NewStats: 3,263,699 , 8,181,074 topics. Date: Saturday, 07 June 2025 at 11:45 AM 6q4i14

This is more of a civil/contractual dispute. Will be difficult to get a conviction except there are other facts not disclosed in the post….

Islie:


https://www.vanguardngr.com/2025/03/my-husband-makes-love-from-midnight-till-dawn-kaduna-woman-wants-divorce/

Na waooooo
It’s usually the other way around. 90% of women cry that their partners are 2minutes men while this one is crying of too much of a sweet thing.

SIMPLE SOLUTION: allow the man marry 2-3 other wives (if he can afford it), do time-table and everyone is happy….

fergie001:


SOURCE

Natasha is not helping her case with this attitude of accusing every one of bias. What INEC took is the correct step. As an example, if you look at the Rules of Procedure of the High Courts of ALL the 36 States as well as FCT, they all, without exception, contain prescriptions as to effect of non-compliance and they all stipulate that failure to comply with the provisions of the Rules as to time, manner, form, mode, etc of doing anything prescribed in the Rules will not invalidate or nullify any proceedings, processes, documents, steps taken, etc as it is mere irregularity which can be corrected. Pure issue of technicality does not invalidate the substance of proceedings as the Supreme Court has held in thousands of cases. The issue here as I understand it is that only one of about six persons who presented the Petition included her address as the leader of the group while the INEC Rules prescribe that all the presenters should do so. This omission does not go to the substance of the Petition itself or validity of the alleged 250K signatures which is a different issue entirely.
To give a practical example from legal proceedings which is even stricter than INEC Rules; if Counsel does not sign a document, the process is a nullity which cannot be cured but if the omission is failure to put his NBA stamp/seal on the process as required by the rules, it is mere irregularity which will not invalidate the process as the Court will merely ask Counsel to go and affix it.
The other day at the Senate Committee on Ethics & Privileges meeting, the Petitioner in the matter of Natasha’s allegations against Akpabio stated that the Committee was biased when hearing had not even started. He refused to adopt his Petition & affidavit in . If that is the case, the Petition is dead on arrival. If the Petition & affidavit in are not adopted, the Committee cannot proceed & the only option is to strike out the Petition. Perhaps, the Committee refrained from doing that because of the outcry by Nigerians who don’t care to understand issues or procedures & also because the confrontation between Ezekwesili & the Senator from Ebonyi disrupted proceedings.
My point is that if Natasha keeps throwing allegations of bias all over, time will come when no one will take her seriously anymore & when instance of actual and genuine bias against her arises, the public will dismiss it with a wave of hand as her normal frivolous allegations….

NgeneUkwenu:
Ok. Fubara is gone for good!

What the ruling means is that: Only the Sole can authorise the Rivers State government to challenge the proclamation in court. Any other person is meddlesome interloper unknown to law...So says the supreme court!

Oya ipob obedients come and cry as usual!

Simply means Fubara and his Deputy or any other aggrieved person with locus Standi can sue in their own names and not in the name of Rivers State….

As a man with three daughters, I don’t take sexual harassment lightly. That said, these allegations don’t hold water simply because it can’t be proved.
PROOF is at the heart of evidence & he who alleges must prove. That a man said, from time to time, come around & let’s chill in my house does not amount to sexual harassment. First Akpabio will say it’s not true & it ends there. Secondly, even if Natasha’s husband says he heard the words, the words themselves amount to nothing in law. Thirdly, the presence of her husband there, walking along with them, means it can no longer be termed “HARASSMENT”. That word harassment is the key word. There needs to be an overt threat of denial of rights, opportunity, advantage, privilege, etc contained in the words said or actions taken or threatened for harassment to be considered. In the workplace where the concept of sexual harassment was born, it is based on the fact that undue pressure & demand for sex by a superior might force the Junior staff to succumb for fear of losing her job or promotion, etc. It is no harassment if a Bank janitor propositions his Manager for sex no matter how aggressively. Office romance is not banned generally. People have been known to marry their Secretaries, junior colleagues, etc & it always starts with a proposition, approach or TOASTING. That the junior colleague is not interested in the toasting does not automatically make it harassment.
A wise woman who has genuine complaints should be patient & set a trap so as to get credible evidence. The fact that an MD/CEO said to the Secretary, come over to my guest house this weekend and make me happy is not sexual harassment in and of its own. That may even be the prayer point of the Secretary for months. If she says “yes Sir, my pleasure, I will be there….”; it’s no harassment. If she says “no Sir, I am sorry but I would rather not come to your house or guest house on a private visit….” & the MD moves on & takes no adverse action against her, that is also not sexual harassment.
Finally, Natasha has not YET taken any action whatsoever to establish or press her claim of harassment. Her action in Court is for defamation not sexual harassment. It should also be pointed out that she has no credibility on this subject & Akpabio will certainly rely on this if the matter arises anywhere. Even in Court, unless there is clear-cut irrefutable evidence, a Judge may not ascribe credibility to her testimony due to the “shouting wolf” phenomenon. Natasha has a history of making false accusations of sexual harassment against men without proof. One good example is when she accused Reno Omokri through a post on her social media handle of harassing her for sex on a specific occasion. The problem was that Reno was abroad at the very period she claimed that he harassed her; he published his port with its Visa & immigration stamps & she pulled down the post. Such history of lying & false accusations of being sexually harassed without offering credible proof, will work against her….

Reading the comments of many Nigerians in this story, one feels so sorry for what Nigerians have become. IT IS SO SAD. Many lack even the most minimal of comprehension skills. They can’t even read or understand what they read. Any article or post over 200 words riles them and they become resentful. You see a total lack of home training or courtesy. Most readers did not even attempt to comprehend or assess the statement or explanation made by the Law Maker one way or the other. You don’t have to agree with his side of the story but readers are expected to at least give a reasoned explanation for disagreeing. Instead it’s just ranting, raving, whining, frothing at the mouth and cussing. Even when the Law Maker has stated that he sued Binance & its CEO in September 2024 for the false allegations against him and gave details of particulars of the case in which hearing has already started, illiterates & mor.ons here are still crying that he should go to Court if he is innocent while other cret.ins mock his resort to the Courts to clear his name. If these are the future leaders of Nigeria, we have no hope.

COPIED FROM ONE NAIJA BROS ON ANOTHER FORUM:
It is indeed a sad day for Abia State. Finally, the TODDLER-GOVERNOR of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu, has caved in to his Lords and Masters, Ochendo and his son Ikuku. In doing so the unity of the Ukwa-Ngwa Nation has been shattered forever. The selfishness, greed, avarice and inconsiderateness displayed by Ikpeazu is unmatched in the history of Nigeria. Ikpeazu is from OBIOMA NGWA which constitutes the Obingwa/Ugwunagbo/Osisioma Ngwa Federal Constituency. At the time of the 2015 General elections, the common wisdom was that with the Governorship going to the Obioma Ngwa Federal Constituency (Obingwa/Ugwunagbo/Osisioma Ngwa Federal
Constituency), the Senate seat for the Abia South Senatorial District will
naturally go to the Ukwa East/Ukwa West Federal constituency. But Obioma Ngwa people in their usual avarice and greed insisted on also keeping the Senate seat with the result that both the Governor and the Senator are from the same LGA which is unprecedented in the history of Abia State and indeed unheard of in any other part of Nigeria. But the Ukwa-Ngwa Nation rallied round to douse the fire so that it does not consume the desire of their people to mount the office of Governor for the first time ever. Now, the same Obioma Ngwa has also taken the office of Speaker. In an unprecedented move, ONE FEDERAL CONSTITUENCY (Obingwa/Ugwunagbo/Osisioma Ngwa Federal Constituency) has produced the Governor of the State, Speaker of the State and also Senator of the Federal Republic. Meanwhile, the new Speaker, Bishop Kennedy Njoku who is a neophyte in legislative matters and is just a year and some months old in the House of Assembly is known to be A GLORIFIED HOUSE BOY of Chinedu Orji (Ikuku), son of
the former Governor, T.A. Orji. Bishop has signed undated letters of resignation and even shot some videos announcing his resignation which are in possession of Ikuku. Also in possession of Ikuku is the signatures of twenty of the House. That signature page could be attached at any time to any other impeachment Notice including that of the Governor. Ikuku now has free access to the Abia Treasury as he will always wave the signatures to the Governor if he proves recalcitrant in granting his wishes. Martins Azubuike had been shielding Ikpeazu from the antics of Ikuku who had been trying to use the House of Assembly to bully the Governor and this has led to great enmity between Martins and Ikuku who has been complaining to anyone who cares to listen that Martins is disrespecting him, Ikuku. For the Governor who doled out millions of Naira to bribe the House to effect this impeachment, karma is a bitch. The knives are out in Abia State. Interesting days lie ahead. It will be interesting to see how things play out and how the Governor manages the fire he has lit. A so-called Ph.D holder whose closest advisers are touts like Godwin Obioma Nna, Raymond Aliga, Nwalor, Erondu, Jnr.; people without any pedigree whatsoever. Once bottles of Henessy XO are on the table, these fraudsters who have held Ikpeazu hostage drink their senses out and the state of Abia totters

http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/06/30/lawyer-withdraws-suit-seeking-buharis-disqualification-for-lack-of-certificate-his-life-allegedly-threatened/#comment-39148

Lawyer Withdraws Suit Seeking Buhari’s Disqualification for Lack of Certificate His life allegedly threatened
June 30, 2016

Davidson Iriekpen

A legal practitioner, Mr. Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, has filed a notice at the Federal High Court in Abuja to discontinue the suit he instituted seeking the disqualification of President Muhammadu Buhari for lack of certificate.
Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe had alleged that Buhari was not qualified to aspire for the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria because he did not sit for the Cambridge West African School Certificate (WASC) in 1961 as he claimed.

The notice of discontinuance dated June 27 and obtained by THISDAY, read: “Take note that the plaintiff in this originating summons, Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, hereby discontinues this action.”
THISDAY checks revealed that following the withdrawal of the suit from court, the trial judge, Justice Ademola Adeniyi will today sit and accordingly strike out the case.
Though Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe did not give any reason for withdrawing the case from court, THISDAY gathered that it might not be unconnected with alleged threats to his life and of his family.
In an interview with THISDAY last month, Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe had alleged that there were some subtle threats on him to withdraw the case from court.
He had said: "Of course, I am concerned and my family and friends are too; I am not naïve and some subtle threats have already been made. For now it is small comfort that if anything happens to me, even if disguised as an accident or anything, Nigerians will know exactly who is responsible.
“In any case, it was Professor Wole Soyinka, I think, who once said in one of his books that ‘The Man Dies in Him Who Keeps Quiet in The Face of Tyranny’ or something of the sort. Speaking of which, I am amazed at the conspiracy of silence by Nigerians. It is astounding is it not, that in the light of this very apparent rape of our constitution, laws, indeed the very essence of our democracy, all of our civil society advocates and activists have gone deaf and dumb in the face of tyranny.
“All those voluble persons (and I don’t want to name them; they know themselves and Nigerians know them too), who pretend they are activists or keepers of the moral conscience of the nation astonishingly can’t see or appreciate what is happening. This country really misses Chief Gani Fawehinmi; he was the only fearless, credible, true and genuine conscience of the nation, not the pretenders we have today; all the others only make noise when it suits them and their interests but look the other way once they are compromised. None of us today, can tie Gani’s shoe-laces.”

http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/06/21/the-ghost-of-buharis-certificate-scandal-resurfaces/

June 20, 2016 Politics
Certificate Saga: Group Warns Presidency, Stop Threatening Nwolocha-Ahaaiwe-Just Produce Your WASC

Report made available to Newsflashngr indicate that a human rights group in Nigeria, the Centre for Human Rights and Social Justice (CHRSJ) has warned the Presidency under the headship of President Muhammadu Buhari against the threatening of a Private Lawyer, Barrister Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe over his stance on the case instituted against President Buhari for alleged lack of prerequisite West Africa School Certificate (WASC) to contest the March 28, 2015 Presidential election, insisting that Buhari lacked the least requirement of School Certificate to stand for the election as required by Form CF001 of the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC).

It disclosed that this issue of Certificate forgery would continue reoccurrence until President Buhari presented his acclaimed School Certificate to the whole world which it should not different in contents from the ‘Statement of Results’ shown to the whole world in February 2015 during a purported Press conference at the wake of 2015 Presidential election, recalling that the First Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Salisu Buhari in this political dispensation were removed from office and hallow Chamber of the National Assembly as a result of Toronto University Certificate forgery .

Reacting to the threat of the Presidency by its Spokesperson, Mr. Garba Sheu against Nwolocha-Ahaaiwe , through a signed statement by the CHRSJ’s Executive Chairman, Comrade Adeniyi, Alimi Sulaiman which a copy was made available to newsmen on Monday, stated that no amount of threat from the Presidency against the courageous Legal Practitioner, could stop the truth of the matter before the Court of Competent jurisdiction, Presided over by Justice Adeniyi Ademola.

Rights activist who urged President Buhari to tender unreserved apology for the great stigma he brought to the country as a result of his failure to present the acclaimed West Africa School Certificate (WASC) to the public by taking the honourable step of tendering his voluntary resignation from office of the President, saying that the era of impunity has become the thing of the past in the land.

Speaking further on the threat issue against Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, Comrade Sulaiman who saluted the courage of the Abuja based Legal Practitioner, maintaining that Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe has put himself in the shoe of our late Legal giant and fearless, credible, incorruptible, genuine social crusader and conscience of the nation, Chief Gani Fawehinmi,SAM,SAN, throwing the group weight behind the genuine cause of the Certificate saga of Mr. President, adding that this was the reason why, the British Prime Minister, Mr. David Cameroon called Nigeria, a fantastically corrupt country recently.

According to him, “This is high time we call a spade a spade. The well meaning Nigerians, particularly, the Northern leaders should tell President Muhamamdu Buhari to present his Cambridge WASC certificate to the public as being claimed in the INEC Form CF001.From all indications, President Buhari did not sit for the west Africa School Certificate(WASC) Examination and Buhari just ed the Nigeria Army with a ‘Letter of Recommendation’ from his Principal instead of School Certificate.

This is a fraud of highest order which should not be allowed to stand during this hard earned democratic era. Mr. Salishu Buhari was just removed from the Lower Chamber of the National Assembly because of Toronto forgery Certificate Saga at the wake of this current democratic dispensation.

President Buhari should just tender his voluntary resignation because he did not qualify to contest for the election at the initial stage. The lack of educational qualification of the President really shows in the way and manner the country is being governed presently.

“With this development, Buhari has committed a criminal offence of not being able to provide the original certificate of his acclaimed ‘WASC’s Statement of Result’. Barrister Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe has constitutional rights to express his opinion on any issue of national importance like this nature.

This is how some hoodlums were physically attacked late Chief Gani Fawehinmi at the High Court Premises in Lagos State during the trial of alleged Chicagogate forgery case against the then Lagos State governor, Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu”.

He faulted the nation’s electoral body under the then Chairman, Professor Attahiru Jegga for not disqualifying Buhari from the presidential race of March 28, 2015 election, noting that this development shown the level of compromise by the electoral body during the run-up to the election, describing the threat by the Presidency as a ruse, undemocratic, satanic and unconstitutional which was against the tenets of democracy.

Sulaiman who doubles as Chairman, Civil Societies Coalition for the Emancipation of Osun State (CSCEOS), then called on the authority of the security agencies in the land to beef up security around the Barrister Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, noting that Presidency should be held responsible if anything bad happened to the legal luminary, adding that the genuine pro-democracy activists would not allow President Buhari and his co-travelers to return the country back to the despotic military dark days.

Signed
COMRADE ADENIYI, ALIMI SULAIMAN
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN, CENTR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE (CHRSJ) +2348038591504/+2348022697573
http://www.newsflashngr.com/certificate-saga-group-warns-presidency-stop-threatening-nwolocha-ahaaiwe-just-produce-your-wasc/

In his Nomination Form and affidavit in , Buhari only put WASC as his qualification for President. He did not mention primary school FSLC nor did he mention any certificate or diploma obtained from War College or any other course he attended. All speculation by of the public as to any other qualification he has is moot because he himself did not claim them. If he does not provide proof of the WASC he claimed, then he has committed perjury & will be disqualified

histemple:


If you read through carefully, you will understand the unnecessary details contained therein. In journalism, reporting every single thing that happened is a sign of incompetence.

Reducing this article to 1/3 of it can still give us the whole message without straining our eyes endlessly.

Don't wallow in your ignorance; it's an interview not an article

Of all the people who filed suits to challenge President Muhammadu Buhari’s qualifications to stand for election to office of president regarding his West African School Certificate, WASC, in the run-up to the general election last year, it is only Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe who has refused to back down from pursuing the case in court. Others have since lost interest and moved on, Davidson Iriekpen asks why

Nigerians were taken by surprise when the Federal High Court, Abuja gave a ruling on May 26, 2016 dismissing the preliminary objections filed by President Muhammadu Buhari in response to your suit challenging his eligibility to stand for election because the general belief was that all the legal actions bothering on his qualification to stand for election to office of President or regarding his WAEC certificate had since been disposed off; what happened in this case?

My action is still pending. It went under the radar because General Buhari adopted an approach and tactics of delaying the matter; in fact the strategy was that the merits of the case would never be heard until after the President serves out his term in office. Their first tactics of course was to ensure that the case which was filed and served on them in February 2015 would not be heard and determined until after the general elections to avoid the possibility of General Buhari being barred from contesting the election. After the general election, the next tactics is to ensure the substantive action will never be heard and determined by the court. These were actualised by the filing of all sorts of frivolous objections that delayed the matter until the court was now able to give a ruling on them on the 26th May 2016 after over one year of the case being instituted. Ordinarily, this sort of matter should be given accelerated hearing and disposed within a month or two of its being instituted being a matter of the utmost national importance but for some reason, the president’s legal team wouldn’t have anything to do with an expeditious disposition of the case.

Why is that?

You mean why they do not want the case to be concluded expeditiously? We can only speculate. It is significant that no defence has been filed for the president and his party the APC in this case. After over a year they were served. Interestingly, INEC who are 1st defendants in the case promptly filed a purported defence within time upon being served but the 2nd and 3rd defendants being the APC and General Buhari have not filed any defence. so I guess that tells the whole story.

So what do we expect on the next adjourned court date being June 16, 2016?

Well, the information I have is that General Buhari’s legal team in execution of their tactics of not wanting the substantive case and the issues raised therein to be heard, are planning to file an appeal against the ruling of the Federal High Court and thereafter apply to stay proceedings in the latter court. In their calculation, the appeal will take another one or two years. If they lose, they will appeal on that interlocutory matter to the Supreme Court where it may take another three years. I am keeping an open mind about it.


So what exactly is President Buhari contesting in these interlocutory applications?

He claims he was not properly served with the originating summons. He is not saying he was not served, but that he was not properly served; that he was served at an address in Abuja instead of an address in Kaduna where he was resident as at the time of service. The court had granted an order permitting us to serve him by substituted service at the national headquarters of APC in Abuja and we did but General Buhari contends that unless he is served at an address in Kaduna, the service is not proper. Now, of course, the Federal High Court has ruled that he was properly served and that ruling is what he wants to appeal. Now you would expect that a President who rode to power on the altar of personal integrity and anti-corruption would take the first opportunity to answer to the substance of the case and clarify and/or defend the substantive issues. But Nigerians can now clearly see the hypocrisy playing out here. For example, if I hear a rumour that someone is claiming in some court that I am a fake lawyer, I will not wait to be served but will do everything to discover the court where he filed such action and defend it. I will go to the court myself and apply for a certificate tone copy of the processes so I can defend it because I am sure I am duly qualified to practice law; I will not start using technicalities to frustrate the case being heard expeditiously as it is in my interest for the matter to be concluded as soon as possible so I can continue my legal practice without any distractions.

So we are not expecting the substantive issues to be argued on June 16, 2016 as the judge has indicated?
It’s not likely, not only because I expect General Buhari to file an application to stay all further proceedings in the Federal High Court pending the outcome of an appeal or to bring a fresh preliminary objection on some other frivolous ground other than the one already disposed of, but because I will myself also be bringing an application to amend my originating summons. My application will be heard on the 16th of June 2016. The reason is that I filed the originating summons before the general elections and my prayers then was to disqualify General Buhari and bar him from contesting the elections not being constitutionally qualified to do so; now that the elections are over and General Buhari has assumed the office of President, my prayers need to be amended so I can pray the court to declare his election a nullity, order the 1st defendant (INEC) to withdraw his Certificate of Return and issue same to the party and its candidate which came second at the election and had a qualified candidate

This is the PDP and Dr. Goodluck Jonathan? Does this not confirm the speculation that this is a ploy by the PDP to come back to power through the back door?
To answer your first question, Yes. That is an idle and false speculation. I had no discussion with anyone in the PDP before I brought the action, nor have I since. I have never met Dr. Goodluck Jonathan in person. I have equally received no whatsoever from anyone in the PDP. I am a lawyer and I saw and appreciated that the Constitution of the Federal Republic was being raped with impunity and therefore brought this action to address it. I have nothing against General Buhari as a person, but I believe he is not qualified to be President as provided by our Constitution which is the grundnorm. If he is not qualified, then he should not occupy that office; there is nothing sentimental about it. If Chief Gani Fawehinmi were alive today and brought a similar action, which he surely would have, will you accuse him of doing so to favour the PDP or anyone? So why should my own action be perceived in that light?



Because we knew you are a ed card-carrying member of PDP

I am a ed member of the PDP for sure but I am a lawyer and a citizen first and foremost. That my action might end up favoring my party is really beside the point.

So what is the substantive case all about?

I don’t want to go into that in detail because it is still a matter before the court. I will only give you the background which is a matter of public record anyway, without commenting on the specific issues before the court. [b]As everyone now knows from available records at the disposal of the general public, General Buhari ed for the Cambridge West African School Certificate when he was in his final year in Provincial Secondary School, Katsina. He was given an Examination number, but before he could sit for the examination, the Nigerian Army started recruiting with the minimum requirement being possession of a WASC or the equivalent at that time. The recruitment was supposed to be for those who had already sat for their WASC and obtained a certificate, i.e. the High School graduates of the previous year and not for General Buhari’s set who would be qualified to apply the following year after sitting for their WASC. Since he did not have any WASC not having yet sat for the exam, General Buhari got his Principal to issue him a recommendation letter in lieu of his WASC. All these are matters of public records and I am sure you also saw a bromide of that recommendation letter when it was published. General Buhari was enlisted into the Nigerian Army with his Principal’s recommendation letter and not his WASC. Having been enlisted, General Buhari reported at the Army Depot for training and commenced his military career; he never went back to sit for the WASC and that is why the Nigeria Army called a press conference at the height of the controversy and stated unequivocally that no WASC had ever been found in his file. You will recall that the Director of Army Public Relations (DAPR) at their January 2015 press conference said as follows and I quote: “In his personal file in the Nigerian Army, he does not have his original copy of his WASC, nor the Nigerian Army have the certified true copy of his WASC results, neither do we have a photocopy. We don’t have that but we do have other documents to show how he was recruited into the Nigeria Army as was entered on Form 199A”. Needless to say, that “other documents” which the Army has which shows how General Buhari was recruited is the Principal’s recommendation letter. You may also recall that at the height of the controversy in early 2015, some Nigerians wrote to the University of Cambridge requesting the School to furnish them with details of the contents of General Buhari’s file relating to the Cambridge WASC he ed for but the university responded that they can only act at the written request of the candidate himself. General Buhari blatantly refused to request Cambridge to release those details so we could confirm conclusively if he ever sat for the exam he ed for and if any certificate was ever issued to him. Indeed, you may also recall that upon assuming and being sworn into the office of President, one of General Buhari’s first official visits was to England, and the popular joke then which went viral on social media was that he would use the opportunity of that visit to go to Cambridge University and request them to release a copy of his certificate if it ever existed, but that never happened.[/b]

This is serious; are you saying the president never even sat for the examination?

I am not the one saying so. The public records say so and the army said as much too. He ed the army with a letter of recommendation from his Principal instead of any WASC and of course this means that his entire career in the army is a complete fraud along with all the ranks he was awarded. He denied some other candidate who was qualified and had his WASC an opportunity of being enlisted into the army and this puts all the ranks obtained and offices held by General Buhari in question.

Considering the serious repercussions this case will have in the polity if the court finds merit in your case, are you not concerned for your personal safety?


Of course, I am concerned and my family and friends are too; I am not naïve and some subtle threats have already been made. For now it is small comfort that if anything happens to me, even if disguised as an accident or anything, Nigerians will know exactly who is responsible. In any case, it was Professor Wole Soyinka, I think, who once said in one of his books that The Man Dies In Him Who Keeps Quiet In The Face Of Tyranny or something of the sort. Speaking of which, I am amazed at the conspiracy of silence by Nigerians. It is astounding not, that in the light of this very apparent rape of our constitution, laws, indeed the very essence of our democracy, all of our civil society advocates and activists have gone deaf and dumb in the face of tyranny. All those voluble persons (and I don’t want to name them; they know themselves and Nigerians know them too), who pretend they are activists or keepers of the moral conscience of the nation astonishingly can’t see or appreciate what is happening. This country really misses Chief Gani Fawehinmi; he was the only fearless, credible, true and genuine conscience of the nation, not the pretenders we have today; all the others only make noise when it suits them and their interests but look the other way once they are compromised. None of us today, can tie Gani’s shoe-laces. Even the Ambassadors in Nigeria of the leading world democracies who would normally make statements on issues of this sort are mute: they have left us to our fate. I think only the British Prime Minister has said something that could be related to this issue when he said that Nigeria has graduated from being corrupt under the previous dispensation to being “fantastically corrupt” under the current President. No corruption can be more fantastic than when the head of a country; it’s President and custodian of its Constitution and laws, illegally and unlawfully ascends into office corruptly and with impunity. You know the saying about when the head of a fish is rotten; the rest is fantastic.

http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/06/11/nwokocha-ahaaiwe-buhari-has-no-certificate/

Utchgirl:



Logically,it's APC dt won d election and nt Buhari.So if peradventure, Buhari is found guilty,APC wil provide anoda person 2 occupy dt position.So,my point is dt PDP/Johnathan is nt an option here. I think we hv a similar case @ Kogi elections last yr. They r almost d same issue if dt wil be d case.

Sorry Sir; if the Court holds that Buhari was not qualified ab initio to contest; the LEGAL IMPLICATION is that the APC fielded no candidate at the election for office of President. The party that came second and its candidate will be declared winner of the election

Vomm:
Where ar the ZOMBIES?

Them go talk say the report na lie now cos paper has refuse to publish it.

What evidence do nigerians need to blv that the dry, empty skull daura king does not even have NEPA BILL sef let alone WEAC result.

With the way issues in this country are been handled,I don't blv we need a soothsayer to tell us that he is an ILLITERATE

Thisday newspaper published it yesterday, Friday at page 11

freeze001:
Source please?

SOURCE is First hand eye-witness . I happen to be a Lawyer & was in that Court for another matter when the case was called up first by the Judge and the Ruling delivered. Only the Counsel for INEC was in Court; the Plaintiff was absent but wrote to Court explaining that he received Notice of the date for the Ruling the previous night & was out of town & could not make it. APC (2nd Respondent) & Buhari (3rd Respondent) were absent, were not represented and did not write to Court

pilotab55:
I just pray,this infor should be true and see the light of the day,I will be so happy.it will only show a zombie they are real zombie.

You have all the info including Suit No., the Court, name of the Judge, date, etc. If you know any Lawyer or someone else in Abuja, just send him across to the Court to confirm for you or better still be in that Court on the 16 of June 2016 when the substantive case will come up for hearing

The Honorable Justice Ademola Adeniyi sitting at the Federal High Court 7, Abuja, today, Thursday the 26th day of May 2016 dismissed the Preliminary Objections filed by President Muhammadu Buhari in the case instituted against him, INEC & APC in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/110/2015 by an Abuja based Legal Practitioner, Barr. Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe challenging his competence to stand election into the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria when he lacks the basic educational qualifications set out in the Constitution. It will be recalled that in February 2015, Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, Esq. filed an Originating Summons at the Federal High Court, Abuja praying the Court to among others declare that Buhari is unqualified to aspire to the position of President not having sat for the Secondary School Certificate and also deposing to a false affidavit about his educational qualifications contrary to the Electoral Act. Buhari & the APC instead of entering a defence on the merits and exhibiting any Educational certificates obtained by Buhari, tried to frustrate the hearing of the case by filing several frivolous objections to the competence of the action. President Buhari retained over twenty SANs led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, Chief Akin Olujinmi, Femi Falana, etc., who for over one year now have failed to file any defence for Buhari or APC but instead used every trick in the book to delay the matter. This morning, the Hon. Justice Ademola Adeniyi in Ruling on the said applications which have been fought for over a year now, dismissed ALL of them as totally lacking in merit. He held that the suit filed by Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe was competent and the service on Buhari and APC was also competent. He thereafter adjourned the case to the 16th day of June 2016 for hearing of the substantive Originating Summons to determine whether Buhari's educational qualifications meets the minimum standards required by the Constitution. The Ruling today has caused lots of disquiet in the Presidency where many had forgotten that this albatross still hangs on Buhari's neck

Femi Fani-Kayode Wrote

THE MURDER OF THE FULANI: YUGOSLAVIA UNFOLDING

The Department of State Security (DSS) have claimed that five Fulani herdsmen were abducted, killed and buried in a mass grave by of IPOB in Abia state a few days ago. They have also claimed that there were up to fifty more bodies in that mass grave and that they are all Fulani.

The implications of this announcement is obvious. It will create more tension and fear in the land and it will lead to reprisal killings in the north. Violence is never the way out and I have always believed that it has no place in any civilized society. Yet what I find curious about this announcement is the fact that it is unique and historic.

I say this because thousands of Igbos, Yorubas, Niger-Deltans and Middle Belters have been killed by Fulani militants and herdsmen over the last ten months since President Buhari came to power yet the DSS has never announced it and told the country about the details and ethnic identities of the victims.

When one thousand Shiite Muslims were slaughtered in Zaria and buried in mass graves the DSS did not speak. When five hundred Idomas were massacred in Agatu by Fulani militants the DSS did not speak.

When hundreds of southern and Middle Belt farms were raided by AK-47-wielding Fulani herdsmen who murdered, raped, burnt down and took over the land of their victims the DSS never gave us details of the victims or made any announcements.

When our leaders in the south were kidnapped and when men witnessed their wives and children being raped and butchered by the Fulani militias before their very eyes the DSS made no announcements.

When the elder-statesman Chief Olu Falae's farm was raided by the Fulani militants for the third time in one year and his OPC guard was slaughtered the DSS made no announcements.

When the villagers and farmers in the south-east were murdered and their wives and daughters were abducted by the Fulani militants the DSS made no announcements.

When traditional rulers,nuns and priests were abducted and killed by Fulani herdsmen in the south-south the DSS made no announcements.

When the farms of the south west were attacked and ravaged and Yoruba farmers and their families were butchered by the Fulani militants the DSS made no announcements.

When the International Terror Index told the world that the Fulani militias in Nigeria are the "fourth most deadly terror organization in the world" the DSS said nothing and neither did they give us details about their activities or their victims.

Worse of all is the fact that our government and our President, who himself happens to be a Fulani, has never deemed it fit or necessary to condemn the activities of the Fulani herdsmen and militants and neither have they expressed any sympathy or displayed any empathy for their many victims.

Let me be clear: the murder of anyone, regardless of their ethnicity or faith, is unacceptable to me. I deplore murder and violence and in my view the killing of one innocent soul diminishes the humanity of every single one of us as a community and nation.

However it seems curious that the minute that Fulanis are killed in the east the DSS is quick to rise to the occasion and express concern about it whilst they do not express the same concern when Nigerians from other ethnic nationalities are killed by the Fulani in their own homes and land.

Therein lies the double standard and it is sad and unfortunate. Furthermore not only is it very dangerous but it also confirms the view that our government and security agencies are not only partial but that they are also attempting to implement an ethnic and religious agenda.

Three questions must be answered: firstly who is funding the Fulani herdsmen and where do they get their weapons from? Secondly why does our government not only turn a blind eye to the mass murder and genocide that they regularly indulge in but also go out of their way to protect them?

And thirdly why do the government and security agencies have so much hatred and contempt for those that the Fulani regularly target and their victims and why do they believe that those victims do not deserve to enjoy the full protection of the Nigerian Federal Government?

Could it be because they are regarded as slaves and second class citizens? Is Fulani blood and are Fulani lives more important than others? Indeed do non-Fulani lives matter in President Buhari's Nigeria?

Are we compelled to begin a ‘’non-Fulani lives matter’’ movement which is based and fashioned on the ‘’Black Lives Matter’’ movement in the United States of America before we can draw the attention of the world to what is going on in our country?

Is it not obvious and logical that when the security agencies refuse to protect the citizens from the murderous hordes and herdsmen from hell those citizens will eventually seek to protect themselves and go on the offensive? That is human nature and it is to be expected.

Is it not clear to those in power that when a people are convinced that their government is no longer impartial in any conflict and that the security agencies of that government have been directed to go out of their way to actively and openly those that constantly and regularly slaughter their people it will eventually lead to open war?

Is it so difficult to accept the fact that no government and no force from hell or on earth can compel or intimidate a man into lying down ively and silently watch his family, loved ones and kinsmen being butchered and slaughtered morning, day and night without trying to protect them and without indulging in some form of retaliation?

With the sort of things that are going on in our country today it is time to tell ourselves some home-truths. No-one wishes to accept it let alone say it but sadly war will come to Nigeria again within the next few years. I do not want war and I consider it to be the ultimate evil but I am constrained to speak the truth and say things as I see them.

The fact that a war is coming is a testimony to the fact that we have all failed to manage the peace that God has given us since 1970 and the cessation of hostilities after our brutal civil war. We have failed so badly that the remote and immediate causes of that civil war are back with us today even though we hate to it or acknowledge it.

Our country is like Yugoslavia unfolding before it exploded and violently broke into five separate countries. All the signs are there. Anyone that knows about the history of Yugoslavia or that is a student of world history will agree with me and appreciate what I am saying.

Consider the dangerous mix. A crumbling economy. An inept, weak, failing and paranoid government. A hungry, angry and increasingly desperate civilian population. An ignorant, obsessive, arrogant, insensitive, corrupt and self-absorbed political class who are out of touch with reality.

The ruthless implementation of an ethnic and religious agenda by a reckless and irresponsible government that refuses to consider the implications of taking such a course of action and that have an early-1960’s mind-set. The growing unrest, ethnic killings and sectarian murders.

An ethnic and religious division within the Armed Forces and security agencies. A relentless clamp-down on and persecution of the opposition and all dissenting voices by the government and the use of fear as a tool of governance and control.

The entering into a secret and covert treaty and military alliance with a group of Arab Sunni Muslim countries that seek to Islamise our country, that have, over the years, funded the most brutal and barbaric jihadist and radical Islamist terrorist organisations all over the world and that seek to impugn our national integrity and violate the secularity of our state.

The constant and open abuse of power. The impunity and insensitivity of the Buhari istration to the plight of the masses. The hunger, hardship, poverty and suffering in the land. The failure of the government to get rid of the fuel queues and supply electrical power.

The demonisation of peaceful and law-abiding self-determination groups and the unlawful incarceration of their leaders. The breach of the constitutional rights of the citizens and the ignoring of court orders and judicial processes by the government.

The attempt to intimidate and control the Judiciary and Legislature by the government and so much more. The list goes on and on and history proves that such a mixture of circumstances is dangerous and can only lead to open conflict if not halted.

The country is badly divided today and the people are suffering as never before. The division and hatred amongst some of our ethnic groups has reached pre-civil war levels.

We in the south must prepare for the worse and not be found wanting when the trouble starts. That is my greatest fear.

We must not end up like the Bosnians of Bosnia-Herzogovina did during the Yugoslavian civil war in the European Balkans in the late 1980's right up until 1992.

They were the only ethnic group in Yugoslavia that was not prepared for it when the war started. They had no arms, no plan, no allies and no fall back position.

When the fighting started they were caught unawares and for two years they suffered immeasurably for their stupidity and naivety whilst their people were killed like flies and their women and children were raped and enslaved. God forbid this should happen to our people.

The reason that they suffered for two years was because there was an international arms embargo placed on all the ethnic groups and warring militias and armies in Yugoslavia when the war started.

And sadly the Bosnians were the only ones that did not buy and stockpile arms in preparation for war months and years before it actually broke out.

Plagued by a cowardly and weak-minded ruling elite and a naive, self-serving, servile, ignorant and intellectually-challenged middle class the Bosnians just kept talking, writing newspaper articles, appeasing the aggressors and their tormentors, praying and hoping for peace whilst all the other ethnic and religious groups and warring parties were quietly preparing for war. Sounds familiar?

They suffered immensely for their lack of understanding, insight and foresight and their civilian population paid a heavy price. For two years after the civil war started the Bosnians could not even buy a gun or bullet to defend themselves. Their towns were besieged and blown up whilst their women and children were raped, enslaved and butchered.

Their men were rounded up into Second World War-like Nazi concentration camps and starved and tortured to death and their dignity and self-respect was taken from them. They were turned into an internally-displaced people and their land was transformed into a sea of desperate and suffering refugees.

It was a nightmare from hell and suffering on this scale had not been seen on European soil since the First and Second World Wars.

It was after the international community silently watched them being slaughtered by their Serbian and Croatian compatriots for two long years that they were compelled, as a consequence of pressure from the people of the world and on moral and humanitarian grounds, to lift the arms embargo on them so that they could buy arms to defend themselves.

The war dragged on for more years after that but at least the Bosnians, though two years late, were now able to fight back and defend themselves.

It took the intervention of NATO, the bombing of Belgrade by the international community led by the Americans and the eventual break-up of the entire country into five pieces to stop the carnage and barbarity of the Serbs and eventually bring the civil war to an end.

It was during that war that the term "ethnic cleansing" was first used by CNN to describe what was being done by the Serbs to the Bosnians, the Croats, the Slovenians, the Kosovars, the Macedonians and the Monte Negrans, all of whom represented the other ethnic groups that made up the old Yugoslavia.

Eventually the country broke up and each of them got their independence from the dominant Serbs and from one another.

If such a thing could have happened in the heart of Europe in the early 1990's why on earth would any reasonably intelligent person dismiss the notion that it can happen here?

The only difference would be that if such a thing were to ever unfold in our country it would be far worse than what happened in Yugoslavia due to the sheer size of our population.

The signs are already there and it is left for us to recognize them and prepare ourselves for the worse or to ignore them and, like the Bosnians, eventually pay a very heavy price. I pray that I am wrong but as far as I am concerned, for Nigeria, the bell is tolling. May the Lord deliver us.

Dreamwaker:
A Range Rover has been parked in my estate for a while now and I suspect that it is a stolen car. My suspicion is based on the fact that the car hasn't been moved since it was parked few weeks ago with no Plate number also it is parked next to a compound with only '' face me I face you '' kinda houses. Who drives a Range and lives in a house like that.

Cynthia Morgan and anyone else whose Range Rover was stolen from them should have a look at the photo and see if it looks like their.

More pics can be taken if need be.

Look at how our useless Nigeria Police is now spinning this and taking credit for "recovering" the car. This is how they always claim to have "RESCUED" kidnap victims who paid ransoms & were released by their captors or who escaped, etc: http://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2016/04/cynthia-morgans-stolen-white-range.html?m=1

zendy:
Bianca has said that she has never met Fani Kayode in her life. It baffles me that FFK and Bianca, two people who come from influential political families had a long standing relationship but only one person knew about it.

But let's just assume it is true that they had a relationship, that was like 30 years ago! Of what relevance is that today? I have had a relationship with the daughter of a late chief Justice of Nigeria. She moved on and is now married with kids. What would be the point of me going to papers to broadcast that I used to sleep with her? Some people are small minded

SPOT ON: No proof whatsoever; no pictures, old letters/telegrams or anything from an era when these where the norm in such "alleged" relationships. And as you pointed out, what is the big deal if they actually dated? They were probably students studying in London at the time; is the big deal that Ojukwu later married her? How many of us know who our wives dated when they were single? Does PMB know those who dated Aisha when she was younger & does it matter? Ditto for GEJ/Patience; OBJ/Stella, etc, etc. We really have a lot of undiagnosed mental health problems in Nigeria

TheGoodJoe:
Speaking with THISDAY in Abuja on Monday, the presidency source, who pleaded anonymity, said when the error committed by the Budget Office was discovered, Ameachi quickly forwarded a memo to the Budget Office, drawing its attention to the error and it was quickly corrected.

The source added: “Minister Ameachi did not stop there, he followed it up with several meetings with Senator Gbenga Ashafa and during the defence of the budget, Amaechi informed the committee of the omission of the Lagos-Calabar rail modernisation project and indeed sent a supplementary copy of the ministry’s budget to the committee, which contained the said project.

http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/04/12/calabar-lagos-rail-project-that-was-never-listed-triggers-a-spat/


Niger Delta People and Senators, Fight Amaechi. Fight him well and let me see who will fight for you in Abuja.

Disgrace him for GEJ.

You state that:
"The source added: “Minister Ameachi did not stop there, he followed it up with several meetings with Senator Gbenga Ashafa and during the defence of the budget, Amaechi informed the committee of the omission of the Lagos-Calabar rail modernisation project and indeed sent a supplementary copy of the ministry’s budget to the committee, which contained the said project."

My brother, no one is above mistakes & the Presidency clearly made several in this budget imbroglio; let them accept their mistakes & move on instead of trying to justify it cos then you keep making matters worse. HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT AMAECHI (A MINISTER) SENT AN AMENDED BUDGET TO A SENATE COMMITTEE? The power to SIGN & send budgets (whether original or amended) Constitutionally lies EXCLUSIVELY with the President of the Republic. The power to receive budgets (whether original or amended) Constitutionally lies EXCLUSIVELY with the Senate President. Clearly, we are in "silly season" again. ENOUGH

TheGoodJoe:



We have gone beyond removed a long time ago. The point is that the Senate has a process, set up Committees and the committees made suggestions that Hon. Jibrin accepted some and rejected some.

So the ones he accepted and added were they in the budget.

His colleagues are saying they set aside fund for the project. He should stop jumping from pillar to post and agree he would put the project back when the Federal Government returns the budget to the house.

With respect Sir, THE POINT IS THAT YOU MISS THE POINT. I want this project budgeted & executed; it is one of my dream projects. If you read my posts carefully, you will understand that my simple point is that it does not lie in the mouth of the Presidency/Amaechi to attack the NASS over the project when the Presidency itself never included it in the budget they presented to NASS; that is all I am saying. You & I can shout about it but I am saying the Presidency should not claim to be the good guys here while the NASS become the villains. If what you are saying are the facts then it means it was NASS (through it's Committee on Transport) that recommended the project sequel to the budget defence while the same NASS (through its Committee on Appropriations) rejected the recommendation. My point therefore is that while the rest of us ordinary citizens can scream at NASS for refusing the recommendation, etc, the Presidency has no moral grounds to scream at NASS for excluding a project the Presidency itself failed to include in the budget they sent to NASS. THE WAY FORWARD: instead of the Presidency to waste everyone's time throwing stones at NASS; they should sign the budget into law & immediately send a supplementary budget to NASS for the Calabar-Lagos Rail project

TheGoodJoe:


I guess you did not read this.

The Lagos to Calabar rail modernisation project was therefore included in the Senate Committee on Land Transports recommendation to the Senate Committee on Appropriations... Senator Gbenga Ashafa

http://saharareporters.com/2016/04/11/federal-government-included-and-defended-inclusion-lagos-calabar-rail-2016-budget-senate

For Christ's sake how can you make a recommendation in favor of a project that is not in the budget? Please let us remove sentiments when discussing very urgent National issues. A budget is submitted to the entire Assembly not to Committees. Even when aspects of it are directed to appropriate Committees for action, fact remains that the duty of Committees is to discuss WHAT IS IN THE BUDGET. Those saying that a supplementary budget was sent don't know what they are talking about; there can be no supplementary budget when the original budget is yet to be signed into law. In any case, my point was very simple: it does not make sense to say that an item WAS REMOVED from the budget if it was never there in the first place. Whether it was discussed by relevant Committees notwithstanding that it was not budgeted in the first instance & recommendations made is a different thing altogether

SageTravels:



From the look of things it seems that you have problem with Reading. as a follow south south I would advise you to pls take at least 2 minutes of your time to read before commenting

My brother, it amazes me when people simply refuse to use that grey matter in their head. Amaechi has been shouting himself hoarse that the National Assembly "REMOVED" the Lagos-Calabar Rail Project from the Budget. The simple question is: can NASS be accused of removing something that was never there in the first place? It is a different thing to say that they refused to accept his plea for it to be included during the budget defence. Amaechi who failed to include such a strategic project in the budget in the first place is now blameless while he uses his own mouth to insult the NASS? Smh

doskie:
PanamaPapers
Many people even friends n colleagues are asking me " What is dis
Panama saga ?" Thank God , I just got d simplest explanation to it :
Please enjoy it:
Here's how DanGliesack explained the Panama Papers leak to five-
year-olds:
When you get a quarter you put it in the piggy bank. The piggy bank
is on a shelf in your closet. Your mom knows this and she checks on
it every once in a while, so she knows when you put more money in
or spend it.
Now one day, you might decide "I don't want mom to look at my
money." So you go over to Johnny's house with an extra piggy
bank that you're going to keep in his room. You write your name on
it and put it in his closet. Johnny's mom is always very busy, so she
never has time to check on his piggy bank. So you can keep yours
there and it will stay a secret.
Now all the kids in the neighborhood think this is a good idea, and
everyone goes to Johnny's house with extra piggy banks. Now
Johnny's closet is full of piggy banks from everyone in the
neighborhood.
One day, Johnny's mom comes home and sees all the piggy banks.
She gets very mad and calls everyone's parents to let them know.
Now not everyone did this for a bad reason. Eric's older brother
always steals from his piggy bank, so he just wanted a better hiding
spot. Timmy wanted to save up to buy his mom a birthday present
without her knowing. Sammy just did it because he thought it was
fun. But many kids did do it for a bad reason. Jacob was stealing
people's lunch money and didn't want his parents to figure it out.
Michael was stealing money from his mom's purse. Fat Bobby's
parents put him on a diet, and didn't want them to figure out when
he was buying candy.
Now in real life, many very important people were just caught hiding
their piggy banks at Johnny's house in Panama. Today their moms
all found out. Pretty soon, we'll know more about which of these
important people were doing it for bad reasons and which were
doing it for good reasons. But almost everyone is in trouble
regardless, because it's against the rules to keep secrets no matter
what.
©Akin Ajayi-Obe

That's a very apt explanation for the very many Nigerians with five year-old brains who have been shouting themselves hoarse over "Panama Papers" when they don't even understand what it means but I don't agree that almost everyone is in trouble because it is against the rules. There is no law anywhere banning offshore companies. An offshore company is simply a company ed by a person in another country in which he or she has shares. It could be in Benin Republic, Ghana or Panama or Belize. For a private person who is not a public person such as Dangote who has been mentioned for instance, it only becomes a problem if he earns money with it which is taxable in Nigeria but he fails to pay such tax in which case it is the same thing like millions of Nigerians including the thousands on Nairaland foaming at their mouths over Panama papers who don't pay their tax too. Not all money earned by offshore coys are taxable as it is only the USA of all countries in the world whose laws mandate that its citizens must pay tax on all earnings including those made abroad; other countries including in Europe & Nigeria do not. Dangote has cement countries in other countries for instance. If he s a company in Panama & uses it to open a company in Kenya, he has the obligation to pay tax on his earnings from such companies to the Kenyan authorities but not to the Nigerian authorities if he keeps those earnings in an offshore . The full complexity of it is too much to go into here so let me restrict a little to public officers. The law is that public officials should not run companies not that they should not own them. This applies to all companies whether in Nigeria or offshore. What thousands of public officials in Nigeria who ran businesses do upon being elected or appointed to public office is simply to resign from any employment or directorship of a company they hold. They continue to hold into their shares in those companies which should now be run by other people provided they declare all the shares they hold in every company whether domestic or offshore. The illegality is in failing to declare or paying tax as appropriate & that has to be proved. For many who have offshore or shell companies & want to keep their privacy, they simply transfer their shares in such offshore companies to trusts or other family other than their wives before it is time to declare their assets such that at the point of declaration of assets, they have no such assets to declare. Therefore the fact that a public officials' name appears in Panama Papers in respect of a company ed in 1999 does not mean that he has committed any offense because that official could have disposed of his interests in March 2016 before assuming public office in May 2016 & has thus broken no laws, ETC

MinCeteris:
I am sure the wrong video was ed.

I did not see any sign or heard where 12m or bribe was mentioned in this video.

Watch again: this time with a good (not cheap chinko) system or phone & good internet connection. It's 15 minutes by the way just so you do not run away after 5 minutes because of bandwidth costs. >:
I gave you his full name & Constituency too

Tallesty1:
Who asked you to post it here?



I must probe your internet connection and service provider.

Hahahahaha, Bros, no shaking. I think it was Prof. Soyinka who said that THE MAN DIES IN HIM WHO KEEPS QUIET IN THE FACE OF TYRANNY. My manhood never die yetoooooo (apologies to Mama Peace ) Even the Daura DSS cannot shut us up in the face of bare-faced Tyranny

We are now watching to see how the Buhari "anti-corruption" Government with its anti-corruption Agencies including the DSS which now leaves issues of State Security to delve into inanities, will react: WILL THEY DO THE NEEDFUL? Or is there one Rule for PDP & another for APC? Buhari's anti-corruption credential is on the line. , this is INCONTROVERTIBLE VIDEO EVIDENCE of self CONFESSION by an APC Candidate of having given bribe to compromise the election.

VIDEO: APC Candidate Demands Return Of N12m Bribe From Collation Officer

Azubuike Chikere Wanjoku, APC House of Assembly candidate for Ikwere state constituency in Rivers State stormed INEC collation Centre in Port Harcourt, when he got wind of his defeat by the PDP candidate, demanding the INEC staff to give him back N12m he gave him as bribe to rig election for when. Click on link below to watch video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4VZ1tJA9wE

hedonistic:
To think that INEC had all the time in the world to prepare for this ONE election! That's the most irritating thing about this inconclusive stupidity. No excuses can be accepted. None whatsoever. This is extremely disgusting, and shows the caliber of idiots Buhari has appointed to run this critical national institution.

The country is doomed, because I don't see how these incompetent buffoons would get it right during the 2019 general elections when there would be numerous simultaneous elections nationwide. If INEC couldn't get it right in Rivers and other states previously where it deployed all its national resources to ONE state at time, how can it get it right when its resources are simultaneously stretched in all directions in 2019?

My dear, I seriously shiver when I think of what is coming in 2019 with elections in 36 States of the Federation & the FCT at the same time. Apart from about 6 Governorship elections, all State House of Assembly, Reps, Senate & Presidential elections will take place within the same space of time in 2019. If elections in 22 out of 32 State Houses of Assembly & a few Reps & Senate seats in ONE State of Rivers could not be managed by INEC, then just imagine when the Presidency, about thirty Governorship & hundreds of legislative seats will be in play. May God help us

cruzita:
small boy wey buy em mama house

That's Reekado Banks