NewStats: 3,264,682 , 8,184,405 topics. Date: Thursday, 12 June 2025 at 01:55 AM 4v3l4h

Tinubu ti lule piii Lekan siii. Congratulations to Atiku Abubakar in advance. February 25th presidential poll is sacrosanct

YeeboMuslim:

Clown
You better find proper work .
We've removed PDP's leprous fingers from Osun state coffers for good

Pdp is unmovable in Osun State and Yoruba Land entirety. Tinubu ma lule piii Lekan siii. February 25th presidential poll is a protest votes against the drug trafficker Tinubu in Yoruba Land.

Cajal:

This dude is still working in the past
INEC SERVER ko BVAS ni

Adeleke can never win at the apex court

Adeleke wins cos’ the Apex court of justice will examine the Bvas machines and its reports. Congratulations to governor Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke

RAND250:


Why you dey cry you don already give your opinion with no fact

clueless guy that never read the section 51 of the signed Amended electoral acts Buhari signed last February. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun

iwaeda:


Imole de

okunkun Parada 💪💪💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️💡💡💡💡✌️✌️✌️✌️🏆🏆🏆🏆🎈🎈🎈🎈

RAND250:



You dey ment

it pained you well 😆

Cajal:

10 QUESTIONS FOR LEARNED SILK, FEMI FALANA, BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.

Help call the attention of Learned Silk Femi Falana to the following points, so as for him to retrace his position on Arise Tv interview today, and in his subsequent interviews as far as Osun 2022 Governorship Election Petition proceedings were concerned:

1. Let the Learned Silk be informed that the Tribunal rejected a certified true copy of the Court of Appeal judgment that cleared Senator Ademola Adeleke of forgery as per his academic documents submitted to INEC in 2018. Let him in good conscience assist us with the position of the law in this situation.

2. Let the Learned Silk also know that the Tribunal closed its eyes against the Law pavilion authority cited before it that reported the Court of Appeal decision that cleared Adeleke of forgery in respect of the same issue and document attached to his electoral forms both in 2018 and 2022, despite the mandatory provision of the Constitution and the Evidence Act that all subordinate courts must take judicial notice of and apply the decisions of superior courts. Infact, that all courts must take judicial notice of judgments of especially superior courts of record.

3.Let Oga Femi Falana SAN, be informed that the petitioners never challenged the accreditation on BVAS machines themselves, neither did they challenge the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines which never established over-voting as falsely claimed by the petitioners.

4. Let the Learned Silk know that the petitioners were challenging the election on the figures on the BVAS reports obtained from the INEC back end server as against the BVAS machines and the direct data on them. Let the Learned silk know that there were two backend server reports which were contradictory, however the information on the machines themselves never changed and they tallied with the Forms EC8As.

5. Let the Learned Silk advise which of the two contradictory BVAS reports from the server should be preferred over the other. Let him tell us which one was the primary source and the best evidence between the BVAS reports from the server and the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines.

6. Let the Learnes Silk, Femi Falana, enlighten us whether truly, voters has no place again in our elections. Let him tell us if truly voters has no place again in our elections and has been replaced by BVAs whether to establish over-voting you need not bring the BVAS itself the primary source.

7. Let the Learned Silk explain to us section 51 of the Electoral Act, 2022, whether when overvoting is truly established and it is substantial as to alter the results of the election, whether a declaration or return could be made as done by the Tribunal.

8. Let him also tell us whether he had really gone through the pleadings of the party vis-a-vis the proceedings at the Tribunal before rendering his opinion on National TV, because from his submission, he seemed not to grab it properly that what the petitioners queried was not the BVAS itself but the BVAS report obtained from the INEC back end server.

9. Let the Learned Silk educate us on whether the Constitutional provision mandating each court or tribunal sitting as a to not only express but also pronounce their opinion in writing, individually, even if in absentia, is sacrosanct.

10. Finally, let Oga tell us whether the Constitution envisages t delivery of a judgment co-signed or counter-signed by judges sitting as a member, without each of them reducing his individual opinion separately in writing, even if to write "I agree".

Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02NVWK9Lnwiz3kidC7kL2KEpPLUvduQ9UdAnbz6cxyKrasQivz4CYHnCtSdQV4LMBPl&id=100026656960460&mibextid=Nif5oz

Cajal:
He will loose

*_10 QUESTIONS FOR LEARNED SILK, FEMI FALANA, BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ._*

Help call the attention of Learned Silk Femi Falana to the following points, so as for him to retrace his position on Arise Tv interview today, and in his subsequent interviews as far as Osun 2022 Governorship Election Petition proceedings were concerned:

1. Let the Learned Silk be informed that the Tribunal rejected a certified true copy of the Court of Appeal judgment that cleared Senator Ademola Adeleke of forgery as per his academic documents submitted to INEC in 2018. Let him in good conscience assist us with the position of the law in this situation.

2. Let the Learned Silk also know that the Tribunal closed its eyes against the Law pavilion authority cited before it that reported the Court of Appeal decision that cleared Adeleke of forgery in respect of the same issue and document attached to his electoral forms both in 2018 and 2022, despite the mandatory provision of the Constitution and the Evidence Act that all subordinate courts must take judicial notice of and apply the decisions of superior courts. Infact, that all courts must take judicial notice of judgments of especially superior courts of record.

3.Let Oga Femi Falana SAN, be informed that the petitioners never challenged the accreditation on BVAS machines themselves, neither did they challenge the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines which never established over-voting as falsely claimed by the petitioners.

4. Let the Learned Silk know that the petitioners were challenging the election on the figures on the BVAS reports obtained from the INEC back end server as against the BVAS machines and the direct data on them. Let the Learned silk know that there were two backend server reports which were contradictory, however the information on the machines themselves never changed and they tallied with the Forms EC8As.

5. Let the Learned Silk advise which of the two contradictory BVAS reports from the server should be preferred over the other. Let him tell us which one was the primary source and the best evidence between the BVAS reports from the server and the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines.

6. Let the Learnes Silk, Femi Falana, enlighten us whether truly, voters has no place again in our elections. Let him tell us if truly voters has no place again in our elections and has been replaced by BVAs whether to establish over-voting you need not bring the BVAS itself the primary source.

7. Let the Learned Silk explain to us section 51 of the Electoral Act, 2022, whether when overvoting is truly established and it is substantial as to alter the results of the election, whether a declaration or return could be made as done by the Tribunal.

8. Let him also tell us whether he had really gone through the pleadings of the party vis-a-vis the proceedings at the Tribunal before rendering his opinion on National TV, because from his submission, he seemed not to grab it properly that what the petitioners queried was not the BVAS itself but the BVAS report obtained from the INEC back end server.

9. Let the Learned Silk educate us on whether the Constitutional provision mandating each court or tribunal sitting as a to not only express but also pronounce their opinion in writing, individually, even if in absentia, is sacrosanct.

10. Finally, let Oga tell us whether the Constitution envisages t delivery of a judgment co-signed or counter-signed by judges sitting as a member, without each of them reducing his individual opinion separately in writing, even if to write "I agree".

Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02NVWK9Lnwiz3kidC7kL2KEpPLUvduQ9UdAnbz6cxyKrasQivz4CYHnCtSdQV4LMBPl&id=100026656960460&mibextid=Nif5oz

Cajal:

The justice is ... penalizing him for over voting
and rigging
He can never win at the apex court

he will win at both Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice. Supreme Court of justice will affirmed governor Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke as the elected governor of Osun State which scored the highest votes 🗳

Atiku Abubakar wins February 25th presidential poll

BRIMBRAM:


It's game over for Adeleke. Anything else is noise making.

you are just clueless in thinking here, have you read Signed Amended electoral Act 2022 niiii, stop arguing blindly here joor. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Oyetola is a clueless goner and clueless loser in the 2 courts

Cajal:
It's unfortunate Adeleke would have to be penalized for INEC fault
Neither Appeal nor supreme can impeach the tribunal rulling
It is crystal clear

😂 na you be justice that will sit on the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice . Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is here . Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

*HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.*


1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' S. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.

3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.

5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.

6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.

7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.

8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.

9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.

10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.

11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.

12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.

13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.

14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.

15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.

16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.

17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.

18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.

- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

quickberry:


Oju e maa to la...Oyetola lo ni Osun, Jagaban lo ni aare orile ede Nigeria.

odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu lokan that will collect his breakfast. Ole jati jati. Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

femisplash:

Osun is BATIFIED.
You have always been a loser, you carry badluck everywhere. Go & Adedancer as a backup dancer so that you can feed your wife & kid.

Tinubu ti lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Infact in his country home in Iragbiji, Tinubu ti lule piii ni be. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. It’s fight to victories for Atiku in February 25th presidential poll. Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

*HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.*


1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' S. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.

3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.

5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.

6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.

7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.

8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.

9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.

10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.

11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.

12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.

13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.

14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.

15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.

16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.

17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.

18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.

- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

EcoBrick:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/01/osun-how-bvas-exposed-pdps-rigging-machine/




Mynd44
Nlfpmod

Ismail omipidan the clueless press Secretary to Oyetola lies and propaganda are Siamese twins. Awon ole oni ro jati jati

quickberry:


Adeleke maa lule ni Appeal Court ati Supreme Court.

Oyetola ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu lokan to ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii . February 25th presidential poll is here and we are fully ready to votes massively . Tinubu the clueless drug trafficker ma lule niiii

femisplash:

PDP fraudsters will never return to Osun, go & find work.

oponu afofun gbemu, Pdp wins Appeal court and Supreme Court justice too. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule pii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is a protest votes in Osun State and Yoruba Land. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule niii

Mandate2023:


Werey r u from osun.....u won't face ur gunmen ridden region

oponu gbogbo 😂 😆

Baba ebenezer babaTope talk truths here

quickberry:


Just dey play

play it well oooo

Atiku Abubakar wins February 25th presidential poll

rolams:


If BVAS is for accreditation and form EC8 is meant for results. Then, to determine the issue at hand, BVAS is supposed to be examine at the court and the judgement should be base on it and the result sheet.

Abeg enlighten him more . Fergie001 I want your input on this response here

Jostoman:
Baba tinubu want to take Adeleke mandate by fire by force.

it will never happen by fire by thunder

FINAL MESSAGES TO OSUN RESIDENTS: IT'S NO LONGER A YORUBA AFFAIRS BUT A FIGHT TO PROTECT OUR MANDATE.

My fellow Osun citizens,

The tribunal has finished its terrible verdicts and it has gone permanently. The furious citizens have organized a peaceful protest which is valid under the constitution.

My advice to all the fans of Governor Ademola Adeleke and also lovers of the PDP is to begin to crusade vigorously from House to House, Ward to Ward, Local Government to Local Government, explaining to the residents the economic downturn the ruling party APC is committing every day and the difficulty will not be unraveled if they proceed to elect the ruling party APC.

Also, educating them that it's not a Yoruba affair, it is a fight to protect their mandate. The TINUBU and APC presidency's primary objective is to activate every alternative to abduct authority from the People's Governor, Ademola Adeleke.

Likewise, enlightening them about the opportunities we are going to have as a state and we are going to appreciate it. If Atiku Abubakar emerges, Osun will have a bright opportunity to become the most fortunate among states in Nigeria, for instance,
Adeleke has been cherished by Atiku Abubakar and Atiku's wife is from Osun state.

Finally, warning them that this is the last opportunity they can utilize to protect themselves from this ferocious party, APC, that doesn't look after the interests of the citizens.

Thank you all.
God bless Osun State.
Imole fun Ipinle Osun.

drlateef:





The shape of the mouth of the lawyer shows that he will be telling plenty of lies. Has he sat down to ask himself: where did the report on the server come from? Who planted it on INEC server. Awon olodo!!!

what he said really pained you. Eku Atemora