NewStats: 3,262,140 , 8,176,183 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 May 2025 at 10:25 PM 3t281e

SarkinYarki:
What nonsense, so Russia should allow you supply the enemy with weapon? All supply lines are legit target in war

aboki, Russia have the right to attack the supply line in Ukraine but not outside Ukraine even Putin knows that.

neuf:


SMH... there's reason so many countries buy weapon systems from the US. They are tested in combat environment and prove their might.
Like I pointed out, if a javelin missile is making light work of Russian tanks it doesn't matter if it's 2% of their force, the rest aren't operating anything supernatural.

During the first gulf War, Iraqi forces were ranked 4th in the world, how did that go for them.

This war has demystify so many things about the Russian army. since you assume I'm not a military expert consult one and if they don't tell you the same thing. I'll gladly pay whatever price you name

With russian elite force ,with airpower ,they will take ukraine in 24hrs.Check Alepoo what they did thier,the level the town.All this current soliders in ukraine are not the main guys.it wants negotations and wants ikraine to agree to his own

neuf:


that's for you to show me what I said?

brainless thwart

.

Brainless thwart like your brainless parents

Lo

[quote author=NigeriaNawa post=110970085]

NATO defeated the Taliban comprehensively. They left Afghanistan because it was no longer popular back home and it became very expensive to maintain.

Let us look at some facts ;

NATO conquered the capital Kabul in less than a week and lost about 10 soldiers. Over the 20 year occupation they lost about 2,000 soldiers ( from all countries ). Compare this to the 15,000 Russia soldiers lost over a mere 9 year period in Afghanistan.

Russia is overrated.

If you know Russia or more about their international engagement you would argue better. They don't act in a manner less way like America and its collaborators, if Russia wants to destroy Kyiv it does not take it 3 days the NATO way, they don't need much personnel on ground just bomb the city, but the casualties will be great. Russia does not destroy intentionally but protect.
America and NATO could not win Syrian war because of Russia presence. If your NATO is such a great power as you are making us to believe why can't they overthrow Assad all this years.
This is a great reset and I will like to see how it ends.

Okpo...

If u don't know the meaning as an Igbo brother

saintrow1:


This fool thinks Russia is libya

U would have been much more better than now.
Reason!!
Brainless

saintrow1:


This fool thinks Russia is libya

NigeriaNawa:


Your baby Russia is about to learn a bitter lesson.

We are talking about reality and una mater's are still busy with Hollywood. @d video posted above.
Who dey wan deter wit da shit, Russia? ...People dat know wot dey know.

NigeriaNawa:


I keep telling Putin e-rats and comradunces that NATO will take the Russian military out in less than a week, thats why Putin is always talking about Nuclear weapons.

What were u expecting of him before? Is NATO not d majority? NATO wey comprise 30 countries...abi more sef. D nuclear weapons he mentioned is to keep NATO on leash. A deternce

yanabasee:


You can't compare Russia nuclear with a collective nuclear weapons from all concerned NATO countries...

which one is collective? US own Dem. Dey just using d so-called Allies to spread wings. Russia isn't just a chunk of a country. If dey should Divine Russia, u will likely get over 10 big countries... Dey have d capacity to match US. Dis is and Russia...forget d subsidiaries

NigeriaNawa:


And ONLY Russia will still be left standing !!

Comedians.

Lol.... Funny shaa.
But u neva can tell o... Wot if diz Russians now have d remedy against nuclear weapons, or are u writing it off?

NigeriaNawa:


NATO defeated the Taliban comprehensively. They left Afghanistan because it was no longer popular back home and it became very expensive to maintain.

Let us look at some facts ;

NATO conquered the capital Kabul in less than a week and lost about 10 soldiers. Over the 20 year occupation they lost about 2,000 soldiers ( from all countries ). Compare this to the 15,000 Russia soldiers lost over a mere 9 year period in Afghanistan.

Russia is overrated.

USA alone lost 2448 soldier and 3800 USA contractors. Any there still return the country to Taliban what are U talking about.

Help2020:

NATO is a combination of 30 countries, is it shameful for such numbers of country to defeat 1 country Russia? I wonder why you keep saying this as if we needed to hear that. But you can't fight me and decide for me which weapon I should use to fight back. Russia has only nukes to fight NATO so let NATO too keep far from Russia if they don't want nukes

Well said!

olas24u:

With russian elite force ,with airpower ,they will take ukraine in 24hrs.Check Alepoo what they did thier,the level the town.All this current soliders in ukraine are not the main guys.it wants negotations and wants ikraine to agree to his own

they were invited and backed by the government.
In hypothetical situation where Russia was helping Ukraine fight the seperatists, then the conditions would be different.

But going into a country you're not wanted from the government down to the citizens is a different ball game. Anybody with military knowledge will tell you that

Eecho:
Dull brain , NATO defeated them , got Osama , got Sadam and many others ... 20 years was enough for the indigenes to be able to defend themselves with all the trainings they got from NATO but they chose to remain lazy like you .

And there still return the country to Taliban rule. That mean Taliban is the winner.

It's like you are reading the post through your anus, so you this not see where the man said that Russia can target the weapon inside Ukraine and not outside Ukraine, if your Putin make mistake and throw missile into any NATO country that will mark the end of Putin

juman:
That statement does not make sense.
Any weapon that enter ukraine is entitled to be targeted.
That is the rule of war.

NigeriaNawa:


NATO is an alliance to protect weaker European countries.

The USA or UK or will destroy the Russian army in less than a week. It's not about numbers, its about training and technology.

Nothing like training.... It's all about proximity. In dis 21st century. A country can fight u without stepping a foot in ur country using missiles and tech. But proximity helps to effect dat... Dats wot Russia is fighting against. US is bringing dia armament Eastern Europe nd close to Russia. It's not good for Russia security.

preciousmetals:
It's like you are reading the post through your anus, so you this not see where the man said that Russia can target the weapon inside Ukraine and not outside Ukraine, if your Putin make mistake and throw missile into any NATO country that will mark the end of Putin

U rather say, dats d end of d world. Cos nuke will surely be involved!

To have nuclear weapon is one thing, to use it is another thing

respect80:


Don't mind dem joor. Only Russia can annihilate the whole world while only them survives.

I discovered that 99% of Putin e-rats here are Muslims.
They so much like war eh. That's why Islam and crises/war are like bread and butter, 5&6.

They hate anything western yet they are always running out of their Islamic countries to the west. With all these Islamic sheer hate for Western life they can't still do without the west

SarkinYarki:

Sharap John before you collect

lol wetin you want give, make it money sha o

ReubenE:


I have refrained from making any comments concerning this developing conflict, but this your submission, I have to applaud you.

What most people don't know or willfully refuse to acknowledge is that having XYZ number of nuclear weapons doesn't translate to being superior.
Like you rightly submitted, over a thousand of both American and Russian nukes are retired, close to three thousand available (this might take days/weeks/months) to prep them to combat readiness, while over a thousand on both sides are already deployed.

Technological advancement in Delivery systems/payloads, air defense systems, communication systems, economy, domestic etc are critical elements in modern warfare. Having a thousand nuclear weapons or not is not the determinant of which power bloc is more superior.

Certainly, the US and Russia does not need a thousand nukes to destroy their homelands because nukes can even be taken out in their silos using conventional weapons.
Whether the US is afraid of Russia or vice versa is BS. No country especially in this dispensation is stupid enough to put their citizens in unnecessary danger just to prove a point that is not there.
It is even more laughable to read where people say China and India will come to the aid of Russia if there is a direct confrontation between them and the US.
To begin with, there is a subsisting conflict between India and China over territory. The buffer that has stopped that from escalating is because of US diplomatic efforts.

No country is stupid enough not even the US despite her might would risk her homeland in defense of another country when it is not directly threatened. The US officially entered WW2 after the bombing of Pearl Harbour in Hawaii.
China will never risk her homeland in loyalty to Russia except directly threatened because China is almost at par with Russia, and even better in several other fronts.

Sometimes it takes a whole lot of stress to educate some of these dudes on nairaland. What gets me angrier is that part they say India and China will come to Russia’s aid. Very funny assertion

juman:


You see that russia nah oga patapata.
One country o. While nato is america and the puppet countries.
Russia is their master and boss.

Pls be aware that only 1,458 of Russian nuclear weapons are functioning. The others are not yet prepped for battle and the remaining is awaiting dismantling because they’re no longer working

The UN security council approved the intervention of NATO in Libya.
NATO was asked to implement the no fly zone. If UN decides today, the same will be applied in Ukraine and Russian Jets will be brought down

Come on, NATO is made up of 30 countries. Una go dey talk anyhow for nigeria

Which country can fight 30 countries at once? Not even USA.


Infact, both NATO and Russia respect them selves. Let me tell u why?.

When USA backed NATO to invade Libya, the people didn't even call for NATO as much as Ukraine has called on NATO to come help her.

Why has NATO not come and fight for Ukraine as they did in Libya and Afghanistan? Both Libya and Afghanistan are not NATO member states but NATO quickly went to damage them.
Do u know why? Both Libya and Afghanistan are weak nations.
NATO can't do the same to Russia because Russia is not a weak nation.
So, both NATO and Russia respect one another and will only get directly involved against each other if the matter enter last minute which is Either NATO directly hits Russia or Russia directly hit at NATO.

Russia is a world power and that is why these countries are scared of directly confronting it. She has nuclear and chemical weapon which can destroy greater part of Europe. NATO is also made up of countries with such weapons. So, both are scared of each other.
Russian president said it before the war that NATO should not get involved. He further stated that Russia surely can't fight 30 countries which is made up NATO but assured NATO that there wouldn't be any winner when both gets involved.
That is simply saying that I know u can't fight 30 countries of NATO but if u fight me, I will fight back and since u can't defeat 30 nations which no nation can do in this life sef, I will simply deploy chemicals and nuclear weapons to end all of us together. [/quote]

neuf:


no wonder you're miserable. Can't get someone to love you is it.

Well love yourself first and stop hating on people that don't know you exist and may just may you'll get your own couple situation

Look at this poverty stricken goat
Which of them knows your generation
Idiot

Merisbankie:

Look at this poverty stricken goat
Which of them knows your generation
Idiot

they don't but I don't behave like a psycho-maniac

neuf:


they don't but I don't behave like a psycho-maniac

Thank God you itted

goodheart01:


Pls be aware that only 1,458 of Russian nuclear weapons are functioning. The others are not yet prepped for battle and the remaining is awaiting dismantling because they’re no longer working

We here in nigeria we need nuclear that can reach many cities in america.
Anerica is terrorist country.
We should be ready for them.

neuf:


they were invited and backed by the government.
In hypothetical situation where Russia was helping Ukraine fight the seperatists, then the conditions would be different.

But going into a country you're not wanted from the government down to the citizens is a different ball game. Anybody with military knowledge will tell you that

It had redlines and you donot have to cross it,because russsia is the target.if he didnot attack today it will eventually be tougher in the future ,when they might have ed nato and staioned weapons russia.From kiev to moscow is 10minutes by misslle,from kiev to moscow is 5 minutes using hypersonic missles.and its really easy from ukraine to enter russia because lf proximity.so everybody understands your position i also do ,but why provoke the country?

[quote author=neuf post=111011591]

they were invited and backed by the government.
In hypothetical situation where Russia was helping Ukraine fight the seperatists, then the conditions would be different.

But going into a country you're not wanted from the government down to the citizens is a different ball game. Anybody with military knowledge will tell you that [/quote
The seperatists are russians ,they are just like the chinese in hongkong or singapore with links to the homeland.donesk,luhansk,karkiv are russian speaking and 17pecent of the population in ukraine .They have been killing them for 8years because they wanted ro be indepedent like crimea.

juman:


The one russia has is enough to knock out all of them.
If nuclear attack starts the whole of europe and some other parts would disappear.

Russia will definitely use nuclear if needed.

You are definitely very daft to think if this war ends in a nuclear war, you and the other morons here wouldn’t be wiped out.

dettolgel:


Few weeks ago everyone thought the same of their military.

So what? The Russians military you see in Ukraine are just the primary of what Putin has in stock. There are more to be unveil once Nato & Us interven. #MarkMyWord

respect80:


Don't mind dem joor. Only Russia can annihilate the whole world while only them survives.

See all these bet9ja kids, weezkeeds and marlians.
So only Russia can annihilate the whole world and still have a space to live in?

This the kind of stupidity that moved God to say my people perish for lack of knowledge.
This is woeful.