NewStats: 3,263,633 , 8,180,856 topics. Date: Friday, 06 June 2025 at 11:55 PM 5r4a16

Small time the same Saudi Arabia will legalize LGBTQ+ to please Westerners but they'd say it's only limited to non-nationals in their countries. It's just a matter of time. Bikini nudity (checked), alcohol (checked), very soon pork too would be checked, and very soon LGBTQ+ too checked. Confused people with no dignity.

Anyways, oh my, what a large-lipped Saudi Arabian model.

This just depicts exactly the situation of this news: '...Following the vote on the motion, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs lobby group called the outcome “misguided and disingenuous”...'.

The supposed Canadians are indeed misguided.

According to Cambridge dictionary, referendum is a vote in which all the people in a country or an area are asked to give their opinion about or decide an important political or social question. Referendum is a direct voting where matters of grave national/social/economic consequence are posed to the general population within voting age to decide upon. A recent example of a world-popular referendum was UK's 2016 referendum to leave the EU, brexit where 52% of her voting population voted to leave the EU and 48% voted against leaving. Leaving EU was a weighty decision given its impact on the national/cultural/economic interest of the UK, and instead of relying the decision-making on just a few 650 parliament in a country of over 66,000,000 individuals, the decision-making was posed to every electorate in the country to make instead.

However in Nigeria, the 1999 Constitution as amended (2011) does not provide for this very important and useful policy and decision-making tool. The question is then, who does Nigeria belong to? If Nigeria truly belongs to the Nigerian citizens, to the over 200 million people and the next 200 million after it, then how come the ability to make important decisions that affect them, that affect national interest, economic interest and so on are not given to them, but instead placed in the hands of but a single man, a president, or a few caucus of friends and colleagues, the senators and honourables?

Nigeria as it is known is quite a delicate country, there are diverse interests, various ethnicities, various religions, various cultures, etc. and as a concerned resident of Nigeria it is pertinent for me to raise this issue: "why is there no provision for referendum in the Nigerian constitution?"; "don't Nigerians deserve the ability to hold referendums?"; "is referendum useful and has a place in the Nigerian setting?"

On this faceless and quite anonymous forum, I ask these. And should there policy think-thank organizers seeing this, please could you raise this issue and let it be discussed and deliberated upon? And should there be a representative in the National Assembly seeing this, oh I'm in luck, could you think about this and possibly propose it to the Assembly?

Seun Osewa, what do you think about this?

naija4life247:


How come they have not completely annihilated Palestine over the years despite the fact that whole Europe, USA, Canada, Australia have all been supplying weapons and mercenaries to Israel?

That's a fine question, maybe you should go to Israel and ask them that question. Anyways, the IDF are the most comionate military in the world. Even as evil humans surrounding them continuously want 'death to all jews' in order to make their own heaven, the Israel and IDF were still comionate, until now although, said.

Procashtips:


The Bible.

Just as I thought.

You can't find this anywhere else but the Bible.

Enough said.

Tip: The Palestinians are ethnic to that land.

Who are the Samaritans?

Who do you think were Bethlehemites?

Do you know the people of Cannan and their present day children?

He, mikeapollo tendered written evidence of Israel people's correct claim to the land(s), he tendered archaelogical findings that show correct evidence of Israel people's claim to that land. In fact, on my side here, the Roman of conquest describe the state Israel. So where is your own evidence that Palestinians are blah blah blah that's besides those folks were Arabs in tents, migraters, tenters? Oh yes, I , you're barbaric, savage and stone-deaf to reason and always ing what is evil to spite what is good, correct and accurate.

Procashtips:


I have no need to further engage you.

You're not worth the effort and not fit enough to be accorded a space where civilised people engage each other.

Wait, who are the civilised people? You? No you, you are not civilized, you are quite barbaric and akin to a savage. I gave you knowledge you ran away like a rabid dog, I gave you insight, you squandered it and continued on like a savage. I gave you evidence, answered your question, educated you but you chose to prune away that education, you didn't quote it full. You're a savage, you need to think your life or get help.

Procashtips:


Do you also accept that other books are also book of history including the Gilgamesh Epic,
Hindu ring Vega,
Enuma Elish,
Enuma amu enlil,
The Egyptian book of the dead,
The tales of the two brothers.
The Chinese classics of poetry, documents and changes,
Odyssey and the lliad,
Hesiod’s Works and Days and Theogony.

These books above are older than the Bible

There are other historical books too

Should we then believe they are true?

If you Bible all therein in the Bible even with some contradictions discovered in it so far, then should you not believe others too or you're just too brainwashed to believe it can't be wrong same as the Muslims believe Korean is true?

I theorized you were a fool and now I have evidence. If the Hindu ring Vega talks about the political happenings of the Indian setting, talks about the geographic description of the Indian setting at the time that it was written and evidence can trace back the date it was written down then it can be accepted as an evidence that points to the political history and geographic history of that Indian setting as it happened at that time. Now if it goes further to talk about how the Indian people in the setting contained in it were like and their behaviours, it can pinpoint to the social history of those Indian people as they were at that time (subject to various reviews anyways). Now if further it talks about the spiritual/religious beliefs of the Indian people that were involved in the Hindu ring Vega, or participated in it, etc, that too could pinpoint to the religious history of those Indian people at that very point in time that the said Hindu ring vega was traced to.

Now apply what I wrote on Hindu ring Vega to the other items on your list.

Nobody asked you to believe the Bible through translations didn't include inaccuracies, in fact, nobody asked you to believe the prophesies in there. Obasanjo wrote the book "Under My Watch", it is compiled into some other bigger books, 200 years, 500 years, all things being equal to this time, that self-report by him would form part of the history of Nigeria as he spoke about his political istration in Nigeria. Do you believe what Obasanjo wrote, nobody cares but that is written history, and could always be tendered as evidence in the future.

Now have I educated you young ignorant human?

DeepSight:


You are the fool. You are also quite illiterate.



Yes it contains some history, but also much myth, legend and barbaric injuctions.
Interestingly, the the Bible gives of Israel's history corroborates the point that they are murderous land grabbers - this they repeatedly did, under the instruction of their pagan, murderous, barbaric mountain deity, Yahweh.



This is where your illiteracy, ignorance and lack of exposure actually shine through brightly. The bold discloses you to be an ethnic chauvinist who assumes that among black African races only the Yoruba have recorded history of any kind.



No, you shattap. You dont know jack shit.

Your moniker, deep sight, you mean shallow sight, or maybe even zero sight. Lolz. Anyways, you say the Bible is myth blah blah, ok, that's your problem, it seems you're an atheist and that's fine there's freedom. Again, like I'd tell you the Bible (Old Testament specifically) is a book of history among other things. History that says Jews are land-grabbers, etc. Again, you're such either an atheist or maybe not an atheist but someone who just either was led to hate Israel unreasonably, your case is hard one man. The Bible, Old Testament specifically is a book of history amon other things that gave the history of ... and the history of Abraham and the generations after him and which includes their self-reported relationship with YHWH, their downfalls, tribulations, mistakes, glories, some wars, fine moments too in chronological order until ofcourse, no more judge and no more kings for them (Rome occupied their land).

Now if you don't agree on the self-reported spiritual aspect of that Bible, again, this topic is not about that rather as I put "the political and geographic history", meaning this topic is not about the right or wrong of Israel rather how the historical of the Bible correlates with the written historical of other regions that kept "written historical records". Talk about Persia, ancient texts from Babylon, etc.!

I'm an ethnic chauvinist cause I said "save except you're Yoruba and the Yoruba ancestors had oral rendition of history of their time in ese Ifa"? Tell me, are you suffering from esteem issues? Where there did I say only Yoruba? Where there did I even mention written? And also, based on findings, African groups didn't write history of their time down, even Egypt didn't write, they used images, I learnt some Cameroonian groups were starting to develop own 'alphabetical letters' but was tarnished by Mother Theresa and the likes anyways. Listen man, I'm not any ethnic chauvinist or whatever you call it but I'm familiar most with antics of the Yoruba ethnicity and the Fulani ethnicity and the Yoruba has history encoded in their ese Ifa, history arguably from the beginning of their own time.

Conclusively, the Bible is a book of history among other things and as with all ancient texts is always tenderable when giving written evidence of history.

Procashtips:


Just see people I share one country with

You obviously think the Bible is the only "book of history"?

The same Bible some scholars said copied other books older than it?

The same Bible with different versions?

The same Bible that has different numbers in them?

The same Bible that the Catholics claim theirs is the correct one compared to that of the protestants?

The same Bible with different wordings?

Don't get me started.

Bring different versions of Bibles and see if they're all saying the same thing.

The fact that you even went abusive on me says alot about you.

I just replied you knowing fully well you're still in the realm of ignorance.

Like I said, you're ignorant. The Bible is book of history among other things, specifically the Old Testament. You're concerned about the cheap things like different wordings, even different comma's I'm sure. But yet again, the Bible is a book of history and the political and geographic history contained in the bible (Old Testament Bible arguably by the Jews that is but the Torah, etc) correlates with the written history of other regions of the world that kept written histories of their times.

If you're concerned about different versions of the Bible, that's your problem not mine, if you're concerned about the disparities in translations of the Bible, once again, that's your problem not mine.

Had it been you had been exposed to history, to the study of history well your statement would have different, but alas you're not especially as most Africans don't even have written histories since the beginning of their times of their own, so I understand and I spare you.

Blazebond:
Anybody standing with Israel in this genocide is A BASTARD,and their generations will suffer the same fate as the Palestinians.

No you made a mistake. You're supposed to say "anyone standing with Israel will get the same destiny/fate as Israel and anyone standing with Palestinians will get the same fate as Palestinians". Cause you stand with someone you get the same good or bad that they get, that is, those standing with Israel will get that, and those standing against Israel will get the same treatment that enemies of the state of Israel get. It's logical, use logic ok?

Procashtips:


If you're asked to provide evidence, you say the Bible.

The same Bible your slave masters used to enslave your ancestors.

You don't even know who you are, so why should I expect anything better?

If Bible is what you will quote as your evidence, please don't quote me further.

Sorry to say but you're a fool. The bible is a book of history among other things, specifically the Old Testament is a book of history written in chronological order. Unfortunately for you, your generations, your ancestors don't have written history compared to how the Babylonians, Israel people, etc. kept written history since the beginning of their time (save except you're Yoruba and the Yoruba ancestors kept quite some history in the oral rendition of ese Ifa).

So is the Bible enough evidence as to what tctrills posted, yes it is. Now does the history of other regions correlate with the history, political and geographic history contained in the Bible, yes they do. Next time young ignorant human, shut up on matters you have no idea of.

.

ANTlSLAAM:


Who is a real muslimah according to Quran?




I will drop my address, phone number, etc for the live debate, infact I've been looking for Muslims to have live debate with but before then, name someone allah heals in the Quran?

Well according to the quaran, no. 1, someone who believes that the prophet is allah's messenger, believes in the hereafter, pays the zakat and observes prayer. and to believe the prophet is to shun this and that.

in the quaran, no human person was healed. spoke predominantly on fighting, the unrighteous people of the past, wives, widows, orphans, sharing of spoils of war. although resurrection, restoration of bodies of dead was spoken about many instances, which the prophet said will happen during day of resurrection.

Now your questions are answered.

Can someone please enlighten me? These guys want to be self-reliant, and also want Nnamdi Kanu released, so how does sitting at home as though making a statement correlate? Shouldn't they be meeting with stakeholders instead and say, cutting their ties with rest of Nigeria?

Am I missing something? For what related reason do they sit at homes rather than acting?

AgentKB:
I found something quite disturbing and I feel it's worth sharing. Perhaps I'll get someone to help me get a hang of it

About 8 days ago, the news of Bank of America's delegates to Nigeria made headlines: at least on Google. With the news, I "personally" thought we're finally getting a few things right.

The part where their analysts said Nigeria naira is undervalued got me quite exited. It even raised my hopes that we might see some better days in the coming year.

But, today's news seems quite disturbing. Can these people be trusted? And why is Nigerian government forming alliance with a group of people with questionable integrity and desperate business moves?

Their submission on Naira was merely analysis, they are mere analysts doing their job and Bank of America is an investment bank going about its interest. Don't take them too serious. Goldman Sachs may come tomorrow to issue its own analysis and partnership proposition, no big deal.

ANTlSLAAM:


Who is a real muslimah according to Quran?




I will drop my address, phone number, etc for the live debate, infact I've been looking for Muslims to have live debate with but before then, name someone allah heals in the Quran?

Allah...