NewStats: 3,261,654 , 8,174,652 topics. Date: Thursday, 29 May 2025 at 11:26 PM x5g42

Aemmyjah:

Jesus was telling Jesus to sit beside him
That is what makes sense to people like Emusan

Not only that Jesus was praying to Jesus!

Aemmyjah:
Jesus was telling Jesus to sit beside him


That is what makes sense to people like Emusan

No it doesn't make any sense not only to me but also to any reasonable person.

The Father told his Son.

Besides, if you're asked to provide the scripture that says "Sit BESIDE me" you'll begin to say another thing.

Truthseeker10:

MaxInDHouse, Janosky, Aemmyjah, Gabrielshow24, QuinQ.
This is the evidence that Emusan claimed that Jesus is Yahweh/Jehovah according to Psalms 110:1.
But it seems the Trinity doctrine is against him now.

Legacy Standard Bible
Of David. A Psalm. Yahweh says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand Until I put Your enemies as a footstool for Your feet.”

American Standard Version
A Psalm of David. Jehovah saith unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, Until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

Until you tell me the Trinity doctrine you've been running away from since then your question/point will be addressed.

Short note: you forgot what leads to that post which is the same thing you're doing till date.

Janosky:


Why is archoladey deceiving himself?

What is the Emphatic Diaglott rendition of John 1:1?

Carry your folly out of this thread.
JWs dwelling rent free in your head.

Your NWT is on fire based on Truthseeker10 words

You can keep regurgitating the folly peddling of your brains about the Diaglott

Janosky:
Psalms 136:1-3 ,Jehovah is the LORD of Lords.
Daniel 44:6 Jehovah is the king of kings.

Your own Daniel have chapter 44

Where did you see King of kings in Psalms 136:1-3 is my question?

It was never there but you inserted it fraud.ster

Jehovah is the Prince of Princes.
Your Trinitarian mentors agreed with the Jews.
Screenshot evidence.

Go and rest or continue WAILING and throw tantrums to mock the holy scriptures.

Jesus is The King of kings! Hallelujah

Emusan:


Who wrote the Emphatic Diaglott?

You dey mind that folly peddling brains

The moment they show their common denominator, he starts looking for who to point fingers at regarding where they copy their lies and manipulations from

Emusan:


When he is afraid of screenshot just know that water has ed Garri

Wahala oooooo

Emusan:


It turns to provide scripture to your claim my comprehension skill is now zero

I'm enjoying this

Attack the person syndrome na one of their way of getting out of discussion

Janosky:
Nah Emusan way to dey deceive himself.

He's coming to deflect & digress to irrelevant matter.
.

Any of my post now can never negate any of my previous posts since I ed Nairaland in year 2012.

I don't digress unlike you people who always boycott, turn blind eyes or deviate from POV.

Just tell your second to answer my question and see how you people will receive another Bible study.

MaxInDHouse:

Not only that Jesus was praying to Jesus!

No! Jesus was praying to His Father.

How is that hard for you to understand?

Emusan:

No! Jesus was praying to His Father.
How is that hard for you to understand?

And who is His father o?

QuinQ:


Explain what??
It is beyond your ability to fully comprehend or describe God just as you can't describe 5th and 6th dimensions; just as someone living in a two-dimensional world can't describe our 3-dimensional world!

Looooool! Their GODS dey inside house for USA. It has dimensions like them

MaxInDHouse:
And who is His father o?

Yahweh!

Now, you know that Jesus can't be praying to Jesus.

I'm glad that is cleared

MaxInDHouse:


The funny thing about arrogant people is the way they keep on asking questions but never give a definitive answer when someone now gives such answer all of them will gather to counter what he says.
WHY?
All of them are sitting on the fence so to give a definitive answer could mean they have someone teaching them and they don't want that therefore they float with whatever they say unlike JWs who always bring answers showing we have authority! Matthew 7:28-29

Projection is allowed. The bold describe you and Truthseeker10 well.


MaxInDHouse and Truthseeker10 are the pots calling kettle black

Emusan:

Yahweh!

And you initially said Jesus is Yahweh o!
So is Jesus not praying to himself?

Gabrielshow24:
Even your publication claims Jehovah as Prince of princes 🤨—A very fishy rhetoric 😅.

Also, You ran away from our previous discussion when you saw that you made no point whatsoever and finally your own organization shot you in the leg🤣🤣.

Jehovah is prince of princes 😅who con be King? 🥲

Looooool! He is using this thread as means to divert and deflect into other areas.

Ken4Christ:


Ode. Search how many times Jesus called God Father compared to the name Jehovah. Well, you don't have the confidence to call God, Father because you are not yet a son of God. So, you are condemning yourself that you are not worthy to be a son of God

It starts by believing in Jesus and accepting him as your Lord and Saviour.

John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name

They are taught not see themselves as sons of God. Only the sons of God according to Jehovah's witnesses is 144,000. None of them can deny or say it is a lie. MaxInDHouse, Janosky, Aemmyjah, Truthseeker10 are not sons of God except they show evidence of eating the emblems at their memorial.

MaxInDHouse:
And you initially said Jesus is Yahweh o!

Yes! YAHWEH is a NAME!

Or you want to say two persons can't have ONE NAME.

Now, the question I asked Mich that leads to that post is this he couldn't answer as he uses his normal style to run away from it.

In Matthew 28:19 we read "Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,"

The NAME in this verse is SINGULAR and what is that NAME?

Let me see if you will answer or chicken out

So is Jesus not praying to himself?

Yes Jesus isn't praying to HIMSELF.

Emusan:


Your own Daniel have chapter 44

Where did you see King of kings in Psalms 136:1-3 is my question?

It was never there but you inserted it fraud.ster



Jesus is The King of kings! Hallelujah

You see him jump on Bible commentaries to bail him out, the same Bible commentaries of false Christians and Babylon the great.

Emusan:

Yes! YAHWEH is a NAME!
Or you want to say two persons can't have ONE NAME.
Now, the question I asked Mich that leads to that post is this he couldn't answer as he uses his normal style to run away from it.
In Matthew 28:19 we read "Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,"
The NAME in this verse is SINGULAR and what is that NAME?
Let me see if you will answer or chicken out
Yes Jesus isn't praying to HIMSELF.

So Jesus is Yahweh. YES or NO!

achorladey:
You see him jump on Bible commentaries to bail him out, the same Bible commentaries of false Christians and Babylon the great.

The most astonish part is how he fused King of kings into Daniel just to make scripture says what it didn't say.

MaxInDHouse:
So Jesus is Yahweh. YES or NO!

Answer my question oga

Stop jumping

Emusan:

Answer my question oga
Stop jumping

Ọmọ i already have what you told my brother i just want everyone to see how empty you are all these while yet arguing aimlessly.

Since you said:
"Jesus is Yahweh" and
"Jesus was praying to Yahweh"

There is no hiding again it's clear that your Jesus was praying to himself jọọ no story!

Emusan:


The most astonish part is how he fused King of kings into Daniel just to make scripture says what it didn't say.

No be today we dey see their manipulations. MaxInDHouse fused lies into Matthew 6:9,10. Janosky fused lies into the meaning of the gospel.

MaxInDHouse:


Ọmọ i already have what you told my brother i just want everyone to see how empty you are all these while yet arguing aimlessly.

Since you said:
"Jesus is Yahweh" and
"Jesus was praying to Yahweh"

There is no hiding again it's clear that your Jesus was praying to himself jọọ no story!

They are always arguing aimless and empty. Shiooooor. Stale and default mode when their arrogant ways of asking questions are countered

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ i already have what you told my brother i just want everyone to see how empty you are all these while yet arguing aimlessly.

Yet you still want attention so bad

Since you said:
"Jesus is Yahweh" and
"Jesus was praying to Yahweh"

There is no hiding again it's clear that your Jesus was praying to himself jọọ no story!

I know none of you can ever answer that question even your gods in Warwick.

What is that NAME Jesus talked about?

Emusan:

Yet you still want attention so bad
I know none of you can ever answer that question even your gods in Warwick.
What is that NAME Jesus talked about?

The name he was praying to nah!

MaxInDHouse:
The name he was praying to nah!

What is that NAME?

Water don Garri

Emusan:

What is that NAME?
Water don Garri

Nah the name he dey pray to nah!

achorladey:

Looooool! Their GODS dey inside house for USA. It has dimensions like them

😂🤣😅

MaxInDHouse:


Angels are God's spirit sons He calls them "Morning Stars" {Job 38:7} only one is called "Archangel" {Jude 9} and only one angel is called "Bright Morning Star" Revelations 22:16

So if only one angel is called Archangel and head of all loyal heavenly armies {Revelations 12:7} just as Jesus also has his angels {Matthew 25:31} and Jesus is called the "Bright Morning Star" {Revelations 22:16} while all other angels are called "Morning Stars" surely it's this same person that is the only Archangel among others! Daniel 12:1

Your grievances can't change anything so it's either you agree or disagree!

It'd do you some good to do a little research. See below.
Lucifer is what specifically means "morning star"

Janosky:

Greek lexicon 743
arxággelos (from 758 /árxōn, "of the first order, chief" and 32 /ággelos, "angel" – an archangel; an angel of the highest rank (see Dan 10:13, 12:1; see also Lk 1:19; Rev 8:2, 12:7); "a ruler of angels, a superior angel, an archangel" (Souter).

Screenshot evidence with Bible references:
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance

Notice how the indefinite article "a" or "an" is used in all the definitions while with the Son of God, the definite article "The" is used - meaning there is only one.

You still haven't told us why Peter didn't yell "Archangel!"

MaxInDHouse:

Nah the name he dey pray to nah!

You can't mention the NAME ni or the NAME hook you for throat?