NewStats: 3,259,417 , 8,170,040 topics. Date: Saturday, 24 May 2025 at 10:10 PM 52x73

advocatejare:

Amen and you too sir.


I’ve read it, it was very detailed and expository. Thanks


Don’t give up on Antichristian, Yahweh still loves him if only he can retrace his steps like the prodigal son.

I’ve been teaching him and his likes and they’ve always been running away after I refute all their lies. I’ve realized that they don’t really understand their religion. They are blind men leading others to destruction.

Galatians: 4. 21. Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22. For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. 28. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. 31. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.

The true site of Mt. Sinai was found over two decades ago by the archeologist Ron Wyatt. Sinai is now known to be Jebel el-Lawz on the Arabian Peninsula. It is right where the Bible has been saying it was all along (see Galatians 4:25). However, the S@udi government has surrounded the Mt. Sinai site with a chain-link fence and suppressed the information, probably because of the devastating effect that discovery could have on the validity of Islam and the Koran.

If the information on that site were to be
released, it would discredit the Islamic claim that the Bible has been corrupted. That site, the artifacts therein (and similar sites in @rabia such as Rephidim), exactly fit the Bible's description of the Israelite wilderness wanderings.

Those sites prove the Bible to be both accurate and true. (Videos of that ancient site @nd many others are available from Wyatt Archeological Research, 713 Lambert Dr.,
N@shville, TN 37220).


Barnabas is believed to have been written by a monk named Marino, a Catholic
turned Muslim, who was later known as Must@pha Arandi. Barn@bas contains direct
quotes from the Koran and from a 15th century comedy by Dante.

After the battle of the ditch in 627AD, Muhammad at a market square commanded the surrendered Banu Quraiza Jews to dig trenches, then in the trenches they had just dug, he ordered that 700 male Jews of that clan be slaughtered, one after the other (Sura 33:26; cf. Ibn Hishams Siratur Rasul, Part 2, pp. 75, 148). The sp@red widows, small children and properties were distributed among the faithful Muslims as their reward for helping Allah.

Poor Hitler! His gre@t undoing was his failure to claim divine inspiration for his actions. If he had done so, we might even have another major religion in Europe a Nazi version of Islam. Muh@mmad himself chose the most beautiful among the widows, Rihanah bint Amr bin Khanafa. She however refused Muhammad's offer of marriage, preferring to be his concubine instead.


In a bid to avenge the massacre of her people, she served Muhammad a meal of goat meat poisoned with a fatal toxin that kills instantly.
Bishr bin al-Bura, one of the companions of the prophet, died on the spot, right after swallowing a piece of the meat. Muhammad managed to spew out the one he was chewing, but traces of the toxin found its way into his system and caused a sickness that eventually led to his death. It is related by Ibn Saad that Muhammad sent for the Jewess and asked her, Did you poison the ewe? She said Yes. He asked, What made you do so? She answered: ìYou had done to my people grievous damage. So I said that if you are a king, we will rid ourselves of you, and if you are a prophet, it will be revealed to you.î Some historians claim he forgave her while others say he ordered her crucifixion.


That incident is the root cause of the virulent hatred the Muslims have towards the Jews. That is why Islam regards the Jews as the very worst enemy Allah has, and believes the Jews must be destroyed. Have you ever wondered why a non-Arabic nation like Iran is just as antagonistic towards Israel as the most radical Arab country? The story above is the answer. The Palestinian issue, the return of Arabís lands, all are just political window-dressing. The Palestinians have already been granted an autonomous state. The Sinai peninsula has already been returned to Egypt. Syria would have gotten back the Gol@n but for her intransigence.

So why is there still no sign of pe@ce? The truth is this: Muslims throughout the world do not believe the Jewish people should be allowed to exist. Even if the Jews were to totally abandon the Holy Land and be relocated elsewhere, that hatred would continue unabated and the conflict would go on (Revelation 12:17 figuratively foretells of this). Revelation: 12. 17. And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. - Bible Offline

TEXTUAL HISTORY OF THE koran

Almost every Muslim is taught from infancy to cling to the notion that
the Bible has been corrupted and changed, while the Koran is free
from corruption, perfectly preserved since the time of Muhammad.
But a thorough study of the textual history of the Koran will show
that it is not the Bible, but the Koran that has been changed. That is
what Islamic historians themselves bequeathed to us.
After the famous battle of Aqraba in 632 AD, during the Caliphate
of Abu Bakr, many Muslims who knew the Koran by heart were killed.


As a result, Umar B. Al-Khattab advised Abu B@kr of the need to compile
the Koran into a standardized text. Abu Bakr ordered the compilation to
be made by Zaid Ibn Thabit from inscriptions on palm leaves, stones and
from the remaining reciters.
When the compilation was done, it was kept by Abu Bakr until his
death. His successor, Umar, then took custody of it. Afterward, it came
into the possession of Hafsa, one of Muhammads widows (a daughter of
Umar). The companions of the prophet also did their own compilations
and produced other manuscripts for use in various provinces. There were
ourt rival provinces, each using a different text of the Koran.


During the reign of Kh@lif Uthman (the third Khalifah), reports
reached him that in various parts of Syria, Armenia and Iraq, Muslims
were reciting the Koran differently from the way it was being recited by
Arabian Muslims. Uthman immediately sent for the manuscript in Hafsas
possession and ordered Zaid Ibn Thabit and three others, Abdullah Ibn
Zubair, Said Ibn Al-As and Abdullah Al-Rahman Ibn Harith B. Hisham to
make copies of the text and make corrections where necessary. When
these were completed, we read that Uthman took violent action
regarding other existing Koranic manuscripts: Uthm@n sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they
had copied and ordered that all the other koranic materials,
whether written in fragmentary manuscripts, whole copies, to
be burnt. (Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 6 Page 479).
To eliminate variant readings and contradictions, all other
manuscripts were indeed burned, but the Uthmanic edition itself was
not perfect and met with a similar fate. When Marwan was governor
of Medin@, he ordered Hafsas manuscript to be destroyed. The only
reasonable conclusion one can have is that during Uthmanís time,
some of the contradictions in Hafsaís text were so glaring that a total
destruction of it was called for rather than a revision. From then until
now, conflicting ages and historical inaccuracies exist within the
kor@nic texts.


The Deedats, the Joommals, and the so-called Sheiks continue their
unwarranted attack on the Bible while suppressing the fact that Khalif
Uthman burned all the Koranic manuscripts apart from Hafsaís, and that
Governor Marw@n followed the example of Uthman by destroying the
Hafsa text as well. Anyone with the slightest regard for truth would have
to it that the Textus Receptus of the Koran now in circulation is a far
cry from the textus originalis! It is not too wild to suggest that were
Muhammad alive at the time of these incidents, he would have received
one of his usual ìrevelationsî to back up those burnings.
Contrary to Muslim belief, there were more than just language
differences between Uthmanís text and the texts which were ordered to
be burned. In every case, there were considerable verbal differences
between them and the text Uthman determined (by whim) to be the
final stand@rdized version of the Koran.

These differences were real textual variants and not just language
peculiarities as is often taken for granted. In several cases there were
words and sentences found in some codices that were missing in others.
In other instances, the variants concerned whole clauses and consonantal
variants in certain words. No wonder Khalif Uthman had to resort to
wholesale burning as his best option.

Evidence abounds to this day, that verses, indeed whole ages are
missing from the Koran that is in circulation today. For instance, the
second Khalifah, Khalif Umar, stated in his life-time that certain verses
prescribing stoning for adultery were recited by Prophet Muhammad
himself as part of the Koran:
God sent Muhamm@d and sent down the scripture to him. Part
of what he sent down was the age on stoning. We re@d it,
we were taught it, and we heeded it. The apostle stoned and we
stoned after him. I fear that in time to come men will say that
they find no mention of stoning in Godís book and thereby go
astray in neglecting an ordinance which God has sent down.

Verily, stoning in the book of God is a penalty laid on married
men and women who commit adultery.î (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat
Rasulullah p. 684)
The verse on stoning, no longer to be found in the Koran, is
incontrovertible proof that the Koran as it stands today is not the same
as the one spoken by Muhammad.


What the public does not know is that Jihad has many faces. Jihad
is not just slaughtering people for Islam, but it is also a systematic
suppression of truth and propagation of lies. If not, how can Muslims
boldly assert (despite hard historic evidence to the contrary) that the
Bible has been changed while the Koran has been perfectly preserved
since Muhammadís time? You cannot tell me that Islamic scholars are ignorant of the many
defects in the Koran, nor of the havoc that the various Khalifs have done
to it. We, ourselves, are not in any way amazed for the Bible has said:
Such teachings [Propaganda] come through hypocritical liars,
whose consciences have been seared as with a hot (1 Timothy 4:2, NIV)
The plain truth is that the Koran has been changed through upression and burning, and many of its ages have been deliberately removed or altered.

TEXTUAL HISTORY OF THE koran

Almost every Muslim is taught from infancy to cling to the notion that
the Bible has been corrupted and changed, while the Koran is free
from corruption, perfectly preserved since the time of Muhammad.
But a thorough study of the textual history of the Koran will show
that it is not the Bible, but the Koran that has been changed. That is
what Islamic historians themselves bequeathed to us.
After the famous battle of Aqraba in 632 AD, during the Caliphate
of Abu Bakr, many Muslims who knew the Koran by heart were killed.
As a result, Umar B. Al-Khattab advised Abu Bakr of the need to compile
the Koran into a standardized text. Abu Bakr ordered the compilation to
be made by Zaid Ibn Thabit from inscriptions on palm leaves, stones and
from the remaining reciters.
When the compilation was done, it was kept by Abu Bakr until his
death. His successor, Umar, then took custody of it. Afterward, it came
into the possession of Hafsa, one of Muhammadís widows (a daughter of
Umar).1
The companions of the prophet also did their own compilations
and produced other manuscripts for use in various provinces. There were
four rival provinces, each using a different text of the Koran.2
During the reign of Khalif Uthman (the third Khalifah), reports
reached him that in various parts of Syria, Armenia and Iraq, Muslims
were reciting the Koran differently from the way it was being recited by
Arabian Muslims. Uthman immediately sent for the manuscript in Hafsaís
possession and ordered Zaid Ibn Thabit and three others, Abdullah Ibn
Zubair, Said Ibn Al-As and Abdullah Al-Rahman Ibn Harith B. Hisham to
make copies of the text and make corrections where necessary. When
these were completed, we read that Uthman took violent action
regarding other existing Koranic manuscripts: ìUthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they
had copied and ordered that all the other koranic materials,
whether written in fragmentary manuscripts, whole copies, to
be burnt.î (Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 6 Page 479).
To eliminate variant readings and contradictions, all other
manuscripts were indeed burned, but the Uthmanic edition itself was
not perfect and met with a similar fate. When Marwan was governor
of Medina, he ordered Hafsaís manuscript to be destroyed. The only
reasonable conclusion one can have is that during Uthmanís time,
some of the contradictions in Hafsaís text were so glaring that a total
destruction of it was called for rather than a revision. From then until
now, conflicting ages and historical inaccuracies exist within the
Koranic texts.
The Deedats, the Joommals, and the so-called Sheiks continue their
unwarranted attack on the Bible while suppressing the fact that Khalif
Uthman burned all the Koranic manuscripts apart from Hafsaís, and that
Governor Marwan followed the example of Uthman by destroying the
Hafsa text as well. Anyone with the slightest regard for truth would have
to it that the Textus Receptus of the Koran now in circulation is a far
cry from the textus originalis! It is not too wild to suggest that were
Muhammad alive at the time of these incidents, he would have received
one of his usual ìrevelationsî to back up those burnings.
Contrary to Muslim belief, there were more than just language
differences between Uthmanís text and the texts which were ordered to
be burned. In every case, there were considerable verbal differences
between them and the text Uthman determined (by whim) to be the
final standardized version of the Koran.
These differences were real textual variants and not just language
peculiarities as is often taken for granted. In several cases there were
words and sentences found in some codices that were missing in others.
In other instances, the variants concerned whole clauses and consonantal
variants in certain words. No wonder Khalif Uthman had to resort to
wholesale burning as his best option.Evidence abounds to this day, that verses, indeed whole ages are
missing from the Koran that is in circulation today. For instance, the
second Khalifah, Khalif Umar, stated in his life-time that certain verses
prescribing stoning for adultery were recited by Prophet Muhammad
himself as part of the Koran:
ìGod sent Muhammad and sent down the scripture to him. Part
of what he sent down was the age on stoning. We read it,
we were taught it, and we heeded it. The apostle stoned and we
stoned after him. I fear that in time to come men will say that
they find no mention of stoning in Godís book and thereby go
astray in neglecting an ordinance which God has sent down.
Verily, stoning in the book of God is a penalty laid on married
men and women who commit adultery.î (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat
Rasulullah p. 684)
The verse on stoning, no longer to be found in the Koran, is
incontrovertible proof that the Koran as it stands today is not the same
as the one spoken by Muhammad.
What the public does not know is that Jihad has many faces. Jihad
is not just slaughtering people for Islam, but it is also a systematic
suppression of truth and propagation of lies.1
If not, how can Muslims
boldly assert (despite hard historic evidence to the contrary) that the
Bible has been changed while the Koran has been perfectly preserved
since Muhammadís time? You cannot tell me that Islamic scholars are ignorant of the many
defects in the Koran, nor of the havoc that the various Khalifs have done
to it.1
We, ourselves, are not in any way amazed for the Bible has said:
ìSuch teachings [Propaganda] come through hypocritical liars,
whose consciences have been seared as with a hot ironî
(1 Timothy 4:2, NIV)
The plain truth is that the Koran has been changed through
suppression and burning, and many of its ages have been deliberately removed or altered.

advocatejare:

I never knew you to be this sound sir, may GOD bless you sir. Pls in of what you said, I'll like to give the history of allah as I've always done on different threads and I've been banned for 1week and it won't stop me at all. Pls sir, leave antichristian alone cos he lacks sense cos Ashtaroth and belzebub are really doing wonders in his life.

WHO IS allah?


Muslims use the remotest l@ngu@ge possible to describe Allah. They try
to make him as transcendent as possible in order to discourage people from conducting research on him. If you ask a Muslim to define Allah, he will just beat about the bush, ascribing attributes to him that neither belong to him nor befit him. But @llah is not as mysterious as Islam
would like the world to believe. He has been at the Kaaba stone all along. Certainly, Christians have not prayed enough to displace him and we may never do so until he meets his doom in the valley of Megiddo.
Some say that the word @llah was or is derived from the Syriac Alaha. But the name Allah was in existence long before Isl@m. That is evidenced from the name Abdullah (meaning servant of Allah) the name of Muhammad's father. The question is this: To whom was this name originally revealed? Certainly none of the Biblical prophets ever referred to it. There is absolutely no trace of that name in the Bible. It is Arabic, not Israelite. But in the mind of Islamic scholars, anything (negative or positive) done to further the cause of Islam is justifiable, so they can lie and claim that the name of @ll@h was revealed to Adam, Abraham or even Ishmael. Lies can be told about those patriarchs because they have been dead a long time and aren't around to refute any false claims. And they never leave Abraham alone. In pre-Islamic Arabia, that Muslims now refer to as Al-Jahiliya, meaning a period of ignorance, the Arabians were grossly paganistic. In and around Kaaba, the Arabs worshiped 360 idols. Each clan had their own particular idols to worship. It is provable that Allah was one of the 360 idols that Muhammadís Hashimite clan worshiped. Muhammad's grandfather, Abdul Muttalib, was the leader of Mecca and a custodian of Kaaba's 360 idols. The Koran confirms that he was a pagan. The names that Muhammad grandfather gave his children are further proof that Muhammad was from a family of idol devotees.



Muhammad's f@ther was n@med Abdullah, meaning servant of Allah. The name of Muhammad's uncle was Abdul Manaf, meaning servant of Manaf. His other name was Abu Talib, meaning father of Talib. This is indisputable proof that Allah and Manaf were clannish idols worshiped by Muhammad and his people. Islamic scholars try to hide the historic fact that Muhammad worshiped idols before and after he claimed to be a prophet. But they canít do away with the record of the Koran itself. That Muhammad was later fascinated by the monotheistic creed of jews and Nestorian Christians is beyond question. He encountered many of them at Mecca and on his business trips to Syria. His wife, Khadija, was a Catholic, as was Waraqa ibn Naufal, his secret tutor. Now, Muhammad wanted to unite the Arab race under a theocratic setting, but there was no way he could carry along all those 360 idols, so Muhammad decided to pick from among the idols of his clan.


Naturally he picked Allah, the idol for which his father was named. Any of the idols would have served; an idol is an idol. It is the demon behind an idol that deceives the mind and heart. Those who try to single out Allah and deify him above the other Meccan idols should that Muhammad could just as easily have picked Manaf, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, or any of the others; and his choice didn't win the of everyone, including his uncle, Abdul Manaf. That is clear from the fact that Abdul didn't submit to Allah and Islam until his death. He held on to Manaf. This elevation of one idol over the other 359 angered the other Meccan clans. The purported persecution of Muhammad was nothing but an inter-tribal or inter-clannish quarrel over whose idol should be or whose should not be venerated. In the same vein, the Koran was written in Muhammads dialect (Quraish). To pacify the other tribes, Muhammad told them (with concocted revelations) that the preserved tablet in heaven was written in Quraish. The world was then asked to swallow the Islamic lie that all the Kaaba idols were destroyed. It just isn't true. About four of those idols are said to remain.


The custodians of K@@ba should open the stone to independent inspectors should anyone dispute this. Just as Islam led 1.2 billion Muslims and even some ignorant Christians to believe that Jesus is Isa or Esau, so it has tried to make the world believe that Allah is God. But there is no link between Allah and the Bible God, who revealed His name to be Yahweh, or the I AM. Websters New Collegiate Dictionary calls the name of the true God a Tetragrammaton, which means that it is made up of four letters. Those Hebrew letters are transliterated YHWH or JHVH. They are usually pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. Yahweh means the I AM. That name defines G-ds eternal being and divine nature: The only true, almighty, personal, holy God, and ìthe Father of spirits (Numbers 16:22, cf. John 4:24), The God who revealed Himself to His people, made a covenant with them, became their law giver, to Whom all honor and worship is due. If God's name was really Allah, why didnít He give that name to the prophet Moses or to any of the other Old Testament prophets? Why didn't Jesus ever hint that God might have a name different than the one already revealed to the prophets? The Supreme Being is eternal isn't He? If God is without beginning or end, isnít His name also eternal and unchanging? Of course, but if the Koran is correct, then nobody knew God's name before Muhammad, and God didnít know what He was talking about when He told Moses that His name was ìI AM that I AM. It was at the burning bush that God revealed Himself to Moses as the I AM (Exodus 3:14). I AM portrays His eternal existence, with no beginning and no end. He is the only eternal God, there is no other. There is no room for any usurper idol, no matter what he calls himself. The name Allah does not belong to the true God, but to an Arabian idol. But there is more. When Jesus called Himself I AM in John 8:58, He said in effect that He is the same I AM who spoke to Moses at the burning bush. The Jews understood exactly what Jesus meant, and tried to stone Him for it (John 8:59). They knew that Jesus was declaring Himself to be the final, perfect and practical revelation of true God. The prophet Isaiah knew it, too, when he called Jesus Emanuel, meaning God with us. This is not polytheism, God the Father and Jesus His Son are one Being, one essence. Jesus said: John 10:30 I and My Father are One.

RightChannel:


Do you understand the new language Jesus Christ spoken about?

Where does devil cast out demons?

Muhammad that took the challenge by taking poisonous meat, where is he today?

Lol, let me correct you, mohammed was poisoned by a Jewish woman, that's where the hatred for Jews and christians started from.

After the battle of the ditch in 627AD, Muhammad at a market
square commanded the surrendered Banu Quraiza Jews to dig trenches,
then in the trenches they had just dug, he ordered that 700 male Jews
of that clan be slaughtered, one after the other (Sura 33:26; cf. Ibn
Hishams Siratur Rasul, Part 2, pp. 75, 148). The spared widows, small
children and properties were distributed among the faithful Muslims
as their reward for helping Allah.



Poor Hitler! His great undoing was his failure to claim divine
inspiration for his actions. If he had done so, we might even have
another major religion in Europe a Nazi version of Islam.
Muhammad himself chose the most beautiful among the widows,
Rihanah bint Amr bin Khanafa. She however refused Muhammad's offer
of marriage, preferring to be his concubine instead.
In a bid to avenge the massacre of her people, she served Muhammad a meal of goat meat poisoned with a fatal toxin that kills instantly.
Bishr bin al-Bura, one of the companions of the prophet, died on the
spot, right after swallowing a piece of the meat. Muhammad managed to spew out the one he was chewing, but traces of the toxin found its way
into his system and caused a sickness that eventually led to his death.
It is related by Ibn Saad that Muhammad sent for the Jewess and
asked her, Did you poison the ewe? She said Yes. He asked, What
made you do so? She answered: You had done to my people grievous
damage. So I said that if you are a king, we will rid ourselves of you, and
if you are a prophet, it will be revealed to you.î Some historians claim he
forgave her while others say he ordered her crucifixion.
That incident is the root cause of the virulent hatred the Muslims
have towards the Jews. That is why Islam regards the Jews as the very
worst enemy Allah has, and believes the Jews must be destroyed. Have
you ever wondered why a non-Arabic nation like Iran is just as antagonistic towards Israel as the most radical Arab country? The story above
is the answer. The Palestinian issue, the return of Arabís lands, all are just
political window-dressing. The Palestinians have already been granted
an autonomous state. The Sinai peninsula has already been returned to
Egypt. Syria would have gotten back the Golan but for her intransigence.
So why is there still no sign of peace? The truth is this: Muslims
throughout the world do not believe the Jewish people should be
allowed to exist. Even if the Jews were to totally abandon the Holy Land
and be relocated elsewhere, that hatred would continue unabated and
the conflict would go on (Revelation 12:17 figuratively foretells of this). Revelation: 12. 17. And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

advocatejare:

Is Muhammad the lord your God?

You’re always running to the same Scriptures you all say is corrrupt, to rescue you.


I’m happy you couldn’t find any sensible back up in your Quran and ahadith, you had to run to the Bible as usual like a dog going back to its vomit.

The same Bible you condemn every time is your lifesaver

God bless you, I gave him a hot chase on my thread and allah really turned in his kaaba and his 72 virgins and wine were all reduced by half. So he's trying to impress allah so that he'll not be punished.

He keeps running to the bible everytime without any evidence from the koran. I've brought up histories and point from the koran and he ran away.

https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/6843958/islam-full-fables-not-g-d#107556223

Ick

The true site of Mt. Sinai was
found over two decades ago by the archeologist Ron Wyatt. Sinai is now known to be Jebel el-Lawz on the Arabian Peninsula. It is right where the Bible has been
saying it was all along (see Galatians 4:25). However, the Saudi government has
surrounded the Mt. Sinai site with a chain-link fence and suppressed the
information, probably because of the devastating effect that discovery could have
on the validity of Islam and the Koran. If the information on that site were to be
released, it would discredit the Islamic claim that the Bible has been corrupted.
That site, the artifacts therein (and similar sites in Arabia such as Rephidim),
exactly fit the Bible's description of the Israelite wilderness wanderings. Those sites
prove the Bible to be both accurate and true. (Videos of that ancient site and many
others are available from Wyatt Archeological Research, 713 Lambert Dr.,
Nashville, TN 37220).


Barnabas is believed to have been written by a monk named Marino, a C@tholic
turned Muslim, who was later known as Must@pha Arandi. Barn@bas cont@ins direct
quotes from the Koran and from a 15th century comedy by Dante.

Galatians: 4. 21. Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22. For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. 28. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. 31. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.

The true site of Mt. Sinai was
found over two decades ago by the archeologist Ron Wyatt. Sinai is now known to be Jebel el-Lawz on the Arabian Peninsula. It is right where the Bible has been
saying it was all along (see Galatians 4:25). However, the Saudi government has
surrounded the Mt. Sinai site with a chain-link fence and suppressed the
information, probably because of the devastating effect that discovery could have
on the validity of Islam and the Koran. If the information on that site were to be
released, it would discredit the Islamic claim that the Bible has been corrupted.
That site, the artifacts therein (and similar sites in Arabia such as Rephidim),
exactly fit the Bible's description of the Israelite wilderness wanderings. Those sites
prove the Bible to be both accurate and true. (Videos of that ancient site and many
others are available from Wyatt Archeological Research, 713 Lambert Dr.,
Nashville, TN 37220).

Barnabas is believed to have been written by a monk named Marino, a Catholic
turned Muslim, who was later known as Mustapha Arandi. Barnabas contains direct
quotes from the Koran and from a 15th century comedy by Dante.

Drella:


You may be right sir.
But sir,are you trying to say the terrorists that do that are not muslim?
Even their actions are condemned by islam?

You dey mind am? When mohammed hired assassins to kill his enemies, even a nursing mother in front of her children.

https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/6843958/islam-full-fables-not-g-d#107556223

LordReed:


LoL! Na so. Small small una eye don dey clear say na pipe dream. Bwahahahahahaha!

The true site of Mt. Sinai was
found over two decades ago by the archeologist Ron Wyatt. Sinai is now known to be Jebel el-Lawz on the Arabian Peninsula. It is right where the Bible has been
saying it was all along (see Galatians 4:25). However, the Saudi government has
surrounded the Mt. Sinai site with a chain-link fence and suppressed the
information, probably because of the devastating effect that discovery could have
on the validity of Islam and the Koran. If the information on that site were to be
released, it would discredit the Islamic claim that the Bible has been corrupted.
That site, the artifacts therein (and similar sites in Arabia such as Rephidim),
exactly fit the Bible's description of the Israelite wilderness wanderings. Those sites
prove the Bible to be both accurate and true. (Videos of that ancient site and many
others are available from Wyatt Archeological Research, 713 Lambert Dr.,
Nashville, TN 37220).


Barnabas is believed to have been written by a monk named Marino, a Catholic
turned Muslim, who was later known as Mustapha Arandi. Barnabas contains direct
quotes from the Koran and from a 15th century comedy by Dante

AntiChristian:


No, maybe like Christianity!

That's where you need to believe in a shedded blood or shed blood!

He told you the truth, your 72 virgins is just fables. Abeg read this

Barnabas is believed to have been written by a monk named Marino, a Catholic
turned Muslim, who was later known as Mustapha Arandi. Barnabas contains direct
quotes from the Koran and from a 15th century comedy by Dante

AntiChristian:


Bros stop telling lies for Christ! See the phrase below in bold! It emphasises the verse above it. They are all lies!

“Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. ” — Matthew 16:28

“Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not away, till all be fulfilled. Heaven and earth shall away: but my words shall not away. ” — Luke 21:32-33

Ode human being,

Galatians: 4. 21. Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22. For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. 28. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. 31. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.

Now on the bolded, why is Saudi Arabia hiding this truth? Anti you're really living in delusion. allah won't save you and the Bible really talked about pole like you.

The true site of Mt. Sinai was
found over two decades ago by the archeologist Ron Wyatt. Sinai is now known to be Jebel el-Lawz on the Arabian Peninsula. It is right where the Bible has been
saying it was all along (see Galatians 4:25). However, the Saudi government has
surrounded the Mt. Sinai site with a chain-link fence and suppressed the
information, probably because of the devastating effect that discovery could have
on the validity of Islam and the Koran. If the information on that site were to be
released, it would discredit the Islamic claim that the Bible has been corrupted.
That site, the artifacts therein (and similar sites in Arabia such as Rephidim),
exactly fit the Bible's description of the Israelite wilderness wanderings. Those sites
prove the Bible to be both accurate and true. (Videos of that ancient site and many
others are available from Wyatt Archeological Research, 713 Lambert Dr.,
Nashville, TN 37220).

LordReed:


As massive as the sun is we don’t all see the sun at once, how then will all eyes see Jesus? Even if he is on TV and live Web broadcast, you know not everybody has a TV or a smartphone so how exactly would all eyes see him? Will he be in multiple places at once or he'll multiply himself?

Lol, don't be deceived, it won't be in this present generation.

I gave you hot chase before and now you're trying hard to impress allah in his kaaba....



WHO IS allah?


Muslims use the remotest language possible to describe Allah. They try
to make him as transcendent as possible in order to discourage people from conducting research on him. If you ask a Muslim to define Allah, he will just beat about the bush, ascribing attributes to him that neither belong to him nor befit him. But Allah is not as mysterious as Islam
would like the world to believe. He has been at the Kaaba stone all along. Certainly, Christians have not prayed enough to displace him and we may never do so until he meets his doom in the valley of Megiddo.
Some say that the word Allah was or is derived from the Syriac Alaha. But the name Allah was in existence long before Islam. That is evidenced from the name Abdullah (meaning servant of Allah) the name of Muhammad's father. The question is this: To whom was this name originally revealed? Certainly none of the Biblical prophets ever referred to it. There is absolutely no trace of that name in the Bible. It is Arabic, not Israelite. But in the mind of Islamic scholars, anything (negative or positive) done to further the cause of Islam is justifiable, so they can lie and claim that the name of allah was revealed to Adam, Abraham or even Ishmael. Lies can be told about those patriarchs because they have been dead a long time and aren't around to refute any false claims. And they never leave Abraham alone. In pre-Islamic Arabia, that Muslims now refer to as Al-Jahiliya, meaning a period of ignorance, the Arabians were grossly paganistic. In and around Kaaba, the Arabs worshiped 360 idols. Each clan had their own particular idols to worship. It is provable that Allah was one of the 360 idols that Muhammadís Hashimite clan worshiped. Muhammad's grandfather, Abdul Muttalib, was the leader of Mecca and a custodian of Kaaba's 360 idols. The Koran confirms that he was a pagan. The names that Muhammad grandfather gave his children are further proof that Muhammad was from a family of idol devotees. Muhammads father was named Abdullah, meaning servant of Allah. The name of Muhammad's uncle was Abdul Manaf, meaning servant of Manaf. His other name was Abu Talib, meaning father of Talib. This is indisputable proof that Allah and Manaf were clannish idols worshiped by Muhammad and his people. Islamic scholars try to hide the historic fact that Muhammad worshiped idols before and after he claimed to be a prophet. But they canít do away with the record of the Koran itself. That Muhammad was later fascinated by the monotheistic creed of jews and Nestorian Christians is beyond question. He encountered many of them at Mecca and on his business trips to Syria. His wife, Khadija, was a Catholic, as was Waraqa ibn Naufal, his secret tutor. Now, Muhammad wanted to unite the Arab race under a theocratic setting, but there was no way he could carry along all those 360 idols, so Muhammad decided to pick from among the idols of his clan. Naturally he picked Allah, the idol for which his father was named. Any of the idols would have served; an idol is an idol. It is the demon behind an idol that deceives the mind and heart. Those who try to single out Allah and deify him above the other Meccan idols should that Muhammad could just as easily have picked Manaf, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, or any of the others; and his choice didn't win the of everyone, including his uncle, Abdul Manaf. That is clear from the fact that Abdul didn't submit to Allah and Islam until his death. He held on to Manaf. This elevation of one idol over the other 359 angered the other Meccan clans. The purported persecution of Muhammad was nothing but an inter-tribal or inter-clannish quarrel over whose idol should be or whose should not be venerated. In the same vein, the Koran was written in Muhammads dialect (Quraish). To pacify the other tribes, Muhammad told them (with concocted revelations) that the preserved tablet in heaven was written in Quraish. The world was then asked to swallow the Islamic lie that all the Kaaba idols were destroyed. It just isn't true. About four of those idols are said to remain. The custodians of Kaaba should open the stone to independent inspectors should anyone dispute this. Just as Islam led 1.2 billion Muslims and even some ignorant Christians to believe that Jesus is Isa or Esau, so it has tried to make the world believe that Allah is God. But there is no link between Allah and the Bible God, who revealed His name to be Yahweh, or the I AM. Websters New Collegiate Dictionary calls the name of the true God a
Tetragrammaton, which means that it is made up of four letters. Those Hebrew letters are transliterated YHWH or JHVH. They are usually pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. Yahweh means the I AM. That name defines G-ds eternal being and divine nature: The only true, almighty, personal, holy God, and ìthe Father of spirits (Numbers 16:22, cf. John 4:24), The God who revealed Himself to His people, made a covenant with them, became their law giver, to Whom all honor and worship is due. If God's name was really Allah, why didnít He give that name to the prophet Moses or to any of the other Old Testament prophets? Why didn't Jesus ever hint that God might have a name different than the one already revealed to the prophets? The Supreme Being is eternal isn't He? If God is without beginning or end, isnít His name also eternal and unchanging? Of course, but if the Koran is correct, then nobody knew God's name before Muhammad, and God didnít know what He was talking about when He told Moses that His name was ìI AM that I AM.î It was at the burning bush that God revealed Himself to Moses as the I AM (Exodus 3:14). I AM portrays His eternal existence, with no beginning and no end. He is the only eternal God, there is no other. There is no room for any usurper idol, no matter what he calls himself. The name Allah does not belong to the true God, but to an Arabian idol. But there is more. When Jesus called Himself I AM in John 8:58, He said in effect that He is the same I AM who spoke to Moses at the burning bush. The Jews understood exactly what Jesus meant, and tried to stone Him for it (John 8:59). They knew that Jesus was declaring Himself to be the final, perfect and practical revelation of true God. The prophet Isaiah knew it, too, when he called Jesus Emanuel, meaning God with us. This is not polytheism, God the Father and Jesus His Son are one Being, one essence. Jesus said: John 10:30 I and My Father are One.