You reason the matter. You are Muslim so you won't understand.
The young boy has past criminal records. That's what irked the policeman into firing a shot howbeit illegal.
In reaction, Arab Muslims raped several white ladies, burnt over 700 white houses, maimed the whites in a racial attack.
Do you expect the white not to show solidarity with a fellow white when you as a Muslim (Arab) show solidarity with a fellow Muslim(Arab) through your criminal conducts?
If you can show religious, hateful and criminal solidarity in a criminal matter, it is only fair you allow the white show love ie solidarity too to their own.
The white is still better than you because they choose to the family of the arrested policeman (who definitely will be left without a breadwinner) in a civilized way ie financial donations rather than deport all Muslims, rape, maim or kill them in retaliation.
Muslims as savages that they are, should learn from the white civilized approach. They could have donated money to the family of the dead Muslim rather than rape or kill whites and still expect white victims to appreciate them by donating money to a Savage Muslim. Does it make sense to you? Please, use your brain reason for once, don't always use koran to reason.
It is even a shame that these Muslim extremists could not financially their own. This goes on to show Islamic ethics of violence takes precedence over love, critical thinking or financial donations to the bereaved.
Muslim organizations world over only give financial aid to terror organizations or in of the spread of hateful preaching. They never give charity to sick, bereaved or poor Muslims except on for show off during festive days just to meet minimum religious obligation. No genuine love in such religion only violence. Yet, fear won't let you abadon it
Ruke1989:
You reason the matter. You are Muslim so you won't understand.
The young boy has past criminal records. That's what irked the policeman into firing a shot howbeit illegal.
In reaction, Arab Muslims raped several white ladies, burnt over 700 white houses, maimed the whites in a racial attack.
Do you expect the white not to show solidarity with a fellow white when you as a Muslim (Arab) show solidarity with a fellow Muslim(Arab) through your criminal conducts?
If you can show religious, hateful and criminal solidarity in a criminal matter, it is only fair you allow the white show love ie solidarity too to their own.
The white is still better than you because they choose to the family of the arrested policeman (who definitely will be left without a breadwinner) in a civilized way ie financial donations rather than deport all Muslims, rape, maim or kill them in retaliation.
Muslims as savages that they are, should learn from the white civilized approach. They could have donated money to the family of the dead Muslim rather than rape or kill whites and still expect white victims to appreciate them by donating money to a Savage Muslim. Does it make sense to you? Please, use your brain reason for once, don't always use koran to reason.
It is even a shame that these Muslim extremists could not financially their own. This goes on to show Islamic ethics of violence takes precedence over love, critical thinking or financial donations to the bereaved.
Muslim organizations world over only give financial aid to terror organizations or in of the spread of hateful preaching. They never give charity to sick, bereaved or poor Muslims except on for show off during festive days just to meet minimum religious obligation. No genuine love in such religion only violence. Yet, fear won't let you abadon it
I will respond to you because your argument seems reasonable. But how/why did you arrive at the conclusion that I am a Muslim?
Ruke1989:
You reason the matter. You are Muslim so you won't understand.
The young boy has past criminal records. That's what irked the policeman into firing a shot howbeit illegal.
In reaction, Arab Muslims raped several white ladies, burnt over 700 white houses, maimed the whites in a racial attack.
Do you expect the white not to show solidarity with a fellow white when you as a Muslim (Arab) show solidarity with a fellow Muslim(Arab) through your criminal conducts?
If you can show religious, hateful and criminal solidarity in a criminal matter, it is only fair you allow the white show love ie solidarity too to their own.
The white is still better than you because they choose to the family of the arrested policeman (who definitely will be left without a breadwinner) in a civilized way ie financial donations rather than deport all Muslims, rape, maim or kill them in retaliation.
Muslims as savages that they are, should learn from the white civilized approach. They could have donated money to the family of the dead Muslim rather than rape or kill whites and still expect white victims to appreciate them by donating money to a Savage Muslim. Does it make sense to you? Please, use your brain reason for once, don't always use koran to reason.
It is even a shame that these Muslim extremists could not financially their own. This goes on to show Islamic ethics of violence takes precedence over love, critical thinking or financial donations to the bereaved.
Muslim organizations world over only give financial aid to terror organizations or in of the spread of hateful preaching. They never give charity to sick, bereaved or poor Muslims except on for show off during festive days just to meet minimum religious obligation. No genuine love in such religion only violence. Yet, fear won't let you abadon it
Ruke1989:
You reason the matter. You are Muslim so you won't understand.
The young boy has past criminal records. That's what irked the policeman into firing a shot howbeit illegal.
In reaction, Arab Muslims raped several white ladies, burnt over 700 white houses, maimed the whites in a racial attack.
Do you expect the white not to show solidarity with a fellow white when you as a Muslim (Arab) show solidarity with a fellow Muslim(Arab) through your criminal conducts?
If you can show religious, hateful and criminal solidarity in a criminal matter, it is only fair you allow the white show love ie solidarity too to their own.
The white is still better than you because they choose to the family of the arrested policeman (who definitely will be left without a breadwinner) in a civilized way ie financial donations rather than deport all Muslims, rape, maim or kill them in retaliation.
Muslims as savages that they are, should learn from the white civilized approach. They could have donated money to the family of the dead Muslim rather than rape or kill whites and still expect white victims to appreciate them by donating money to a Savage Muslim. Does it make sense to you? Please, use your brain reason for once, don't always use koran to reason.
It is even a shame that these Muslim extremists could not financially their own. This goes on to show Islamic ethics of violence takes precedence over love, critical thinking or financial donations to the bereaved.
Muslim organizations world over only give financial aid to terror organizations or in of the spread of hateful preaching. They never give charity to sick, bereaved or poor Muslims except on for show off during festive days just to meet minimum religious obligation. No genuine love in such religion only violence. Yet, fear won't let you abadon it
House niggar, I'm not suprised by your stupid comment since you think you're special by not being a Muslim. Whites don't give 2 fvcks if you're a Christian or Muslim, or herbalist, their prejudice against you can never change as long as you're not white. Even Arabs dgaf, look what's happening in Tunisia. I'm not a Muslim either.
Ruke1989:
You reason the matter. You are Muslim so you won't understand.
The young boy has past criminal records. That's what irked the policeman into firing a shot howbeit illegal.
In reaction, Arab Muslims raped several white ladies, burnt over 700 white houses, maimed the whites in a racial attack.
Do you expect the white not to show solidarity with a fellow white when you as a Muslim (Arab) show solidarity with a fellow Muslim(Arab) through your criminal conducts?
If you can show religious, hateful and criminal solidarity in a criminal matter, it is only fair you allow the white show love ie solidarity too to their own.
The white is still better than you because they choose to the family of the arrested policeman (who definitely will be left without a breadwinner) in a civilized way ie financial donations rather than deport all Muslims, rape, maim or kill them in retaliation.
Muslims as savages that they are, should learn from the white civilized approach. They could have donated money to the family of the dead Muslim rather than rape or kill whites and still expect white victims to appreciate them by donating money to a Savage Muslim. Does it make sense to you? Please, use your brain reason for once, don't always use koran to reason.
It is even a shame that these Muslim extremists could not financially their own. This goes on to show Islamic ethics of violence takes precedence over love, critical thinking or financial donations to the bereaved.
Muslim organizations world over only give financial aid to terror organizations or in of the spread of hateful preaching. They never give charity to sick, bereaved or poor Muslims except on for show off during festive days just to meet minimum religious obligation. No genuine love in such religion only violence. Yet, fear won't let you abadon it
Arabs did this to French in their own country?
the movie the hate you give?
She asked the police if the kid was a white kid, would he have shot the guy. Dude backed out on his statement.
If only you know the number of death caused by 'Christianity'.
Islam is still learning.
They belong to the same source.
I it that there were deaths caused by Christianity. I dont it or agree that Islam is still learning in that regard. I share a different view.
The massacres committed through Jihads is not as documented in history as the massacres from the crusades. I am not saying they are the same in of number killings or one is more than the other. I don't have facts to prove that on hand right now.
What I am saying is, if you go by the documentation of recent history, and add to it, the televised renderings of this history, through the media, film makers etc, you would get the impression or sense that the crusaders wrecked havoc on the world and thus did more killings than jihadists.
I it that there were deaths caused by Christianity. I dont it or agree that Islam is still learning in that regard. I share a different view.
The massacres committed through Jihads is not as documented in history as the massacres from the crusades. I am not saying they are the same in of number killings or one is more than the other. I don't have facts to prove that on hand right now.
What I am saying is, if you go by the documentation of recent history, and add to it, the televised renderings of this history, through the media, film makers etc, you would get the impression or sense that the crusaders wrecked havoc on the world and thus did more killings than jihadists.
Oga, go and read history.
Not here to argue.
Crusaders are just one of the numerous death merchants in Christianity.
Death via Christianity is like x 3 of that of Islam because the former is older and more widespread than the latter.
But in your effort to offer a resource for me to research, you refer me to quora.com? Thats like saying I should check Nairaland.com 🙊
Anyway, history is written by the victors of conquests. And thats for those who cared to document like the christians/crusaders.
I think the Arabs may not have cared that much to document or record at the onset of their Jihads...until documentation and records became widly available to those who would do it on their behalf.
Again to the point, I don't dispute that people died at the hands of Christians, what I am saying is, deaths from Jihads, or Arabs or Islam is not learning...not at all. They are not that far behind!
Not Sarah, blame grandpa Abraham. That grandpa too like women. Grandma Sarah was handicap!
You don't know what you're saying, Abraham was probably one of the richest men in his time,yet he was married to Sarah only till he was 90 plus. How did he "too like women"? Next time stick to the tribalism, hatred and religious bigotry and intolerance you know best. Keep spiritual things beyond your knowledge out of your mouth.
You don't know what you're saying, Abraham was probably one of the richest men in his time,yet he was married to Sarah only till he was 90 plus. How did he "too like women"? Next time stick to the tribalism, hatred and religious bigotry and intolerance you know best. Keep spiritual things beyond your knowledge out of your mouth.
Hey kid, I'm not sure you know the person you addressed with the above boldest statement. It's obvious you lack both comprehension and emotional intelligence. Did I said Abraham was married to many women? Did Abraham had sexual intercouse with anther woman in the Bible? Next time get understanding (proverb. 4:7, proverb. 3:13) before you reply me.
