NewStats: 3,264,103 , 8,182,611 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 04:54 PM 386u5c

doctokwus:
Well said, prof Sagay.
I salute the courage of the transition monitoring group and now prof Sagay who have come out openly to lampoon this set of justices of the Supreme Court.
I said it here,that the supreme Court tried to justify their clearly fraudulent ruling by convenienting choosing a technicality that suited its aim.
But u cannot seperate justice from the law as Sagay said.
Where justice is not served,anarchy reigns and that's what these crop of sc judges did in Rivers.
They wud be held responsible for foisting anarchy in rivers because when shi t hits the fan,everyone wud have to for their part in what caused the shi t to escape from the bowel in the first place.
That they are judges of the SC wud not cow right thinking people from calling a spade by its crooked shape.

Lamentation chapter 1 vs 1.

Why do you guys hail the judiciary when the ruling is in your favour but cry blue murder when its against you? Pfft.

missingrib:
I will do just that.....happy birthday to all Feb 14 celebrants...

Funny @Feb 14 Celebrants.

@Topic, Valentine's day has been abused.

A: How can I reach you by transportation?

B: T or UDP.

Lol. Happy sale bro.

I think you already know where the problem lies. Work on your port numbers.

Please, in the name of God, don't move this Lawma material to front page. Let the FP regain its glory.