NewStats: 3,261,203 , 8,173,382 topics. Date: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 02:43 PM 4yn516z3e3g |
Court Orders Blood Transfusion For Two-Year-Old Girl Despite Parents' Objection (21670 Views)
Angelindisguise: 6:23am On May 10 |
ejimatic: Tell me one judicial decision of the court that has ever ed the JW parents. Don't come here and be saying things that are not true. No court judgement has ever ed this JW parents, simply because the right to life is fundamental and nobody is permitted to allow another d*e especially when that other can be saved. 2 Likes |
udemzyudex(m): 6:25am On May 10 |
I already know it is jehova witness people, very heartless set of people. Even when you're dying they'll rather watch you die than accept blood transfusion. 1 Like 1 Share |
effty(m): 6:27am On May 10 |
ejimatic:Show me one judgement in Nigeria that have been in the JW favor on this. 1 Like |
Obesity(m): 6:28am On May 10 |
After reading this every sane JW should leave that church. I was thinking this is an outdated tradition, i don't know it's still being practiced π ![]() 3 Likes |
Agboogashi: 6:30am On May 10 |
The gullible parents would have abandoned taking the child to hospital altogether, since they believe that jehova would healing the child. Mtchee.
3 Likes |
enambobo(m): 6:31am On May 10 |
drlaykay:Be ready to take care of the complications too should it go south. Cos the parents have the right to sue you for going against their wish and putting them in a mess of taking care of complications. 3 Likes |
Snowx: 6:31am On May 10 |
Ndo Ama Jehoππ
|
TONYE001(m): 6:39am On May 10 |
ejimatic: Actually, you are right and wrong at the same time. The Law respects the right of others to practice their religion. When a minor is involved, however, and it has to do with life and death, the Law reserves the right to empower doctors to do what they consider best. This is not a new thing, has been there for years. 2 Likes |
wolement: 6:40am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse: The verses you quote are out of context. Is the blood sacrificed to idols or from a strangled animal? 4 Likes |
mekuso89(m): 6:41am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse:Your organization is Evil 5 Likes 1 Share |
Fiscus105(m): 6:42am On May 10 |
ejimatic: Under normal circumstances, mod is supposed to ban you from commenting and also remove your comments from public forum, because you are endangered to the society and gullible reader, now or in future. I liking ur comments to a Boko Haran, Hamas, er of APC militias or ritualist, given deadly advice in public forum 4 Likes |
jmichael259(m): 6:43am On May 10 |
Blood transfusion itself is not treatment and in a sane country, things can be done without it. It might be fewer but it's not unusual nor unheard of for people to refuse chemotherapy, invasive surgery, transplants, resuscitation, blood transfusion etc The sad part of this is that this is a country where Doctors are still using 1945 methodologies. They don't know any other things to do in such situations in case of unavailability(which is a frequent occurrence in our hospitals) or refusal of transfusion. They don't have plasma and other blood replenishment or blood recycling equipment, they don't even know what those things look like. [b]For the people involved in this particular matter, having to wait till now to attempt to remove the child is a sign of being unprepared or even negligent. The child should have been gone at the first sign of opposition or inability to ister treatment. You have no business there in the first place if you did your homework or actually aligned with the people of your fath. Do not get pregnant and have kids if you cannot think, plan and save ahead. If the child has a condition or your faith denies some treatment methods then you should have arranged such matters with hospital liaison committees long time ago. A prepared person has no business being in a place where outsiders are now trying to impose, veto or retrace steps for you. Fortunately, There are thousands of modern hospitals and doctors with experience to cater for these and many more cases such as Laser removal of kidney Stones without surgery, alternative care without chemotherapy, treatment without blood etc Do not use faith as excuse for blood transfusion if you'll fail to monitor and comply with precautionary measures against drop in blood levels or having emergency s of similar faith doctors or hospitals that are able to handle your case. A person whose faith doesn't allow meat, will go out of their way to find and learn to prepare nutritious and strengthening vegetable based meals.[/b] 6 Likes |
VaginaAcademic: 6:45am On May 10 |
Hypocrite of Jehovah's witnesses they only follow part of the their laws that benefit them and discard others. So many of their kids have lost their lives because of a twisted interpretation of the old testament law to not eat animal blood. Meanwhile when it comes to sexual matters they practice double standards.
1 Like |
id4sho(m): 6:48am On May 10 |
TONYE001: Nawaooo π₯, I no carry religion for head shaπ€· |
drlaykay(m): 6:51am On May 10 |
enambobo:Speak less of topics you don't know much about. There are complications to every procedure. As far as consent has been sought, the doctor is not liable to any complications that arise. In this case, the consent has been given by the law court. They can go ahead to sue the court if they wish. They will still lose. 3 Likes |
Stayingalive: 6:52am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse:Said alot yet said nothing about how the girl should be saved. Damn 4 Likes 1 Share |
JuanDeDios: 6:53am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse: ejimatic:I know. Everybody now treks because of the risks of driving. And they're all switching to mushrooms because of the risk of getting a bone stuck in your throat when you eat fish. When a person hears the same thing day in day out, it becomes their reality. In the real world, blood transfusions remain as popular as ever. Doctors everywhere continue to prescribe them to save people's lives. But in the reality/universe some people have crafted, "bloodless surgery" is now the norm because of the "risks of blood transfusion". 5 Likes |
jmichael259(m): 6:55am On May 10 |
Agboogashi:Lying against people does not make you wise nor prove any of your points. Or maybe you're mixing up different people. They do not refuse medical care and believe that Jehova would heal the child as you said. It's unfortunate in 2025 that to a typical Nigerian, the thought of refusing blood transfusion sounds like refusing treatment altogether because of how moribund the successive governments have rendered both our education and medical sectors. Heart surgeries, caesarian sections etc have been done without blood transfusion. Faith or Religion is not the only basis for refusal of certain practices in medicine around the world but that's another story. 2 Likes 1 Share |
highoctane: 6:56am On May 10 |
The case have not ended. Let the hospital and their cohort not celebrate. Doctors and Surgeons in general its that BLOOD is POISON, always labeled HANDLE with care. Forced medical procedure or otherwise to any person be it a Jehovah's Witness or not, lIS a RAPE on that person's conscience. Doctors who still ister blood are still archaic and antiqued. Because blood is given free by prisoners and well intention persons, most doctors commercial it, to make money. The battle line has been drawn. The Bible strictly says " It is the blood of Jesus that saves life." 1 Like |
jmichael259(m): 6:58am On May 10 |
Hushpuppy20:Jehovah's witnesses do not refuse to take medication. Your memory isn't serving you right. 3 Likes |
Stayingalive: 7:01am On May 10 |
Obesity:Sane and JW in same sentence? 1 Like |
Onliie(m): 7:02am On May 10 |
Religion is a scam
2 Likes |
Kayberg: 7:11am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse: I have always known that you JWs are so poor in understanding the Bible, hence you twist it with reckless abandon. Where did GOD tell man to abstain from blood? What GOD said in that Genesis is: βBut flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.β β Genesis 9:4 (KJV) GOD said they should not EAT THE FLESH AND THE BLOOD TOGETHER! Meaning they should not eat it raw! You also quote Acts 15:28-29, the blood mentioned there is bloodshed! Murder! Killing of humans!!! Poor biblical understanding!!! Have you no understanding that the Bible likewise say: βFor the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.β β Leviticus 17:11 (KJV) βAnd almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.β β Hebrews 9:22 (KJV) This is why I will always have problems with your contorted and satanically manipulated Charles Taze Russell's misleading and deranging doctrines. 8 Likes 1 Share |
Okhuadams(m): 7:13am On May 10 |
OLAADEGBU:That's how many of them have died, the wise ones do it secretly is the foolish one that don't, this is the same way a friend of mine lost his twin sister till tomorrow the guy has not set his eyes on his parents because of that he hates them with ion 1 Like |
uvie66: 7:15am On May 10 |
jmichael259:Don't try to twist the argument here, the nexus of whether the girl lives or die was the blood transfusion, and in this instance the parents are objecting to medical evidence of blood transfusion because of their faith. Of course the parents would have been told that their are no other options of the girl's survivability but the transfusion. 4 Likes 1 Share |
Talismann: 7:18am On May 10 |
jeh0va witness girls pretend anything. To wish them birthday them go say no they don't celebrate πΆ, even happy new year or new month, Dem no go wish you back. Them sabi hold onto church doctrines. But for back, na Dem knac.k another person husband . 2 Likes |
dettolgel: 7:19am On May 10 |
TONYE001: Thanks a lot. I am sure you didn't write this because of that fanatic but because of other rational people on this forum. 2 Likes |
Eniitankorede: 7:27am On May 10 |
SmartProf: It is not true that they will use religious beliefs as ground for safeguarding measures. Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right. |
Trustedpronet: 7:28am On May 10 |
SmartProf: Go and do your research Jehovah has won such cases in that abroad, is because you don't know. Some states in the united has even take stands with jw by providing alternative mean of transfusion. Jw are like the Muslims version of Christian, they are so attached to biblical injunctions without regret. You might condem jw but the last time I checked they are better than that religion that will enters your village to kill you kill your wives and children even where there is no war alert, they are also better that those churches that is deceiving on fake Miracles and fake financial breakthrough. 2 Likes |
Eniitankorede: 7:30am On May 10 |
MaxInDHouse: If you are not a medical expert, stop making statements that are not ed by research. Blood transfusion is being given all over the world. It has saved millions of lives. And not giving it has caused millions of deaths. We have evidence on that. 3 Likes |
AK481(m): 7:37am On May 10 |
papyjaypaul: Landmark judgement ? There is a supreme court judicial president that did the good work which makes it easy for lower courts to give good judgement like this . In the Nigerian case of Tega Esabunor & Anor v. Faweya & Ors (2019), the court Read it and it's very interesting. 1 Like 1 Share |
Nlandmodesfku: 7:37am On May 10 |
JW are a cult. They are irrational in reasoning
2 Likes |
Rising Cost Of Living In Nigeria, What Of The Poor Among Us?
(Go Up)
Sections: How To . 84 Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland. |