NewStats: 3,265,373 , 8,186,560 topics. Date: Saturday, 14 June 2025 at 05:15 PM 4o6z4y

achimendy:





Poverty will put you and your family in their place.

I laugh. ur threat dont work.. Lol🤣🤣🤣🤣.. Sorry i know u r crying.. But unfortunately that power doesn't belong to u.. In fact i have already escaped the poverty since birth. No be beans.. You are the one who knows poverty and is suffering it already.. Dont worry poverty has heard ur cry and is coming to embrace ur generation wholeheartedly.. rd

raskymonojendor:

"All eyes on the judiciary" in the mud. Obidients Mumu too much 😂

All Eyes Are Crying...

This was when I started doubting Tinubu's victory. INEC was compromised seriously in Rivers. The votes in Rivers should be deducted from Tinubu and added to Peter obi. Tinubu did not win 12 states . Am sure same thing played out in some other locations.

Ofunaofu:


Is that what you call defending.

A public institution for that matter

INEC conducts an election, you go to ask for the documents used in conducting the election, INEC put up various gimmicks to deny you those documents knowing fully well that you are time bound.

Stop deceiving yourself. Judges have been bought alresdy by that DRuglord

press9jatv:
I’m seeing rerun judgement in today’s tribunal judgement. 98% of the electorates predicts that too. Let’s keep our fingers crossed..

Peter obi should have made sure he had polling agents with very good camera that will snap and send the pictures via satellite communications to his situation room. This is a lesson to future contestants . Peter obi would have had a picture evidence of all votes cast in his favour nationwide without recourse to INEC. Anyways it's too late. He should try harder next time

skj1377:
This was when I started doubting Tinubu's victory. INEC was compromised seriously in Rivers. The votes in Rivers should be deducted from Tinubu and added to Peter obi. Tinubu did not win 12 states . Am sure same thing played out in some other locations.

That even won't make Obi the winner.

Obi lost

Pakute:
The easiest Presidential case since 1979. Tribunal just dey tear each case throway piece by piece.. I swear, nothing the judges are saying is new, everything have been analysed and predicted here long ago.

Very true.
Even in my WhatsApp group o.
Exact same analysis and judgement.

plaindealer:



All Eyes Are Crying...

This one enter oooo,can I borrow it?

Popular votes means majority. Meaning the figure given to Tinubu is for Peter obi.

Goke7:


what do you mean by popular votes?

All eyes are no longer on the judiciary. All eyes are now crying 🤣🤣

BluntCrazeMan:
One thing is clear..
All those loads of evidence which the LP tendered at the tribunal were not fully demonstrated and related to the petition..
Especially those CTCs of EC8Bs, EC8Cs, and EC8Ds, and so on..

LP didn't clearly establish (from the evidence) the calculation-errors in the collation in such a way that it is sufficient enough to render the results invalid.

LP also didn't establish all those polling units that have their total votes more than the Accredited Voters as recorded in the BVAS Machines.

You've sensed the failure earlier

skj1377:
Popular votes means majority. Meaning the figure given to Tinubu is for Peter obi.

OldBeer:
Please Obedients, let's come out and protest.
Don't let these children of Satan win.
Venue: Train station and Lekki tollgate.
Refreshments is available

Can you see this enemy of development?

A new Train station wey then just commission, wey Lagos people just start to dey use, your eye don dey there to go destroy ham. Same way one Chinasa came from Anambra to destroy Lagos State government properties..

Hand go soon touch you all..

fergie001:

It is my finding that the petitioners have failed to convince on the mandatory use of only electronic means in collation and transmission.

The 1st Respondent (INEC) have adduced enough evidence to show that physical or manual collation can also be used in transmitting and/or transfer of results

The glitches experienced during the of the results to the IREV portal was not a ploy to temper or manipulate the results as alleged by the Petitioner.

The Petitioner failed to prove that it was a case of manipulation by INEC.

The glitches are not grounds to challenge the outcome of an election in view of section 134(1)b of the Electoral Act.

Which balance?? They did not win

GambaOsaka:
The way Peter Obi’s lawyers are looking Ehn, they know it’s a failed battle already. They are thinking of how to get their balance from the man.

fergie001:

The glitches experienced during the of the results to the IREV portal was not a ploy to temper or manipulate the results as alleged by the Petitioner.

The Petitioner failed to prove that it was a case of manipulation by INEC.

The glitches are not grounds to challenge the outcome of an election in view of section 134(1)b of the Electoral Act.

Great job Fergie! Kudos 👏

haffaze777:


This one enter oooo,can I borrow it?

Yes oooo..

skj1377:
Which balance?? They did not win

Are you trying to say his lawyers are still owing him change 😂?

Even before now I knew the petitions would fail going about what the Peter Obi lawyers were presenting during the hearing.

pquaver:


Na u papa make the mistake.. He is regretting his life. What time of son are u? Useless son of a wretched fan.. My friend find ur square root go follow ur fellow brainless O.... bi.....n....go s ... No body wan heare una noise...

Bros ur brain for something good for urself and the society u are better dan dis. If u like curse ur ancestors na u sabi. Enough of ur useless hatred

fergie001:

The glitches experienced during the of the results to the IREV portal was not a ploy to temper or manipulate the results as alleged by the Petitioner.

The Petitioner failed to prove that it was a case of manipulation by INEC.

The glitches are not grounds to challenge the outcome of an election in view of section 134(1)b of the Electoral Act.

It is clear that the petitioners were unable to substantiate their claims of non-compliance wrt Section 73 of the EA 2022.

skj1377:
Peter obi should have made sure he had polling agents with very good camera that will snap and send the pictures via satellite communications to his situation room. This is a lesson to future contestants . Peter obi would have had a picture evidence of all votes cast in his favour nationwide without recourse to INEC. Anyways it's too late. He should try harder next time

The results he got at the polling units across Lagos,why didn't he tender them as evidence he scored over 1m votes as his ers were alleging after the poll?I am in Edo state,and i can confirm to you he had agents across all the polling units in Edo state. Tinubu won the election fair and square.

Just now https://64tower.com/2023/09/tribunal-slap-out-petition-against-tinubu-gives-reasons/

Sheeeeesh ... literally everything against APC and INEC were dismissed

They should just give the final ruling no need to explain again, everybody understands... they basically can't remove a sitting president.

Jorussia:
The results he got at the polling units across Lagos, why didn't he tender them as evidence he scored over 1m votes as his ers were alleging after the poll? I am in Edo state,and i can confirm to you he had agents across all the polling units in Edo state. Tinubu won the election fair and square.

nobody has scored over a million votes in the history of Lagos State, those folks were just bloody liars and fake news experts

fergie001:

It is clear that the petitioners were unable to substantiate their claims of non-compliance wrt Section 73 of the EA 2022.

Rivers/Benue Results:

To prove falsification of results, the petitioner needs to produce two sets of results.... The real and the false one.

fergie001:

It is clear that the petitioners were unable to substantiate their claims of non-compliance wrt Section 73 of the EA 2022.

You already predicted this outcome when the supreme court gave her verdict in oyetola v adeleke case. I respect your intellectual capacity.

fergie001:

Rivers/Benue Results:

To prove falsification of results, the petitioner needs to produce two sets of results.... The real and the false one.

Prosecution Witness 4 completely destroyed the case of the petitioners by itting that Form EC8A is the document scanned into the IReV portal.

These are basic statements. The tribunal is clearly compromised

fergie001:

Prosecution Witness 4 completely destroyed the case of the petitioners by itting that Form EC8A is the document scanned into the IReV portal.

fergie001:

Prosecution Witness 4 completely destroyed the case of the petitioners by itting that Form EC8A is the document scanned into the IReV portal.

He itted that he didn't have as much document from INEC that he needed and only worked on Rivers and Benue States. He also claimed that he worked with data available from the IReV portal.

This completely rubbishes his report and hence his evidence has no probative value.

As earlier stated, PW7 is a person of interest been a member of the Party and vied for office in that party.

What are they still doing in court ??