NewStats: 3,259,524 , 8,170,419 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 May 2025 at 12:56 PM 4j2l67

pocohantas:


Naso! You have all this yet you think only ritualists can buy Range? Maybe it is not hustle you need. You need to revamp your thinking and circle.

Are you doubting me ?

Only very few women will get anything like a range rover from there partner. Many will be lured with the illusion of having one. But ultimately get nothing. Is not about been able to afford it. It is about deserving it. People that speak like you, will never get one from me. Even when you manage to meet a stupid, money mix road, you will still fall short, because you do not have youthfulness to trigger such generosity from them.

If you really think i need to change circles, may be relocate to meet a decent woman. Then we have to it that we have a problem here. We want to have enough good ladies to go round, not few. The aim of the thread is to point out what we do not like in our beautiful ladies. We want them to improve. We want to have a better relationship with them. You can also create similar thread about guys and offer constructive criticism.
Thank you

Creativity22:

Are you doubting me ?

Only very few women will get anything like a range rover from there partner. Many will be lured with the illusion of having one. But ultimately get nothing. Is not about been able to afford it. It is about deserving it. People that speak like you, will never get one from me. Even when you manage to meet a stupid, money mix road, you will still fall short, because you do not have youthfulness to trigger such generosity from them.

If you really think i need to change circles, may be relocate to meet a decent woman. Then we have to it that we have a problem here. We want to have enough good ladies to go round, not few. The aim of the thread is to point out what we do not like in our beautiful ladies. We want them to improve. We want to have a better relationship with them. You can also create similar thread about guys and offer constructive criticism.
Thank you

That wasn’t the topic. Please learn to stick to the topic next time. Regards

Sagamite:
Do you think women are logical?

I am more interested in reading at least one of the facts which you claim the OP revealed.

jaxxy:


Lol, when things are in minority it doesn't mean they are inaccessible or unavailable. U just have to look for the right things or know how to choose.

Good girls by u every other day bt u will obviously see the bad ones easily. They have their trademarks. know them and look out for them. Dont be a dickhead. Enjoy

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

When cretinnous fuuktard start struggling, they start looking for strawmans to build and attack.

Where did I say they were inaccessible or unavailable?

I asked your dumbass to tell us how to access them or make it available, since you seem to think it is simple and it is just about "changing the circle of girls" one mixes with.

Cretins and simplistic solutions to complex situations.

Oya, tell us na.

Tell us how to find the good girls in the midst of a sea of bad ones.

Einstein of stupidity, while you are at it, also telll us how someone in Nigeria can make N5m per month.

Abi that income for the minority is not accessible and available in Nigeria too; and if it is, it surely must be simple too according to your fuuctard brains, abi?

Supersymetry:

If you don't know common facts about humans and as little as this, it means that you have not learned enough to argue with me, you should be reading/studding/researching to improve ur knowledge instead.

Most of you claim women are illogical but can't list the illogical things they do that men don't,
only talking about discussion, of which men and women have different values and target goal. Even one of the females goal is also to emotionally blackmail u, so clearly they know what they are doing which means logic.

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

So you can waffle about anything, but yet cannot provide the "scientific reports" you claimed?

Braindead iiidiots will be talking like if they have something to contribute.

Kobojunkie:
I am more interested in reading at least one of the facts which you claim the OP revealed.

That is he essense of his write-up.

You don't think that is a fact?

Are women logical or not?

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

When cretinnous fuuktard start struggling, they start looking for strawmans to build and attack.

Where did I say they were inaccessible or unavailable?

I asked your dumbass to tell us how to access them or make it available, since you seem to think it is simple and it is just about "changing the circle of girls" one mixes with.

Cretins and simplistic solutions to complex situations.

Oya, tell us na.

Tell us how to find the good girls in the midst of a sea of bad ones.

Einstein of stupidity, while you are at it, also telll us how someone in Nigeria can make N5m per month.

Abi that income for the minority is not accessible and available in Nigeria too; and if it is, it surely must be simple too according to your fuuctard brains, abi?

Comparing finding a good girl to earning 5m per month? That's ludicrous.

Seek and u shall find bt 1st u need to know what ure looking for snd how to identify it.

Then know if ure qualified for what u are looking for also. Do u have the right attributes?

These things are relatively easy if u know how to do it.

jaxxy:



Comparing finding a good girl to earning 5m per month? That's ludicrous.

Seek and u shall find bt 1st u need to know what ure looking for snd how to identify it.

Then know if ure qualified for what u are looking for also. Do u have the right attributes?

These things are relatively easy if u know how to do it.

I applied your logic.

Or is N5m inaccessible and unavailable income level in Nigeria?

By your logic, are things that are not inaccessible and unavailable not "simple" to get?

Sagamite:


I applied your logic.

Or is N5m inaccessible and unavailable income level in Nigeria?

By your logic, are things that are not inaccessible and unavailable not "simple" to get?

So because I said that u compared income to a relationship?

How did u arrive at 5m per month to compare? why not 20m per month?

These are things that are very different in achieving because of the process and time involved and getting a good relationship is easier because u can find different categories and classes or partners or girls.

Earnings 5m per month in a recession is obviously not same as finding a good partner.

yes both are accessible bt not same process and time frame which changes the probability rate.

Hard, difficult bt doable especially if u know how.

Sagamite:
That is he essense of his write-up. You don't think that is a fact?Are women logical or not?

I don't follow! How are women able to adequately occupy positions of logic in industries, and society if they are not capable of logically reasoning their surroundings and existence?

Help me understand the context of your question.

Fiscus105:




That's why redpilers thread has to pull down/block, take it of leave it, people are being indoctrinated in that thread, and indirectly it will affect society, society that has been in turmoil already.

They might say, it bringing traffic to the site, but it's disadvantages far outweigh advantage.

That was how Mutalub indoctrinated from social media years back, if not because of God intervention, hundred of lives would have lost because of satanist and foolish religion ideology from social media.

Nonsense! The day redpill threads get pulled down on this site is the day I'll deactivate my here. Those threads are saving the male gender by teaching them to put themselves first and above the females. Before now, most men were more like SLAVES to the female gender! From the moment you grow into adulthood (sometimes, from childhood), you're made to work your butt off, take bullets and get exposed to all manner of dangers just to cater for the selfish females. What do you get in return, just some over used pvssy! Sometimes, they still deny you the pussy despite all your efforts to care for them.

FEMALES are selfish and I seriously the redpill movement to change the orientation of the male gender on how to relate with the females.

Redpill knowledge is golden!!!

pocohantas:


She should have. I think she didn’t because she needed the belle to trap his father.

No one hates holidays ....


As e dey pain you e dey sweet me ..... i don't care if your farher owns Nairaland

pocohantas:


That wasn’t the topic. Please learn to stick to the topic next time. Regards

Have you forgotten you started the argument about range rover ?

jaxxy:


So because I said that u compared income to a relationship?

How did u arrive at 5m per month to compare? why not 20m per month?

These are things that are very different in achieving because of the process and time involved and getting a good relationship is easier because u can find different categories and classes or partners or girls.

Earnings 5m per month in a recession is obviously not same as finding a good partner.

yes both are accessible bt not same process and time frame which changes the probability rate.

Hard, difficult bt doable especially if u know how.

You are dimwitted!

You made a stuuuupid statement about how the solution to a complex problem is to just "change the circle of girls" one is around.

Now, when you are challenged on the stuuupiid solution, you resorted to making fooolish logical assertions to back it up.

One of the logical assertions is that "because such girls are accessible and available, then they must be easy and simple to find".

The thing about logic is that it is universal!

So I decided to test your foooolish logic by giving you another thing that is also "accessible and available" to see how you can teach us how "easy and simple" it too is to find.

It is a simple logical test.

When I tell una say una dey poorly educated, una go think say na insult. Your brain is poorly developed and things are above its capacity.

Creativity22:

Have you forgotten you started the argument about range rover ?

I can’t having an argument with you or even quoting you. No, I didn’t start an argument over RR with you.

Kobojunkie:
I don't follow! How are women able to adequately occupy positions of logic in industries, and society if they are not capable of logically reasoning their surroundings and existence?

Help me understand the context of your question.

Seems you are struggling with knowing what "context" is.

The context to the "question" is that women tend to argue illogically, not that are not in positions in logic industries. I don't know where the hell you pulled that out from.

The premise is based on comparisons. Women tend to argue illogically more than and in comparison to men, hence woman are illogical.

Are women logical or not?

Or you are still struggling with the logic?

Jman06:
Nonsense! The day redpill threads get pulled down on this site is the day I'll deactivate my here. Those threads are saving the male gender by teaching them to put themselves first and above the females. Before now, most men were more like SLAVES to the female gender! From the moment you grow into adulthood (sometimes, from childhood), you're made to work your butt off, take bullets and get exposed to all manner of dangers just to cater for the selfish females. What do you get in return, just some over used pvssy! Sometimes, they still deny you the pussy despite all your efforts to care for them.

FEMALES are selfish and I seriously the redpill movement to change the orientation of the male gender on how to relate with the females.

Redpill knowledge is golden!!!

Though u dnt deserve response o , but I decided to reply you so that, one day, u would that one man warned you.


That indoctrination that making you crazy now, which is a result of financial situation you find urself, if u dear try it as u claimed,.......you would be the only one suffer for it in future, then ur ogas in lamentation thread may be enjoying themselves in their respective marriages

@KlausMichaelson I really understand your pain and even as a female at times it pains me to hear the words that come out of the mouth of people my gender. I once read a book some years back titled "The Manipulated Man" and in the book the writer explains that women are emotional beings but can become rational overtime through proper exposure.

When I mean exposure I mean, by getting exposed to what's happening around them: the news, politics, reading books, etc. It also pains me to see the kind of comments that the females in this topic make. None of them can make a valid point which could wow a person.

I can beat my chest and tell you that there is nothing wrong with you. You are just a man who has high standards in what you look for in a woman. You want someone that's logical, someone that you can have mature conversations with and not someone who always nags and tries to drain your wallet with useless things which will soon go out of style. What attracts you to a woman is not her body or her beauty. You are looking for someone with brains.

Such women are hard to find these days. But I can assure you, there are reasonable women out there. I have met only two in my lifetime plus my mother, that's how rare they are.

For now just focus on yourself and being the better version of yourself. I am sure you will find that woman who will sweep you off your feet someday with her intelligence and maturity.

Sagamite:

Do you think women are logical?

Oga Sagamite, You still dey? Last time I checked you had gone on hiatus. I can see you're still "grumpy"?
Do you still live in your council flat in Peckham? 😂
Or have you been deported back to Sagamu?

I do reading your posts (I operated under a different moniker at the time) and I recall with much amusement how you would handle "cretïns", "fuucktards" and "products of a failed education system". 🤣🤣🤣

While I don't always agree 100% with a few of your submissions, I do ire your perspective on many issues (public governance, management, politics, law, policy-making, history, career, education, etc). There are certain posts I'd come across and I'd be like, "I wonder what Sagamite would have to say about this...".

I wasn't even going to be a part of this thread (these type of topics exhaust me) but I thought of giving you a mention to pick your brain on one or two issues (unrelated to the topic). I'd appreciate your opinion(s) on you how you would handle certain situations/people;

1. How would you balance disciplining and loving (without spoiling) an emotionally fragile child (5 years 8 months)?

2. How would you generally handle a catty/toxic person who deliberately wants to be in your space for the sole purpose of ruining your peace of mind? Particularly if they are your relatives (so they feel you wouldn't dare cut off your blood) or people with whom you share mutual acquaintances.

Your responses to the above questions will be highly appreciated.

Creativity22:

Are you doubting me ?

Only very few women will get anything like a range rover from there partner. Many will be lured with the illusion of having one. But ultimately get nothing. Is not about been able to afford it. It is about deserving it. People that speak like you, will never get one from me. Even when you manage to meet a stupid, [b]money mix road, you will still fall short, because you do not have youthfulness [/b]to trigger such generosity from them.

bros me i don't know about youthfulness buh forget say pocohantas fall short if she stand she reach 5,9inch generosity concerned 🤣🤣🤣

pocohantas:


I can’t having an argument with you or even quoting you. No, I didn’t start an argument over RR with you.

You actually started it in a thread, i was reading through. You were actually responding to someone else. So i felt i had to come in, and correct some wrong notion. If you don't want to be quoted, then you need to stop commenting in a public forum.

Farfalla:


Oga Sagamite, You still dey? Last time I checked you had gone on hiatus. I can see you're still "grumpy"?
Do you still live in your council flat in Peckham? 😂
Or have you been deported back to Sagamu?

I was in prison jare!

UK government locked me up for not paying child for any of 69 children. Dem wan come deport me on top am.

Na all my 200 obese council estate side chics who never born tell the UK Border Force say if dem try am, dem go do a naaked protest at Heathrow Airport and stop all flights.

Na im make dem release me on bail.

Still grumpy though.

Farfalla:

I do reading your posts (I operated under a different moniker at the time) and I recall with much amusement how you would handle "cretïns", "fuucktards" and "products of a failed education system". 🤣🤣🤣

While I don't always agree 100% with a few of your submissions, I do ire your perspective on many issues (public governance, management, politics, law, policy-making, history, career, education, etc). There are certain posts I'd come across and I'd be like, "I wonder what Sagamite would have to say about this...".

Awwwn.

Farfalla:

I wasn't even going to be a part of this thread (these type of topics exhaust me) but I thought of giving you a mention to pick your brain on one or two issues (unrelated to the topic). I'd appreciate your opinion(s) on you how you would handle certain situations/people;

1. How would you balance disciplining and loving (without spoiling) an emotionally fragile child (5 years 8 months)?

My opinion when anyone has these rugrats is that you have 2 roles to play:

a) Mother/Father

b) Parent

Many people nowadays do not play both roles and don't know they are two different roles.

When being a mother/father, you are there to love and provide for a child. Show them care, provide what they need in life, joke & smile with them and make them feel generally catered for.

When you are being a parent, it is when you do the job of making and building them to be able to grow up and function effectively in society. This when you show them the ropes and the norms, just like other animals show their young ones the ropes and the norms of survival. You need to be stern, or even harsh if needs be, to ensure they are equipped and equiping themselves to be competent adults and valued of society. Not a fcking liability, cry-baby, entitled mentality and iiidiots that think the world should revolve around them. Life is a story of challenges and struggles for all animals.

Hollywood have damaged a generation to the point most people in the West, and some of the affluent in Third World, are only doing (a) nowadays. In the UK and USA, I can just see the damage with the useless Woke kids, with fragile sensitivities and who have a need for "safe spaces". Parenting has failed. China will overtake them in the coming years.

As for your specific question, a child of about 6 years. I think it is a highly trainable age. You need to ensure you show them love at this age and less of smacking (Note: I did not say "No smacking", I just said less of). Smacking should be last resort after repeated advice and warnings.

Establish your authority and ensure you are building the following:

i) The child feels loved.

ii) The child respects you.

iii) The child fears disappointing you.

Most yeye modern parents focus mainly on only (i)

An emotionally fragile child is unlikely to be one that highly misbehaves in my opinion (the child no be the young version of Sagamite ), so the child is likely to want to please and get validation. Emotionally fragile kids need less smacking and more speaking to. They are not stone-hearted kids like I was that might be more susceptible to smacking.

Ensure you communicate with the child frequently, aka speak to him/her and let him/her speak, correct the child and let the child know you will be disappointed with some things and consequently he/she will not get your validation. And when the child does the right thing, give the child a decent (not too much) validation as a sign of approval.

A lot of talk is important. Talk about life and the right behaviours at different opportunities in the house, the car or at venues.

Farfalla:

2. How would you generally handle a catty/toxic person who deliberately wants to be in your space for the sole purpose of ruining your peace of mind? Particularly if they are your relatives (so they feel you wouldn't dare cut off your blood) or people with whom you share mutual acquaintances.

Your responses to the above questions will be highly appreciated.

The bolded is where we are different. I don't know any of my blood that reallly thinks I can not and will not cut them off.

They know I am nice, jovial but I don't take shiiit. They have even said it to my face at family gatherings. So they know.

If I can cut Jesu/Mo and God off, I can cut anyone off.

So, my advice is to cut the person off if your perspective is completely the truth.

Another thing you need to consider is what is wrong with such a person. There are some things wrong with people that is not clear to the eye at first sight.

I suggest you read about Borderline Personality Disorder. People with such a disorder behave like that, so that family member might need awareness and therapy.

Creativity22:

You actually started it in a thread, i was reading through. You were actually responding to someone else. So i felt i had to come in, and correct some wrong notion. If you don't want to be quoted, then you need to stop commenting in a public forum.

You can quote, but learn to stay on track. At least know the difference between a question and an argument first.

The question was, are you one of the men spending madly on women? Why would you expect women to go out of their way to prove themselves to you on a public forum?

The simple answer to that is NO, you are not one of these men. It is not an argument. Come in with understanding/comprehension next time.

Sagamite:
Seems you are struggling with knowing what "context" is.

The context to the "question" is that women tend to argue illogically, not that are not in positions in logic industries. I don't know where the hell you pulled that out from. The premise is based on comparisons. Women tend to argue illogically more than and in comparison to men, hence woman are illogical. Are women logical or not?
Or you are still struggling with the logic?

That context you claim no make sense. Second, your premise, along with those presented by the Op, and most every other who has stepped in in of him are all born of flawed reasoning. Reading through the claims made by pretty all of those who claim they are logical in their reasoning, I was able to identity numerous cases here of
▪︎ sweeping generalizations fallacies
▪︎ Faulty Analogies
▪︎ is-ought fallacies
▪︎ No True Scotsman fallacies
▪︎ Affirming a Disjunct fallacies
▪︎ Appeal to Emotion fallacies
▪︎ Slippery slope fallacies
▪︎ False dilemmas
▪︎ Red Herring fallacies
▪︎ Begging the question fallacies
▪︎ Fallacies of inconsistency
▪︎ Ad hominems --- what seems the favorite
▪︎ Strawman fallacies
▪︎ Appeal to ignorance fallacies
....

Fallacies, everywhere you look, mistaken for logical reasoning. We are talking of at least 14 pages of logjcal fallacies offered up as logical reasoning in argument for women supposedly being incapable of logic. I chose to ignore it all because I am used to Nigerians boys pretending to know what they don't have a clue about.

But when I saw a post from an acquaintance from way back when, I had a rethink of sorts. Maybe there is a fact contained in all that hogwash, I thought to myself. But your response left me flat and thoroughly disappointed , I must say.

Kobojunkie:
That context you claim no make sense. Second, your premise, along with those presented by the Op, and most every other who has stepped in in of him are all born of flawed reasoning. Reading through the claims made by pretty all of those who claim they are logical in their reasoning, I was able to identity numerous cases here of
▪︎ sweeping generalizations fallacies
▪︎ Faulty Analogies
▪︎ is-ought fallacies
▪︎ No True Scotsman fallacies
▪︎ Affirming a Disjunct fallacies
▪︎ Appeal to Emotion fallacies
▪︎ Slippery slope fallacies
▪︎ False dilemmas
▪︎ Red Herring fallacies
▪︎ Begging the question fallacies
▪︎ Fallacies of inconsistency
▪︎ Ad hominems --- what seems the favorite
▪︎ Strawman fallacies
▪︎ Appeal to ignorance fallacies
....

Fallacies, everywhere you look, mistaken for logical reasoning. We are talking of at least 14 pages of logjcal fallacies offered up as logical reasoning in argument for women supposedly being incapable of logic. I chose to ignore it all because I am used to Nigerians boys pretending to know what they don't have a clue about.

But when I saw a post from an acquaintance from way back when, I had a rethink of sorts. Maybe there is a fact contained in all that hogwash, I thought to myself. But your response left me flat and thoroughly disappointed , I must say.

You are a joker.

So you can type all this and yet not answer the simple question:

Are women logical or not?

You are gaddam proving me right as I stated here.

https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/7555050/gradually-becoming-misogynist/5#120655991

Obfuscation and diversion experts.

Sagamite:
■ You are a joker. So you can type all this and yet not answer the simple question: Are women logical or not? You are gaddam proving me right as I stated here. https://nairaland.unblockandhide.com/7555050/gradually-becoming-misogynist/5#120655991
■ Obfuscation and diversion experts.

1. I see we may have to visit the textbook here to bring some enlightenment to this.

A faulty generalization is an informal fallacy wherein a conclusion is drawn about all or many instances of a phenomenon on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon. It is similar to a proof by example in mathematics.[1] It is an example of jumping to conclusions.[2] For example, one may generalize about all people or all of a group, based on what one knows about just one or a few people:
If one meets a rude person from a given country X, one may suspect that most people in country X are rude.
If one sees only white swans, one may suspect that all swans are white.

Expressed in more precise philosophical language, a fallacy of defective induction is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises, or one which is not justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence.[3] Unlike fallacies of relevance, in fallacies of defective induction, the premises are related to the conclusions, yet only weakly buttress the conclusions, hence a faulty generalization is produced. The essence of this inductive fallacy lies on the overestimation of an argument based on insufficiently-large samples under an implied margin or error.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization

We know the following to be true

■ Women are capable of logical reasoning .... this is a known fact given that women occupy seats in government, society, and industries where logical reasoning — adherence to strict principles of government and rule — is the expectation in those areas. You name any industry possible where men are found, and you will find women are there too, equally thriving.
■ Women are also capable of emotionally dissecting their environments, relationships, work, etc.
There is no one section of women that is able to logically process their situation and another section is only capable of processing situations emotionally.

---

Now to your question "Are women logical or not". The obvious answer given the facts of the world we live in is that women are quite capable of logic and hence are logical when they want to be. Faulty generalization would be the case to conclude that
▪︎ All women are illogical or
▪︎ All women are logical.
Hope you see now why I didn't bother to answer your question as I had expected your logical side to kick in at some point before now.

2. If pressing on the application of rules according to logic appear as obfuscation and diversion to you, the one who pretends to be the more logical being, I am afraid it can only mean one thing and one thing only.

Supersymetry:
Fallacy. I have seen countless illogical men, in general most people are not logical.
It depends on the situation, both gender can be illogical and logical.

Exactly! Most of those here claiming to be logical are instead offering up what amounts to biased jargons, emotionally fueled rants aka fallacies which they confuse with logic. We are almost at the 20 page mark and not a single logical evidence for the claim made by OP.

Kobojunkie:
1. I see we may have to visit the textbook here to bring some enlightenment to this.
We know the following to be true

■ Women are capable of logical reasoning .... this is a known fact given that women occupy seats in government, society, and industries where logical reasoning — adherence to strict principles of government and rule — is the expectation in those areas. You name any industry possible where men are found, and you will find women are there too, equally thriving.
■ Women are also capable of emotionally dissecting their environments, relationships, work, etc.
There is no one section of women that is able to logically process their situation and another section is only capable of processing situations emotionally.

---

Now to your question "Are women logical or not". The obvious answer given the facts of the world we live in is that women are quite capable of logic and hence are logical when they want to be. Faulty generalization would be the case to conclude that
▪︎ All women are illogical or
▪︎ All women are logical.
Hope you see now why I didn't bother to answer your question as I had expected your logical side to kick in at some point before now.

2. If pressing on the application of rules according to logic appear as obfuscation and diversion to you, the one who pretends to be the more logical being, I am afraid it can only mean one thing and one thing only.

More obfuscation and diversions.

It is a very simple question that can even be answered with even a simple "Yes" or "No" answer. Not the storyland diversions.

Are women logical or not?

Sagamite:
More obfuscation and diversions.

It is a very simple question that can even be answered with even a simple "Yes" or "No" answer. Not the storyland diversions.

Are women logical or not?

As I previously said....If pressing on the application of rules according to logic appear as obfuscation and diversion to you---- one who pretends to be the more logical being --- I am afraid it can only mean one thing and one thing only.

premierlead:
I so much like this, we tend to be on the same page...I hate them like deadly smelling rats just like I do to that fucking ahnie

@Seun, please do something about this problem on Nairaland already!