countries, including secular democracies like the United States, India, and Indonesia. Also, your idea that Muslims âalways want to impose Sharia lawâ in non-Muslim countries is a distortion of what Sharia actually is. Sharia is a broad ethical and moral framework that primarily governs personal behavior, such as prayer, fasting, charity, and family matters. It is not a singular or uniform legal code, and its interpretation varies widely across cultures and legal systems. In many Muslim-majority countries, such as Turkey, Tunisia, and Senegal, Sharia is not implemented as state law, and these countries maintain secular governance. Muslims living in the West rarely seek to implement religious law on others and often actively participate in upholding the constitutions and legal systems of their host nations. Examples like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Thlaib both in US Congress. Your assertion that Muslims force non-Muslims to live under Sharia law once they become the majority is a myth fueled by fear and misinformation. In Islam, coercion in matters of faith is explicitly forbidden. The Quran clearly states, âThere is no compulsion in religionâ (Quran 2:256), emphasizing freedom of belief and conscience. Where individuals or groups do attempt to impose religion by force, they are acting in contradiction to Islamic teachings and are often motivated by political or ideological agendas rather than genuine religious principles. You will be surprise if you continue to research Islam. |
DrRasheed: 8:40pm On Apr 25 |
BrighterSyde: Firebomber is lying to you. He's apparently biased and not being objective. He's talking from deep hatred which is against all i mentioned in my previous posts According to a report by the Pew Research Center, about 77% of people raised Muslim remain Muslim into adulthoodâa retention rate comparable to Christians at 75%. In the United States, nearly one in four Muslim adults (23%) are converts to Islam, which clearly indicates that people are willingly choosing to embrace the faith based on belief, not birthrate. Islamâs growth is therefore not just biological, but spiritual and ideological. Pewâs data also shows that the global population of atheists, agnostics, and religiously und people is expected to decline by 2050, while Islam and Christianity will continue growing, based on trends in belief, not just demographics. |
aswani(m): 8:50pm On Apr 25 |
Seun: So upon all the abuse Obidients are abusing Muslims in other sections, you are going to give them even more leeway in the dedicated Muslim section, very wrong move. |
Verbtips(m): 9:13pm On Apr 25 |
Please other features like chat, photos, videos should be added Facebook too dey disable acct Make we dey flex for nl |
3seriez(m): 9:14pm On Apr 25 |
Thunderfayamods: I gave my reasons why they put the oath in the 1st place and you're deviating to the same reason again. Muslims here just want to enjoy Muslim topics without it being derailed or someone reminding us what misguided people do in the name of Islam. |
3seriez(m): 9:19pm On Apr 25 |
Greatness09: Agreed. Unfortunately over time , extremists preaching have reached alot of Muslim followers. I during the military, extremist Preachers were dealt with but since the advent of democracy, politicians have allowed these preachings to go uncensored, hence the actions of a few giving Islam a bad name. |
aalangel(f): 10:34pm On Apr 25 |
It was really a senseless oath and very suspicious.
|
Edipet(m): 11:38pm On Apr 25 |
DrRasheed:not so, you guys are afraid not to find something that will make you change y mind or convert to Christianity. the difference version of the Bible are the same, just that, you choose it Base on your understand of English |
sonofthunder: 5:15am On Apr 26 |
Seun Mother's prayers are working.... He'll soon become a Pastor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Graphic Pictures Of Christians Slaughtered In Islamic Nations
(Go Up)
Sections: How To . 76 Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland. |