NewStats: 3,264,408 , 8,183,637 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 11:02 PM 32qd

this 36yr old man joachim or whatever what is his problen he will not see barca to shine with

was that gk in a prayer meeting

ororo scores 4-2

why wont ramos respect himself and go without a card
that goal didnt enter
when is bale going

i hope asensio is staying as perez said
ramos equalizes i knew he would make me proud

that 2nd goal nacho should cleared the ball

ronaldo missed it

we are losing

now they have equalize what was ramos and casemiro doing ffs

what is wrong with this team betis almost scored there

ramos pls man this defence properly

good run in by asensio

Miremoses1:
Looks like we are playing a diamond 4-4-2 with big Benz on the bench. Starting line-up in a bit

its not a diamond, asensio lm and lucas rm

ronaldo and bale are up top

EarthXmetahuman:
that's a dumb deal.

100 + ronaldo or outright 200million.

see thief. bale is worth atleast 100m, am talking about how overprice hazard is your talking about ronaldo. can chelsea even afford his salary

Miremoses1:
modric isn't leaving. There is a rumor that kroos will leave this summer. If any one has to leave, it should be benzema.

why kroos?

Miremoses1:
very well. But the last part you said ronaldo to play as a cf, is a big no. when he came back from suspension . Zizou played him as a cf, but he didn't thrive. Playing a 4-4-2 diamond is OK by me, but Madrid is known for counter attack, that's why I think we will stick with the 4-3-3. And with that formation, we have ronaldo(LWF) Benz(cf) bale(RWF and in the midfield, we have kross, casemiro and modric. The only way hazard coming into that midfield is if modric or kross leaves in the summer, which I hope not.

bale is too inconsistent for a team like madrid to depend on. we will get a new CF so ronaldo can play beside him. ronaldo has lost pace to play wing as effectly as he used to.

kroos won't leave, likely modric then a midfield 3 would be DM Casemiro, CM kroos right, AM hazard left, but then who plays RW if bale goes. i think zizou and madrid want to use a 4-4-2 except we buy SALAH but we are linked to strikers, no wingers.

Miremoses1:
hazard coming to Madrid will see the downfall of either isco or asensio. We all know zizou loves hazard. I'm not against him getting the dude. But I wouldn't like to see asensio suffering for game-time

i feel the 100m + bale is very expensive, if marina accepts the offer.

either isco or modric should go, with zidane's last statement if true, isco is staying then modric will leave.

casemiro DM, kroos CM, isco RM, hazard LM then 2 strikers. zidane can still go casemiro DM, Kroos CM, isco RM, asensio LM, hazard SS, Ronaldo CF

that is if Kovacic does not bench isco.

it's just a matter of us losing bale and modric this summer. both are declining so is not a waste if they go

Miremoses1:
well, what we really need now is a striker, a clinical one. Even if we get hazard, in that midfield, who will he replace in the starting 11?

isco in a heartbeat. we play 4-4-2 zidane's preferred formation Hazard is the best LM, AM I know.

it will be like having our very own iniesta, city have there own. ronaldo and kane (i prefer icardi) can play front two.

that is a dm, 2 cm; hazard; ronaldo and kane.

or we play casemiro, kroos, lucas rm, asensio lm, hazard ss, ronaldo cf

Eyedea:

Hazard is another version of benzema, hold up play, dribbles blah blah blah but no goals.
we don't need that

am not understanding you is hazard a CF, how many AM have more goals that hazard.

is hazard the kane or icardi we want to buy, if it's about about goals then why did we buy isco or even james rodriguez (that was even better at scoring than hazard) how many goals did they have?

you think it's conte that has never coached a player to score 30goals a season that will turn hazard to a high scoring striker.

is it bale we need, off and on, atimes selfish and a blind bat.

i agree benzema has been having bad luck, i still want benzema in madrid alas as a backup CF

Miremoses1:
asensio isn't part of that deal. I think it's bale. Buh seriously I wouldn't welcome hazard to Madrid.

I dont want him doesn't mean i won't welcome him, we need fresh legs and someone with great quality to play for the team.

having hazard in our midfield will be bloody, let ronaldo just do his tap ins. hazard is one of the hardest players for any defense to stop.

hazard came back from serious injury like it was nothing, see the way he linked up with morata that period. or is it hazard in belgium.

since we cant get neymar, hazard is the next best thing. there is not a single better option, maybe cheaper options but not better.

all these selfish proud players we already have in our attack. if only isco was consistent enough who would have done so well hazard won't have been considered.

if getting hazard makes zizou stay then am ok with it.

Eyedea:

Really nigga? BTW bale>hazard, we don't need another version of benzema till we get another version of ronaldo

which one is another version of benzema?

Eruditor:


Enrique did not build any defensive structure. In his reign Barca became a counter-attacking team that relied on MSN not the midfielders.

he did what some managers failed to do, use messi has a winger. make use a real striker and bring the best out of neymar.

barca lost xavi the engine of tiki taka, so instead of slow build up play he made it quicker and shortened the transition time from defense to attack. his focus was on winning games (not winning midfield) and won 76% of his matches.

you can't play good counter attack without a good defensive structure.

umiti was brought and utilize by enrique, who also brought a tactical sound and more defensive minded digne, also replaced dani alves.

even bravo and stergen will tell you enrique did defensive drills if you ask them.

EV is a tactical genius but some of winnings have been by luck and not always because barca played well. you guys are now shouting balance balance upandan (BALANCE FC).

I hope marina rejects madrid's offer of 100m + bale for hazard.

I want asensio to stay but is offering bale + 100m to chelsea for hazard really a good idea?

Kennitrust:
myth

alot of things are called myths till truth was found.

donnie:


And how did you come about "banquet" when the OP mentioned nothing in that regard?

Nevertheless, In Mat 22 & Luke 14 the Lord Himself likened the kingdom of heaven to a man who organized a feast. So what's your headache. Is it your banquet?

yes it is my banquet and thank you for asking I don't have a headache

a political meeting disguise as a service.

ClumsyFlimsy:

Yea Enrique is a good coach no mind that boy


But my problem now be say wetin make u dey defend Enrique like this

E be like u be closet barca fan

Or u dey pray make abrahimovich sack Conte for Enrique


Anyways come Tuesday Stamford bridge must fall

if conte was not ready to beat barca then chelsea should get someone that knows barca to beat barca.

that was my thought when conte's job was on the line. chelsea fans still have faith in him anyway but barca CL out is still the plan


Enrique had almost the same 11 for 3 years and built the defensive structure he was criticised for that EV is enjoying now and being praised for.

jamescross:
we should be looking at max Meyer, all the German inputs to our team have excelled so far and he would be free.

Fred for £45m to replace Fernadinho in the summer, hope he is a good g

now it 40m for julian weigl, 22years old from dortmund

VivaLaByke:

1000times better actually.

Enrique doesn't have a single tactical acumen.

yet he worn 9trophies in 3years while pep worn 10trophies in the same period of time. and they both worn 6 major trophies in 3years.



clap for yourself

zionmde:

the fig tree Jesus went to pluck, was he the one that planted it?
Yes Jesus sent his disciples on a second mission and he asked them to carry enough ( or u didn't see that one)
hahahaha where exactly did Jesus get the money he used to provide for his disciples' daily need?
lastly do u have any evidence of a false promises Oyedepo made?

first of my posts have nothing to do with oyedepo, or maybe you think they do because the truth does agree with him.

enough of what and for what? do not remove the purpose of a text and input yours.

read the laws in israel about letting the poor, windows, orphans and less privilegde eat from their trees and fields taking enough they could eat for that day.

but but you read the bible

zionmde:

did Jesus condemn their actions?
I don't care about Wat atheists think its their business
if u can't condemn an action using the bible as a reference then swerve
Oyedepo also have angels the same with me
Who told u God didn't choose to prosper oyedepo

GO AHEAD WITH UR POVERTY ANNOINTING
I REST MY CASE HERE

no he encouraged (in a sarcastic voice)

you don't need a bible reference, you read the bible .

like I said God can let a wicked man prosper, that is why he said, this people say i take pleasure in the prosperity of the wicked.

Jesus said God sends rain upon both the good and the evil.

don't be like job's friends, wealth doesn't define God's favor upon a man's life and doesn't prove such a man is walking under God's light.

well the anointed was poor, picked up the cross and died and like paul said if such fate await me, TO DIE IS GAIN.

false teachers have no place with God, Matt 7:15-23