NewStats: 3,261,181 , 8,173,321 topics. Date: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 01:29 PM 5w10y

⚡North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspected a newly modified Il-76 Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft, marking the first of its kind for the Korean People’s Air Force.

Additionally, he reviewed the Saetbyol-4—a North Korean copy of the U.S. RQ-4 Global Hawk—and oversaw the use of quadcopters and kamikaze drones. Notably, North Korea is actively involved in the conflict against Ukrainian forces and has been closely monitoring the evolution of drone warfare, likely drawing lessons for future engagements against South Korea and the United States.

During the demonstration, North Korean forces employed these drones against static targets resembling U.S. Stryker MGS vehicles and M1A2 Abrams tanks.

WriterrNg:
⚡Zelensky:

Putin will die soon, it's a fact, and his safe and unsuccessful historical life will end.

Projecting he knows zelensky is the one to die soon

WriterrNg:
⚡More Russian drone raid on Dnepropetrovsk.

Pleasant news

Burkina Faso President plays football with okocha Jay jay and adeboye and many Africa former stars in a friendly game he host

RUSSIA MUST GET OUT OF UKRAINE. RUSSIA IS THE SERPENT IN THE GARDEN.

shoodboi2:


Botragelad and senseless arguments are like bread and butter. Did you see any source stating that the jets breached Iran's airspace? Even Israel isn't claiming such but you keep saying it is so because "there is no way Israel would bomb deep inside Iran without entering Iran's airspace.

Israeli jets can bomb deep inside Iran without entering Iran's airspace the same way Iran can bomb Israel without sending a single aircraft into the air. It all depends on the type of missile that each side uses.

Times of Israel indicates that Israel used an air-launched ballistic missile for the attack. That missile is most likely the Golden Horizon, aka the silver sparrow, which has a range of 1500 - 2000 kilometers. Financial Times (FT) also indicates that Israel also used the ROCKS missile.

Israel isn't talking about the range of the ROCKS missile but sources say it has a range of up to 800 kilometers. Financial Times even mentioned that the range is 2000 kilometers. (In case you Google it, some sources claim 300 kilometers, but those are the versions sold to India and not the one Israel uses. The one Israel uses travels farther than that.)

Baghdad to Tehran is only about 700 kilometers. Mosul, Iraq to Tehran is 750 km. And these are not border areas. Erbil, Iraq is 654 km to Tehran while Kirkuk, Iraq in 616 km from Tehran. Mashhad, Iran's farthest city, is 1444 kilometers from Baghdad.

All these places are within the range of the ROCKS and Golden Horizon missiles, so it is very possible for Israel to fire into Iran from Iraq.

The only reason Israel entered Iraq is to:

1. Prevent Iran from shooting at their aircrafts
2. Get their missiles closer to the eastern parts of Iran
3. Reduce Iran's response time to the incoming missile attack.

The earlier Israel fires the missile, the easier it becomes for Iran to detect and intercept it. So, they get close and fire and leave before Iran can shoot back.

As for the S-300, Iran used them to shoot down the missiles. (The S-300 can shoot down planes and missiles. It was not only made for aircrafts.)

And before you begin another round of senseless arguments, note that I only used Tehran and Baghdad as examples. I know Israel fired at areas farther from Tehran, and Israel likely fired areas other than Baghdad, but I used them as examples since they are the capital cities of both countries.

What on earth are you babbling about? 🤷🏼 Are you seriously dismissing multiple sources, including the IDF itself because they don’t align with your narrative? The IDF confirmed that some aircraft breached Iranian airspace during Operation, yet here you are, stubbornly arguing.

Those S-300 systems are designed to intercept incoming missiles. Israel targeted these systems inside Iran to clear the skies for follow-up strikes. If standoff missiles alone were sufficient, why on earth would Israel bother neutralising air defences? 🤷🏼🤷🏼

As I’ve already stated, Israel deployed over 100 aircraft, including F-35s and F-15s, because direct engagement was necessary to ensure success. If standoff missiles could do the job, why would Israel send stealth fighters into hostile territory? What then was the point of neutralising air defences if you’re not planning to enter their airspace?

Are you also aware there are reports of Israeli jets flying over Tehran and conducting live battle damage assessments? Are these jets just sightseeing?
Here; https://africa.businessinsider.com/military-and-defense/strike-on-iran-shows-israeli-air-forces-embrace-of-ballistic-missiles/pd5nbls

orisa37:
RUSSIA MUST GET OUT OF UKRAINE. RUSSIA IS THE SERPENT IN THE GARDEN.

the last time I checked,the serpent did not leave the garden,it was Adam that left garden

orisa37:
RUSSIA MUST GET OUT OF UKRAINE. RUSSIA IS THE SERPENT IN THE GARDEN.

Mumu.

Watcharena:
the last time I checked,the serpent did not leave the garden,it was Adam that left garden

lol

Botragelad:

What on earth are you babbling about? 🤷🏼 Are you seriously dismissing multiple sources, including the IDF itself because they don’t align with your narrative? The IDF confirmed that some aircraft breached Iranian airspace during Operation, yet here you are, stubbornly arguing.
Here; https://africa.businessinsider.com/military-and-defense/strike-on-iran-shows-israeli-air-forces-embrace-of-ballistic-missiles/pd5nbls

1. Your sources clearly mentions this in the first paragraph:

These allowed Israeli jets to strike largely from beyond the reach of Iran's defenses and with fast flight paths, most likely from neighboring Iraq, that complicated efforts to shoot them down.

There are no multiple reports of Israeli jets entering Iranian airspace.

Only a few Israeli soldiers are claiming they entered Iranian airspace. Iran never said they did and neither did western media or the US government, which both Israel. Even the Israeli government never said they entered Iranian airspace.

Botragelad:

Those S-300 systems are designed to intercept incoming missiles. Israel targeted these systems inside Iran to clear the skies for follow-up strikes. If standoff missiles alone were sufficient, why on earth would Israel bother neutralising air defences? 🤷🏼🤷🏼

2. Iran has many missiles systems and not just the S-300. So, if you insist they destroyed the S-300, what about the other missiles?

For clarity, S-300 can shoot down aircraft and missiles. In this case, Iran used them to destroy the missiles and they worked perfectly well.

There is no that the S-300 was destroyed.

Botragelad:

As I’ve already stated, Israel deployed over 100 aircraft, including F-35s and F-15s, because direct engagement was necessary to ensure success. If standoff missiles could do the job, why would Israel send stealth fighters into hostile territory? What then was the point of neutralising air defences if you’re not planning to enter their airspace?

3. How many times do we have to go over this? Air defenses can shoot down missiles.

Specifically, the S-300 is very good at shooting down ground or air-launched ballistic missiles, which Israel extensively used in the attack on Iran.

So, it is common sense for Israel to target them to keep them busy and reduce their possibility of intercepting missiles heading to other locations.

Botragelad:

Are you also aware there are reports of Israeli jets flying over Tehran and conducting live battle damage assessments? Are these jets just sightseeing?

If Israeli jets didn't enter Iran while bombing, what makes you think they will enter to conduct "battle damage assessments"?

Who even does battle damage assessments by flying into hostile territory filled with anti-aircraft missiles?

Countries use satellites or rely on intelligence aircrafts that fly in a safe zone. It's the same way NATO flies intelligence aircrafts over Poland to gather intel on Russian military movement in Ukraine. You don't need to fly directly over the target to gather Intel on them.

Lastly, most of your analysis are based on "reports" and what you think rather than factual analysis.

Reports by who? Reports is just someone talking. And what you (or anyone else) thinks is irrelevant to what happened.

Instead of reports and what you think, why don't you focus on reality and factual analysis based on what happened and what you see, rather than what someone told you?

Do you even know the missiles Israel used? No. But your sources mention that air-launched ballistic missiles were extensively used. And all these missiles can be carried by F-16s and F-35s.

Do you know how big those missiles are and how they affect the performance of a jet? Each jet carried no more than one each of those missiles. That's why Israel had 100 jets on that attack.

They also cause the aircraft to consume more fuel and reduce its range and ability to function properly. So if you insist Israel entered Iran, I should ask you how Israel refueled those jets?

Israel may be dumb. But they are definitely not dumb enough to fly a heavy aircraft carrying a heavy missile into a country with an active air defence system.

⚡North Korea's first domestically developed airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft.

⚡Russian Foreign Ministry is organizing Kim Jong-un's visit to Russia.

⚡Chinese automotive firm Chery will establish $1bn car factory in Turkey, which will produce 200,000 vehicles in a year, reports.

shoodboi2:


1. Your sources clearly mentions this in the first paragraph:

These allowed Israeli jets to strike largely from beyond the reach of Iran's defenses and with fast flight paths, most likely from neighboring Iraq, that complicated efforts to shoot them down.

There are no multiple reports of Israeli jets entering Iranian airspace.

Only a few Israeli soldiers are claiming they entered Iranian airspace. Iran never said they did and neither did western media or the US government, which both Israel. Even the Israeli government never said they entered Iranian airspace.



2. Iran has many missiles systems and not just the S-300. So, if you insist they destroyed the S-300, what about the other missiles?

For clarity, S-300 can shoot down aircraft and missiles. In this case, Iran used them to destroy the missiles and they worked perfectly well.

There is no that the S-300 was destroyed.



3. How many times do we have to go over this? Air defenses can shoot down missiles.

Specifically, the S-300 is very good at shooting down ground or air-launched ballistic missiles, which Israel extensively used in the attack on Iran.

So, it is common sense for Israel to target them to keep them busy and reduce their possibility of intercepting missiles heading to other locations.



If Israeli jets didn't enter Iran while bombing, what makes you think they will enter to conduct "battle damage assessments"?

Who even does battle damage assessments by flying into hostile territory filled with anti-aircraft missiles?

Countries use satellites or rely on intelligence aircrafts that fly in a safe zone. It's the same way NATO flies intelligence aircrafts over Poland to gather intel on Russian military movement in Ukraine. You don't need to fly directly over the target to gather Intel on them.

Lastly, most of your analysis are based on "reports" and what you think rather than factual analysis.

Reports by who? Reports is just someone talking. And what you (or anyone else) thinks is irrelevant to what happened.

Instead of reports and what you think, why don't you focus on reality and factual analysis based on what happened and what you see, rather than what someone told you?

Do you even know the missiles Israel used? No. But your sources mention that air-launched ballistic missiles were extensively used. And all these missiles can be carried by F-16s and F-35s.

Do you know how big those missiles are and how they affect the performance of a jet? Each jet carried no more than one each of those missiles. That's why Israel had 100 jets on that attack.

They also cause the aircraft to consume more fuel and reduce its range and ability to function properly. So if you insist Israel entered Iran, I should ask you how Israel refueled those jets?

Israel may be dumb. But they are definitely not dumb enough to fly a heavy aircraft carrying a heavy missile into a country with an active air defence system.

Quit embarrassing yourself. You clearly didn't read that source I dropped there or how did you manage to miss this👇🏻👇🏻 and go off on a tangent!

"Before the attack, leaked US intelligence documents mentioned a hitherto unknown Israeli air-launched ballistic missile, or ALBM, dubbed Golden Horizon and a long-range drone referred to as RA-01. Other known Israeli ALBMs, such as Rocks, Rampage, and Air LORA, have ranges of about 175 miles, enough to reach targets across Iran's border but insufficient for striking Tehran without entering Iranian airspace.[/i]

"However, Israeli officials said some IDF aircraft entered Iranian airspace," Roblin said. "Penetrating flight may have helped with target acquisition and bomb damage assessment of certain point targets, or delivery of attacks requiring greater precision."

It's likely that only F-35 stealth fighters, and possibly RA-01s, entered Iranian airspace while fourth-generation F-15s and F-16 jets kept their distance.

The Rampage missile is 4.7 meters long, roughly 15 feet, meaning it cannot fit in the F-35's internal weapons bay. The Golden Horizon is most likely a similar size, if not larger. Carrying such a weapon externally would reduce the F-35's crucial stealth capabilities. If any F-35s entered Iranian airspace, they probably used smaller weapons carried internally.

"By targeting Iran's best surface-to-air missiles — allegedly knocking out all of Iran's remaining S-300s — the attacks have also paved the way for future strikes to operate closer at reduced risk," Roblin said.

"At the same time, Israeli sources declared that F-35s entered Iranian airspace, potentially to conduct accurate live battle damage assessment without necessarily delivering strikes," Borsari told BI. "Given that Israel destroyed or damaged key radar and air defense sites in Iran, its F-35s could operate in a less threatening environment
SEE WHERE LIVE BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT, S_300 DESTRUCTION, ISRAELI WARPLANES BREACHING IRAN AIR, ETC ARE MENTIONED? You could have read the whole thing if you have no idea!🤷🏼


What credible evidence? Read up there, there is literally a firsthand s from military personnel but you dismissed that while simultaneously appealing to western media narratives as truth. I believe you will agree that soldiers on the ground (or in the air, as it were) are more likely to know whether their own aircraft breached enemy territory than CNN or the BBC? Or do you only trust reports when they align with your narrative?

You can't just cherrypick. Lol. Fast flight paths originating from Iraq don’t necessarily preclude incursions into Iranian airspace.
Tell us, what exactly qualifies as "beyond the reach of Iran's defenses"? Last time I checked, crossing borders tends to bring one well within range of those defenses.

You state confidently that the S_300 worked “perfect no less!) at intercepting Israeli missiles. Yet , despite this, Tehran still suffered damage across multiple sites. Funny how the S-300 didn’t manage to stop dozens of precision strike(got destroyed still, read that source). What went wrong?

Who said Israel needed to obliterate every single battery?😂😂😂
Even targeting key part could degrade its effectiveness enough to allow other missiles through. Are you aware?

What happens when cloud cover obscures satellite imagery? What about warfare attempt to jam remote sensors?
Common sense should tell you that modern stealth technology allows F-35s to operate undetected even in contested environment. What makes you feel assume Israel couldn’t have sent a small contingent deep into Iranian airspace for rapid reconnaissance?

Yes, Israel indeed launched over 100 jets(like you agreed) carrying air-to-ground ballistic missiles, question is, why wouldn’t they maximize efficiency by refueling mid-air? Ever heard of tanker planes? Lol

Again, why assume each jet carried only one missile? 😂😂
Modern fighters are designed to handle substantial loads. Read the source I sent, stop talking trash! Lol
Answers to most of the questions you ask is boldly written there.

Nairaland should have certain personalised features to enable s censor/filter what they want to read by now.. this rambling is getting out of hand.. I mean, you'll just come online and meets some piles of senseless aurgument as if this place is an assembly of mad men and women.
Brainless human-animals parading this thread like botraglad, obedience and gbadebo can give you migraine within seconds should you mistakenly read what they write.. these guys are so sttupiid that you'll think they are on some special kinds of dumb enhancement steriods to boost their waywardness or something.

⚡Russia about to build first highway to North Korea, on tripoint border with China

'Sharp increase in economic and military exchanges anticipated, eroding sanctions' — Seoul

⚡ Zelensky said Trump had unblocked intelligence sharing with Ukraine.

All things are unlocked, we have made important steps. President Trump unlocked.

Zelensky also announced an agreement with Macron to increase the number of French Mirage fighters in Ukraine.

jjj37:
Nairaland should have certain personalised features to enable s censor/filter what they want to read by now.. this rambling is getting out of hand.. I mean, you'll just come online and meets some piles of senseless aurgument as if this place is an assembly of mad men and women.
Brainless human-animals parading this thread like botraglad, obedience and gbadebo can give you migraine within seconds should you mistakenly read what they write.. these guys are so sttupiid that you'll think they are on some kinds of special dumb enhancement steriods to boost their waywardness or something.

You failed to mention Writterng, shoodboi, kingsnairaland, masterviolence, crayfish in your rant.

Go cry elsewhere! 😂😂

⚡Trade war in full swing as Trump threatens EU & Canada with more tariffs if they team up 'to do economic harm' to US

'Large scale tariffs, far larger than currently planned'

jjj37:
Nairaland should have certain personalised features to enable s censor/filter what they want to read by now.. this rambling is getting out of hand.. I mean, you'll just come online and meets some piles of senseless aurgument as if this place is an assembly of mad men and women.
Brainless human-animals parading this thread like botraglad, obedience and gbadebo can give you migraine within seconds should you mistakenly read what they write.. these guys are so sttupiid that you'll think they are on some kinds of special dumb enhancement steriods to boost their waywardness or something.

Will you keep quiet. In the side of the bright bulbs na you bright . I have never read any thing that shows a little intellect from you.

Russia begging USA to be accepted into SWIFT again what happens to BRICS hahahaha. Islamists and propagandist shey i warned you guys earlier that Brics won't succeed hahahahahahha.

Botragelad:

You failed to mention Writterng, shoodboi, kingsnairaland, masterviolence, crayfish in your rant.

Go cry elsewhere! 😂😂

So, it seems I can’t step away from this thread for a few days without returning to witness the incoherent ramblings of Major General Pillock, the bright bulb, alongside that rabid dog who mindlessly leaps into discussions far beyond his intellectual grasp.

Botragelad!
I have yet to see your evidence ing your claim regarding the fallen Russian stormtroopers. Either you present photographic proof to substantiate your assertion, or you confess before everyone here that you have lied.

okeysoninv:
Russia begging USA to be accepted into SWIFT again what happens to BRICS hahahaha. Islamists and propagandist shey i warned you guys earlier that Brics won't succeed hahahahahahha.

what's the difference between SWIFT and BRICS

⚡Italy Pledges €68 Million for Syria Reconstruction

Italy has allocated €68 million ($73 million) to humanitarian efforts and infrastructure rebuilding in Syria.

This initial package will hospitals, infrastructure, and food supply chains.

New cooperation projects and a reconstruction business forum are planned.

⚡Denmark's Defense Minister:

We will not put up with the US thinking they can decide how the Danish realm, including Greenland, should look like in the future.

Lawag3:

Will you keep quiet. In the side of the bright bulbs na you bright . I have never read any thing that shows a little intellect from you.

With which head will you use to read?

You should even be thanking God., I omitted your name intentionally out of sympathy of the obvious psychiatric teatment you said you were going through in the hospital some months back.
As a mad man, you think "intellect" means sleeping over here with quagmirous Stuipiid post all over social media.. Studd mad goat!!

WriteerNg:
⚡Trade war in full swing as Trump threatens EU & Canada with more tariffs if they team up 'to do economic harm' to US

'Large scale tariffs, far larger than currently planned'

Go Trump! Fight to the death so that less children around the world will be bombed over petty Western imperialism

Botragelad:

Quit embarrassing yourself. You clearly didn't read that source I dropped there or how did you manage to miss this👇🏻👇🏻 and go off on a tangent!

"Before the attack, leaked US intelligence documents mentioned a hitherto unknown Israeli air-launched ballistic missile, or ALBM, dubbed Golden Horizon and a long-range drone referred to as RA-01. Other known Israeli ALBMs, such as Rocks, Rampage, and Air LORA, have ranges of about 175 miles, enough to reach targets across Iran's border but insufficient for striking Tehran without entering Iranian airspace.[/i]

"However, Israeli officials said some IDF aircraft entered Iranian airspace," Roblin said. "Penetrating flight may have helped with target acquisition and bomb damage assessment of certain point targets, or [/b]delivery of attacks requiring greater precision."

[b]It's likely [/b]that only F-35 stealth fighters, and [b]possibly RA-01s, entered Iranian airspace while fourth-generation F-15s and F-16 jets kept their distance.

The Rampage missile is 4.7 meters long, roughly 15 feet, meaning it cannot fit in the F-35's internal weapons bay. The Golden Horizon is most likely a similar size, if not larger. Carrying such a weapon externally would reduce the F-35's crucial stealth capabilities. If any F-35s entered Iranian airspace, they probably used smaller weapons carried internally.

"By targeting Iran's best surface-to-air missiles — allegedly knocking out all of Iran's remaining S-300s— the attacks have also paved the way for future strikes to operate closer at reduced risk," Roblin said.

"At the same time, Israeli sources declared that F-35s entered Iranian airspace, potentially to conduct accurate live battle damage assessment without necessarily delivering strikes," Borsari told BI. "Given that Israel destroyed or damaged key radar and air defense sites in Iran, its F-35s could operate in a less threatening environment
SEE WHERE LIVE BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT, S_300 DESTRUCTION, ISRAELI WARPLANES BREACHING IRAN AIR, ETC ARE MENTIONED?You could have read the whole thing if you have no idea!🤷🏼


What credible evidence? Read up there, there is literally a firsthand s from military personnel but you dismissed that while simultaneously appealing to western media narratives as truth. I believe you will agree that soldiers on the ground (or in the air, as it were) are more likely to know whether their own aircraft breached enemy territory than CNN or the BBC?Or do you only trust reports when they align with your narrative?

You can't just cherrypick. Lol. Fast flight paths originating from Iraq don’t necessarily preclude incursions into Iranian airspace.
Tell us, what exactly qualifies as "beyond the reach of Iran's defenses"? Last time I checked, crossing borders tends to bring one well within range of those defenses.

You state confidently that the S_300 worked “perfect no less!) at intercepting Israeli missiles. Yet , despite this, Tehran still suffered damage across multiple sites. Funny how the S-300 didn’t manage to stop dozens of precision strike(got destroyed still, read that source). What went wrong?

Who said Israel needed to obliterate every single battery?😂😂😂
Even targeting key part could degrade its effectiveness enough to allow other missiles through. Are you aware?

What happens when cloud cover obscures satellite imagery? What about warfare attempt to jam remote sensors?
Common sense should tell you that modern stealth technology allows F-35s to operate undetected even in contested environment. What makes you feel assume Israel couldn’t have sent a small contingent deep into Iranian airspace for rapid reconnaissance?

Yes, Israel indeed launched over 100 jets(like you agreed) carrying air-to-ground ballistic missiles, question is, why wouldn’t they maximize efficiency by refueling mid-air? Ever heard of tanker planes? Lol

Again, why assume each jet carried only one missile? 😂😂
Modern fighters are designed to handle substantial loads. Read the source I sent, stop talking trash! Lol
Answers to most of the questions you ask is boldly written there.

"Possibly, probably, may have helped, if, or, likely, most likely, allegedly, potentially, without necessarily, etc"

The words above dominate every single paragraph from your "first-hand military " of the IDF, which has an excellent track record for honesty and transparency. There is not a single solid statement from any of the senfences you quoted, and you're trying to use them to your argument.

Now as for your claim about the F-35's modern stealth technology, can you provide any evidence that it is effective against modern air defenses? For all that we know so far, the F-35 has been doing excellently against hospitals, schools, and mosques. And please, don't mention Syria. I take una god beg you.

Now why should anyone buy Israel's claim about damaging multiple targets in Iran when you're not ready to accept Iran's claim about destroying several F-35s?

Now assuming the F35 is truly immune to anything Iran has to offer, don't you worry about the wellbeing of those poor hypothetical refueling tankers in the face of an Iranian retaliation?

Like the APC fanboy said, you need an English class. You do not understand the things you quote

shoodboi2:


Botragelad and senseless arguments are like bread and butter. Did you see any source stating that the jets breached Iran's airspace? Even Israel isn't claiming such but you keep saying it is so because "there is no way Israel would bomb deep inside Iran without entering Iran's airspace.

Israeli jets can bomb deep inside Iran without entering Iran's airspace the same way Iran can bomb Israel without sending a single aircraft into the air. It all depends on the type of missile that each side uses.

Times of Israel indicates that Israel used an air-launched ballistic missile for the attack. That missile is most likely the Golden Horizon, aka the silver sparrow, which has a range of 1500 - 2000 kilometers. Financial Times (FT) also indicates that Israel also used the ROCKS missile.

Israel isn't talking about the range of the ROCKS missile but sources say it has a range of up to 800 kilometers. Financial Times even mentioned that the range is 2000 kilometers. (In case you Google it, some sources claim 300 kilometers, but those are the versions sold to India and not the one Israel uses. The one Israel uses travels farther than that.)

Baghdad to Tehran is only about 700 kilometers. Mosul, Iraq to Tehran is 750 km. And these are not border areas. Erbil, Iraq is 654 km to Tehran while Kirkuk, Iraq in 616 km from Tehran. Mashhad, Iran's farthest city, is 1444 kilometers from Baghdad.

All these places are within the range of the ROCKS and Golden Horizon missiles, so it is very possible for Israel to fire into Iran from Iraq.

The only reason Israel entered Iraq is to:

1. Prevent Iran from shooting at their aircrafts
2. Get their missiles closer to the eastern parts of Iran
3. Reduce Iran's response time to the incoming missile attack.

The earlier Israel fires the missile, the easier it becomes for Iran to detect and intercept it. So, they get close and fire and leave before Iran can shoot back.

As for the S-300, Iran used them to shoot down the missiles. (The S-300 can shoot down planes and missiles. It was not only made for aircrafts.)

And before you begin another round of senseless arguments, note that I only used Tehran and Baghdad as examples. I know Israel fired at areas farther from Tehran, and Israel likely fired areas other than Baghdad, but I used them as examples since they are the capital cities of both countries.

You are a fool.
Here's a comprehensive timeline of the Iran vs. Israel attacks in 2024, detailing what was destroyed and the interceptions that occurred:

Timeline of Attacks
April 1, 2024
Event: Israeli bombing of an Iranian military facility.
Destruction: Targeted military assets, including weapons depots.
Interceptions: None reported.
April 13-14, 2024
Event: Iran launched missile strikes against Israel.
Destruction: Several buildings and military installations in northern Israel.
Interceptions: The Iron Dome intercepted approximately 70% of the incoming missiles.
April 19, 2024
Event: Israeli response to Iranian missile strikes.
Destruction: Additional Iranian military sites were targeted.
Interceptions: None reported.
October 1, 2024
Event: Iran launched between 180 and 200 ballistic missiles at Israel.
Destruction: Significant damage to infrastructure and military targets in Israel.
Interceptions: The Iron Dome intercepted around 60% of the missiles.
October 26, 2024
Event: Israeli strikes against Iranian positions in Iraq and Syria.
Destruction: Four S-300 air defense systems were taken out.
Interceptions: None reported.
October 28, 2024
Event: Further Israeli attacks on Iranian military assets.
Destruction: Key military installations were damaged.
Interceptions: None reported.
Summary of Key Points
Total Attacks: Multiple exchanges with significant escalation in April and October.
Destruction: Various military assets and infrastructure on both sides.
Interceptions: The Iron Dome played a crucial role, with varying success rates.

Once their four S-300 PMPU missile defenses were taken out , IDF was free to roam over Iran airspace 2
days later. IDF also took out Syrian air defences to prevent Syria from warning Iran of a sudden large number of jet fighters heading Eastwards
Idf6 can still fly in anytime , Iran will not fire up their air defences because of the HARM missile.

WriteerNg:
⚡Chinese automotive firm Chery will establish $1bn car factory in Turkey, which will produce 200,000 vehicles in a year, reports.

China better set up a bomb that can blow the company when Turkey takes the company because of sanctions

TURKEY will always lick USA feet when USA ask them to sanction China in the future

WriteerNg:
⚡Russia about to build first highway to North Korea, on tripoint border with China

'Sharp increase in economic and military exchanges anticipated, eroding sanctions' — Seoul

These South Korean people should concentrate on Korean movie drama. There's already a railway track linking Russia and DPRK. So what's the fuse about building/constructing a highway?

OkpaNsukkaisBae:


These South Korean people should concentrate on Korean movie drama. There's already a railway track linking Russia and DPRK. So what's the fuse about building a highway?

I just smell envy.

The West are so cunning, just like their ers here. They want each one of Russia or North Korea or China to fight them alone without any or alliance.

While they go on to create alliances of dozens of countries to fight Russia or North Korea or China.

They hate seeing others form alliances and will try every trick in the book to quash it.