NewStats: 3,262,067 , 8,176,009 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 May 2025 at 05:26 PM 1m6k6o

Transgender 'Dad' Breastfeeds 'His' Baby After Giving Birth To Him


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgFdwKIeVsQ

'Why shouldn't I utilise what I've got?'

Read More

Bashing from aproko, “So-Called-Christians” loading. . . . .
Not my bizznezz.

Pukes

The baby is happy. The parent is happy.

What an aberration. 🤢

Inside life. Lord have mercy!

DontBullshitMe:
The baby is happy. The parent is happy.

It's only natural for the baby to be happy when being breastfed.

When he comes of age and sees this, I'm sure he'll cringe. Unless he chooses to tow his dad's line.

Lol
Funny news. But also not funny.
This crap that the western world is trying to push down humanity's throat - homosexuality, LGBTQ+, blah blah blah - it can't work. Nah.


It's against the Natural order of things for a man to breastfeed a baby. It CAN NEVER end well.


Some people say that we should allow homosexuals do "what makes them happy". If that's the case, how come suicide rates among gay people is up the roof?
Cheap lies of satan. Lol.


These folk try to paint themselves happy, paint everything fine and rosy. But nah...its a facade.


How will God create you a man, with the configuration of a man, and you say that you were meant to be born a woman. That, my people, is a mental disorder.

I don't hate gays or transgender folks. I believe they need deliverance first, then therapy. I've interacted with a few gay people so I'm not homophobic. But you can't try to sell me on the fact that it is normal for you to think you're a woman. It's not normal. It goes against every natural law of science and biology.

Stranger Things
Tom Stiglich January 8, 2022


Cartoon by Tom Stiglich, Commentary by R. Mitchell, Editor-in-Chief

RoyalBlu:
What an aberration. 🤢
Inside life. Lord have mercy!

Aberration of what? The Lord who made the body make it configurable, didn't He? So why are you miffed that there are those taking advantage of that to obtain for themselves happiness of the kind they seek?

RoyalBlu:
It's only natural for the baby to be happy when being breastfed. When he comes of age and sees this, I'm sure he'll cringe. Unless he chooses to tow his dad's line.

The reason you cringe is because of the bullsheet you have been fed regarding such things and nothing more. Learn instead to live and let live!

Kobojunkiee:
Aberration of what? The Lord who made the body make it configurable, didn't He? So why are you miffed that there are those taking advantage of that to obtain for themselves happiness of the kind they seek?

Ah Kobo!!!

Configurable That a man should have a womb, breastfeed a baby in the actual sense?
This is a deviation from the natural order of things and it's cringe worthy.

Whose work are you doing exactly?

RoyalBlu:
■Ah Kobo!!! Configurable That a man should have a womb, breastfeed a baby in the actual sense?
This is a deviation from the natural order of things and it's cringe worthy.
■Whose work are you doing exactly?

1. Yes, it is quite configurable!

2. I am certain you are not going to say God sent you to look down on others because He never sent anyone to do that on His behalf. So, whoever you think you do this for, it is certainly not Jesus Christ.

That child is not safe with the evil..father

Kobojunkiee:
1. Yes, it is quite configurable!

2. I am certain you are not going to say God sent you to look down on others because He never sent anyone to do that on His behalf. So, whoever you think you do this for, it is certainly not Jesus Christ.

Are you a student of kobojunkie?

Just noticing the difference. Was beginning to wonder why you were yet to roll out some Bible verses to back up your 'sermon'


Live and let live doesn't hold up all of the time.

RoyalBlu:
■Are you a student of kobojunkie? Just noticing the difference. Was beginning to wonder why you were yet to roll out some Bible verses to back up your 'sermon'
■Live and let live doesn't hold up all of the time.

1. Tt's my other moniker. There is no scripture that prohibits what you see nor is there scripture to validate your pretend stance against it.

2. Then you don't know Jesus Christ at all. He didn't send you or anything into the world to condemn those who do not believe or care for Him. Nor did He send you to condemn those who do either. He sent you out to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to live your existence in continuous submission and obedience to His teachings and commandments — God's Truth and Law in the Kingdom of God. So, when you go out judging others by a standard that has nothing that has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, pretending you do so for His sake, you actually violate your agreement with God —sin against God.

Kobojunkie:
1. Tt's my other moniker. There is no scripture that prohibits what you see nor is there scripture to validate your pretend stance against it.

2. Then you don't know Jesus Christ at all. He didn't send you or anything into the world to condemn those who do not believe or care for Him. Nor did He send you to condemn those who do either. He sent you out to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to live your existence in continuous submission and obedience to His teachings and commandments — God's Truth and Law in the Kingdom of God. So, when you go out judging others by a standard that has nothing that has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, pretending you do so for His sake, you actually violate your agreement with God —sin against God.

Pains

But you judged her same way she did, so there is no difference between you two.

Jovialjune1:
Pains. But you judged her same way she did, so there is no difference between you two.

Can you please explain how I judged her so I can be certain what this is directed at?

Kobojunkie:
Can you please explain how I judged her so I can be certain what this is directed at?

The bolded.

Kobojunkiee:
The reason you cringe is because of the bullsheet you have been fed regarding such things and nothing more.

You assumed and judged her.

Jovialjune1:
The bolded. You assumed and judged her.

How is stating that the reason she cringes has to do with what she had fed on a judgment against her?

RoyalBlu:


Ah Kobo!!!

Configurable That a man should have a womb, breastfeed a baby in the actual sense?
This is a deviation from the natural order of things and it's cringe worthy.

Whose work are you doing exactly?

Don't mind kobo. I believe he/she is a troll.
So if the human body is "configurable", it means that a woman should be able to get impregnated by a dog and nobody should bat an eyelid because a humans body is configurable.


Very laughable and ludicrous assertions. It SHALL NOT STAND, BY GOD AND HIS MERCY.

Kobojunkie:
How is stating that the reason she cringes has to do with what she had fed on a judgment against her?

How do you know that the reason she cringed has to do with what she has been fed? She is not capable of thinking for herself?

DontBullshitMe:
The baby is happy. The parent is happy.

How do you know the baby is happy?
How do you know if the parent is happy?
Have you seen the suicide rates for gays? Through the roof. And I'm very positive that the suicide rate for transgenders will be way higher because they are mutilating their bodies by trying to reconfigure themselves.

Jovialjune1:
How do you know that the reason she cringed has to do with what she has been fed? She is not capable of thinking on her own?

Her post has an obvious religious connotation to her stance and from her other posts, I was able to gather that she is more likely a Churchian. So, how is that a judgment?

WhisperedNoise:
■Don't mind kobo. I believe he/she is a troll.
So if the human body is "configurable", it means that a woman should be able to get impregnated by a dog and nobody should bat an eyelid because a humans body is configurable.
■ Very laughable and ludicrous assertions. It SHALL NOT STAND, BY GOD AND HIS MERCY.

1. If? Evidence is right before your eyes confirming it is indeed configurable to an extent, yet you are stil asking "if"?

2. Yeah, there emotional rants are indeed laughable, and ludicrous!

Jovialjune1:
The bolded. You assumed and judged her.

I couldn't have done that though since..

Kobojunkie:
Her post has an obvious religious connotation to her stance and from her other posts, I was able to gather that she is more likely a Churchian. So, how is that a judgment?

... as I made clear in my post,
▪︎ there was religious undertone to her cringe
▪︎ she is in fact a churchian

Telling me I judged/condemned her amounts to implying it is wrong for calling a spade a spade.

Kobojunkiee:
I couldn't have done that though since.. ... as I made clear in my post,
▪︎ there was religious undertone to her cringe
▪︎ she is in fact a churchian

Telling me I judged/condemned her amounts to implying it is wrong for calling a spade a spade.

Kobo, rest.

Kobojunkie:
1. Tt's my other moniker. There is no scripture that prohibits what you see nor is there scripture to validate your pretend stance against it.

2. Then you don't know Jesus Christ at all. He didn't send you or anything into the world to condemn those who do not believe or care for Him. Nor did He send you to condemn those who do either. He sent you out to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to live your existence in continuous submission and obedience to His teachings and commandments — God's Truth and Law in the Kingdom of God. So, when you go out judging others by a standard that has nothing that has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, pretending you do so for His sake, you actually violate your agreement with God —sin against God.

Just so we're clear, far it be from me that I look down on or condemn anyone for whatever reason.

This phenomenon right before me here is an aberration. I'm not seeing it in another way.

You called it my pretend stance...

Well, go on and preach this very sermon to your brethren whom you can see and see how it goes.

Kobojunkie:
Her post has an obvious religious connotation to her stance and from her other posts, I was able to gather that she is more likely a Churchian. So, how is that a judgment?

Churchian?

Kobojunkie, remove the planks...

RoyalBlu:
Churchian?
Kobojunkie, remove the planks...

I am not a churchian though. So what plank do you mean?

LilMissFavvy:
That child is not safe with the evil..father

is it that he was a woman before or what

WhisperedNoise:

How do you know the baby is happy?
How do you know if the parent is happy?
Have you seen the suicide rates for gays? Through the roof. And I'm very positive that the suicide rate for transgenders will be way higher because they are mutilating their bodies by trying to reconfigure themselves.

I don’t think they are happy people, apart from suicide, they kill each other at the slightest infidelity, one was killed recently and his body was stuffed in a suitcase…. They sleep with any of their kind as well

Yes, he used to be a woman, but transgendered to become a man in his upper body, while still retaining some of his female reproductive organs.

Lamanii22:
is it that he was a woman before or what