NewStats: 3,261,180 , 8,173,310 topics. Date: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 01:11 PM 696f6v

6z3e3g

American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! - Foreign Affairs (4856) - Nairaland 6e1n

American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! (2530130 Views)

(4)

Go Down)

bemeruca: 2:59pm On Feb 21
IjeBos:


You mean they investigated a guy who broke laws and then dared the DOJ to come after him by committing obstruction making it hard for them not to.
A man who then decided to run for President as a way to stay out of jail when they did.
You can search for my post her, when I said that I was 100% sure he was going to run for President where some people said he wasn't.
I said the singular reason being he wanted to stay out of jail.
He did run and he is out of jail.
People like you turned off your brains and your critical thinking skills.



1.) Hunter's first case was a Gun Case. They said he lied on a gun form about being an addict, bought a gun, had it for1 day and then threw it away.
There are few cases where any person was charged with this crime who hadn't committed a violent crime or was arrested for some sort of felony drug distribution.
In fact this case was so ridiculous, the gun owner who sold Biden the gun, forged the gun form. What did he get? A plea deal to tesitfy against Hunter Biden.
Biden's original plea deal that was overturned was even harsher than anyone in a similar situation would get.
Now how do I know this?
I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read articles from non partisan career prosecutors who prosecuted similar case.
Can you find many similar cases where someone was prosecuted for lying on the form without a concurrent charge for a violent offence or a drug distribution one? No you can't.

2.) Hunter Biden's tax case
Again, he was prosecuted harsher than anyone else in his similar situation.
There are relatively few cases where someone has paid back the taxes he owed and still been prosecuted criminally.
Most aren't prosecuted at all and if anything happens it's a civil case.
Look up Trump's friend Roger Stone's case.
He owed more money to the IRS than Hunter did. They brought a civil case against him to get him to pay the taxes.
How do I know?
Again, I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read opinions from non partisan people who have prosecuted similar cases.
Do you have many similar cases was someone was prosecuted even though they paid back their taxes? No you don't.

3.) Trump's Jan 6th Case.
That was inevitable yet still slow walked by Merrick Garland.
Just go and watch what Republican Mitch McConnel said during Trump's impeachment.
He said there were criminal remedies to handle this. McConnel is not a Democrat.

4.) Trump's Document case.
Biden's DOJ gave Trump every opportunity to turn over the documents.
It wasn't until Trump committed obstruction, lied about having the documents and directed his employee Nauta to lie and hide them did the DOJ have to prosecute.
Trump dared them and by the rule 'no-one is above the law', they had to take him to task.
Again, this was slow walked and every opportunity given to Trump to turn over the documents he took.




You see the difference between you and I?
You are exactly what you are complaining about.
You've let propaganda and right wing media fill your head.
Did you research the cases? No
Did you read opinions from non partisans who prosecuted such cases? No?
Do you even know the actual details of the cases? No?

Do you have any reporting from anyone that Biden even spoke to Garland about these cases or directed him to go after Trump. No. Cuz he didn't.
I'm sure if he did, he would have told him NOT TO PROSECUTE HIS fking SON.

What you do do is claim to be in the Middle while spewing right wing talking points.
Spare Me.
If you want to be in the Middle, go be informed so you cans speak from some facts.

You are still defending hunter Biden. Old age šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

1 Like

Livelystone01: 3:03pm On Feb 21
IjeBos:


You mean they investigated a guy who broke laws and then dared the DOJ to come after him by committing obstruction making it hard for them not to.
A man who then decided to run for President as a way to stay out of jail when they did.
You can search for my post her, when I said that I was 100% sure he was going to run for President where some people said he wasn't.
I said the singular reason being he wanted to stay out of jail.
He did run and he is out of jail.
People like you turned off your brains and your critical thinking skills.



1.) Hunter's first case was a Gun Case. They said he lied on a gun form about being an addict, bought a gun, had it for1 day and then threw it away.
There are few cases where any person was charged with this crime who hadn't committed a violent crime or was arrested for some sort of felony drug distribution.
In fact this case was so ridiculous, the gun owner who sold Biden the gun, forged the gun form. What did he get? A plea deal to tesitfy against Hunter Biden.
Biden's original plea deal that was overturned was even harsher than anyone in a similar situation would get.
Now how do I know this?
I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read articles from non partisan career prosecutors who prosecuted similar case.
Can you find many similar cases where someone was prosecuted for lying on the form without a concurrent charge for a violent offence or a drug distribution one? No you can't.

2.) Hunter Biden's tax case
Again, he was prosecuted harsher than anyone else in his similar situation.
There are relatively few cases where someone has paid back the taxes he owed and still been prosecuted criminally.
Most aren't prosecuted at all and if anything happens it's a civil case.
Look up Trump's friend Roger Stone's case.
He owed more money to the IRS than Hunter did. They brought a civil case against him to get him to pay the taxes.
How do I know?
Again, I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read opinions from non partisan people who have prosecuted similar cases.
Do you have many similar cases was someone was prosecuted even though they paid back their taxes? No you don't.

3.) Trump's Jan 6th Case.
That was inevitable yet still slow walked by Merrick Garland.
Just go and watch what Republican Mitch McConnel said during Trump's impeachment.
He said there were criminal remedies to handle this. McConnel is not a Democrat.

4.) Trump's Document case.
Biden's DOJ gave Trump every opportunity to turn over the documents.
It wasn't until Trump committed obstruction, lied about having the documents and directed his employee Nauta to lie and hide them did the DOJ have to prosecute.
Trump dared them and by the rule 'no-one is above the law', they had to take him to task.
Again, this was slow walked and every opportunity given to Trump to turn over the documents he took.




You see the difference between you and I?
You are exactly what you are complaining about.
You've let propaganda and right wing media fill your head.
Did you research the cases? No
Did you read opinions from non partisans who prosecuted such cases? No?
Do you even know the actual details of the cases? No?

Do you have any reporting from anyone that Biden even spoke to Garland about these cases or directed him to go after Trump. No. Cuz he didn't.
I'm sure if he did, he would have told him NOT TO PROSECUTE HIS fking SON.

What you do do is claim to be in the Middle while spewing right wing talking points.
Spare Me.
If you want to be in the Middle, go be informed so you cans speak from some facts.
You always falter at the end to bring in insults but I will ignore.

What about Hunter's drugs issue, the bribery issue and others?

Only you responded because your other fellows understand this but you will never accept.

Trump's J6 issue and other issues. Why did they not prosecute him between 2021-2023? Why wait until he's almost sure of his candidature before pressing the issues?


Like I said before. You guys have never called out one wrongs from your camp but you will still call others names for speaking out.

Isn't that the case of being brainwashed? Not being able to see anything wrong from the programmers?

1 Like

basilico: 3:05pm On Feb 21
Obrigardo:


Before Columbus allegedly discovered America and brought disease and death, Native Americans believed a man has two genders, one is repressed while the other is dominant. Anyone can be revealed anytime you so wish.
They still believe till today.

Will you call them disgusting because of your pseudo religious belief, one you grew up been indoctrinated into?

Trust me to silence fools. This rings a bell?

Galileo Galilei faced significant consequences for his of the heliocentric model, which posited that the Earth and other planets revolve around the Sun.

Trial and Charges: In 1633, Galileo was tried by the Roman Catholic Church for heresy due to his advocacy of heliocentrism, which contradicted the Church's teachings at the time.
Conviction: He was found guilty of "a strong suspicion of heresy." This was a serious charge, but it was less severe than outright heresy.
Sentence: Instead of imprisonment, he was sentenced to house arrest for the remainder of his life, during which he continued to write and conduct research.
Impact: His trial marked a significant moment in the conflict between science and religious doctrine, influencing the
cococandy(f): 3:05pm On Feb 21
Honestly I feel like you guys are wasting your time with that one.
when this thread of conversation started and you asked him to name one left wing policy that was extreme and he said LGBTQ but couldn’t point out what the actual policy was (because news flash there’s none)?

That’s how you know who’s basing their opinion of the left bs right on what they heard versus what they actually know. It’s usually buried inside that singular issue. but since they don’t really have any substance to it, so you see them flailing around trying to make false equivalencies that fall flat on their faces with even the slightest scrutiny.

That’s because nothing factual you’re telling them is penetrating. They are hung up on that one issue and for them that’s enough to make them the right not matter how bizarre it gets.

IjeBos:


You mean they investigated a guy who broke laws and then dared the DOJ to come after him by committing obstruction making it hard for them not to.
A man who then decided to run for President as a way to stay out of jail when they did.
You can search for my post her, when I said that I was 100% sure he was going to run for President where some people said he wasn't.
I said the singular reason being he wanted to stay out of jail.
He did run and he is out of jail.
People like you turned off your brains and your critical thinking skills.



1.) Hunter's first case was a Gun Case. They said he lied on a gun form about being an addict, bought a gun, had it for1 day and then threw it away.
There are few cases where any person was charged with this crime who hadn't committed a violent crime or was arrested for some sort of felony drug distribution.
In fact this case was so ridiculous, the gun owner who sold Biden the gun, forged the gun form. What did he get? A plea deal to tesitfy against Hunter Biden.
Biden's original plea deal that was overturned was even harsher than anyone in a similar situation would get.
Now how do I know this?
I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read articles from non partisan career prosecutors who prosecuted similar case.
Can you find many similar cases where someone was prosecuted for lying on the form without a concurrent charge for a violent offence or a drug distribution one? No you can't.

2.) Hunter Biden's tax case
Again, he was prosecuted harsher than anyone else in his similar situation.
There are relatively few cases where someone has paid back the taxes he owed and still been prosecuted criminally.
Most aren't prosecuted at all and if anything happens it's a civil case.
Look up Trump's friend Roger Stone's case.
He owed more money to the IRS than Hunter did. They brought a civil case against him to get him to pay the taxes.
How do I know?
Again, I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read opinions from non partisan people who have prosecuted similar cases.
Do you have many similar cases was someone was prosecuted even though they paid back their taxes? No you don't.

3.) Trump's Jan 6th Case.
That was inevitable yet still slow walked by Merrick Garland.
Just go and watch what Republican Mitch McConnel said during Trump's impeachment.
He said there were criminal remedies to handle this. McConnel is not a Democrat.

4.) Trump's Document case.
Biden's DOJ gave Trump every opportunity to turn over the documents.
It wasn't until Trump committed obstruction, lied about having the documents and directed his employee Nauta to lie and hide them did the DOJ have to prosecute.
Trump dared them and by the rule 'no-one is above the law', they had to take him to task.
Again, this was slow walked and every opportunity given to Trump to turn over the documents he took.




You see the difference between you and I?
You are exactly what you are complaining about.
You've let propaganda and right wing media fill your head.
Did you research the cases? No
Did you read opinions from non partisans who prosecuted such cases? No?
Do you even know the actual detail of the cases? No?

Do you have any reporting form anyone that Biden even spoke to Garland about these cases. No. Cuz he didn't.
I'm sure if he did, he would have told him NOT TO PROSECUTE HIS fking SON.

What you do do is claim to be in the Middle while spewing right wing talking points.
Spare Me.
If you want to be in the Middle, go be informed so you cans speak from some facts.

4 Likes 1 Share

descarado: 3:07pm On Feb 21
happney65:
President Donald Trump is preparing to dissolve the leadership of the U.S. Postal Service and absorb the independent mail agency into his istration, potentially throwing the 250-year-old mail provider and trillions of dollars of e-commerce transactions into turmoil.

Trump is expected to issue an executive order as soon as this week to fire the of the Postal Service’s governing board and place the agency under the control of the Commerce Department and Secretary Howard Lutnick, according to six people familiar with the plans, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisals.

The board is planning to fight Trump’s order, three of those people told The Washington Post. In an emergency meeting Thursday, the board retained outside counsel and gave instructions to sue the White House if the president were to remove of the board or attempt to alter the agency’s independent status.

Washington Post
Mail in disaster.
Can't understand why they do that in the first place.
American election in its entirety should be overhauled. The shit is very expensive and highly complicated. When uou spend so much during electioneering, expect people to steal. Election is business. Don't expect people to inject millions and no dividends.

Enuf said

1 Like 1 Share

Maeve7: 3:07pm On Feb 21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8QLgLfqh6s&pp=ygUUTllUIGRvbnQgYmVsaWV2ZSBoaW0%3D

Budaatum, Cococandy, Ijebos and other sane people on the thread. Watch this.

3 Likes

Livelystone01: 3:08pm On Feb 21
cococandy:


A blind man could’ve seen it from miles away.

And then he gets in his feelings when you point it out to him 😃
Between both of us who gets in their feelings?

I have seen you here multiple times almost crying through your responses on issues.

Like I said, you guys are actually the brainwashed here. It's very obvious because you hate when you are being called out and instead of trying to intelligently discuss, you throw insults, tags and others. You yourself started with the right arguements but for the last 2 months, all you do is call names without facts.

You have even come out with more conspiracies than everyone here in 2 months. I see your posts but I ignore them because your responses always come as if you are being oppressed.

1 Like

bemeruca: 3:09pm On Feb 21
Livelystone01:

You always falter at the end to bring in insults but I will ignore.

What about Hunter's drugs issue, the bribery issue and others?

Only you responded because your other fellows understand this but you will never accept.

Trump's J6 issue and other issues. Why did they not prosecute him between 2021-2023? Why wait until he's almost sure of his candidature before pressing the issues?


Like I said before. You guys have never called out one wrongs from your camp but you will still call others names for speaking out.

Isn't that the case of being brainwashed? Not being able to see anything wrong from the programmers?


Trump was living peacefully, I thought he won't be running and even if I put my on DeSantis. Trump announced he is running and all of a sudden indictments from left, right, center

They started racing against time to indict him.
They did all they could from Federal and state basis but God is with Trump

1 Like

cococandy(f): 3:09pm On Feb 21
Maeve7:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8QLgLfqh6s&pp=ygUUTllUIGRvbnQgYmVsaWV2ZSBoaW0%3D

Budaatum, Cococandy, Ijebos and other sane people on the thread. Watch this.

Oh yea I saw this. And there’s more like this too. They outline their plans in broad daylight and these their defenders here try to gaslight themselves into believing they don’t mean it

2 Likes 1 Share

cococandy(f): 3:10pm On Feb 21
Okay Trumpie.
Livelystone01:

Between both of us who gets in their feelings?

I have seen you here multiple times almost crying through your responses on issues.

Like I said, you guys are actually the brainwashed here. It's very obvious because you hate when you are being called out and instead of trying to intelligently discuss, you throw insults, tags and others. You yourself started with the right arguements but for the last 2 months, all you do is call names without facts.

You have even come out with more conspiracies than everyone here in 2 months. I see your posts but I ignore them because your responses always come as if you are being oppressed.

5 Likes 1 Share

Livelystone01: 3:10pm On Feb 21
cococandy:
Honestly I feel like you guys are wasting your time with that one.
when this thread of conversation started and you asked him to name one left wing policy that was extreme and he said LGBTQ but couldn’t point out what the actual policy was (because news flash there’s none)?

That’s how you know who’s basing their opinion of the left bs right on what they heard versus what they actually know. It’s usually buried inside that singular issue. but since they don’t really have any substance to it, so you see them flailing around trying to make false equivalencies that fall flat on their faces with even the slightest scrutiny.

That’s because nothing factual you’re telling them is penetrating. They are hung up on that one issue and for them that’s enough to make them the right not matter how bizarre it gets.

If you are honest with yourself, you'd see that you are actually speaking or posting the talking points of left wing commentators both on and of the media.

That alone should tell you how brainwashed you are.

You've fallen so bad that you do not even know what to say but to hold on to people's views? Wonderful!

1 Like

Livelystone01: 3:10pm On Feb 21
cococandy:
Okay Trumpie.
Thank you libtard.

2 Likes

bemeruca: 3:11pm On Feb 21
Livelystone01:

Between both of us who gets in their feelings?

I have seen you here multiple times almost crying through your responses on issues.

Like I said, you guys are actually the brainwashed here. It's very obvious because you hate when you are being called out and instead of trying to intelligently discuss, you throw insults, tags and others. You yourself started with the right arguements but for the last 2 months, all you do is call names without facts.

You have even come out with more conspiracies than everyone here in 2 months. I see your posts but I ignore them because your responses always come as if you are being oppressed.

Leave that girl, she is lonely and is emotional. Just like AmazonTopaz, feminism and leftism only makes you miserable.

All the life issues cococandy has is blamed on trump šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

1 Like

raumdeuter: 3:12pm On Feb 21
basilico:
The National Garden of American Heroes is a proposed sculpture garden honoring "great figures of America's history".[1] The concept was first put forward by President Donald Trump in 2020 during an Independence Day event in Keystone, South Dakota.[2][3][4] It was subsequently included in a series of executive orders issued by Trump in the final months of his first term in office that sought to address conservative cultural grievances.[4] Congress never appropriated funding for such a garden,[5] nor were concrete steps ever taken to construct such a site.[4] President Joe Biden revoked the executive orders relating to the garden in May 2021.[4][6] Upon Trump's return to the presidency, he revoked Biden's executive order.

Trump the racist.

Src : Wikipedia.
Promises Made. Promises kept.


But Trump is racist
cococandy(f): 3:12pm On Feb 21
descarado:

Mail in disaster.
Can't understand why they do that in the first place.
American election in its entirety should be overhauled. The shit is very expensive and highly complicated. When uou spend so much during electioneering, expect people to steal. Election is business. Don't expect people to inject millions and no dividends.

Enuf said

Can’t understand why a country with hundreds of military bases around the world and thousands of families abroad serving said country would have a need for mail in voting?

2 Likes 1 Share

bemeruca: 3:13pm On Feb 21
cococandy:
Honestly I feel like you guys are wasting your time with that one.
when this thread of conversation started and you asked him to name one left wing policy that was extreme and he said LGBTQ but couldn’t point out what the actual policy was (because news flash there’s none)?

That’s how you know who’s basing their opinion of the left bs right on what they heard versus what they actually know. It’s usually buried inside that singular issue. but since they don’t really have any substance to it, so you see them flailing around trying to make false equivalencies that fall flat on their faces with even the slightest scrutiny.

That’s because nothing factual you’re telling them is penetrating. They are hung up on that one issue and for them that’s enough to make them the right not matter how bizarre it gets.


Chemically castrating minors is not extreme? šŸ˜‚ werey

1 Like

cococandy(f): 3:15pm On Feb 21
No one will beat you if you say you’re a Trumptard.

Just stop fronting it’s not that hard.

You don’t see me claiming to be neutral. I’m not. I’m very much on the left.
I don’t claim useless neutrality. I don’t know what you think you can achieve with that.

That anyone will take you more seriously if you claim to come from a place of neutrality ? In a conversation between fascism and the fight against it?

DEEPLY CHILDISH

Livelystone01:

If you are honest with yourself, you'd see that you are actually speaking or posting the talking points of left wing commentators both on and of the media.

That alone should tell you how brainwashed you are.

You've fallen so bad that you do not even know what to say but to hold on to people's views? Wonderful!

6 Likes 1 Share

raumdeuter: 3:15pm On Feb 21
nateevs:


I KNOW the video is from one year ago, because I watched it at the time of release, which is how I knew to find it.

Me I deal with facts, figures and evidence, not soundbites. Like I say, when they reach the Pentagon and make cuts, ping me.

What he said as candidate and what's happening now is talk for another time.

You don't deal with soundbites but you brought the campaign video filled with soundbites as evidence not the orders and Actions taken as President?

What actions, fact and figures were you presenting in the campaign video you presented

1 Like

Livelystone01: 3:18pm On Feb 21
bemeruca:


Trump was living peacefully, I thought he won't be running and even if I put my on DeSantis. Trump announced he is running and all of a sudden indictments from left, right, center

They started racing against time to indict him.
They did all they could from Federal and state basis but God is with Trump
The moment the cases began, I stopped taking the Dems serious. What they didn't know was that the cases helped him and boosted him to become the president as neutrals saw that he was being persecuted.

It is funny how neutrals saw that but only the so-called moralists who didn't see it.

Only MAGA would never have made Trump president, the neutrals are always the ones who decide every election.

To show you have far they are from reality by accepting they were wrong, a man who lost an election with same rhetorics in 2024 won with same people and rhetorics 4 years later. That should make smart people go back to the drawing board to think through their policies.

The minions here would rather attack others who call out these reasons for their failure.
raumdeuter: 3:18pm On Feb 21
LordAdam16:
47 endorses Byron Donalds.

Byron will be a fantastic governor and great add to the cast of 2032!

-Lord

A worthy successor to Ron DeSantis
Livelystone01: 3:19pm On Feb 21
cococandy:
No one will beat you if you say you’re a Trumptard.

Just stop fronting it’s not that hard.

You don’t see me claiming to be neutral. I’m not. I’m very much on the left.
I don’t claim useless neutrality. I don’t know what you think you can achieve with that.

That anyone will take you more seriously if you claim to come from a place of neutrality ? In conversation between fascism and the fight against it?

DEEPLY CHILDISH

This is the way a child argues. They always want to push you to accept the opposite of who or what they claim. Stop posting like a child, you cannot force me to pick a side.

I know you are brainwashed, but why do you feel I should suffer the same foolishness as you?

4 Likes

Maeve7: 3:20pm On Feb 21
ā€œTrump is acting like a king because he is too weak to govern like a president.ā€

3 Likes 1 Share

cococandy(f): 3:21pm On Feb 21
Ah such a mature response.

Maybe if everyone who’s reading your comment can see clearly that you’re not neutral, you should consider telling yourself the truth.

It’s giving special ed.
Livelystone01:

This is the way a child argues. They always want to push you to accept the opposite of who or what they claim. Stop posting like a child, you cannot force me to pick a side.

I know you are brainwashed, but why do you feel I should suffer the same foolishness as you?

3 Likes

descarado: 3:21pm On Feb 21
Ibime:
Diddy party goers done suffer sha

Pesin no fit attend Diddy party in peace again. grin grin grin

As Diddy no dey around, maybe Jay z should lead the church.

Choirmaster must be Bishop Jake.

Jokes apart, never knew something like this really happens.
Maeve7: 3:22pm On Feb 21
cococandy:


Oh yea I saw this. And there’s more like this too. They outline their plans in broad daylight and these their defenders here try to gaslight themselves into believing they don’t mean it

Watching this video was the best 15 minutes since the clown got elected. Journalistic masterpiece.

3 Likes 2 Shares

Android17: 3:23pm On Feb 21
nateevs:


The child SHEEP who is slowly out-nutting even the craziest here. Hey "Look at me... Look at me ....I love Donald Trump".....Others are TDS .... others are TDS, like TDS is something that makes sense to anyone else outside your head.

Android SHEEP.
The funniest thing is you actually think you have some credibility credit stored up somewhere that you can withdraw from to post here.

You're the little man who's reputation got torched due to being a miserable town-crier on the worst bout of TDS ever witnessed.

Should we believe Trump or not? Which one? I've seen other small fries refer to him now. Should we disagree or agree with Trump? You fools should apply Kylie Jenner's lip gloss on your heads so it will help you make up mind.

Ninny.

1 Like

bemeruca: 3:24pm On Feb 21
Livelystone01:

This is the way a child argues. They always want to push you to accept the opposite of who or what they claim. Stop posting like a child, you cannot force me to pick a side.

I know you are brainwashed, but why do you feel I should suffer the same foolishness as you?

They insult you, they come for you when you are civil but when you start to Change am for them, they avoid you and play victim. See budaatum, he knows to stay away from me, see IjeBos, avoid me and cococandy 🤣

Every now and then they may say a thing or two but most times they are thinking twice.

1 Like

cococandy(f): 3:24pm On Feb 21
Maeve7:


Watching this video was the best 15 minutes since the clown got elected. Journalistic masterpiece.

And you know none of their ers will watch it. It doesn’t scratch their confirmation bias itch

1 Like

LordAdam16: 3:24pm On Feb 21
raumdeuter:


A worthy successor to Ron DeSantis

šŸ’Æ

Heartened that Trump endorsed him before he had even thrown his hat in the ring.
#Byron2027 is a goal!

-Lord
Livelystone01: 3:28pm On Feb 21
cococandy:
No one will beat you if you say you’re a Trumptard.

Just stop fronting it’s not that hard.

You don’t see me claiming to be neutral. I’m not. I’m very much on the left.
I don’t claim useless neutrality. I don’t know what you think you can achieve with that.

[/b]That anyone will take you more seriously if you claim to come from a place of neutrality ? In conversation between fascism and the fight against it?[b]

DEEPLY CHILDISH

Can you read the bolded from your post?
Why is my neutrality affecting your brain? Isn't that the sign of low self esteem? You should ignore.

In America today, we have libertarians, independents and they always speak based on individual issues and not along party lines, why have you taken your gun to their houses to kill them because they chose not to your crusade against opposing views and since you've made your self the police of morality?

3 Likes

Android17: 3:28pm On Feb 21
nateevs:


I KNOW the video is from one year ago, because I watched it at the time of release, which is how I knew to find it.

Me I deal with facts, figures and evidence, not soundbites. Like I say, when they reach the Pentagon and make cuts, ping me.

What he said as candidate and what's happening now is talk for another time.
See the tool who deals in facts. But he was patching tropy nonsense together to explain how Trump stole money that didn't reflect in his net worth.

There should be a Reader's Discretion slapped at the top of this eediot's post.

2 Likes

raumdeuter: 3:28pm On Feb 21
descarado:

I thought so too.
Women should have send a strong message by boycotting. But then again, those pushing the agenda can buy off athletes. If expensive sports can be fixed, is athletes?
So, it's really not their fault. They have the minority voice though it's their game.

A40:
Hahahahaha I've stopped blaming them. Who are the women competing in these sports. Why are they not boycotting? We saw same nonsense in the Olympics.

All the women should have forfeited and let them box themselves. When they start doing that is when I would know they mean business. Till then. C'est LA vie

The women who refuse to compete will be tagged anti trans. Or what do you think happened to JK Rowlings one of the leaders of the feminism movement the day she spoke against Trans in women spaces? She was immediately cancelled

Imagine the level of bullying a girl who refuse to participate will face. They know its not right for men to be playing in their sports but they cant say anything or act because of the blowback

If anyone can play female sports why do we have a category for female sports, and I am wondering why women who transitioned are not struggling to fight with Anthony Joshua or Wilder or compete in men sports? Its the weakling who want to use biological female to shine that go there

Reply)

African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos Thread

Viewing this topic: ObaIgwe1

(Go Up)

Sections: How To . 111
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland.