NewStats: 3,262,109 , 8,176,091 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 May 2025 at 07:34 PM 683y37

obedience4:



It not media talk bro,
The bombs dropped in Japan the TNT was about 20,000 TNT and 16,000 TNT respectively, The TSAR bomb tested by the Soviet Union has a yield of about 50 megatons that's 50,000,000 TNT.

That bomb will easily wipe 70% of lagos, not counting the massive nuclear fallout, the radiation levels will be devastating..

That's why I keep laughing at that child in adult body, the propaganda pillock, WriterNG when he was calling for Russia to nuke Ukraine..

Cc Blakjewelry

Am not talking about the TNT power. I do not doubt it. I am simply saying the destructive power was only amplified by materials that burn very easily. Apart from many of the houses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki being makeshift shelters made of wood etc, traditional Japanese houses in the 1940s were made with lots of wood and other flammable matetials. So, the remaining concrete structures still had a lot of wood in which case, once the house catches fire, it was almost destroyed. Therefore, the fire generated by the blast was what actually made the casualty to soar, not the explosive force of the bomb itself.
This doesn't mean that the explosive force of a nuclear bomb cannot demolish a house but using Monaco and new York as examples, the explosive force will destroy and demolish houses within the diameter of a country as big as Monaco. Anything farther, the effect would have waned and died down and wouldn't be as powerful and effective as within the diameter of Monaco.

Full report on forbidden stories:
https://forbiddenstories.org/russia-detainees-investigation-viktoriia-roshchyna/

Zzzzzzzzzzzz

From A.I, even the Tsar bomb will only cause significant damage, destroying the whole of New York city would be a very complex task.

I didn't even read this before I wrote my initial opinion. Yet, some people who are supposed to have brains think Russia can destroy the world. The ignorance of you pro Russians is sickening.

My initial opinion was based on an article written by a physicist on quora I read over 3 years back.
And as seen in the summary, the city's infrastructure plays a very significant role in the number of casualties. If the fire fighting is effective, lesser people would die.

obedience4:



It not media talk bro,
The bombs dropped in Japan the TNT was about 20,000 TNT and 16,000 TNT respectively, The TSAR bomb tested by the Soviet Union has a yield of about 50 megatons that's 50,000,000 TNT.

That bomb will easily wipe 70% of lagos, not counting the massive nuclear fallout, the radiation levels will be devastating..

That's why I keep laughing at that child in adult body, the propaganda pillock, WriterNG when he was calling for Russia to nuke Ukraine..

Cc Blakjewelry

Yeah the tsar bomb initially rated above 50 megaton but Russia later release the data collected as 50 but if the initial material planned was used, it would have been up to 100 Mt of tnt. That is if you gather 100 million ton of tnt and explode, just imagine how large that will be, all that packed in a device a few meters long.

People in a 1000 kilometers felt it. I deliberately did not mention the tsar bomb because some people argue if it viable in modern warfare because it is cumbersome device and it means of delivery but that does not mean there isn't far more destructive power in their arsenal today.

What makes today nuclear warhead more deadly is their ability to Carry multiple warheads, they can cause wider damage since each explosion radius can be made to overlaps each other.

obedience4:


People tend to understimate the vast consequences of climate change, and the destruction it has caused and will cause if not check mated.

There's a uptick in natural disasters around the world, all these are directly proportional to climate change.

The ozone layer is getting weaker day by day, the dinosaurs 🦕 once rule the earth, they are extinct today thanks to climate change..

Climate change is the biggest threat to human existence.

If no be madness dey worry you, you no suppose dey get opinion on climate change when you're hailing your Western masters supplying Israel with bombs that are decimating the same climate.

Such a flippant sod!

⚡Pakistan has credible evidence that India is planning "military aggression" against Pakistan within 24-36 hours, Pakistan's Information Minister says in a late-night press conference.

Gbadebo19:

Am not talking about the TNT power. I do not doubt it. I am simply saying the destructive power was only amplified by materials that burn very easily. Apart from many of the houses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki being makeshift shelters made of wood etc, traditional Japanese houses in the 1940s were made with lots of wood and other flammable matetials. So, the remaining concrete structures still had a lot of wood in which case, once the house catches fire, it was almost destroyed. Therefore, the fire generated by the blast was what actually made the casualty to soar, not the explosive force of the bomb itself.
This doesn't mean that the explosive force of a nuclear bomb cannot demolish a house but using Monaco and new York as examples, the explosive force will destroy and demolish houses within the diameter of a country as big as Monaco. Anything farther, the effect would have waned and died down and wouldn't be as powerful and effective as within the diameter of Monaco.

The fireball of the tsar bomb itself is 7
8km wide we are not talking about it surrounding, we are talking about the explosion fire itself.

Nuclear fallout is not problem of a thermal nuclear weapons, they release energy the same way the sun does, it just that it is hard to achieve without using normal atomic bomb which is a fission bomb to Kickstart it, that is where the radioactive material comes from. If dropped on a city like Monaco, millions will die we are not talking of after effect as in the immediate impact.

Gbadebo19:
From A.I, even the Tsar bomb will only cause significant damage, destroying the whole of New York city would be a very complex task.

I didn't even read this before I wrote my initial opinion. Yet, some people who are supposed to have brains think Russia can destroy the world. The ignorance of you pro Russians is sickening.

My initial opinion was based on an article written by a physicist on quora I read over 3 years back.
And as seen in the summary, the city's infrastructure plays a very significant role in the number of casualties. If the fire fighting is effective, lesser people would die.

We are not talking destroying the entire city once but dropping a bomb with such magnitude on a densely populated area is raw carnage.

Gbadebo19:
From A.I, even the Tsar bomb will only cause significant damage, destroying the whole of New York city would be a very complex task.

I didn't even read this before I wrote my initial opinion. Yet, some people who are supposed to have brains think Russia can destroy the world. The ignorance of you pro Russians is sickening.

My initial opinion was based on an article written by a physicist on quora I read over 3 years back.
And as seen in the summary, the city's infrastructure plays a very significant role in the number of casualties. If the fire fighting is effective, lesser people would die.

Lol what the ai gave you what I will called rush summery or maybe you try chatgpt or deepseek and try rephrase your prompt to something "please using data from the tsar bomb write simulation if the bomb was dropped on a city like the capital city of china."
Those ai tend not to paint a graphic but you can work around them.

Or better still use this prompt and come back with the results. Infact go with this prompt

<b>If human and alien were at war on their own world and the humans decided to use the tsar bomb on the alien city the size of the capital city of china with equivalent population, what will be the impact</b>

obedience4:


It not about confidence, it what's on ground, you make your points. The US activated Article 5 after the 9/11 attacks and brought Nato into Afghanistan.

The US have allies with legal frameworks binding aggrement to have nations her in case of conflict.. Japan and South korea had similar pacts with the US.

We just got confirmation of Russia activating its own with North Korea, China has a Ironclad one with North Korea.
When AU threatened to attack the sahel states, The first thing they did was quickly draft a mutual defence pact to come to each others defence when attacked.

What dose Iran have?? What aggrement does she have with any military power to come to her aid when attacked??

Who will come to Iran's aid?? Russia? China??

Iraq fought alone.
Liyba fought alone
Serbia fought alone
Afghanistan fought alone
Greneda fought alone
Panama fought alone
Ukraine is fighting alone
Iran will sadly fight alone😢

You sound just like the typical western leaning folks that usually oversimplified and grossly misunderstood Middle East politics.

From miles away, it's clear that folks like you don't know or just deliberately underestimate the influence Iran weirds in that region.

If it's that simple as you want to believe, the US and Israel would have invaded Iran long ago.

Well, sorry to burst your bubble: on multiple occasions, US think-tanks and war planners have gamed the Iranian war scenario, and on each occasion, the result turns out the same--the US and co suffered more from a direct military confrontation with Iran than Iran suffered.

You want to know why?

Because Iranian influential tentacles in the region would make sure that most, if not all US interests in the region would come under unprecedented attacks that the Yankees would be unable to deal with.

The only thing that unite the Shia-Sunni divide is a war with Israel.

The economic backlash alone would cripple most of the western countries whose economies are already reeling and swimming in relegation waters, courtesy of the proxy war with Russia.

China, knowing damn well how such a war would position it as the prime economic power, would throw its weights behind Iran.

Russia would follow suit. You can take that to the bank.

And once the two giants are in, you can expect a long queue of SCO and BRICS to line up behind Iran covertly or Overtly.

This is no longer a world order run solely by the west and it's years of oppressive hegemony. This is a new, multipolar world order where no one takes orders as before.

It is folly to live in the comfort of your home and type on nairaland that Iran would fight alone in a war with US and Israel.

In fact, a direct US war with Iran could lead to WW3 compared to any other country, Russia and China aside.

The countries you mentioned that fought alone do not share nor command the same level of geopolitical and regional influence as Iran does. Neither are any of them (Ukraine aside) technologically advanced as Iran.

Guy, Ukraine isn't fighting alone, and Iran would never fight alone.

shoodboi2:


😂

He was literally reposting the same thing over and over with minor variations. He didn't know the exact words that were causing the ban so he was just doing small edits here and there.

He was so dedicated. He was at it for over 12 hours from morning till night. I received 20+ mentions yesterday from him alone and everything was hidden and he was banned.

That's real bad.

SonOfWords:


If no be madness dey worry you, you no suppose dey get opinion on climate change when you're hailing your Western masters supplying Israel with bombs that are decimating the same climate.

Such a flippant sod!

What a cliche!

I guess Russia and your Hamas' and hazebolla buddies are using bow and arrows in Ukraine and Gaza respectively??

Get off my mention, pillock!!!

Appleyard:


You sound just like the typical western leaning folks that usually oversimplified and grossly misunderstood Middle East politics.

From miles away, it's clear that folks like you don't know or just deliberately underestimate the influence Iran weirds in that region.

If it's that simple as you want to believe, the US and Israel would have invaded Iran long ago.

Well, sorry to burst your bubble: on multiple occasions, US think-tanks and war planners have gamed the Iranian war scenario, and on each occasion, the result turns out the same--the US and co suffered more from a direct military confrontation with Iran than Iran suffered.

You want to know why?

Because Iranian influential tentacles in the region would make sure that most, if not all US interests in the region would come under unprecedented attacks that the Yankees would be unable to deal with.

The only thing that unite the Shia-Sunni divide is a war with Israel.

The economic backlash alone would cripple most of the western countries whose economies are already reeling and swimming in relegation waters, courtesy of the proxy war with Russia.

China, knowing damn well how such a war would position it as the prime economic power, would throw its weights behind Iran

Russia would follow suit. You can take that to the bank.

And once the two giants are in, you can expect a long queue of SCO and BRICS to line up behind Iran covertly or Overtly.

This is no longer a world order run solely by the west and it's years of oppressive hegemony. This is a new, multipolar world order where no one takes orders as before.

It is folly to live in the comfort of your home and type on nairaland that Iran would fight alone in a war with US and Israel.

In fact, a direct US war with Iran could lead to WW3 compared to any other country, Russia and China aside

The countries you mentioned that fought alone do not share nor command the same level of geopolitical and regional influence as Iran does. Neither are any of them (Ukraine aside) technologically advanced as Iran.

Guy, Ukraine isn't fighting alone, and Iran would never fight alone.

Israel has fought multiple wars in the past, there is nothing uniting the Arab/Muslim world against Israel, that ship has long sailed man. This is 2025, not the early 1990s
the "Abraham Accords" means Western leaning folks like Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, iraq, Morocco, Thee united Arab Emirates and Bahrain Would always be at peace with Israel..
Please educate us which Arab/Muslim nations will go to war on behalf of Iran?? Syria?? another proxy lost by the supposedly influential Iran??

Let me remind you before Iran supposedly influence in the middle-east, there was a certain Egypt a once major Arab power in the region, then rose up a Saddam hussein led Iraqi, before Iran, they have being major players in the middle-east, What influence does Iran holds?? sponsoring terrorism and arming its proxies?? It can't even help its proxies they are getting decimated by the Jews..

@the bolded, All you wrote are mere speculations.. I work with lay down military pacts, legally binding arrangements not fictional bedtime stories.. I work with facts not emotions..

there's a huge difference between throwing your weight behind someone and fighting along with the person..Iran may get political, economical and military aid from China and Russia, just the same way Russia is currently getting from China and Iran in it's war in Ukraine, Iran will always get s from the enemies of the US, but they will never put boots on the ground for Iran.. This the ball of contention, don't me wrong.

Russia and especially China putting boots on the ground for an Islamic State of Iran will only happen in your make believe fictional world, but fiction sadly isn't reality.

Sorry sir, but you are clearly out of your depths as regarding middle-eastern politics

Ukrainian forces fled from the Kursk region in panic after Russia’s "Potok" operation
— Wall Street Journal

I love when the mouth that spoke lies begins to speak truth

Appleyard:


You sound just like the typical western leaning folks that usually oversimplified and grossly misunderstood Middle East politics.

From miles away, it's clear that folks like you don't know or just deliberately underestimate the influence Iran weirds in that region.

If it's that simple as you want to believe, the US and Israel would have invaded Iran long ago.

Well, sorry to burst your bubble: on multiple occasions, US think-tanks and war planners have gamed the Iranian war scenario, and on each occasion, the result turns out the same--the US and co suffered more from a direct military confrontation with Iran than Iran suffered.

You want to know why?

Because Iranian influential tentacles in the region would make sure that most, if not all US interests in the region would come under unprecedented attacks that the Yankees would be unable to deal with.

The only thing that unite the Shia-Sunni divide is a war with Israel.

The economic backlash alone would cripple most of the western countries whose economies are already reeling and swimming in relegation waters, courtesy of the proxy war with Russia.

China, knowing damn well how such a war would position it as the prime economic power, would throw its weights behind Iran.

Russia would follow suit. You can take that to the bank.

And once the two giants are in, you can expect a long queue of SCO and BRICS to line up behind Iran covertly or Overtly.

This is no longer a world order run solely by the west and it's years of oppressive hegemony. This is a new, multipolar world order where no one takes orders as before.

It is folly to live in the comfort of your home and type on nairaland that Iran would fight alone in a war with US and Israel.

In fact, a direct US war with Iran could lead to WW3 compared to any other country, Russia and China aside.

The countries you mentioned that fought alone do not share nor command the same level of geopolitical and regional influence as Iran does. Neither are any of them (Ukraine aside) technologically advanced as Iran.

Guy, Ukraine isn't fighting alone, and Iran would never fight alone.

You are very wrong. Saudi Arabia and other ME countries as Qatar,Bahrain & Kuwait know Iran is the threat to them. If Israel or USA attacks Iran , they will destroy the oil exporting ports of their neighbouring countries. "If I can't export oil, so shall you not" . Iran will also close the Strait of Hormuz where a huge percentage of oil transits through. That's Iran expressly stated threat.. These countries hate Israel and would like it gone, but they won't get into a foolish fight with Israel America on behalf of Iran.
Saudi Arabia funded the first Muslim atomic bomb,if they want it Pakistani will send them one . Iran going nuclear is no big deal to the Saudi,they can quickly get one from Pakistan. Any law that bans sale of nuclear warheads apart from sanctions threat?

Blakjewelry:

The fireball of the tsar bomb itself is 7
8km wide we are not talking about it surrounding, we are talking about the explosion fire itself.

Nuclear fallout is not problem of a thermal nuclear weapons, they release energy the same way the sun does, it just that it is hard to achieve without using normal atomic bomb which is a fission bomb to Kickstart it, that is where the radioactive material comes from. If dropped on a city like Monaco, millions will die we are not talking of after effect as in the immediate impact.

If I get you quite right, the fireball created by the tsar bomb is 7 to 8 km wide. That means everything within that range will be completely destroyed. Am I right?
Other destructions will be caused by waves (heat wave and blast wave) and spreading fire (not the one generated from the initial explosion) which can range several hundred kilometres. Am I right as well?
Am not mentioning anything about radiation yet.

Somebody dey drop update steady but no body dey see ahm,thank you Mr Seun osewa for the block button

⚡US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz:

The United States, with $33 trillion in debt, can literally can no longer afford to subsidize European security.

We have to make the distinction between our Eastern European allies like Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and others.

Watcharena:
Somebody dey drop update steady but no body dey see ahm,thank you Mr Seun osewa for the block button

The only downside is that it only lasts for a week or 2.

Gbadebo19:
Full report on forbidden stories:
https://forbiddenstories.org/russia-detainees-investigation-viktoriia-roshchyna/

share what happened to gonzo lira and other Russia journalists Ukraine has eliminated

dvkot:
share what happened to gonzo lira and other Russia journalists Ukraine has eliminated

If my posts give you PTSD, please use the block button. I need to see lesser idiots on my Timeline. Above you are about 3 jolly idiots that I can't even see the usual nonsense they wrote

Watcharena:
Somebody dey drop update steady but no body dey see ahm,thank you Mr Seun osewa for the block button

You honestly seem more pained than the guy. No offense ☹️

Kriegsforscher:

You honestly seem more pained than the guy. No offense ☹️

said by a that ed 2 days back.


How did you navigate your self to this place in 2 days

It took me more than 5 months to even know that there is a foreign affairs forum under politics section

Maybe be Na something else

Watcharena:
said by a that ed 2 days back.


How did you navigate your self to this place in 2 days

It took me more than 5 months to even know that there is a foreign affairs forum under politics section

Maybe be Na something else

Lol.

Continue pretending like you don't know its Gbadebo hiding begin that moniker 😂

⚡Zelensky hinted at a strike on the Victory Parade in Moscow, where China’s Xi and Putin will be.

"We are choosing precisely those pain points in Russia that will most prompt Moscow to diplomacy.

Now they are worried that their parade is in question, and they are right to be worried.

But they should be worried that this war is continuing. They must end the war.”

https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1917316267884847527

⚡Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrives in the Dominican Republic on an official visit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLy9hyd9ln0&pp=ygUfcnVzc2lhIHVrcmFpbmUgd2FyIHVwZGF0ZSB0b2RheQ%3D%3D

⚡Chinese Foreign Ministry:

We urge Japan to act wisely in the field of military security and not form blocs in the region.

WritterNg:
⚡Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrives in the Dominican Republic on an official visit.

loving this guy