NewStats: 3,262,171 , 8,176,312 topics. Date: Sunday, 01 June 2025 at 06:39 AM 5o3r57

In an era of visual misinformation and deepfakes, thorough verification is crucial before drawing conclusions. After conducting a detailed comparative analysis of the images in question, I'll present objective evidence examining specific physical characteristics:
My analysis focuses on verifiable physical features to determine if these images show the same individual or different people with similar appearances.

1. Facial Features: Both images display remarkably similar facial structures, particularly in the shape of the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes have a slightly downward cantal tilt at the outer edges. The nose is similarly shaped in both images, with a soft bridge and rounded tip, and the nostrils appear alike in width and structure.

2. Eyebrows: The eyebrow shape and natural arch are nearly identical across the images, though there might be minor variations due to grooming or expressions and she has a fat upper eyelid at the corner of both eyes consistent across the images.

3. Hair: Both images show dark, slightly curly hair that is styled in a similar way. Notably, the hairline has a subtle, slightly receding pattern.

4. Skin Tone and Complexion: She is fair and mixed race, not a lot of people have that skin tone in Equi Guinea. Despite differences in lighting and exposure, suggests a close match in complexion.

5. Forehead and Facial Shape: The forehead shape, height, and curvature are consistent across both images. Each individual has a rounded forehead and face shape, with high, prominent cheeks. This combination creates a soft, balanced facial structure, reinforcing the likelihood that both images depict the same person.

6. Chin and Jawline: In both images, the chin appears rounded without a pronounced cleft, and the jawline is soft and lacking sharp angles. This shared feature contributes to the gentle contours of the face, adding to the overall resemblance.

7. Cheek Structure: High, rounded cheeks are evident in both images, a defining feature that further aligns the two appearances. This cheek structure enhances the sense of similarity, especially when combined with the shared face shape.


Conclusively, these shared physical features—eye shape and tilt, etc.. strongly indicate that the two images represent the same individual. Minor differences can be attributed to lighting, camera angle, and expression, but the unique combination of features and consistency across these two photos the conclusion that both images are of the same person.

The nose ridge and overall shape are irrevocably similar.

I am convinced now ...i wasnt convinced before becos of her boobs were so upright for a woman who has dropped plenty kids.Probably d vid was before marriage or after a kid

bdon123:
I am convinced now ...i wasnt convinced before becos of her boobs were so upright for a woman who has dropped plenty kids.Probably d vid was before marriage or after a kid

I thought as much. The breast though

bdon123:
I am convinced now ...i wasnt convinced before becos of her boobs were so upright for a woman who has dropped plenty kids.Probably d vid was before marriage or after a kid

Buharidgeneral:

I thought as much. The breast though

Are you guys for real? You mean you never heard of breast augmentation?

BeardedMeat:




Are you guys for real? You mean you never heard of breast augmentation?

If breast augmentation was readily available why do celebrities choose implants to kee d melons erect

Yet una never use AI create solution for una domot. Jobless mongrel.

The nose already gave her away. She's the one in the video 💯.

angelboy01:
The nose already gave her away. She's the one in the video 💯.

The nose area is a good determinant that she is the one.

By the way, what AI tool is that?

UncleLondon:


The nose area is a good determinant that she is the one.

By the way, what AI tool is that?

The odds that she is not the one are slim and might likely be twins, siblings at the very least.

People were saying she was innocent, too beautiful and calm for that evil man.

OpenVision AI is a Chrome Extension for https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/openvision/olhhjbhkjhoknmfkhfjaenmhlendkegg

bdon123:

If breast augmentation was readily available why do celebrities choose implants to kee d melons erect

most celebrities don't have money. That woman is the equivalent of the wife of EFCC chairman. She get money wella. Bribes and all

Feldie:
most celebrities don't have money. That woman is the equivalent of the wife of EFCC chairman. She get money wella. Bribes and all

She get money n see d cheap hotel dem dey fck her?at least her husband was using quality hotels....her own be like bois quarters.Nothing like augmentation jare.If it was readily available tiwa n dem co will do it....abeg dont disrespect out female celebrities....a few of dem dey money die

I POSTED THE VIDEO. WATCH ALL FOR FREE

Here ==>>>> https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/8263622/whatsapp-group-videos-meetups-mature
☝️👆☝️👆

bdon123:

If breast augmentation was readily available why do celebrities choose implants to kee d melons erect

Is having implants not part of breast augmentation?

bdon123:
I am convinced now ...i wasnt convinced before becos of her boobs were so upright for a woman who has dropped plenty kids.Probably d vid was before marriage or after a kid

And if the picture is originally manipulated using her real image, what will AI say, if not that they resemble, AI usually do whole lots of errors and inconsistencies, if you have been using it .

If the Op reversed his questions and asks, AI proof that they are not the same, it would also proof it convincely.

NB. The woman they claimed is egonga wife in that leaked video, she is different from Egonga wife. It is computer manipulation.

I don't think that woman in the video is Balthazar's wife

DoctorShomo:
I don't think that woman in the video is Balthazar's wife

Where the video

Fiscus105:


And if the picture is originally manipulated using her real image, what will AI say, if not that they resemble, AI usually do whole lots of errors and inconsistencies, if you have been using it .

If the Op reversed his questions and asks, AI proof that they are not the same, it would also proof it convincely.

NB. The woman they claimed is egonga wife in that leaked video, she is different from Egonga wife. It is computer manipulation.

Ehen na so i see an too