NewStats: 3,263,198 , 8,179,377 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 June 2025 at 02:31 AM 44573m

matify83:
The race for the moon to me is a distraction and waste of Earth's scares resources which would have been been better deployed in solving the litany of environmental problems on the mother planet.

We have not subdued mother earth in totality yet and here we are racing for the moon to do what exactly?

You are unaware that this earth is actually an intergalactic prison for humans. Space exploration is us trying to break free.

Meanwhile my ronu brothers dey collect Mpiawa azu for 100 naira bread

NOGRUDGES:




I reading about India landing on the moon, US looks like the dumb but rich kid trying to use all means to get an A by all means.

Just after India lands on the moon, they also land on the moon after 50 years of landing a manned craft on the moon.


Do they just print dollars to buy whatever they want?

Stop using headlines to understand an article , some are just to catch your attention and not the real message on tbe body of the article

Was landed by plane or mutor?

If you believe America landed on the moon, then you can as well believe that chickens can fly to the sun and lay eggs 🥚.

Moon landing is a great scam!!!!

Krismas:
Where is the proof that America landed manned craft on the moon?
Then why has that not been replicated by them or any other nation?

Simply because of the enormous cost involved and the fact there are no immediate returns in resources invested yet, unlike space technology powering our Internet. Imagine spending $257b on the Apollo mission.

America no be your mate

Broveens42:


You call someone a clown while you are the real clown who believes anything without real criticism.
Your first paragraph just gave you away...@ using gps because of advancement in space technology. What concerns space technology and moon landing? Are you telling us that moon is synonymous with space?

You should as well criticize people for identifying a hollywood movie location as swimming pool instead of an ocean as captured in a movie production

You don't need moon landing to produce electricity or advance in technology. All raw materials are abundant on planet earth, so people could be right when they say moon landing is a hoax, since you can generate images with materials made from earth

You are a clown, wasn't the advancement of space tech that brought about satellite that brought a about GPS,
How do GPS work, is it not by satellite?

This moon landing na every year? And is always tagged "first ever"

Krismas:
The Apollo landing is the main issue here why has it not been replicated by either the americans or the other nations that have also sent missions to the moon?

NASA sent men to the moon more than five time's after the first Apollo 11 mission that brought Neil Armstrong to the moon the first time

victorazy:
This moon landing na every year? And is always tagged "first ever"

First ever private firm to do it

matify83:
The race for the moon to me is a distraction and waste of Earth's scares resources which would have been been better deployed in solving the litany of environmental problems on the mother planet.

We have not subdued mother earth in totality yet and here we are racing for the moon to do what exactly?

To find out how to subdue the earth....its all part of the grand plan to subdue the mother earth in totality

matify83:


Givien that the moon regulates Earth's climate. As the only natural satellite of the earth, any cosmic disturbance to the earth will ultimately impact on the moon since it is held in orbit by Earth's forces.

Also, man orchestrated disaster on the moon will have a far reaching negative impact on earth.


The moon is not another planet, it's earth only natural satellite.

This does nothing to obviate the possible usefulness of all extra terrestrial exploration - including that of the moon - in protecting the Earth from Cosmic threats.

Somilat:

You are the clown. Why did you talk A history of space? I never mentioned this. The only line relevant is you ignoring the fact about the surveillance capability (and you are dumb to deny it)

You sound like one of those ignoramuses who still believe this Earth is flat

NOGRUDGES:




I reading about India landing on the moon, US looks like the dumb but rich kid trying to use all means to get an A by all means.

Just after India lands on the moon, they also land on the moon after 50 years of landing a manned craft on the moon.


Do they just print dollars to buy whatever they want?

At the bolded is the advice you all gave Buhari and now Tinubu, and see where it has gotten us as a country today. You think any government can just wake up one day and decide to start printing money to buy whatever they want, without first expanding the economy and you think the currency will not lose it vale and be turned to a mere piece of paper.

obedience4:



You are a clown, wasn't the advancement of space tech that brought about satellite that brought a about GPS,
How do GPS work, is it not by satellite?

Exactly how clownish you sound.
I was expecting you to counter my points by saying moon landing led to development of GPS.
How is space technology synonymous with moon landing?

The problem of Africans; they know a lot about science but always jump at an opportunity to embrace superstition of the whites.... be it technological propaganda or religion

killsmith:

You are unaware that this earth is actually an intergalactic prison for humans. Space exploration is us trying to break free.

Break free from what exactly?

To a place that has zero for life form as we know it on earth?

The same earth that by our carelessness under the guise of technological development have polluted and not willing to invest in regeneration?

I may be wrong on this assertion but all I see with the upsurge in the "moon race" can't be divorced from nations aiming to achieving military superiority over one another.
All the ruse about rare minerals are a hoax to divert attention from the original intent.

killsmith:

You are unaware that this earth is actually an intergalactic prison for humans. Space exploration is us trying to break free.

The earth is not a prison. The global agendists should lift restrictions on many sites like the Antarctica, underground sites, deserts, etc

Reflect7:


Do NOT believe them.

They faked the first so-called moon landing in the 1960s.

This could be another scam.

Ya dumb ye. They faked da donkey says. Kikikiki

Broveens42:


The earth is not a prison. The global agendists should lift restrictions on many sites like the Antarctica, underground sites, deserts, etc

Human are not like other animals. Other animals have evolved stronger immune system over time. They eat whatever junk and don't fall sick. Have evolved hair hur to protect them from cold. Humans are not from earth.

matify83:


Break free from what exactly?

To a place that has zero for life form as we know it on earth?

The same earth that by our carelessness under the guise of technological development have polluted and not willing to invest in regeneration?

I may be wrong on this assertion but all I see with the upsurge in the "moon race" can't be divorced from nations aiming to achieving military superiority over one another.
All the ruse about rare minerals are a hoax to divert attention from the original intent.

Break free from the van allen belt.

killsmith:

Human are not like other animals. Other animals have evolved stronger immune system over time. They eat whatever junk and don't fall sick. Have evolved hair hur to protect them from cold. Humans are not from earth.

Why can't they evolve brain like humans since you think they evolve stuff at will.

Cornpop:


Why can't they evolve brain like humans since you think they evolve stuff at will.

Animal brains evolve too. But cannot reach the level of humans because humans are gods.

Broveens42:


Exactly how clownish you sound.
I was expecting you to counter my points by saying moon landing led to development of GPS.
How is space technology synonymous with moon landing?

The problem of Africans; they know a lot about science but always jump at an opportunity to embrace superstition of the whites.... be it technological propaganda or religion

You are daft, the technology that brought about putting satellite in orbit, was the same that brought about moon landing,
Clown, as soon as men could put artificial satellite in space, this was achieved by the Soviet union in October 4 1957 with the launching of the first artificial satellite Sputnik, development started on how to send man in space, this was also achieved by the Soviet union when cosmos Yuri Gagarin on April 12 1961 became the first man to orbit the earth and the first in space,
After this man was then thinking on how to put a man on the moon
Thus the Apollo 11 mission put Neil Armstrong into the moon on July 21_1969
The same technology to put a satellite on a rocket and blasted it into orbit, was the same that put a capsule on a rocket and put it on yhe moon

Clown is asking what is the similarities between space technology and the moon landings
As in if wasn't the the technological advancement in space technology and exploration that brought the moon landing

Please don't quote me again, I don't enjoy engaging with dull people

killsmith:

Human are not like other animals. Other animals have evolved stronger immune system over time. They eat whatever junk and don't fall sick. Have evolved hair hur to protect them from cold. Humans are not from earth.

Let same humans allow for science based advancement and save us some superstitions.
Let's explore beyond Antarctica, the ice cage.
Let's have more info about places like Horus, isle of Anubis, atens etc. or are they scared their space theory would be bursted?

Let's ask governments to lift restrictions on sites for more exploration on planet earth.

obedience4:



You are daft, the technology that brought about putting satellite in orbit, was the same that brought about moon landing,
Clown, as soon as men could put artificial satellite in space, this was achieved by the Soviet union in October 4 1957 with the launching of the first artificial satellite Sputnik, development started on how to send man in space, this was also achieved by the Soviet union when cosmos Yuri Gagarin on April 12 1961 became the first man to orbit the earth and the first in space,
After this man was then thinking on how to put a man on the moon
Thus the Apollo 11 mission put Neil Armstrong into the moon on July 21_1969
The same technology to put a satellite on a rocket and blasted it into orbit, was the same that put a capsule on a rocket and put it on yhe moon

Clown is asking what is the similarities between space technology and the moon landings
As in if wasn't the the technological advancement in space technology and exploration that brought the moon landing

Please don't quote me again, I don't enjoy engaging with dull people

Continue deceiving yourself. They connected high quality cables across seas and countries, using Drones/ specialized aircrafts as carriers of transmitters/satellite, and you say they went to fix an object in an imaginary space.

Where is the space located, show me a picture let me use science to disgrace you.
Above the firmament or below?

You are a big clown that has thrown away real science from his forefathers while proving nothing about moon landing

There's no difference between landing on a moon and landing on lightning/thunder.
You see how you have been scammed?

killsmith:

Animal brains evolve too. But cannot reach the level of humans because humans are gods.

So what you said earlier does not make sense.

Cornpop:


So what you said earlier does not make sense.

Okay.

Broveens42:


Continue deceiving yourself. They connected high quality cables across seas and countries, using Drones/ specialized aircrafts as carriers of transmitters/satellite, and you say they went to fix an object in an imaginary space.

Where is the space located, show me a picture let me use science to disgrace you.
Above the firmament or below?

You are a big clown that has thrown away real science from his forefathers while proving nothing about moon landing

There's no difference between landing on a moon and landing on lightning/thunder.
You see how you have been scammed?

You are one dull boy.

RenaissanceGuy:
Simply because of the enormous cost involved and the fact there are no immediate returns in resources invested yet, unlike space technology powering our Internet. Imagine spending $257b on the Apollo mission.

what on earth are u talking? which is more expensive? sending a human to the moon or sending a robot? why will america have as much as five unmanned moon landings, if they know how to man land?
watch this vid and stop talking upside down

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MQz228FNKI?si=t-_rHCVK3hC6Bx

obedience4:



NASA sent men to the moon more than five time's after the first Apollo 11 mission that brought Neil Armstrong to the moon the first time

NASA sent nobody to the moon, its all a hoax
its part of the reason Kennedy was killed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MQz228FNKI?si=t-_rHCVK3hC6Bx