NewStats: 3,262,881 , 8,178,452 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 June 2025 at 10:15 PM 4y341b

6z3e3g

Chief Justice Of Nigeria Bans Plea Bargain For Corrupt Public Servants - Politics - Nairaland 35j54

Chief Justice Of Nigeria Bans Plea Bargain For Corrupt Public Servants (5635 Views)

(4)

(1) (Go Down)

ybase2: 11:38am On Nov 17, 2011
CJN Ban On Plea Bargain For Graft

The Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Dahiru Musdapher, has banned the use of plea bargain and trial by public parade against suspected criminals and corrupt public office holders. This is coming at a critical time in the nation’s life, where the plea bargaining has smeared the judicial process and has ridiculed effort at securing justice.

While delivering a speech at this year’s 5th annual general conference of the Nigeria Bar Association, he said the two prosecutorial tools were not only alien to the nation’s statute, but also dangerous to its justice system. Specifically, he mentioned that they should never be mentioned in the country’s jurisprudence.

Plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case whereby the prosecutor offers the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, typically for a lesser charge for a reduced punishment/sentence. It is a prosecutorial tool that allows criminal defendants to avoid the risk of conviction at trial on the original more severe charge.

This has been wielded by the government and her agencies in impeding the prosecution of top public officials. Examples of its use were for former Inspector- General of Police, Mr. Tafa Balogun, and former Governor of Bayelsa State, Chief Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, who were convicted via this prosecutorial tool.

This tool remains controversial and has been deployed in the resolution of the multi-billion dollar Halliburton and Siemen scandals with the culprit left off the hook. It has been argued that this tool comes handy as a result of our weak legal system.

We are pleased with CJN’s resolve that it should never again be mentioned in our jurisprudence. This alien tool has its origins from the criminal justice system of United State and plays a critical role over there and should be left there for now; if it has to be used then we have to legislate and it into law with discreetness.:

http://businessnews.com.ng/2011/11/17/cjn-ban-on-plea-bargain-for-graft/
kings112(m): 3:55pm On Nov 17, 2011
Wow!
I am in total sopot of this.

1 Like

Johndoe100(m): 4:03pm On Nov 17, 2011
One of the most s. tupid acts in a long time. I hope the National Assembly es the whistle blower act soon to restore this. How can a man be so unenlightened?
kizito96(m): 4:18pm On Nov 17, 2011
This would be wonderful if it could be implemented
NET1(m): 4:25pm On Nov 17, 2011
Please can they back-date this to start from 1985? I say this because I believe that's when corruption really started in Nigeria.

.NET
Koolking(m): 4:34pm On Nov 17, 2011
A step in the right direction. I pray it is not one of those lip statements typical of this present govt. If it is anything to go by, I am afraid prosecution and conviction of those good for nothing retarded politicians will be rare now. I wish EFCC and IC could could also step up their game.
brainpulse: 4:51pm On Nov 17, 2011
Good if allowed to work. Laws works only in nigeria the day they are made and after the day it only exixt in the pockets of some
GWslim(f): 4:59pm On Nov 17, 2011
Good
Re: Chief Justice Of Nigeria Bans Plea Bargain For Corrupt Public Servants by Nobody: 5:19pm On Nov 17, 2011
Na Lie. Fewer will get to trial.
segunjowo(m): 5:48pm On Nov 17, 2011
Good riddance for bad rubbish!
Roland17(m): 5:51pm On Nov 17, 2011
I just hope this is true
denitro(m): 6:50pm On Nov 17, 2011
This statement by the CJN doesn't make sense.

Let's reason: A particular charge has been brought against a particular corrupt public servant lets say
EMBEZZLEMENT of public funds. which let's make an assumption carries a minimum of 5 years and a maximum
of 15 years.

The defendant has a choice to plead guilty or not guilty to the charge,

Statement: by CJN
******************
Plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case whereby the prosecutor offers the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, typically for a lesser charge for a reduced punishment/sentence. It is a prosecutorial tool that allows criminal defendants to avoid the risk of conviction at trial on the original more severe charge.

****************** I am not grounded in law, but I don't think that is true.
I believe a plead bargain offers the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, typically for a reduced punishment/sentence
You plead guilty and then get the minimum sentence, if you decide to allow the prosecutor go through the trouble of a trial then you get the maximum

I don't understand the statement of the CJN, can someone please help me with some explanation, ?
okosodo: 6:56pm On Nov 17, 2011
They will simply look for another law to escape. Nigeria‘s law has many clauses in different corners to aid criminals in government. Though i this move,
UyiIredia(m): 7:03pm On Nov 17, 2011
Good . . . but . . . will it work ?
aribisala0(m): 7:08pm On Nov 17, 2011
this is a glaring example of bad journalism and even worse readership.
does the chief Justice have the power to ban anything?
if he does is this how it is done?
it is probably true that plea bargaining is not recognized in the British legal system and so technically he is right but he is not  "BANNING" anything he is expressing his (very momentous) opinion on what the law is now but this is quite different from banning.
if the national assembly want to formally introduce it NOTHING stops them.
olawalebabs(m): 7:27pm On Nov 17, 2011
I hope CJN will be able to clear the mess left behind by Katsina-Alu. Good one there
gascoign1(m): 7:32pm On Nov 17, 2011
I hope this ban don't end up in a trash bin.
BCuZiMBlaCk(m): 7:43pm On Nov 17, 2011
So if u're guilty, u're guilty and if not, no
Kay17: 9:37pm On Nov 17, 2011
I feel the CJ ought not to have expressed such an opinion publicly. However the SC has not pronounced on it.
aribisala0(m): 10:52pm On Nov 17, 2011
i agree but what is shameful is that people do NOT seem to understand simple english both the writer and readers.

THERE IS NO BAN.
Xfactoria: 8:50am On Nov 18, 2011
In as much as this is a good idea, the CJN does not have the power to ban plea bargain.

If it is not in our constitution and it has become a rule of practice in the Judiciary, he can only set it aside in the Supreme Court where he is the President and cannot order the Court of Appeal or the High Courts (both federal and states) to stop the practice. Only the NJC can make a pronounciation that would be binding on all being the regulatory body for judicial practice in Nigeria. Please see section 21(i) in the supplemental section of the constitution: the NJC shall have power to "deal with all other matters relating to broad issues of policy and istration"[b][/b]

This is an issue of policy in the judiciary and the CJN has no unilateral power to deal with it.
Kay17: 9:29am On Nov 18, 2011
This is an issue of law not judicial istration. NJC dont go to their backyard to make judicial pronouncements
aribisala0(m): 9:30am On Nov 18, 2011
X-factoria:

In as much as this is a good idea, the CJN does not have the power to ban plea bargain.

If it is not in our constitution and it has become a rule of practice in the Judiciary, he can only set it aside in the Supreme Court where he is the President and cannot order the Court of Appeal or the High Courts (both federal and states) to stop the practice. Only the NJC can make a pronounciation that would be binding on all being the regulatory body for judicial practice in Nigeria. Please see section 21(i) in the supplemental section of the constitution: the NJC shall have power to "deal with all other matters relating to broad issues of policy and istration"

This is an issue of policy in the judiciary and the CJN has no unilateral power to deal with it.
i agree with you that the CJN has no power to do this but your explanation is wrong.
it is not a policy/ issue but one of law and jurisprudence.
[b]where [/b]does plea bargaining take place. NOT in court

plea bargaining occurs at the level of prosecution i.e in the attorney general's office after the police or similar body conclude investigation and put a case bundle before the DPP AG etc
so e.g you have  mama suwe in custody and you have evidence to prosecute her but you agree you will not charge her if she agrees to do XYZ or you will charge her only for lesser offences .xyz will usually mean giving evidence against other bigger suspects.
in the case of corruption the prosecutor may feel that if the suspect agrees to refund some money that it would be cheaper than going to court and that there is a chance of not winning the case.
the CJ's pronouncement centres on whether the AG is allowed to do this
there are two issues
1.the AG may do this without even disclosing to the public
2 .if the AG does this who can challenge that decision
it is now part of our law since Gani vs FG in the matter of Dele Giwa that private individuals may bring prosecution for criminal cases but this is complex.
so in practice where a case of plea bargaining occurs the courts have not been involved and as such the question of policy/ does not even come up.
another  lesser variant of plea bargaining may happen at the police level e.g arrest a man with small quantity of cocaine and agree not to take the case further if he shows them where he bought it

it is possible that in some countries (NOT NIGERIA) where plea bargaining is part of their law a plea bargain agreement will be permanently binding and perhaps the CJ's point is that if any plea bargain arrangement is challenged in court it will be revoked. but he cannot stop them happening in the first place
redleich(m): 9:39am On Nov 18, 2011
, sO sO on point and long overdue!!public hanging ll be a better deterrent#just saying
Xfactoria: 11:51am On Nov 18, 2011
aribisala0:

i agree with you that the CJN has no power to do this but your explanation is wrong.
it is not a policy/ issue but one of law and jurisprudence.
[b]where [/b]does plea bargaining take place. NOT in court

plea bargaining occurs at the level of prosecution i.e in the attorney general's office after the police or similar body conclude investigation and put a case bundle before the DPP AG etc
so e.g you have  mama suwe in custody and you have evidence to prosecute her but you agree you will not charge her if she agrees to do XYZ or you will charge her only for lesser offences .xyz will usually mean giving evidence against other bigger suspects.
in the case of corruption the prosecutor may feel that if the suspect agrees to refund some money that it would be cheaper than going to court and that there is a chance of not winning the case.
the CJ's pronouncement centres on whether the AG is allowed to do this
there are two issues
1.the AG may do this without even disclosing to the public
2 .if the AG does this who can challenge that decision
it is now part of our law since Gani vs FG in the matter of Dele Giwa that private individuals may bring prosecution for criminal cases but this is complex.
so in practice where a case of plea bargaining occurs the courts have not been involved and as such the question of policy/ does not even come up.
another  lesser variant of plea bargaining may happen at the police level e.g arrest a man with small quantity of cocaine and agree not to take the case further if he shows them where he bought it

it is possible that in some countries (NOT NIGERIA) where plea bargaining is part of their law a plea bargain agreement will be permanently binding and perhaps the CJ's point is that if any plea bargain arrangement is challenged in court it will be revoked. but he cannot stop them happening in the first place


Thanks aribisala0.

I am not a Lawyer and I must it I didn't have as much view of plea bargaining as you have highlighted above. From what I have read in American novels and also seen in their movies, I guess plea bargaining is binding in the US. The CIA and the FBI uses it a lot especially in cases of organized crimes and drugs trafficking. Thanks for the clarification once again.

BTW, are you the same Aribisala with Ajibola Aribisala SAN?
1025: 11:59am On Nov 18, 2011
this is only possible on the pages of our newspapers.
splitnaija(m): 12:29pm On Nov 18, 2011
.NET:

Please can they back-date this to start from 1985? I say this because I believe that's when corruption really started in Nigeria.

.NET

Hmmmm, hope Lucky Igbinedion is reading this oooo, his sins are still trying to find him out! lipsrsealed
jaybee(f): 12:38pm On Nov 18, 2011
someone help me please. i'm not a lawyer.

1. do we have "PLEA BARGAIN" in Nigerian statutes?

2. Kindly quote the section(s) of the law that provide for it.

3. i'm just curious that the Chief Justice would ban what was not established by law in the first place.

4. if plea bargain is established by law, then i thought the section of the law should be amended by the national assembly and not by fiat of the Chief Justice
baslone: 12:43pm On Nov 18, 2011
GEJ has woken up!
Kay17: 4:47pm On Nov 18, 2011
The AG has discretionary powers to prosecute, so plea bargaining arises from that power.

As an agreement, it should be but if the court feels that its against public policy then it would not enforce it. That is if its unhealthy for criminal .
olawalebabs(m): 6:57pm On Nov 18, 2011
that is what the CJN is saying, there is no justice serve in plea bargaining. in the word of justice Kayode Esho (Retired JSC) " Justice is not one way, 2 way traffic but three ways- Justice to the plantif, defendant and society" in the case of plea bargaining, justice is not done to the society
ayex0001: 11:06am On Nov 19, 2011
Get free ing codes, how to generate recharge card nombas, how to hack and crack, how to be a real programmer in minutes, secrets and the legit ways of making online all on
www . naijatechzone . com

(1) (Reply)

Army Shares Video Of IPOB Attacking Soldiers Outside Nnamdi Kanu's House

(Go Up)

Sections: How To . 45
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland.