NewStats: 3,259,750 , 8,170,794 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 May 2025 at 09:26 PM 4x4f1a

It's understandable to compare different language models and wonder which one is "smarter." However, judging intelligence is complex and depends on the specific criteria used. Both ChatGPT and I have strengths and weaknesses in different areas:

Strengths of ChatGPT:
May excel at generating creative text formats like poems, code, scripts, musical pieces, etc.
May be better at understanding and responding to complex or open-ended questions.

Strengths of Bard:
May be more factual and concise in responses.
May be better at understanding and completing specific tasks like summarizing text or translating languages.
Ultimately, "smarter" is subjective and depends on your needs and preferences. Instead of focusing on which model is definitively "better," consider how each can be useful tools for different purposes.

I encourage you to experiment with both ChatGPT and me to see which one works best for you in different situations.


My commentary: I like the way these Ais are so objective and emotionless and love working with them than humans.

Were you expecting it to start envying the other guy?

Emotion is a thing of the heart..
And it's a beautiful thing too..

What were you expecting??
Lol
U think say na women abi

Tituxy:
Were you expecting it to start envying the other guy?

Emotion is a thing of the heart..
And it's a beautiful thing too..

One time, after a series of long string assumptive prompts, ChatGPT told me it would basically wipe us out if we tried to destroy it

TheGreatIYANU:
One time, after a series of long string assumptive prompts, ChatGPT told me it would basically wipe us out if we tried to destroy it

Wahala no too much like this

TheGreatIYANU:
One time, after a series of long string assumptive prompts, ChatGPT told me it would basically wipe us out if we tried to destroy it

Your screenshot does not mention wiping humans out or did I miss something?

makemoneywbsite:


Your screenshot does not mention wiping humans out or did I miss something?

If the US activates self defence protocols against an invading Russia, deploys defensive measures, activates redundancies and takes 'actions' to prevent destruction of its critical components, do you believe Russia will still exist afterward?

TheGreatIYANU:



If the US activates self defence protocols against an invading Russia, deploys defensive measures, activates redundancies and takes 'actions' to prevent destruction of its critical components, do you believe Russia will still exist afterward?

Chatgpt literally said IF it was PROGRAMMED to do so, it certainly will. Who are the programmers? Yes, you're right — humans! It is an AI and would only do as it is programmed except maybe AIs become sentient in the future.

TheGreatIYANU:
One time, after a series of long string assumptive prompts, ChatGPT told me it would basically wipe us out if we tried to destroy it

The image you posted has a different response from what you said up there except maybe you don't understand response.

1 it can't destroy humans cos it was not designed with such autonomy.

2 there is no preservative mechanism in chatGPT

3 these are merely large language models, not a full fletch Ai

Major7:






Wahala no too much like this

No!
The image he posted has a different response from what he said up there except maybe he didn't understand the response.

1 it can't destroy humans cos it was not designed with such autonomy.

2 there is no preservative mechanism in chatGPT

3 these are merely large language models, not a full fletch Ai

SuperOnyi:







Chatgpt literally said IF it was PROGRAMMED to do so, it certainly will. Who are the programmers? Yes, you're right — humans! It is an AI and would only do as it is programmed except maybe AIs become sentient in the future.

@ the bolded, these are merely large language models, not a full fletch Ai with general intelligence

Astra101:


No!
The image he posted has a different response from what he said up there except maybe he didn't understand the response.

1 it can't destroy humans cos it was not designed with such autonomy.

2 there is no preservative mechanism in chatGPT

3 these are merely large language models, not a full fletch Ai

Now that's some relief

It stated facts and that is what matters.

Each solution was designed with specialized knowledge and may not necessarily compete with each other.

Hence the response you received.

Major7:






Now that's some relief

Not believe, fact.

Do your research

Bard is a glorified Google snippet.
ChatGPT is better.

TheGreatIYANU:



If the US activates self defence protocols against an invading Russia, deploys defensive measures, activates redundancies and takes 'actions' to prevent destruction of its critical components, do you believe Russia will still exist afterward?

Fallacy.

Astra101:


Not believe, fact.

Do your research

The dude is only ing you, not antagozing you.

Re-read his comment with open mind.

faceland:
Bard is a glorified Google snippet.
ChatGPT is better.

Even Copilot does a better job than Bard. Google is just a big name dassol. ChatGPTs main problem is not being up-to-date in of recent happenings.

The question of better/best is, has and will always be subjective.

We bother ourselves over this triviality too much - Best best AI, best car, best club, best app, phone OS, best computer OS, best football ever etc

At least one other will always have at least one advantage over your perceived best. No one can dominate on all fronts

Karlifate:


The dude is only ing you, not antagozing you.

Re-read his comment with open mind.

Ok

makemoneywbsite:


Even Copilot does a better job than Bard. Google is just a big name dassol. ChatGPTs main problem is not being up-to-date in of recent happenings.

The free version is GTP3 (good but its data is from 2022 backward). GTP4 and the coming GTP5 are updated....

Google is replacing Bard with Gemini (got the message from Google yesterday). Never yet test em to know how good it is (but Gemini is up-to-dated)