NewStats: 3,261,910 , 8,175,518 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 May 2025 at 12:48 AM 3z112o

Antwan99:
No!

Biological make-up is the fundamental determining factor. Women were not, won't and never make complex technical and scientific constructs.

Women have been shaping science and technology for centuries.

Ever heard of Ada Lovelace, the first computer programmer? Or Katherine Johnson, whose calculations sent men to the moon? Or Hedy Lamarr, who helped invent the foundation of Wi-Fi?

Funny how you’re using technology built by women to spread your outdated nonsense.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Merry100:

Women have been shaping science and technology for centuries.

Ever heard of Ada Lovelace, the first computer programmer? Or Katherine Johnson, whose calculations sent men to the moon? Or Hedy Lamarr, who helped invent the foundation of Wi-Fi?

Funny how you’re using technology built by women to spread your outdated nonsense.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

How many of them. It can never be without the guidance of a bunch of men. Go check!

Iamthoney:
A man’s one ejaculation can get about 5-10 women pregnant and you still think a woman is more important? Laughable

Why shouldn’t I referenced the Bible? Was it not from a man a woman was created? Ab Initio= From the beginning

That's exactly why you don't need MEN. You need ONE man! See below, just one ejaculation contains 300 million sperms, which means he can theoretically impregnate one billion women in a day if he cums 3 times in a day. So you don't need the rest of the men - they are disposable!
Not so with women. A woman only has one child every two years or so. So precious! So protection- worthy!

Antwan99:
How many of them. It can never be without the guidance of a bunch of men. Go check!

Just take the L and move on. Your argument crumbled the moment you had to shift from "women never contribute" to "but men guided them!"

Did men guide Marie Curie to two Nobel Prizes? Did they hold Margaret Hamilton’s hand while she wrote the code that put men on the moon? Did they whisper the structure of DNA to Rosalind Franklin before stealing her work?

The only thing men truly guided was erasing women’s names from history. And yet, despite centuries of suppression, credit theft, and gatekeeping, women still revolutionized science and technology. Imagine what we’d accomplish without insecure little men like you trying to hold us back.

By whining about "not that many," you're just proving my point - women were systematically silenced and excluded. It’s not about ability, it’s about access.

Wake up, man. Biological makeup doesn’t determine intelligence. Science isn’t a boys' club, it’s a collaboration. And whether you like it or not, women have always been part of it.

Now go cry in a corner while using Wi-Fi invented by a woman. 🤡

Merry100:

Just take the L and move on. Your argument crumbled the moment you had to shift from "women never contribute" to "but men guided them!"

Did men guide Marie Curie to two Nobel Prizes? Did they hold Margaret Hamilton’s hand while she wrote the code that put men on the moon? Did they whisper the structure of DNA to Rosalind Franklin before stealing her work?

The only thing men truly guided was erasing women’s names from history. And yet, despite centuries of suppression, credit theft, and gatekeeping, women still revolutionized science and technology. Imagine what we’d accomplish without insecure little men like you trying to hold us back.

By whining about "not that many," you're just proving my point - women were systematically silenced and excluded. It’s not about ability, it’s about access.

Wake up, man. Biological makeup doesn’t determine intelligence. Science isn’t a boys' club, it’s a collaboration. And whether you like it or not, women have always been part of it.

Now go cry in a corner while using Wi-Fi invented by a woman. 🤡

No!

How many of them.

Who brought the codes idea? Women only studied.

Antwan99:
No!

How many of them.

Who brought the codes idea? Women only studied.

😂🤣🤣 I had a nice time watching you struggle with reality. Good luck with your delusions!

DaddyCoool:


That's exactly why you don't need MEN. You need ONE man! See below, just one ejaculation contains 300 million sperms, which means he can theoretically impregnate one billion women in a day if he cums 3 times in a day. So you don't need the rest of the men - they are disposable!
Not so with women. A woman only has one child every two years or so. So precious! So protection- worthy!

That one man is more precious than all the women put together

Iamthoney:
That one man is more precious than all the women put together

Point is, unlike women, most men are redundant and unnecessary and ought be destroyed to reduce wars and crime. We still can't fathom why there are so many men when all that's needed is about 10

DaddyCoool:


Point is, unlike women, most men are redundant and unnecessary and ought be destroyed to reduce wars and crime. We still can't fathom why there are so many men when all that's needed is about 10

The truth remains without a man, a woman will never have existed. God ain’t a stupid for creating a man first

Aonkuuse:
Happy mother's Day


Don't miss out on FG's YEIDEP empowerment money

Apply here>>> https://wikigists.com/fg-renames-niyeedep-to-yeidep-apply-here/

Good afternoon sir, I have ed for the program. I am yet to receive response from the bank. Any updates sir.

[quote author=iwhotng post=134447121][/quote]
Happy International Women's Day 🫶🏻 🫶🏻