NewStats: 3,262,130 , 8,176,151 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 May 2025 at 09:23 PM 14703i

Who is this man with the name Bola Ahmed Tinubu?

Nigerians should begin to ask questions.

Don't rush just make sure you refresh and keep refreshing the thread I will be dropping it one after the other .

On his INEC Form EC9, Tinubu provided no details of his primary and secondary education, even filling in the relevant years as “0000”. Exactly why INEC permitted this clear violation remains unclear, but it could perhaps go some way to explaining the Commission’s reluctance to release certified true copies of the EC9 to the public.

To gain some clarity over Tinubu’s educational background, another subpoena went out to Chicago State University, where Tinubu claims to have obtained a degree in Business and istration in 1979

The documents that came back make up the bulk of what underpins Enahoro-Ebah’s criminal complaint against Bola Tinubu. First of all, on his EC9, Tinubu gave his date of birth as March 29, 1952.

On Chicago State University’s records however, “Bola A. Tinubu” has a different date of birth - March 29, 1954.

As mentioned above, Tinubu’s EC9 contained no details of any secondary school attended in Nigeria. On it, he also affirmed that he has no nationality other than Nigeria.

On Chicago State University’s ission records however, he claimed to have attended Government College, Lagos. He also claimed to be “Black American.”

The presidency is not the retirement home for any drug baron, if you cannot use Buhari's Economic, Corruption and Insecurity policies to campaign as ruling party's candidate then shut the fvck up and go home.

After all, you brought the colossal failure as the best but what has it turned out to be?

This is important because there is a certain amount of ambiguity as to whether Section 137 of the 1999 constitution precludes certain public office holders including the president, state governors and of the Senate and Federal House of Representatives from holding dual citizenship. What is known for a fact in any case, is that if Tinubu was indeed “Black American,” i.e. in possession of U.S. citizenship, that would mean that he committed perjury by failing to declare it on his EC9.

His refusal to include details about his Nigerian education on the EC9 affidavit has not helped to dispel persistent rumours that “Bola Ahmed Tinubu” could in fact, be an assumed identity.

This is worsened by what is revealed on the following document included in Chicago State University’s responses to the subpoena. The document is an academic transcript for “Bola A. Tinubu” from Southwest College (later renamed Richard J. Daley College), which was used to process his ission into the university. On it, the sex of “Bola A. Tinubu” is clearly marked “F.”

And inec cleared this man to run?

The only thing about him that is true is his face.
He is yet to have a double

Since US law in the 1970s only permitted individuals to legally reclassify their gender after gender reassignment surgery (M.T. v J.T. 1976), it is safe to preclude the possibility that the person now known as “Bola Ahmed Tinubu” once identified as a woman. This raises all sorts of questions about who exactly the APC presidential candidate is, including the alarming question of potential identity theft, criminal impersonation and fraud.


Even more curiously, as stated by CSU, there are no records for Tinubu on file that contain clear information about who exactly “Bola A. Tinubu” was. No port, no visa, no social security card, and no driver’s licence.

descarado:
And inec cleared this man to run?

The only thing about him that is true is his face.
He is yet to have a double

Keep refreshing the page I dey drop am one by one . Cool down temper

Still it gets even worse.

The following document was submitted to INEC alongside the EC9 affidavit as proof of Bola Tinubu’s degree at Chicago State University.

In response to the subpoena, Chicago State University reproduced and sent in the exact degree certificate that was awarded to him in 1979. That certificate can be seen below. Evidently, both certificates are completely different.

A line-by-line analysis of the original certificate versus what Tinubu submitted to INEC reveals the following glaring discrepancies. First of all, both certificates are written in completely different font types. It is important to note that the certificate provided by CSU in response to the subpoena is an exact reprint of the original certificate issued in 1979.

This means that any other certificate purporting to be the same one with even the slightest deviation in style, format or content, can only be a fake.

Congratulations. Now, take this court and stop disturbing us here. Social media is not a court of competent jurisdiction.

ALTERNATEID:
Congratulations. Now, take this court and stop disturbing us here. Social media is not a court of competent jurisdiction.

I am not done with your master stay on the page more are being ed

Next, the certificate submitted to INEC has 2 grammatical errors on it. It says: “On the recommendation of the faculty of the college of business, and under the authority of the board of trustees of Chicago state university has conferred upon…” This is a meaningless and incomplete statement. What the original document provided by CSU actually says is “On the recommendation of the faculty of the college of business and under the authority of the board of trustees, Chicago State University has conferred upon…” That is a grammatically correct statement with meaningful sentence construction.

The certificate submitted to INEC then says “In testimony thereof, the undersigned officers of Chicago State University have affixed their Signatures together with the seal of the University in witness thereof this Diploma is granted this twenty-second day of June A.D. 1979.” This is another meaningless and incorrect statement. What it should say, per the original on the left is “In testimony thereof, the undersigned officers of Chicago State University have affixed their Signatures together with the seal of the University. In witness thereof, this Diploma is granted this twenty-seventh day of June A.D. 1979

Both documents also have clearly different logos on them. Once again bear in mind that the certificate obtained from CSU via subpoena is an exact reprint of the original issued certificate. This means that the logo on the left must appear in Tinubu’s certificate even if Chicago State University has changed logos 75 times since 1979.

In any case, Chicago State University’s only other known logos since then can be found below. Where exactly the logo on Tinubu’s certificate originates from is anyone’s guess.

ALTERNATEID:
Congratulations. Now, take this court and stop disturbing us here. Social media is not a court of competent jurisdiction.

But, the case is in court na.

You don't know?

They really think Nigerians are fools and sometimes I suspect they may be right.

sharpden:


The presidency is not the retirement home for any drug baron, if you cannot use Buhari's Economic, Corruption and Insecurity policies to campaign as ruling party's candidate then shut the fvck up and go home.

After all, you brought the colossal failure as the best but what has it turned out to be?

Opintiwa:


I am not done with your master stay on the page more are being ed

Is Nairaland a court? See David, nobody cares again about the nonsense attention you’re seeking on social media. You can’t use Tinubu to get the asylum you’re desperately hoping for.

Campaign has started and we will vote in February. Regurgitating the same rubbish from Twitter to Nairaland to your site won’t change anything. Go to court and remain there.

And then there is the layout of both certificates. At risk of excessive repitition, it must be noted once again that the certificate on the left is an exact replica of the certificate issued by Chicago State University in June 1979. Any deviation from what is on it can mean only one thing - forgery.

ALTERNATEID:


Is Nairaland a court? See David, nobody cares again about the nonsense attention you’re seeking on social media. You can’t use Tinubu to get the asylum you’re desperately hoping for.

Campaign has started and we will vote in February. Regurgitating the same rubbish from Twitter to Nairaland to your site won’t change anything. Go to court and remain there.

I am not done with your master.

Stay on the page

Finally there, is the crowning touch that proves without a doubt that Bola Tinubu submitted a forged certificate to INEC - the date on his purported certificate is different to that on the reprinted certificate obtained via subpoena from Chicago State University. Whereas the original on the left states that the degree was awarded on June 27, 1979, the certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC states that the degree was awarded on June 22, 1979. All of this points to one clear conclusion - the “certificate” on the right is a forgery.

descarado:

But, the case is in court na.

You don't know?

If it’s in court, why not take all these groundbreaking evidence to court. Why the desperation for social media judgement? Can Tinubu be disqualified on Nairaland? Are you even aware it’s contempt of court to be discussing details of a matter that is sub judice?

Shortly after this story was published, it came to our attention that the forged certificate submitted to INEC by Bola Tinubu appears to have originated from an online fake diploma design service called diplomamakers.com.

ALTERNATEID:


If it’s in court, why not take all these groundbreaking evidence to court. Why the desperation for social media judgement? Can Tinubu be disqualified on Nairaland? Are you even aware it’s contempt of court to be discussing details of a matter that is subsidized?

Pahahahahahahha

Is it affecting you personally if it is shared on social media while in court at the same time ?

A search of the Diploma Makers repository on Pinterest turns up dozens of fake university and college degree certificates including a Chicago State University certificate that is nearly identical in design and structure to that submitted to INEC by Tinubu.

Legal Implications and Political Reactions
Under Section 29 of Nigeria’s Electoral Act, 2022, providing false information on Form EC9 constitutes grounds for disqualification for an election provided another contestant files a suit at the Federal High Court seeking to declare the information provided as false.

ALTERNATEID:


Is Nairaland a court? See David, nobody cares again about the nonsense attention you’re seeking on social media. You can’t use Tinubu to get the asylum you’re desperately hoping for.

Campaign has started and we will vote in February. Regurgitating the same rubbish from Twitter to Nairaland to your site won’t change anything. Go to court and remain there.

Are you angry?
Be calming down bros.

Obi is always scrutinised here every minute. Even a small joke he made yesterday in pH was used by your people to score own goal.